Download PDF
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 65(06): 491-496
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1600113
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

R3 versus R4 Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy for Severe Palmar Hyperhidrosis

Wenxiong Zhang
1   The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China
,
Yiping Wei
2   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
,
Han Jiang
2   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
,
Jianjun Xu
2   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
,
Dongliang Yu
2   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 November 2016

16 January 2017

Publication Date:
10 March 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background Thoracoscopic sympathectomy (TS) was the preferred surgical treatment for palmar hyperhidrosis (PH), but postoperative complications such as compensatory sweating (CS) were common. This study was projected to compare R3 versus R4 TS for treating severe PH.

Methods From April 2009 and March 2015, 106 consecutive patients with severe PH underwent bilateral R3 (n = 62) or R4 (n = 44) TS at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. The patients were followed up to evaluate symptom resolution, postoperative complications, satisfaction level, and severity of CS.

Results The 106 patients underwent 212 sympathecotomies and were cured with no severe complications or perioperative mortality. The incidence of minor side effects (such as pneumothorax, gustatory sweating, moist hands, and bradycardia) was similar in both groups. More patients had overdry hands in the R3 group than in the R4 group (6/62 vs. 0/44; p = 0.040). More CS occurred in the R3 group as compared with the R4 group (42/62 vs. 23/44; p = 0.156). The incidence of moderate-to-severe CS was higher in the R3 group than in the R4 group (14/62 vs. 4/40; p = 0.045). Most patients were satisfied with the results, except for three (5.84%) in the R3 group and one (2.27%) in the R4 group.

Conclusion PH can be effectively treated by either R3 or R4 TS, with high rates of patient satisfaction. R4 sympathectomy appears to be associated with less severe CS and should be the choice of denervation level.

Keywords

thoracoscopy - sympathectomy - palmar hyperhidrosis - compensatory sweating
 

  • References

  • 1 Sato K, Kang WH, Saga K, Sato KT. Biology of sweat glands and their disorders. II. Disorders of sweat gland function. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 20 (5 Pt 1): 713-726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Günal N, Ozpolat B, Dere Günal Y, Dural K. Single port thoracoscopic sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperhidrosis in adolescence. Turk J Med Sci 2014; 44 (01) 79-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ambrogi V, Campione E, Mineo D, Paternò EJ, Pompeo E, Mineo TC. Bilateral thoracoscopic T2 to T3 sympathectomy versus botulinum injection in palmar hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88 (01) 238-245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cheng A, Johnsen H, Chang MY. Patient satisfaction after thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: do method and level matter?. Perm J 2015; 19 (04) 29-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cai S, Huang S, An J. , et al. Effect of lowering or restricting sympathectomy levels on compensatory sweating. Clin Auton Res 2014; 24 (03) 143-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Li X, Tu YR, Lin M, Lai FC, Chen JF, Dai ZJ. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized control trial comparing T3 and T2-4 ablation. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85 (05) 1747-1751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Aoki H, Sakai T, Murata H, Sumikawa K. Extent of sympathectomy affects postoperative compensatory sweating and satisfaction in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis. J Anesth 2014; 28 (02) 210-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mahdy T, Youssef T, Elmonem HA, Omar W, Elateef AA. T4 sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: looking for the right operation. Surgery 2008; 143 (06) 784-789
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Purtuloğlu T, Deniz S, Atım A, Tekindur Ş, Gürkök S, Kurt E. A new target of percutaneus sympathic radiofrequency thermocoagulation for treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis: T4. Agri 2013; 25 (01) 36-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Liu Y, Yang J, Liu J. , et al. Surgical treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis: a prospective randomized study comparing T3 and T4 sympathicotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35 (03) 398-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Abd Ellatif ME, Hadidi AE, Musa AM. , et al. Optimal level of sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperhidrosis: T3 versus T4 in a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2014; 12 (08) 778-782
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lai YT, Yang LH, Chio CC, Chen HH. Complications in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis treated with transthoracic endoscopic sympathectomy. Neurosurgery 1997; 41 (01) 110-113 , discussion 113–115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ishy A, de Campos JR, Wolosker N. , et al. Objective evaluation of patients with palmar hyperhidrosis submitted to two levels of sympathectomy: T3 and T4. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 12 (04) 545-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kim WO, Kil HK, Yoon KB, Yoon DM, Lee JS. Influence of T3 or T4 sympathicotomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Am J Surg 2010; 199 (02) 166-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Goh PM, Cheah WK, De Costa M, Sim EK. Needlescopic thoracic sympathectomy: treatment for palmar hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70 (01) 240-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lee DY, Yoon YH, Shin HK, Kim HK, Hong YJ. Needle thoracic sympathectomy for essential hyperhidrosis: intermediate-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69 (01) 251-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Baroncello JB, Baroncello LR, Schneider EG, Martins GG. Evaluation of quality of life before and after videothoracoscopic simpathectomy for primary hyperhidrosis. Rev Col Bras Cir 2014; 41 (05) 325-330
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Turhan K, Cakan A, Cagirici U. Preserving T2 in thoracic sympathicotomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: less tissue trauma, same effectiveness. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 59 (06) 353-356
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gray H. The sympathetic nerves. In: Lewis WH. , ed. Anatomy of the Human Body. 20th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 2000: 1292-1299
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Liu Y, Li H, Zheng X. , et al. Sympathicotomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: the association between intraoperative palm temperature change and the curative effect. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 21 (04) 359-363
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hashmonai M, Assalia A, Kopelman D. Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Ablate or resect?. Surg Endosc 2001; 15 (05) 435-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Choi BC, Lee YC, Sim SB. Treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis by endoscopic clipping of the upper part of the T4 sympathetic ganglion. Preliminary results. Clin Auton Res 2003; 13 (01) (Suppl. 01) I48-I51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lin CC, Telaranta T. Lin-Telaranta classification: the importance of different procedures for different indications in sympathetic surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol 2001; 90 (03) 161-166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Yang J, Tan JJ, Ye GL, Gu WQ, Wang J, Liu YG. T3/T4 thoracic sympathictomy and compensatory sweating in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2007; 120 (18) 1574-1577
    PubMedGoogle Scholar