Intra-abdominal Pressure and Trunk Muscular Activities during Abdominal Bracing and Hollowing

Abstract

This study examined the difference in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) between abdominal bracing and hollowing in relation to trunk muscular activities. IAP with a pressure transducer placed in the rectum and surface electromyograms for rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, and erector spinae during the 2 tasks were obtained in 7 young adult men. The difference between IAP at rest and its peak value (ΔIAPmax) showed high intra- and inter-day repeatability, and was significantly greater in abdominal bracing (116.4±15.0 mmHg) than in abdominal hollowing (9.9±4.5 mmHg). The trunk muscular activities at ΔIAPmax were significantly higher in abdominal bracing than in abdominal hollowing, and in the internal oblique than in the other 3 muscles. In both abdominal bracing and hollowing, the changes in IAP during the tasks were linearly correlated with those in trunk muscular activities, but the slope of the regression line for the relationship differed between the 2 tasks. The current results indicate that 1) abdominal bracing is an effective maneuver to elevate IAP compared with abdominal hollowing, and 2) in the 2 tasks, the changes in IAP are linked with those in trunk muscular activities, but the association is task-specific.

Key words

stabilization exercise - electromyogram - repeatability - task specificity

• References

• 1 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8: 307-310
• 2 Cholewicki J, Ivancic PC, Radebold A. Can increased intra-abdominal pressure in humans be decoupled from trunk muscle co-contraction during steady state isometric exertions?. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 87: 127-133
• 3 Cresswell AG, Grundstrom H, Thorstensson A. Observations on intra-abdominal pressure and patterns of abdominal intra-muscular activity in man. Acta Physiol Scand 1992; 144: 409-418
• 4 Cresswell AG, Thorstensson A. Changes in intra-abdominal pressure, trunk muscle activation and force during isokinetic lifting and lowering. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994; 68: 315-321
• 5 Cresswell AG, Blake PL, Thorstensson A. The effect of an abdominal muscle training program on intra-abdominal pressure. Scand J Rehabil Med 1994; 26: 79-86
• 6 Dupeyron A, Hertzog M, Micallef JP, Perrey S. Does an abdominal strengthening program influence leg stiffness during hopping tasks?. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 2129-2133
• 7 Essendrop M, Andersen TB, Schibye B. Increase in spinal stability obtained at levels of intra-abdominal pressure and back muscle activity realistic to work situations. Appl Ergon 2002; 33: 471-476
• 8 Essendrop M, Trojei Hye-Knudsen C, Skotte J, Faber Hansen A, Schibye B. Fast development of high intra-abdominal pressure when a trained participant is exposed to heavy, sudden trunk loads. Spine 2004; 29: 94-99
• 9 Harman EA, Frykman PN, Clagett ER, Kraemer WJ. Intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressure during lifting and jumping. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20: 195-201
• 10 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
• 11 Hodges PW, Eriksson M, Shirley D, Gandevia SC. Intra-abdominal pressure increases stiffness of the lumbar spine. J Biomech 2005; 38: 1873-1880
• 12 Junginger B, Baessler K, Sapsford R, Hodges PW. Effect of abdominal and pelvic floor tasks on muscle activity, abdominal pressure and bladder neck. Int Urogynecol J 2010; 21: 69-77
• 13 Kawabata M, Kagaya Y, Shima N, Nishizono H. Change in intra-abdominal pressure and trunk activation during drop jump. Jpn J Phys Fitness Sports Med 2008; 57: 225-234
• 14 Kawabata M, Shima N, Hamada H, Nakamura I, Nishizono H. Change in intra-abdominal pressure and spontaneous breath volume by magnitude of lifting effort: highly trained athletes versus healthy men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 279-286
• 15 Kumar S. Physiological responses to weight lifting in different planes. Ergonomics 1980; 23: 987-993
• 16 Maeo S, Takahashi T, Takai Y, Kanehisa H. Trunk muscle activities during abdominal bracing: comparison among muscles and exercises. J Sports Sci Med 2013; 12: 467-474
• 17 Malbrain ML. Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal. Care Med 2004; 30: 357-371
• 18 McCarthy TA. Validity of rectal pressure measurements as indication of intra-abdominal pressure changes during urodynamic evaluation. Urology 1982; 20: 657-660
• 19 McGill SM, Sharratt M. Relationship between intra-abdominal pressure and trunk EMG. Clin Biomech 1990; 5: 59-67
• 20 McMeeken JM, Beith ID, Newha DJ, Milligan P, Critchely DJ. The relationship between EMG and change in thckness of transversus abdominis. Clin Biomech 2004; 19: 337-342
• 21 Miyamoto K, Iinuma N, Maeda M, Wada E, Shimizu K. Effects of abdominal belts on intra-abdominal pressure, intramuscular pressure in the erector spinae muscles and myoelectrical activities of trunk muscles. Clin Biomech 1999; 14: 79-87
• 22 Nordin M, Elfström G, Dahlquist P. Intra-abdominal pressure measurements using a wireless radio pressure pill and two wire connected pressure transducers: a comparison. Scand J Rehabil Med 1984; 16: 139-146
• 23 Schinkel-Ivy A, Nairn BC, Drake JD. Investigation of trunk muscle co-contraction and its association with low back pain development during prolonged sitting. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2013; 23: 778-786
• 24 Tsao H, Hodges PW. Persistence of improvements in postural strategies following motor control training in people with recurrent low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2008; 18: 559-567
• 25 Vera-Garcia FJ, Moreside JM, McGill SM. MVC techniques to normalize trunk muscle EMG in healthy women. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010; 20: 10-16
• 26 Vincent WJ. Statistics in kinesiology. Champain IL: Human Kinetics; 2004