Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 66(S 01): S1-S110
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1628099
Short Presentations
Sunday, February 18, 2018
DGTHG: Heart-Lung-Failure
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Nonstandard Donor Organs in Pediatric Lung Transplantation have no Negative Impact on Recipients Outcome

W. Sommer
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hannover, Germany
,
F. Ius
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hannover, Germany
,
N. Schwerk
2   Department for Pediatric Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
,
C. Müller
2   Department for Pediatric Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
,
D. Bobylev
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hannover, Germany
,
C. Kühn
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hannover, Germany
,
M. Avsar
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hannover, Germany
,
J. Salman
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hannover, Germany
,
T. Siemeni
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hannover, Germany
,
A. Horke
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hannover, Germany
,
A. Haverich
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hannover, Germany
,
I. Tudorache
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hannover, Germany
,
G. Warnecke
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Hannover, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
22. Januar 2018 (online)

 

    Background: Pediatric lung transplantation remains the only curative treatment option for end-stage lung diseases in childhood. Recipients outnumber available pediatric donor organs, hence non-ideal donors are considered. Here, we describe the outcome of utilizing non-standard donor organs in pediatric lung transplantation.

    Methods: A retrospective analysis of all pediatric lung transplantations (recipient age < 18 years) performed in our center between 04/2010 and 12/2016 was performed. Donors were assigned to a group fulfilling ISHLT Standard Donor Criteria (SDG; Age < 55 years; clear chest X-Ray; PaO2/FiO2 >300; < 20 years Nicotine abuse; absence of chest trauma, endobronchial microbiological organisms, purulent secretion, aspiration or malignancy) or not (Non-Standard Donor Group; Non-SDG).

    Results: A total of 57 pediatric lung transplantations was performed, of which 27 donors fulfilled standard donor criteria, and 30 did not. Preoperative characteristics including age (12.3 ± 4.1 vs.12.9 ± 3.7 years, p = 0.71), admission to ICU (37.0 vs. 50%, p = 0.42), mechanical ventilation (14.8 vs. 10.0%, p = 0.70) and ECMO support (11.1 vs. 23.3%, p = 0.30) of both groups were not significantly different.

    Perioperative characteristics including intraoperative use of extracorporeal circulation and cold ischemic times also did not differ. In the Non-SDG, more atypical volume reductions of the donor lungs were performed (0 vs. 16.7%, p = 0.05), but the frequency of postoperative ECMO support was similar in both groups.

    Postoperative complications including primary graft dysfunction grade 2 or 3 or postoperative dialysis did not differ. Non-SDG recipients were significantly shorter on mechanical ventilation (Median 2 [1–2] vs. 1 [1–2] days, p = 0.04) following surgery, however, total ICU stay (4 [2–12] vs. 3 [2–10] days, p = 0.54) and total hospital stay (33 [22–48] vs. 33.5 [23.5–47] days, p = 0.67) were similar.

    Pulmonary function testing at discharge from the initial hospital stay, after 1 year and at last assessment did not show significant differences. Freedom from CLAD at 1 (100 vs. 100%, p > 0.99) and 5 years (57.9 vs. 71.7%, p = 0.78) o showed no significant differences between both groups.

    Survival up to 5 years (67.9 vs. 90.5%, p = 0.35) after transplantation was not statistically significantly different, but was numerically higher in the Non-SDG group.

    Conclusion: ISHLT Non-standard Criteria Donor lungs can safely be used for pediatric lung transplantation without compromising short- and midterm results.


    #

    Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.