Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78(02): 145-151
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593816
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Hemi-transseptal Approach for Pituitary Surgery: A Follow-Up Study

Naif Fnais
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
,
Salvatore Di Maio
3   Division of Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
,
Susan Edionwe
*   This author is currently working as Allergy and ENT Associate in Sugar Land, Texas, United States
,
Anthony Zeitouni
2   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
,
Denis Sirhan
4   Department of Cerebrovascular and Skull Base Surgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
,
Constanza J. Valdes
5   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
,
Marc A. Tewfik
2   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 June 2016

13 September 2016

Publication Date:
08 November 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives The hemi-transseptal (Hemi-T) approach was developed to overcome the potential drawbacks of the nasoseptal flap (NSF) in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal skull base surgery. In this study, we describe further refinements on the Hemi-T approach, and report long-term outcomes as compared with traditional methods of skull base reconstruction.

Design A retrospective case-control study.

Setting Montreal Neurological Institute and Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.

Participants Patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to skull base pathology.

Main Outcome Measures Operative time, CSF rhinorrhea, and postoperative nasal morbidity.

Results A total of 105 patients underwent the Hemi-T approach versus 40 controls. Operative time was shorter using the Hemi-T technique (180.51 ± 56.9 vs. 202.9 ± 62 minutes; p = 0.048). The rates of nasal morbidity (septal perforation [5/102 vs. 6/37; p = 0.029] and mucosal adhesion [11/102 vs. 10/39 p = 0.027]), fascia lata harvest (21/100 vs. 18/39; p = 0.0028), and postoperative CSF leak rates (7/100 vs. 9/38; p = 0.006) were lower in the Hemi-T group.

Conclusion Advantages of the Hemi-T approach over traditional exposure techniques include preservation of the nasal vascular pedicle, shorter operative time, reduced fascia lata harvest rates, and decreased nasal morbidity.

Keywords

skull base - pituitary surgery - endoscopic endonasal - nasoseptal flap

Note

Presented at the 26th Annual Meeting North American Skull Base Society, Princess Scottsdale, Arizona, February 12 to 14, 2016.


Letter to this article:

Hemi-transseptal versus Combined Transseptal/Transnasal Approach to the Sellar Region: Differences in Incidence of Postoperative CSF Leak RateJ Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80(03): 330-331
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1620247

 

  • References

  • 1 Hosemann W, Schroeder HW. Comprehensive reviewon rhinoneurosurgery. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 94 (1) 153-205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Zanation AM, Thorp BD, Parmar P, Harvey RJ. Reconstructive options for endoscopic skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2011; 44 (5) 1201-1222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kono Y, Prevedello DM, Snyderman CH , et al. One thousand endoscopic skull base surgical procedures demystifying the infection potential: incidence and description of postoperative meningitis and brain abscesses. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011; 32 (1) 77-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tewfik MA, Valdes CJ, Zeitouni A, Sirhan D, Di Maio S. The endoscopic hemi-transseptal approach to the sella turcica: operative technique and case-control study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75 (6) 415-420
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rivera-Serrano CM, Snyderman CH, Gardner P , et al. Nasoseptal “rescue” flap: a novel modification of the nasoseptal flap technique for pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (5) 990-993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zanation AM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH , et al. Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009; 23 (5) 518-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Doglietto F, Prevedello DM, Jane Jr JA, Han J, Laws Jr ER. Brief history of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery—from Philipp Bozzini to the First World Congress of Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (6) E3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Di Maio S, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, Stagno V, Corriero OV, Cappabianca P. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach for selected pituitary adenomas: early experience. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (2) 345-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Schaberg MR, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. 10 pearls for safe endoscopic skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2010; 43 (4) 945-954
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Couldwell WT, Kan P, Weiss MH. Simple closure following transsphenoidal surgery. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus 2006; 20 (3) E11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Spaziante R, de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P. Reconstruction of the pituitary fossa in transsphenoidal surgery: an experience of 140 cases. Neurosurgery 1985; 17 (3) 453-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Seiler RW, Mariani L. Sellar reconstruction with resorbable Vicryl patches, gelatin foam, and fibrin glue in transsphenoidal surgery: a 10-year experience with 376 patients. J Neurosurg 2000; 93 (5) 762-765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yin J, Su CB, Xu ZQ, Xia XW, Song F. Reconstruction of the sellar floor following transsphenoidal surgery using gelatin foam and fibrin glue. Chin Med Sci J 2005; 20 (3) 198-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Valente V , et al. Sellar repair with fibrin sealant and collagen fleece after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Surg Neurol 2004; 62 (3) 227-233 , discussion 233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Matsumoto K, Kohmura E, Tsuruzono K, Mori K, Kawano K, Tsujimura T. Silicone plate-induced granuloma presenting pituitary apoplexy-like symptoms: case report. Surg Neurol 1995; 43 (2) 166-169
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Zweig JL, Carrau RL, Celin SE, Snyderman CH, Kassam A, Hegazy H. Endoscopic repair of acquired encephaloceles, meningoceles, and meningo-encephaloceles: predictors of success. Skull Base 2002; 12 (3) 133-139
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dlouhy BJ, Madhavan K, Clinger JD , et al. Elevated body mass index and risk of postoperative CSF leak following transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 2012; 116 (6) 1311-1317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Han ZL, He DS, Mao ZG, Wang HJ. Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea following trans-sphenoidal pituitary macroadenoma surgery: experience from 592 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008; 110 (6) 570-579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nishioka H, Haraoka J, Ikeda Y. Risk factors of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea following transsphenoidal surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005; 147 (11) 1163-1166 , discussion 1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sherman JH, Pouratian N, Okonkwo DO, Jane Jr JA, Laws ER. Reconstruction of the sellar dura in transsphenoidal surgery using an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene dural substitute. Surg Neurol 2008; 69 (1) 73-76 , discussion 76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Snyderman CH, Janecka IP, Sekhar LN, Sen CN, Eibling DE. Anterior cranial base reconstruction: role of galeal and pericranial flaps. Laryngoscope 1990; 100 (6) 607-614
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Neligan PC, Mulholland S, Irish J , et al. Flap selection in cranial base reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (7) 1159-1166 , discussion 1167–1168
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Hirsch O. Successful closure of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea by endonasal surgery. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 1952; 56 (1) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL , et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (1) (Suppl. 01) ONS44-ONS52 , discussion ONS52–ONS53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Babin E, Moreau S, de Rugy MG, Delmas P, Valdazo A, Bequignon A. Anatomic variations of the arteries of the nasal fossa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128 (2) 236-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Chiu T, Dunn JS. An anatomical study of the arteries of the anterior nasal septum. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134 (1) 33-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Fujii M, Goto N, Shimada K, Moriyama H, Kikuchi K, Kida A. Demonstration of the nasal septal branches of the sphenopalatine artery by use of a new intravascular injection method. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105 (4) 309-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lee HY, Kim HU, Kim SS , et al. Surgical anatomy of the sphenopalatine artery in lateral nasal wall. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (10) 1813-1818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Navarro JA, Filho JL, Zorzetto NL. Anatomy of the maxillary artery into the pterygomaxillopalatine fossa. Anat Anz 1982; 152 (5) 413-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar