Stereoselective Oxidation of Titanium(IV) Enolates with Oxygen

Key words

stereoselective synthesis - hydroxylation - titanium enolates - chiral auxiliaries - oxygen - radicals

The chemo-, site-, and stereoselective oxidation of the carbon backbone of organic molecules is a formidable challenge that has attracted increasing interest in recent years.[1] It goes without saying that the wide range of functional groups and positions that can be oxidized makes such a synthetic approach very complicated. Hence, the oxidation of metal enolates is an appealing way to tackle such a challenge and gain access to enantiomerically pure α-hydroxy carbonyl or carboxylic compounds in a straightforward manner.[2] Indeed, this ensures site-selective oxidation of the Cα position, both the control of the geometry (Z vs E) and the π-face differentiation of the enolate enable highly stereocontrolled transformations, and the overall reactivity can be tuned by the appropriate choice of the metal. Traditionally, the stereoselective oxidation of enolates has been carried out with N-sulfonyloxaziridines,[2] [3] [4] but there is a need for new methods that use environmentally benign oxidants. Molecular oxygen is arguably the most suitable candidate for such an oxidant as it is an abundant reagent that does not produce harmful by-products.[5] However, despite such benefits, it has been scarcely used for the stereoselective hydroxylation of enolates. In pioneering studies, Córdova described the organocatalytic and photosensitized oxidation of cyclohexanones and aldehydes with molecular oxygen.[6] Furthermore, Brigaud established that treating sodium enolates from chiral N-acyl trifluoromethylated oxazolidines with molecular oxygen produced α-hydroxy adducts with outstanding diastereoselectivities.[7] In turn, Itoh and Zhao used oxygen for the enantioselective phase transfer catalyzed α-hydroxylation of oxindoles and ketones leading to tertiary alcohols.[8] More recently, Lu has reported a highly efficient hydroxylation of chiral sulfinyl imidates and amidines with oxygen.[9] All of these reported oxidations involve a heterolytic mechanism that provides the corresponding hydroperoxide intermediates, which must be subsequently reduced to the desired α-hydroxy derivatives.

In this context and by taking advantage of both the biradical character of the titanium(IV) enolates[10] [11] and our experience of oxidizing them with TEMPO,[12] we aimed to determine whether the reaction of chiral titanium(IV) enolates with triplet molecular oxygen would yield enantiomerically pure α-hydroxylated derivatives through a radical pathway. Thus, we were pleased to observe in exploratory experiments that bubbling a stream of oxygen through a solution of the TiCl₄-enolate of (S)-4-benzyl-5,5-dimethyl-N-propanoyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (1a) triggered the desired oxidation at 0 °C (Scheme [1]). To our surprise, instead of the expected hydroperoxide 2a, the hydroxylated derivative 3a was directly obtained as a single diastereomer with a yield of 28% (Scheme [1]).

Scheme 1 Oxidation of Ti(IV) enolates with molecular oxygen

Titanium(IV) enolates prepared by enolization with TiCl₃(i-PrO)­/i-Pr₂NEt did not add any benefit and milder TiCl₂(i-PrO)₂ or TiCl(i-PrO)₃ Lewis acids are known to be unable to promote an appropriate enolization of such oxazolidinones.[13] [14] In turn, the oxidation of the corresponding sodium or boron enolates using the same conditions was unsuccessful; whereas the oxidation of zirconium(IV) enolates[15] produced the α-hydroxylated adduct 3a in a yield of 18%. Remarkably, careful analysis of the crude reaction mixtures indicated the generation of low, but significant amounts of the by-products 4 shown in Figure [1].

Figure 1 By-products formed in the oxidation of Ti(IV) enolates with oxygen

A comprehensive optimization of the reaction conditions indicated that the oxidation was much more reliable by a simple stirring of the solution containing the titanium(IV) enolate in an oxygen atmosphere at room temperature. Indeed, enolization of 1a with TiCl₄/i-Pr₂NEt at 0 °C for 40 minutes in a nitrogen atmosphere and further stirring of the resulting deep red solution under an oxygen atmosphere (1 atm) at room temperature for 3 hours produced the α-hydroxy adduct 3a in a yield of 45% without consuming all the starting material (see Figure [2]). Interestingly, the color of the reacting mixture changed to orange or dark yellow, which facilitated the monitoring of the oxidation.

Figure 2 Oxidation of titanium(IV) enolate of 1a with oxygen

The use of molecular sieves or the addition of a second equivalent of TiCl₄ or other reagents, such as (EtO)₃P, did not improve the yield. Instead, temperature turned out to be crucial, since the reaction did not progress at all at temperatures lower than –20 °C. Finally, we also examined the influence of the amount of oxygen on the yield of the reaction. Surprisingly, both an excess and 1.3 equivalents of oxygen produced the same yield (Table [1], entries 1 and 2), whereas a substoichiometric amount of oxygen gave 3a in a 40% yield (entry 3). Such close results hinted that both atoms of the oxygen molecule were incorporated into the oxidized adduct 3a.

Table 1 Influence of the Amount of Oxygen on the Yield of the Reaction

Entry	O2 (equiv)a	Yield (%)b
1	excess	45
2	1.3	45
3	0.6	40

^a Estimated amount of O₂ based on the equivalence 1 mmol ≈ 22.4 mL.

^b Isolated yields.

Although the underlying mechanism of such α-hydroxylation is still unclear, the abovementioned results suggest that the oxidation of titanium(IV) enolates might be rationalized by considering the biradical character of such species. Indeed, we hypothesized that a radical-like reaction of triplet oxygen with the biradical titanium enolate II might trigger the formation of the peroxide III shown in Scheme [2]. The observed high π-face selectivity may be due to the chelated character of II.[16] Taking into account a previous report by Adam,[17] the internal autoxidation of the titanium(III) center of the resulting species might then generate a peroxytitanate intermediate like IV, which could be responsible for the further oxidation of a titanium(IV) enolate I that is not yet oxidized.[18] [19] [20]

Scheme 2 Mechanistic hypothesis

Aiming to assess the scope of the reaction, we next applied the optimized reaction conditions to TiCl₄-enolates from N-acyloxazolidinones 1 containing a wide array of R groups (Scheme [3]).[17] [18] All these reactions provided in moderate yields a single diastereomer of the corresponding oxygenated adducts, which were easily isolated by column chromatography (Scheme [3]). The yields from 1a–d indicated that the reaction is sensitive to the steric hindrance of the R groups. Otherwise, the benzylic position in 1e (R: Bn), the double and triple carbon bonds in 1f and 1g, respectively, or the ester group in 1h did not affect the result, which proves the high site-selectivity and chemoselectivity achieved in this oxidation of the Cα position.

Scheme 3 Oxidation of N-acylated oxazolidinones 1

Finally, the smooth removal of the chiral auxiliary from model adduct 3e, following reported procedures,[21] generated excellent yields of up to 95% of the α-hydroxy ester 5 and 1,2-diol 6 (Scheme [4]). This also enabled the S-configuration of the α-stereocenter to be established.

Scheme 4 Removal of the chiral auxiliary

In summary, we have reported a novel stereoselective approach of synthesizing α-hydroxy carboxylic derivatives based on the oxidation of titanium(IV) enolates from chiral acyl oxazolidinones with environmentally friendly oxygen using simple experimental conditions. This transformation produces moderate yields, but in a highly selective manner, of the corresponding α-hydroxy adducts, which can then be easily converted into enantiomerically pure and synthetically useful intermediates. Importantly, the isolation of the α-hydroxy adducts does not require any additional reducing agent, suggesting that the overall reaction involves an internal redox step that is probably linked to the biradical character of titanium(IV) enolates.

Unless otherwise stated, reactions were conducted in oven-dried glassware under an inert atmosphere of N₂ with anhydrous solvents. The solvents and reagents were dried and purified, when necessary, according to standard procedures. All commercial reagents were used as received. Column chromatography were carried out under low pressure (flash) conditions and performed on SDS silica gel 60 (35–70 μm). Analytical TLC were carried out on Merck silica gel 60 F254 plates and analyzed by UV (254 nm) and stained with phosphomolybdic acid or p-anisaldehyde. R_f values are approximate. Melting points were determined with a Stuart Scientific SMP10 or a Gallenkamp apparatus and are uncorrected. Specific rotations ([α]) were determined at 589 nm and at 20 °C on a PerkinElmer 241 MC polarimeter. IR spectra (Attenuated Total Reflectance, ATR) were recorded on a Nicolet 6700 FT-IR Thermo Scientific spectrophotometer and only the more representative frequencies are reported. ¹H NMR (400 MHz) and ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury 400 spectrometer. Chemical shifts (δ) are quoted in ppm and referenced to internal TMS (δ 0.00 for ¹H NMR) or CDCl₃ (δ 77.0 for ¹³C NMR); data are reported as follows: integration, peak multiplicity (standard abbreviations) with coupling constants measured in Hz; when necessary, 2D techniques (COSY and HSQC) were also used to assist with structure elucidation. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained with an Agilent 1100 spectrometer by the Unitat d’Espectrometria de Masses, Universitat de Barcelona.

Acylation of the Chiral Auxiliary (S)-4-Benzyl-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one; General Procedure

A 2.5 M solution of n-BuLi in hexanes (2.2 mL, 5.5 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of (S)-4-benzyl-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one[22] (1.03 g, 5.0 mmol) in THF (25 mL) at –78 °C under N₂. The solution was stirred for 15 min and the corresponding acyl chloride (6.5 mmol) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred at –78 °C for 20 min, allowed to warm to r.t., stirred for 2 h, and quenched with sat. aq NH₄Cl (20 mL). The volatiles were removed and the resulting mixture was partitioned between H₂O and EtOAc (20 mL each), and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with sat. aq NaHCO₃ (15 mL) and brine (15 mL), dried (MgSO₄), filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography to give the respective acylated chiral auxiliary 1a–h [23] in yields higher than 90%.

Direct Oxidation of 1; General Procedure

Neat TiCl₄ (61 μL, 0.55 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of respective 1a–h (0.50 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) at 0 °C under N₂ and the resultant yellow suspension was stirred for 5 min. Then, i-Pr₂NEt (96 μL, 0.55 mmol) was added dropwise and the ensuing dark solution was stirred for 40 min at 0 °C. The reaction flask was purged with H₂SO₄­-dried O₂ for 5 min at 0 °C and stirring was continued at r.t. for 2–5 h under an O₂ atmosphere. The reaction was quenched by the addition of a sat. aq NH₄Cl (2 mL) at r.t. with vigorous stirring. The mixture was partitioned between CH₂Cl₂ (10 mL) and H₂O (10 mL), and the aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated. The residue was analyzed by ¹H NMR and purified by column chromatography to afford a single diastereomer of the corresponding hydroxylated compound 3a–h.

(S)-4-Benzyl-N-[(S)-2-hydroxypropanoyl]-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (3a)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from (S)-4-benzyl-N-propanoyl-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (1a; 131 mg, 0.5 mmol). Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20) afforded 62 mg (0.22 mmol, 45%) of 3a as a white solid; mp 45–47 °C; [α]_D ²⁰ –36.5 (c 1.1, CHCl₃); R_f = 0.20 (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20).

IR (ATR): 3451, 2982, 2930, 1771, 1694, 1392, 1354, 1275, 1100 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.34–7.22 (5 H, m), 5.04 (1 H, quint, J = 6.9 Hz), 4.49 (1 H, dd, J = 9.5, 3.8 Hz), 3.74 (1 H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 3.18 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 3.8 Hz), 2.93 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 9.5 Hz), 1.42 (3 H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 1.40 (3 H, s), 1.39 (3 H, s).

¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 175.2, 152.7, 136.5, 129.0, 128.7, 126.9, 83.7, 67.2, 64.0, 35.1, 28.6, 22.2, 19.7.

HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₅H₂₀NO₄: 278.1387; found: 278.1392.

(S)-4-Benzyl-N-[(S)-2-hydroxybutanoyl]-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (3b)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from (S)-4-benzyl-N-butanoyl-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (1b; 137 mg, 0.5 mmol). Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20) afforded 63 mg (0.22 mmol, 43%) of 3b as a white solid; mp 67–68 °C; [α]_D ²⁰ –30.7 (c 1.0, CHCl₃); R_f = 0.30 (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20).

IR (ATR): 3412, 2967, 2927, 2874, 1770, 1672, 1352 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.34–7.22 (5 H, m), 4.95 (1 H, td, J = 7.6, 3.8 Hz), 4.47 (1 H, dd, J = 9.6, 3.6 Hz), 3.44 (1 H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 3.20 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 3.6 Hz), 2.93 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 9.6 Hz), 1.91–1.81 (1 H, m), 1.68–1.57 (1 H, m), 1.39 (3 H, s), 1.39 (3 H, s), 1.03 (3 H, t, J = 7.4 Hz).

¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 175.0, 152.4, 136.6, 129.0, 128.7, 126.9, 83.5, 71.8, 64.0, 35.0, 28.5, 27.3, 22.1, 9.4.

HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₆H₂₁NO₄Na: 314.1363; found: 314.1373.

(S)-4-Benzyl-N-[(S)-2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoyl]-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (3c)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from (S)-4-benzyl-5,5-dimethyl-N-(3-methylbutanoyl)-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (1c; 145 mg, 0.5 mmol). Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20) afforded 43 mg (0.14 mmol, 28%) of 3c as a white solid; mp 65–66 °C; [α]_D ²⁰ –18.0 (c 1.0, CHCl₃); R_f = 0.30 (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20).

IR (ATR): 3430, 2972, 2923, 2869, 1766, 1694, 1672, 1347 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.34–7.22 (5 H, m), 4.98 (1 H, dd, J = 8.3, 3.3 Hz), 4.46 (1 H, dd, J = 9.7, 3.5 Hz), 3.21 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 3.5 Hz), 3.19 (1 H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 2.94 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 9.7 Hz), 2.12–2.04 (1 H, m), 1.38 (6 H, s), 1.09 (3 H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.84 (3 H, d, J = 6.8 Hz).

¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 175.1, 152.2, 136.6, 129.0, 128.7, 126.9, 83.4, 74.7, 64.2, 35.0, 31.4, 28.4, 22.1, 19.7, 15.1.

HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₇H₂₃NO₄Na: 328.1519; found: 328.1529.

(S)-4-Benzyl-N-[(S)-2-cyclopropyl-2-hydroxyacetyl]-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (3d)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from (S)-4-benzyl-N-(2-cyclopropylacetyl)-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (1d; 99 mg, 0.35 mmol). Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20) afforded 28 mg (0.11 mmol, 32%) of 3d as a white solid; mp 106–108 °C; [α]_D ²⁰ –30.9 (c 1.0, CHCl₃); R_f = 0.20 (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20).

IR (ATR): 3404, 2963, 2918, 2851, 1780, 1668, 1352, 1160, 1094 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.34–7.22 (5 H, m), 4.82 (1 H, dd, J = 8.0, 6.1 Hz), 4.49 (1 H, dd, J = 9.6, 3.6 Hz), 3.39 (1 H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 3.21 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 3.6 Hz), 2.95 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 9.6 Hz), 1.41 (3 H, s), 1.40 (3 H, s), 1.29–1.22 (1 H, m), 0.61–0.39 (4 H, m).

¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 174.7, 152.6, 136.6, 129.0, 128.7, 126.9, 83.6, 71.4, 64.2, 35.1, 28.5, 22.1, 13.7, 1.5, 0.9.

HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₇H₂₁NO₄Na: 326.1363; found: 326.1359.

(S)-4-Benzyl-N-[(S)-2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoyl]-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (3e)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from (S)-4-benzyl-5,5-dimethyl-N-(3-phenylpropanoyl)-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (1e; 168 mg, 0.5 mmol). Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20) afforded 60 mg (0.17 mmol, 34%) of 3e as a white solid; mp 98–99 °C; [α]_D ²⁰ –17.3 (c 1.0, CHCl₃); R_f = 0.30 (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20).

IR (ATR): 3425, 3056, 3025, 2994, 2972, 2914, 1792, 1677, 1352, 1330, 1094 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.34–7.23 (10 H, m), 5.28 (1 H, td, J = 7.9, 4.0 Hz), 4.46 (1 H, dd, J = 9.7, 3.7 Hz), 3.46 (1 H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 3.20 (1 H, dd, J = 14.2, 3.7 Hz), 3.16 (1 H, dd, J = 13.8, 4.0 Hz), 2.92 (1 H, dd, J = 14.2, 9.7 Hz), 2.88 (1 H, dd, J = 13.8, 7.9 Hz), 1.40 (3 H, s), 1.37 (3 H, s).

¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 174.2, 152.4, 136.7, 136.5, 129.5, 129.0, 128.7, 128.3, 126.9, 126.7, 83.5, 71.7, 64.0, 40.2, 35.0, 28.5, 22.2.

HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₂₁H₂₄NO₄: 354.1700; found: 354.1705.

(S)-4-Benzyl-N-[(S)-2-hydroxy-5-hexenoyl]-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (3f)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from (S)-4-benzyl-N-(5-hexenoyl)-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (1f; 150 mg, 0.5 mmol). Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20) afforded 51 mg (0.16 mmol, 32%) of 3f as a white solid; mp 90–92 °C; [α]_D ²⁰ –15.1 (c 1.0, CHCl₃); R_f = 0.30 (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20).

IR (ATR): 3448, 2994, 2972, 2940, 2990, 2851, 1766, 1703, 1361, 1281 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.34–7.22 (5 H, m), 5.84–5.75 (1 H, m), 5.07 (1 H, dq, J = 17.1, 1.6 Hz), 5.01–4.95 (2 H, m), 4.47 (1 H, dd, J = 9.6, 3.7 Hz), 3.52 (1 H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 3.19 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 3.7 Hz), 2.93 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 9.6 Hz), 2.29–2.24 (2 H, m), 1.94–1.85 (1 H, m), 1.71–1.62 (1 H, m), 1.40 (3 H, s), 1.39 (3 H, s).

¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 174.9, 152.4, 137.5, 136.6, 129.0, 128.7, 126.9, 115.3, 83.5, 70.2, 64.0, 35.0, 33.1, 29.4, 28.5, 22.1.

HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₈H₂₃NO₄Na: 340.1519; found: 340.1532.

(S)-4-Benzyl-N-[(S)-2-hydroxy-5-hexynoyl]-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (3g)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from (S)-4-benzyl-N-(5-hexynoyl)-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (1g; 149 mg, 0.5 mmol). Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20) afforded 51 mg (0.16 mmol, 32%) of 3g as a white solid; mp 106–108 °C; [α]_D ²⁰ –16.4 (c 1.0, CHCl₃); R_f = 0.30 (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20).

IR (ATR): 3466, 3292, 2949, 2918, 1761, 1699, 1352, 1107 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.34–7.22 (5 H, m), 4.99 (1 H, ddd, J = 8.6, 7.1, 3.6 Hz), 4.49 (1 H, dd, J = 9.4, 3.9 Hz), 3.77 (1 H, d, J = 7.1 Hz), 3.18 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 3.9 Hz), 2.93 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 9.4 Hz), 2.42 (2 H, td, J = 7.3, 2.6 Hz), 2.10–2.01 (1 H, m), 1.97 (1 H, t, J = 2.6 Hz), 1.87–1.78 (1 H, m), 1.41 (3 H, s), 1.40 (3 H, s).

¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 173.9, 152.6, 136.4, 129.0, 128.7, 126.9, 83.7, 83.3, 69.5, 68.9, 64.0, 35.0, 32.1, 28.6, 22.2, 14.4.

HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₈H₂₁NO₄Na: 338.1363; found: 338.1377.

(S)-4-Benzyl-N-[(S)-2-hydroxy-5-methoxy-5-oxopentanoyl]-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (3h)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from (S)-4-benzyl-N-(5-methoxy-5-oxopentanoyl)-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one (1h; 166 mg, 0.5 mmol). Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20) afforded 53 mg (0.15 mmol, 30%) of 3h as a white solid; mp 91–93 °C; [α]_D ²⁰ –21.0 (c 1.0, CHCl₃); R_f = 0.20 (hexanes–EtOAc, 80:20).

IR (ATR): 3466, 2972, 2918, 2851, 1757, 1703, 1352, 1245 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.34–7.22 (5 H, m), 4.97 (1 H, td, J = 7.8, 3.9 Hz), 4.48 (1 H, dd, J = 9.5, 3.8 Hz), 3.68 (3 H, s), 3.68 (1 H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 3.18 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 3.8 Hz), 2.92 (1 H, dd, J = 14.5, 9.5 Hz), 2.61–2.47 (2 H, m), 2.18–2.10 (1 H, m), 2.00–1.91 (1 H, m), 1.42 (3 H, s), 1.40 (3 H, s).

¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 174.1, 173.6, 152.6, 136.5, 128.9, 128.7, 126.9, 83.7, 69.6, 63.9, 51.6, 35.0, 29.4, 28.5 (2 ×), 22.2.

HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₈H₂₃NO₆Na: 372.1418; found: 372.1430.

Methyl (S)-2-Hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoate (5)

A 3.0 M solution of MeMgBr in Et₂O (103 μL, 0.31 mmol) was added to MeOH (1.0 mL) and stirred at 0 °C for 10 min. Then, a solution of 3e (0.53 g, 0.15 mmol) in 3:1 CH₂Cl₂–MeOH (1.5 mL) was added to the former suspension at 0 °C under N₂ and the resultant mixture was stirred for 5 min. The reaction was quenched with 10% w/w aq NaHSO_3­ (1 mL) and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was partitioned between 10% w/w aq NaHSO₃ (10 mL) and CH₂Cl₂ (20 mL). The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO_4­), filtered, and concentrated. Purification by column chromatography (hexanes–EtOAc, 85:15) afforded 31 mg (0.15 mmol, 99% recovery) of (S)-benzyl-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one and 25 mg (0.14 mmol, 93%) of 5 as a white solid; mp 47–48 °C; [α]_D ²⁰ –13.1 (c 1.1, CH₂Cl₂) {Lit.[4a] [α]_D ²⁰ –13.7 (c 1.1, CH₂Cl₂)}.

IR (ATR): 3271, 3018, 2945, 2838, 1748, 1726, 1425, 1273, 1251, 1087 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.32–7.20 (5 H, m), 4.45 (1 H, ddd, J = 6.8, 6.1, 4.4 Hz), 3.77 (3 H, s), 3.12 (1 H, dd, J = 13.9, 4.4 Hz), 2.96 (1 H, dd, J = 13.9, 6.8 Hz), 2.74 (1 H, d, J = 6.1 Hz).

¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 174.5, 136.3, 129.4 (2 ×), 128.4 (2 ×), 126.9, 71.2, 52.4, 40.5.

HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₁₀H₁₆NO₃: 198.1125; found: 198.1116.

(S)-3-Phenyl-1,2-propanediol (6)

A solution of 3e (53 mg, 0.15 mmol) in THF (1 mL) was added to a solution of NaBH₄ (34 mg, 0.9 mmol) in THF–H₂O (3:1, 2.2 mL) at 0 °C under N₂ and the resultant mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 50 min. The reaction was quenched by dropwise addition of aq 2 M HCl/brine solution until bubbling ceased. The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL) and the brine layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (hexanes–EtOAc, from 40:60 to 20:80) afforded 30 mg (0.15 mmol, 97% recovery) of (S)-benzyl-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one and 21 mg (0.14 mmol, 95%) of (S)-3-phenyl-1,2-propanediol (6) as a clear colorless oil; [α]_D ²⁰ –18.3 (c 1.3, CHCl₃) {Lit.[6a] [α]_D ²⁰ –18.6 (c 1.3, CHCl₃)}; R_f = 0.20 (hexanes–EtOAc, 85:15).

IR (ATR): 3221, 3024, 2917, 2850, 1495, 1451, 1070, 1036 cm^–1.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.33–7.20 (5 H, m), 3.95–3.89 (1 H, m), 3.66 (1 H, dd, J = 11.2, 2.7 Hz), 3.49 (1 H, dd, J = 11.2, 7.0 Hz), 2.80–2.70 (2 H, m), 2.39 (2 H, br s).

¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 137.7, 129.3 (2 ×), 128.6 (2 ×), 126.6, 73.0, 66.0, 39.8.

HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + NH₄]⁺ calcd for C₉H₁₆NO₂: 170.1176; found: 170.1176.

• References

• 1a Chen K. Baran PS. Nature 2009; 459: 824
• 1b Newhouse T. Baran PS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 3362
• 1c Saint-Denis TG. Zhu R.-Y. Chen G. Wu Q.-F. Yu J.-Q. Science 2018; 359: 747
• 2a Chen B.-C. Zhou P. Davis FA. Ciganek E. Org. React. 2003; 62: 1
• 2b Smith AM. R. Hii KK. Chem. Rev. 2011; 111: 1637
• 3 Davis FA. Chen B.-C. Chem. Rev. 1992; 92: 919
• 4a Evans DA. Morrissey MM. Dorow RL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985; 107: 4346
• 4b Zhang L. Zhu L. Yang J. Luo J. Hong R. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 3890
• 5a Punniyamurthy T. Velusamy S. Iqbal J. Chem. Rev. 2005; 105: 2329
• 5b Bryliakov KP. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 11406
• 6a Córdova A. Sundén H. Engqvist M. Ibrahem I. Casas J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 8914
• 6b Sundén H. Engqvist M. Casas J. Ibrahem I. Córdova A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004; 43: 6532
• 6c Córdova A. Sundén H. Bøvegig A. Johansson M. Himo F. Chem. Eur. J. 2004; 10: 3673
• 7 Lubin H. Tessier A. Chaume G. Pytkowicz J. Brigaud T. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 1496
• 8a Sano D. Nagata K. Itoh T. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 1593
• 8b Sim S.-BD. Wang M. Zhao Y. ACS Catal. 2015; 5: 3609
• 9 Ma P.-J. Liu H. Xu Y.-J. Aisa HA. Lu C.-D. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 1236
• 10a Moreira I. deP. R. Bofill JM. Anglada JM. Solsona JG. Nebot J. Romea P. Urpí F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 3242
• 10b Heras C. Gómez-Palomino A. Romea P. Urpí F. Bofill JM. Moreira I. deP. R. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 8909

Zakarian has convincingly demonstrated the biradical character of titanium(IV) and zirconium(IV) enolates in highly stereoselective reactions:
• 11a Beaumont S. Ilardi EA. Monroe LR. Zakarian A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 1482
• 11b Gu Z. Herrmann AT. Zakarian A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 7136
• 11c Herrmann AT. Smith LL. Zakarian A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 6976
• 11d Ilardi EA. Zakarian A. Chem. Asian J. 2011; 6: 2260
• 12a Gómez-Palomino A. Pellicena M. Romo JM. Solà R. Romea P. Urpí F. Font-Bardia M. Chem. Eur. J. 2014; 20: 10153
• 12b Mabe PJ. Zakarian A. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 516
• 13 Evans DA. Urpí F. Somers TC. Clark JS. Bilodeau MT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112: 8215

Enolization with mild titanium(IV) Lewis acids is only possible in more acidic α-halo or α-aryl substrates. See, for instance:
• 14a Nebot J. Romea P. Urpí F. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 7518
• 14b Alvarado J. Herrmann AT. Zakarian A. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 6206
• 15 Zirconium(IV) enolates from 1a were prepared according the experimental procedure reported in reference 11b.
• 16 Radical α-hydroxylations of non-chelated chiral N-acyloxazolidinones with oxygen yield the corresponding adducts with low diastereoselectivities, see: Kihara N. Ollivier C. Renaud P. Org. Lett. 1999; 1: 1419
• 17 Adam W. Metz M. Prechtl F. Renz M. Synthesis 1994; 563

Stereoselective oxidation of enolates by peroxide intermediates has been occasionally proposed in α-hydroxylation reactions with molecular oxygen. See, for instance:
• 18a Yang Y. Moinodeen F. Chin W. Ma T. Jiang Z. Tan C.-H. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 4762
• 18b Wang Y. Yin H. Tang X. Wu Y. Meng Q. Gao Z. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 7042
• 18c Wang Y. Zheng Z. Lian M. Yin H. Zhao J. Meng Q. Gao Z. Green Chem. 2016; 18: 5493
• 18d Ding W. Lu L.-Q. Zhou Q.-Q. Wei Y. Chen J.-R. Xiao W.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 63

For the role of peroxide intermediates in nonstereoselective hydroxylation of enolates with molecular oxygen, see:
• 19a Liang Y.-F. Jiao N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 548
• 19b Chaudhari MB. Sutar Y. Malpathak S. Hazra A. Gnanaprakasam B. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 3628
• 20 For a comprehensive analysis of the copper-catalyzed oxidation of ketones with oxygen, see: Tsang AS.-K. Kapat A. Schoenebeck F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 518

For the removal of 5,5-disubstituted oxazolidinones, see:
• 21a Davies SG. Sanganee HJ. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995; 6: 671
• 21b Hintermann T. Seebach D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1998; 81: 2093
• 22 SuperQuat chiral auxiliary (S)-4-benzyl-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one was prepared according to a procedure previously reported, see: Bull SD. Davies SG. Jones S. Polywka ME. C. Shyam Prasad R. Sanganee HJ. Synlett 1998; 519

Spectroscopical and analytical data of 1a–h are in agreement with those reported in the literature, see:
• 23a Ref. 11.
• 23b Bull SD. Davies SG. Nicholson RL. Sanganee HJ. Smith AD. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003; 1: 2886