Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(01): 063-069
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1588018
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Long-Term Follow-Up after Phrenic Nerve Reconstruction for Diaphragmatic Paralysis: A Review of 180 Patients

Matthew R. Kaufman
1   Center for Treatment of Paralysis and Reconstructive Nerve Surgery, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, New Jersey
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, David Geffen UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
,
Andrew I. Elkwood
1   Center for Treatment of Paralysis and Reconstructive Nerve Surgery, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, New Jersey
,
David Brown
3   Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, JFK Medical Center, Edison, New Jersey
,
John Cece
1   Center for Treatment of Paralysis and Reconstructive Nerve Surgery, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, New Jersey
,
Catarina Martins
1   Center for Treatment of Paralysis and Reconstructive Nerve Surgery, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, New Jersey
,
Thomas Bauer
4   Division of Thoracic Surgery, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, New Jersey
,
Jason Weissler
5   Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Medical Center, New Brunswick, New Jersey
,
Kameron Rezzadeh
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, David Geffen UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
,
Reza Jarrahy
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, David Geffen UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

03 June 2016

15 July 2016

Publication Date:
25 September 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Corrected by:

Erratum to: Long-Term Follow-Up after Phrenic Nerve Reconstruction for Diaphragmatic Paralysis: A Review of 180 PatientsJ Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(01): e1-e2
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604271

Abstract

Background Phrenic nerve reconstruction has been evaluated as a method of restoring functional activity and may be an effective alternative to diaphragm plication. Longer follow-up and a larger cohort for analysis are necessary to confirm the efficacy of this procedure for diaphragmatic paralysis.

Methods A total of 180 patients treated with phrenic nerve reconstruction for chronic diaphragmatic paralysis were followed for a median 2.7 years. Assessment parameters included: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical functioning survey, spirometry, chest fluoroscopy, electrodiagnostic evaluation, a five-item questionnaire to assess specific functional issues, and overall patient-reported outcome.

Results Overall, 134 males and 46 females with an average age of 56 years (range: 10–79 years) were treated. Mean baseline percent predicted values for forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, vital capacity, and total lung capacity, were 61, 63, 67, and 75%, respectively. The corresponding percent improvements in percent predicted values were: 11, 6, 9, and 13% (p ≤ 0.01; ≤ 0.01; ≤ 0.05; ≤ 0.01). Mean preoperative SF-36 physical functioning survey scores were 39%, and an improvement to 65% was demonstrated following surgery (p ≤ 0.0001). Nerve conduction latency, improved by an average 23% (p ≤ 0.005), and there was a corresponding 125% increase in diaphragm motor amplitude (p ≤ 0.0001). A total of 89% of patients reported an overall improvement in breathing function.

Conclusion Long-term assessment of phrenic nerve reconstruction for diaphragmatic paralysis indicates functional correction and symptomatic relief.

Keywords

phrenic nerve injury - diaphragmatic paralysis - peripheral nerve surgery
 

  • References

  • 1 Maish MS. The diaphragm. Surg Clin North Am 2010; 90 (05) 955-968
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Kumar N, Folger WN, Bolton CF. Dyspnea as the predominant manifestation of bilateral phrenic neuropathy. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79 (12) 1563-1565
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Kaufman MR, Willekes LJ, Elkwood AI. , et al. Diaphragm paralysis caused by transverse cervical artery compression of the phrenic nerve: the Red Cross syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012; 114 (05) 502-505
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Kaufman MR, Elkwood AI, Aboharb F. , et al. Diaphragmatic reinnervation in ventilator-dependent patients with cervical spinal cord injury and concomitant phrenic nerve lesions using simultaneous nerve transfers and implantable neurostimulators. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (05) 391-395
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Patterson DL, DeRemee RA, Hunt LW. Severe asthma complicated by bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis attributed to Parsonage-Turner syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc 1994; 69 (08) 774-778
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Kaufman MR, Elkwood AI, Rose MI. , et al. Surgical treatment of permanent diaphragm paralysis after interscalene nerve block for shoulder surgery. Anesthesiology 2013; 119 (02) 484-487
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 DeVita MA, Robinson LR, Rehder J, Hattler B, Cohen C. Incidence and natural history of phrenic neuropathy occurring during open heart surgery. Chest 1993; 103 (03) 850-856
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Heine M, Roy TM. Diaphragmatic paralysis following scalenotomy for thoracic outlet syndrome. J Ky Med Assoc 1996; 94 (01) 13-15
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Schram DJ, Vosik W, Cantral D. Diaphragmatic paralysis following cervical chiropractic manipulation: case report and review. Chest 2001; 119 (02) 638-640
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lahrmann H, Grisold W, Authier FJ, Zifko UA. Neuralgic amyotrophy with phrenic nerve involvement. Muscle Nerve 1999; 22 (04) 437-442
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Buszek MC, Szymke TE, Honet JC. , et al. Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis: an unusual complication of cervical spondylosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64 (12) 601-603
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE. Chronic nerve compression model for the double crush hypothesis. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 26 (03) 259-264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Kaufman MR, Elkwood AI, Rose MI. , et al. Reinnervation of the paralyzed diaphragm: application of nerve surgery techniques following unilateral phrenic nerve injury. Chest 2011; 140 (01) 191-197
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kaufman MR, Elkwood AI, Colicchio AR. , et al. Functional restoration of diaphragmatic paralysis: an evaluation of phrenic nerve reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97 (01) 260-266
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Schoeller T, Ohlbauer M, Wechselberger G, Piza-Katzer H, Margreiter R. Successful immediate phrenic nerve reconstruction during mediastinal tumor resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122 (06) 1235-1237
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Brouillette RT, Hahn YS, Noah ZL, Ilbawi MN, Wessel HU. Successful reinnervation of the diaphragm after phrenic nerve transection. J Pediatr Surg 1986; 21 (01) 63-65
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Nath R, Mackinnon S, Shenaq S. New nerve transfers following peripheral nerve injuries. Operative Techniques In Plastic And Reconstructive Surgery 1997; 4 (01) 2-11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30 (06) 473-483
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Khan A, Morgenthaler TI, Ramar K. Sleep disordered breathing in isolated unilateral and bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction. J Clin Sleep Med 2014; 10 (05) 509-515
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Weiss C, Witt T, Grau S, Tonn JC. Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis with recurrent lung infections due to degenerative motor root compression of C3 and C4. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153 (03) 597-599
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Franko OI, Khalpey Z, Gates J. Brachial plexus trauma: the morbidity of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Emerg Med J 2008; 25 (09) 614-615
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Criée CP, Baur X, Berdel D. , et al. Standardization of spirometry: 2015 Update: Published by German Atemwegsliga, German respiratory society and german society of occupational and environmental medicine [in German]. Pneumologie 2015; 69 (03) 147-164
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Brack T, Jubran A, Tobin MJ. Dyspnea and decreased variability of breathing in patients with restrictive lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165 (09) 1260-1264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Cuomo R, Grasso R, Sarnelli G. , et al. Role of diaphragmatic crura and lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux disease: manometric and pH-metric study of small hiatal hernia. Dig Dis Sci 2001; 46 (12) 2687-2694
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Janssens L, Brumagne S, Polspoel K, Troosters T, McConnell A. The effect of inspiratory muscles fatigue on postural control in people with and without recurrent low back pain. Spine 2010; 35 (10) 1088-1094
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Onders RP, Elmo M, Kaplan C, Katirji B, Schilz R. Extended use of diaphragm pacing in patients with unilateral or bilateral diaphragm dysfunction: a new therapeutic option. Surgery 2014; 156 (04) 776-784
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar