Keywords
knee - lateral knee pain - snapping biceps femoris tendon - snapping knee
Snapping biceps femoris tendon (BFT) over the fibular head is an uncommon cause of lateral knee pain, with few case reports in the literature.[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12] Reported causes include anomalous tendon insertion, tears at the tendon insertion site, abnormality of the fibular head, and tendon subluxation despite normal anatomy. When nonoperative management fails, various surgical treatment techniques have been used, including partial fibular head resection, partial release of an offending BFT, and anatomic reductions of anomalous tendon insertions and tears.
Surgical treatment of a snapping BFT requires a thorough understanding of the complex tendon anatomy at the knee. In 1955, Sneath[13] described the insertion as a confluence of three layers in a fan-like orientation. Marshall et al[14] later described the common biceps tendon as having superficial, middle, and deep layers. The middle layer was found to envelope the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) such as a sling, providing tautness and stability to the LCL during flexion. Terry and LaPrade[15] have promoted the anatomical study of the BFT. The long head of the biceps femoris originates from the ischial tuberosity and terminates in two tendinous insertions—a direct arm that inserts on the posterolateral edge of the fibular head, lateral to the styloid and an anterior arm that inserts along the lateral edge of the fibular head, lateral to the fibular LCL.[15] Fascial components include the reflected arm, lateral aponeurosis, and anterior aponeurosis. The short head of the biceps femoris originates immediately medial to the linea aspera of the distal femur and similarly has the two direct tendinous insertions of direct arm and anterior arm.
We report on a painful snapping BFT with hypertrophy of the anterior arm of the long head of the BFT that was treated with the novel surgical technique of partial fibular head resection and tenodesis of the anterior arm to the popliteofibular ligament (PFL).
Case Report
A 42-year-old man presented to the clinic with a 1-year history of symptomatic pain and snapping localized to the lateral aspect of his left knee. He denied any history of trauma or previous knee injury. The pain and snapping were most notable with such activities as bicycling, weightlifting, and even operating the manual transmission of his car.
On physical examination, the patient was noted to have full range of motion, no joint line tenderness, and a stable ligamentous examination. He had a visible, palpable, and audible subluxation of the BFT over the fibular head when extending from 120 to 100 degrees flexion. This subluxation was exacerbated by internal rotation of the tibia and relieved by manual compression of the posterolateral thigh. Tenderness occurred to palpation over the fibular head, as well as slightly proximal along the biceps femoris. The contralateral knee was asymptomatic and without any similar physical examination findings. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were notable for a slightly prominent fibular head ([Fig. 1A]). Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging were negative for a bony pathologic finding, bursitis, or soft tissue inflammation.
Fig. 1 (A) Preoperative posteroanterior and lateral radiograph of patient with symptomatic snapping biceps femoris tendon. (B) Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiograph of patient with symptomatic snapping biceps femoris tendon after minimal resection of femoral head.
The patient had previously undergone 9 months of conservative therapy that included ice, activity modification, anti-inflammatory medications, physical therapy, and one corticosteroid injection, which failed to provide adequate relief. Furthermore, because he was having pain and snapping during high-impact activities, he elected to proceed with surgical intervention.
The patient was placed supine on the operating table with a bump under the operative hip. Examination under anesthesia revealed obvious snapping of the BFT as the knee was taken from 120 degrees flexion to extension. A diagnostic arthroscopy, performed to rule out an intra-articular pathologic cause, was negative. Next, a 7-cm curvilinear incision was made anterior to the fibula, extending proximally to the lateral femoral condyle ([Fig. 2A]). Blunt dissection was carried down to the iliotibial band, and the fascia was incised immediately posterior to the iliotibial band ([Fig. 2B]). The peroneal nerve was palpated at the level of the fibular neck and dissected at this level to identify it. This allowed for visualization of the peroneal nerve for safety where the work was being done at the level of the fibular head. Since this was adequate to identify and protect the nerve, we did not perform an extensive dissection and mobilization of the nerve. The fibular head appeared to be hypertrophic at both the lateral edge and the styloid process. The anterior arm of the long head of the biceps femoris insertion was thickened, and the bicipital bursa was inflamed. No snapping was apparent with tourniquet insufflation; therefore, the tourniquet was released and the snapping became obvious again. The thickened anterior arm of the long head of the BFT was snapping over the hypertrophic fibular head.
Fig. 2 Surgical treatment of snapping biceps femoris tendon. (A) Curvilinear incision with dissection through iliotibial band shows the biceps femoris tendon (star). (B) Capsular incision of fibula anterior, superior, and slightly posterior, with care not to dissect distal toward the nerve. (C) High-speed burr used to resect hypertrophic fibular head. (D) Remnant of anterior arm of long head biceps femoris tendon (arrow) is identified and a tenodesis made to the popliteofibular ligament.
The prominent areas of the fibular head were resected using a high-speed burr ([Fig. 2C]). This was a minimal resected as to not disrupt the biceps and LCL attachments onto the fibular head ([Fig. 1B]). A finger was kept on the identified peroneal nerve inferior to the burr to prevent it from injury. The anterior arm was partially released, and the inflamed bursa was identified and excised between the anterior arm and the LCL. At this time, the knee was again taken through a range of motion; we noted that the anterior arm continued to snap over the remaining fibular head. Given the previous resection of the hypertrophic fibular head and concern for possible iatrogenic fibular head fracture if additional drill holes or suture anchors were placed in the bone, we decided to perform a tenodesis of the anterior arm of the BFT long head to the PFL. Since the anterior arm of the BFT long head is anterior and superficial to the PFL, this was rotated 180 degrees posteriorly to lie on the PFL. This was then tenodesed using 0-suture (FiberWire; Arthrex, Inc) in a figure-of-eight manner ([Figs. 2D, ]
[3A, B]). Snapping was no longer evident through a full range of motion.
Fig. 3 (A) Anatomical drawing of the lateral knee with relationship of the popliteofibular ligament and biceps femoris. (B) Tenodesis technique demonstrated following partial resection of the fibular head.
Postoperatively, the patient was allowed full range of motion in a hinged knee brace and weightbearing as tolerated. At his 1-week follow-up, the patient reported resolution of his symptoms. He progressed through an accelerated rehabilitation program, with return to full activities by 12 weeks. At the last follow-up via phone communication 24 months postoperatively, the patient was back to his desired level of competition five times a week, including running, biking, swimming, and lifting weights with no limitations. He denied any knee pain, swelling, or residual biceps snapping.
Discussion
To our knowledge, only 14 previous case reports of a symptomatic snapping tendon of the biceps femoris have been reported in the literature to date. [Table 1] summarizes all case reports found in our literature review and the present case. Thirteen male and 2 female patients have been reported (mean age, 27 years; range, 15–49 years). Among cases, 13 (87%) reported that the symptoms of a snapping biceps femoris began without significant trauma. In addition, eight case reports (53%) noted findings of asymptomatic snapping in the contralateral knee. [Table 2] describes common causes for a snapping BFT, as reported in the literature and the present case. Of these 15 cases, 6 (40%) were noted to have occurred because of an anomalous tendon insertion. Treatment options for a snapping BFT include partial fibular head resection, partial release of an offending biceps tendon, and anatomic reductions of anomalous tendon insertions and tears.
Table 1
Reported cases of snapping biceps femoris tendon and described surgical management
Case report
|
Age, y/sex
|
Trauma
|
Contralateral snapping
|
Operative finding
|
Treatment
|
Kristensen et al (1989)[1]
|
20/M
|
No
|
Yes
|
Anomalous anterior insertion on proximal tibia
|
Partial fibular head resection
|
Lokiec et al (1992)[2]
|
23/M
|
No
|
Yes
|
Anomalous anterior insertion on fibula
|
Rerouted anterior one-half of tendon posteriorly with sutures
|
Hernandez et al (1996)[3]
|
16/M
|
No
|
Yes
|
Anomalous anterior insertion on proximal tibia
|
Rerouted tendon through tunnel in fibular head
|
Kissenberth and Wilckens (2000)[4]
|
20/M
|
No
|
Yes
|
Distal bifurcation of long head tendon anterior and direct arms
|
Rerouted anterior one-half of tendon posteriorly with suture anchors
|
Bach and Minihane (2001)[5]
|
24/M
|
No
|
Yes
|
Prominent fibular head with normal tendon insertion
|
Partial fibular head resection
|
Bagchi and Grelsamer (2003)[6]
|
22/M
|
No
|
Yes
|
Bilateral anomalous insertion on proximal tibia
|
Bilateral partial fibular head resection
|
Bansal et al (2005)[7]
|
19/M
|
Yes
|
No
|
Tear/attenuation of reflected arm of long head
|
Rerouted tendon through tunnel in fibular head
|
Fung et al (2008)[8]
|
17/M
|
No
|
Yes
|
Bilateral prominent fibular head (exostosis)
|
Bilateral partial fibular head resection (exostosis)
|
Crow et al (2009)[9]
|
49/M
|
No
|
No
|
Visualized subluxation; no anatomic abnormality
|
Partial release of superior portion of tendon
|
Bernhardson and LaPrade (2010)[10]
|
28/M
|
Yes
|
No
|
Tear of direct arm of long head and short head
|
Anatomic suture anchor repair of both long head and short head
|
|
43/F
|
No
|
No
|
|
41/F
|
No
|
No
|
Vavalle and Capozzi (2010)[11]
|
37/M
|
No
|
No
|
Visualized subluxation; no anatomic abnormality
|
Partial release of superior portion of tendon and partial fibular head resection
|
Date et al (2012)[12]
|
15/M
|
No
|
Yes
|
Anomalous component with anterior insertion on proximal tibia with intact anterior and direct arms
|
Resection of anomalous component and anterior arm with suture tenodesis to native direct arm
|
Present study
|
42/M
|
No
|
No
|
Tendonitis of anterior arm with prominent fibular head
|
Resection of anterior arm with suture tenodesis to popliteofibular ligament and partial fibular head resection
|
Abbreviations: F, female; M, male.
Table 2
Etiologic factors of snapping biceps femoris tendon by case reports
Etiologic factor
|
Cases reported, No. (%)
|
Anomalous tendon insertion
|
6 (40)
|
Tendon tear at insertion
|
4 (27)
|
Fibular head prominence
|
3 (20)
|
No anatomic abnormality
|
2 (13)
|
The biceps femoris has been well studied and acts as both a static and a dynamic stabilizer to the lateral knee by functioning as knee flexor and external rotator. Marshall et al[14] noted the superficial expansion (anterior arm) of the superficial biceps tendon to specifically be a strong and important flexor lever and a major force responsible for external rotation. They further described the importance of the superficial expansion with regard to lateral stability, noting that while the LCL was taut at 10 to 30 degrees, the anterior arm was taut with knee flexion at greater than 30 degrees. The understanding that this anterior arm with tibial attachment is important for lateral stability highlights the importance of this structure when it is released in the case of a snapping BFT.
In the present case, a dilemma arose when residual snapping occurred despite resection of a prominent fibular head. If the snapping had subsided, no additional procedure would have been warranted. However, given the persistent snapping, we proceeded with release of the anterior arm. In theory, this release procedure could weaken the stabilizing effect of the biceps femoris on the lateral knee. We could have proceeded with bony tunnels or anchors to reroute the tendon back to the fibula, as described previously, but concern for possible iatrogenic fracture of the fibular head negated this option, due to the previous partial fibular head resection.
The PFL has been described as an important component of the posterolateral corner of the knee. Shahane et al[16] concluded that the PFL has both static and dynamic functions in providing important posterolateral stability by preventing posterior translation, varus angulation, and external rotation. Furthermore, the anatomic insertion posterior on the fibula helps maintain the flexor lever arm of the biceps femoris, which Brunet et al[17] highlighted as problematic for superficial transfer of the BFT in the clinical setting of anterolateral rotary instability. Therefore, tenodesis of the anterior arm posteriorly to the PFL appears a viable option when fibular head resection is substantial with persistent snapping and, at the same time, it would reinforce an important component of the posterolateral corner of the knee.
Various treatment options have been described for a painful snapping BFT, including partial fibular head resection, partial release of an offending biceps tendon, and anatomic reductions of anomalous tendon insertions and tears. We have described a novel technique of fibular head resection and partial resection of the biceps femoris insertion with tenodesis to the PFL. This surgical approach is viable when the surgeon gives anatomic consideration to the critical stabilizing structures of the posterolateral corner of the knee, in addition to avoiding the potential catastrophic complication of iatrogenic fibular head fracture.