High Tibial Osteotomy following Biologic Replacement of the Knee

Abstract

Biologic unicondylar replacement with fresh osteoarticular allografts of the femoral condyle and tibial plateau plus a meniscus transplant provides an option for young or active patients with severe articular cartilage loss. The timing of osteotomy procedures to correct malalignment either before, concurrent, or after allograft implantation has become an area of research interest. Concurrent osteotomies and allograft transplantation have become increasingly popular due to the decreased patient morbidity from multiple surgeries that require a period of toe-touch weight bearing (TTWB) postoperatively. We discuss here our techniques for correcting malalignment, which concurrently repair major bipolar knee lesions while transplanting the meniscus. We prefer to perform a simultaneous biologic unicondylar replacement with an osteotomy, if needed. Weight bearing alignment radiographs should be obtained 6 weeks following surgery to confirm the intraoperative findings that were obtained using fluoroscopy and the alignment rod. If malalignment persists and the biologic grafts are overloaded, a staged osteotomy should be performed as soon as possible.

Keywords

biologic unicondylar replacement - osteotomy - tibial plateau

• References

• 1 Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ. , et al. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 1994; 84 (03) 351-358
• 2 Gaskin DJ, Richard P. The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain 2012; 13 (08) 715-724
• 3 Bugbee WD, Pallante-Kichura AL, Görtz S, Amiel D, Sah R. Osteochondral allograft transplantation in cartilage repair: graft storage paradigm, translational models, and clinical applications. J Orthop Res 2016; 34 (01) 31-38
• 4 Assenmacher AT, Pareek A, Reardon PJ, Macalena JA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Long-term outcomes after osteochondral allograft: a systematic review at long-term follow-up of 12.3 years. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (10) 2160-2168
• 5 Cook JL, Stoker AM, Stannard JP. , et al. A novel system improves preservation of osteochondral allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (11) 3404-3414
• 6 Stoker A, Garrity JT, Hung CT, Stannard JP, Cook J. Improved preservation of fresh osteochondral allografts for clinical use. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (02) 117-125
• 7 Gross AE, Kim W, Las Heras F, Backstein D, Safir O, Pritzker KP. Fresh osteochondral allografts for posttraumatic knee defects: long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (08) 1863-1870
• 8 Harris JD, Hussey K, Wilson H. , et al. Biological knee reconstruction for combined malalignment, meniscal deficiency, and articular cartilage disease. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (02) 275-282
• 9 Harris JD, Hussey K, Saltzman BM. , et al. Cartilage repair with or without meniscal transplantation and osteotomy for lateral compartment chondral defects of the knee: case series with minimum 2-year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med 2014; 2 (10) DOI: 10.1177/2325967114551528.
• 10 Levy YD, Görtz S, Pulido PA, McCauley JC, Bugbee WD. Do fresh osteochondral allografts successfully treat femoral condyle lesions?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (01) 231-237
• 11 Shasha N, Krywulak S, Backstein D, Pressman A, Gross AE. Long-term follow-up of fresh tibial osteochondral allografts for failed tibial plateau fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (Suppl. 02) 33-39
• 12 McCulloch PC, Kang RW, Sobhy MH, Hayden JK, Cole BJ. Prospective evaluation of prolonged fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation of the femoral condyle: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (03) 411-420