Download PDF
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 66(06): 517-522
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607217
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Sternal Anomalies in Asymptomatic Patients after Median Sternotomy and Potential Influencing Factors

Hector Rodriguez Cetina Biefer
1   University Hospital Zurich, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Simon H. Sündermann
2   Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
,
Hatem Alkadhi
3   Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Michele Genoni
1   University Hospital Zurich, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Francesco Maisano
1   University Hospital Zurich, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Maximilian Y. Emmert
1   University Hospital Zurich, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Zurich, Switzerland
,
André Plass
1   University Hospital Zurich, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 March 2017

29 August 2017

Publication Date:
07 October 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background We aimed to assess asymptomatic patients who had open-heart surgery with median sternotomy for potential sternal anomalies (SA), their related patient-specific risk factors, and treatment options for the prevention of SA.

Methods Multiplanar CT scans (CTs) from 131 asymptomatic consecutive patients were analyzed retrospectively. Of these, 83 underwent CABG (63.4%), and 48 had aortic valve (AV) procedures via median sternotomy. Sternal bone healing was analyzed for SA and their exact location.

Results In total, 49 SA were identified in 42 (32.1%) patients; 65% SA were found in the manubrium (n = 32). Five hundred thirty-two wires were implanted (4.2 ± 0.5 wires/patient), out of which 96.1% (n = 511) were figure 8 wires. There was no difference between normal and abnormal sterna with regard to the number of wires used for sternal closure (4.2 ± 0.5 vs. 4.3 ± 0.6, p = ns). The distance between wire placement to the proximal edge of the manubrium in normal and abnormal sterna was comparable (11.2 ± 4.2 vs. 10.9 ± 4.8 mm, p = ns). Patients who underwent CABG had a significantly higher risk for SA (OR = 2.4, p ≤ 0.05, 95% CI [1.2–4.9]). The use of BIMA (OR = 4.4, p ≤ 0.05, 95% CI [1.1–17.9]) and body mass index (BMI) > 31 kg/m2 (OR = 3.4, p ≤ 0.01, 95% CI [1.4–8.3]) significantly increased the risk of SA.

Conclusion At least 30% of patients were at an increased risk for SA after receiving a median sternotomy. CABG, use of BIMA, and a BMI > 30 kg/m2 were potential risk factors for the development of SA and warrant close clinical follow-up. Sternal plate fixation, particularly in the manubrium, could be beneficial in such patients.

Keywords

surgery - complications - sternum - outcomes - wound - healing

Paper Presentation

This study was presented at the Oral Sessions of the Joint Annual Meeting of the Swiss Society of Cardiology, Swiss Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, and the Swiss Society of Pneumology, Lausanne, Switzerland from June 15 to 17, 2016.[30]


 

  • References

  • 1 Inan B, Kucukdurmaz F, Karakan S. , et al. Straight versus S-shaped sternotomy: a histologic study in the sheep model. J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 9: 173
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Rodriguez Cetina Biefer H, Sündermann SH, Emmert MY. , et al. Negative microbiological results are not mandatory in deep sternal wound infections before wound closure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 42 (02) 306-310 ; discussion 310
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Fu RH, Weinstein AL, Chang MM, Argenziano M, Ascherman JA, Rohde CH. Risk factors of infected sternal wounds versus sterile wound dehiscence. J Surg Res 2016; 200 (01) 400-407
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Casha AR, Manché A, Gatt R. , et al. Mechanism of sternotomy dehiscence. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014; 19 (04) 617-621
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Li AE, Fishman EK. Evaluation of complications after sternotomy using single- and multidetector CT with three-dimensional volume rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181 (04) 1065-1070
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Boiselle PM, Mansilla AV. A closer look at the midsternal stripe sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178 (04) 945-948
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Bitkover CY, Cederlund K, Åberg B, Vaage J. Computed tomography of the sternum and mediastinum after median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68 (03) 858-863
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Boiselle PM, Mansilla AV, White CS, Fisher MS. Sternal dehiscence in patients with and without mediastinitis. J Thorac Imaging 2001; 16 (02) 106-110
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Boiselle PM, Mansilla AV, Fisher MS, McLoud TC. Wandering wires: frequency of sternal wire abnormalities in patients with sternal dehiscence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173 (03) 777-780
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Hayward RH, Knight WL, Reiter CG. Sternal dehiscence. Early detection by radiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 108 (04) 616-619
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Restrepo CS, Martinez S, Lemos DF. , et al. Imaging appearances of the sternum and sternoclavicular joints. Radiographics 2009; 29 (03) 839-859
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Olbrecht VA, Barreiro CJ, Bonde PN. , et al. Clinical outcomes of noninfectious sternal dehiscence after median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82 (03) 902-907
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Wang W, Wang S. Titanium plate fixation versus conventional approach in the treatment of deep sternal wound infection. J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 11: 46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 McDonald WS, Brame M, Sharp C, Eggerstedt J. Risk factors for median sternotomy dehiscence in cardiac surgery. South Med J 1989; 82 (11) 1361-1364
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Schimmer C, Reents W, Berneder S. , et al. Prevention of sternal dehiscence and infection in high-risk patients: a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86 (06) 1897-1904
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Bryan AJ, Lamarra M, Angelini GD, West RR, Breckenridge IM. Median sternotomy wound dehiscence: a retrospective case control study of risk factors and outcome. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992; 37 (05) 305-308
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Borger MA, Rao V, Weisel RD. , et al. Deep sternal wound infection: risk factors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65 (04) 1050-1056
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Nakano J, Okabayashi H, Hanyu M. , et al. Risk factors for wound infection after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: should bilateral internal thoracic arteries be harvested in patients with diabetes?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135 (03) 540-545
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 El-Ansary D, Waddington G, Adams R. Relationship between pain and upper limb movement in patients with chronic sternal instability following cardiac surgery. Physiother Theory Pract 2007; 23 (05) 273-280
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Brocki BC, Thorup CB, Andreasen JJ. Precautions related to midline sternotomy in cardiac surgery: a review of mechanical stress factors leading to sternal complications. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2010; 9 (02) 77-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kamiya H, Al-maisary SSA, Akhyari P. , et al. The number of wires for sternal closure has a significant influence on sternal complications in high-risk patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 15 (04) 665-670
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Bitkover CY, Gårdlund B. Mediastinitis after cardiovascular operations: a case-control study of risk factors. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65 (01) 36-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 McGregor WE, Trumble DR, Magovern JA. Mechanical analysis of midline sternotomy wound closure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117 (06) 1144-1150
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Casha AR, Yang L, Kay PH, Saleh M, Cooper GJ. A biomechanical study of median sternotomy closure techniques. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15 (03) 365-369
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Khasati N, Sivaprakasam R, Dunning J. Is the figure-of-eight superior to the simple wire technique for closure of the sternum?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2004; 3 (01) 191-194
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Sargent LA, Seyfer AE, Hollinger J, Hinson RM, Graeber GM. The healing sternum: a comparison of osseous healing with wire versus rigid fixation. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 52 (03) 490-494
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Plass A, Emmert MY, Pilsl M. , et al. Sternal plate closure: indications, surgical procedure and follow-up. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 59 (01) 30-33
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Song DH, Lohman RF, Renucci JD, Jeevanandam V, Raman J. Primary sternal plating in high-risk patients prevents mediastinitis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26 (02) 367-372
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Kim WK, Kim JB, Kim GS. , et al. Titanium plate fixation for sternal dehiscence in major cardiac surgery. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 46 (04) 279-284
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Cardiovascular Medicine, Supplementum 26, ad Cardiovascular Medicine, 2016;19(5):1S-108S
    PubMed