Abstract
Objective This article evaluates trends in venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis during delivery hospitalizations in the United States.
Methods We utilized an administrative database to determine if women hospitalized for vaginal or cesarean delivery received pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis, mechanical VTE prophylaxis, or both from January 2011 through March 2015. Mechanical prophylaxis included sequential compression devices, graduated compression stockings, and other pneumatic devices. Pharmacologic prophylaxis included unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, or fondaparinux. Probability of use of thromboprophylaxis for individual hospitals was estimated in an adjusted model.
Results A total of 956,428 women who underwent cesarean and 1,914,142 women who underwent vaginal delivery were included in the analysis. Cesarean VTE prophylaxis declined between 2011 (50.3%) and 2015 (47.7%; p < 0.01). Of women undergoing vaginal delivery, 2.9% received prophylaxis. Delivery hospital was an important determinant of cesarean prophylaxis: in the adjusted model, one-third of hospitals used prophylaxis for less than 20% of deliveries, one-third of hospitals used prophylaxis for 20 to 80% of deliveries, and the final third of hospitals used prophylaxis in greater than 80% of deliveries.
Conclusion While many hospitals appear to be following best clinical practices, some do not provide routine cesarean VTE prophylaxis. Minimizing care quality variation may improve maternal safety.
Keywords
obstetric thromboembolism - severe maternal morbidity - thromboprophylaxis
