Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2000; 13(01): 9-17
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632623
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Dynamic Analysis of In Vivo Segmental Spinal Motion: An Instrumentation Strategy

K. K. Haussler
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
,
J. E. A. Bertram
2   Department of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA
,
K. Gellman
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
,
J. W. Hermanson
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
› Author AffiliationsThe authors wish to thank David Lee for computer programming assitance; Lisa M. Mitchell and Vince Soderholm for treadmill assistance and technical advice; Normand G. Ducharme and Richard P. Hackett for surgical implant advice; and Michael A. Simmons for production of the illustrations.
Research funding provided by the Traver‘s Committee Inc.
Further Information

Publication History

Received 15 June 1999

Accepted 30 September 1999

Publication Date:
09 February 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Summary A transducer for measuring threedimensional segmental spinal motion was designed to directly measure dynamic rotations (Rx, Ry and Rz) about three orthogonal axes using an array of liquid metal strain gauges (LMSGs). The configuration of the LMSG array results in differential length changes due to segmental spinal motion. In vitro calibration utilized transducer attachment to Steinmann pins implanted into the dorsal spinous processes of anatomical spinal segments. The response of the LMSGs approximated linearity (R2 ≥0.980) over the calibrated ranges of angular displacement (i.e., ± 5°). On average, artifactual mechanical noise of the LMSGs was <3% of the signal recorded during locomotion. The minimum resolution of the transducer was 0.07 degrees of flexion-extension, 0.46 degrees of lateral bending, and 0.56 degrees of rotation. Average resistive force for all transducers was 0.31 ± 0.05 Nm at the neutral articular position (0°) and 0.51 ± 0.03 Nm at 5° of flexion. Clinically, the modest mechanical resistance of the transducers did not affect spinal mobility nor locomotion. In vivo application of the transducer was demonstrated at thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spinal segments in horses treadmill locomotion. The transducer was designed and tested on an equine model, but may be adapted for other quadrupeds. The dynamic and continuous measure of three-dimensional in vivo segmental spinal motion will provide an important new perspective for evaluating normal and altered spinal motion.

A technique was developed for directly measuring threedimensional segmental spinal motion in the thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spinal segments in horses during treadmill locomotion. The dynamic and continuous measure of three-dimensional in vivo segmental spinal motion will provide an important new perspective for evaluating normal and altered spinal motion associated with back problems.

Keywords

Kinematics - spine - liquid metal strain gauge - equine
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Adams MA, Dolan P. Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their clinical significance. Clin Biomech 1995; 10: 3-19.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Brown TD, Sigal L, Njus GO. et al. Dynamic performance characteristics of the liquid metal strain gage. J Biomech 1986; 19: 165-73.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Chang YH, Bertram JEA, Ruina A. A dynamic force and moment analysis system for brachiation. J Exp Biol 1997; 200: 3013-20.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Dekutoski MB, Schendel MJ, Ogilvie JW. et al. An improved technique for measuring in vivo intervertebral motion in the canine. Spine 1994; 19: 2672-5.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Denoix J-M. Kinematics of the thoracolumbar spine of the horse during dorsoventral movements: A preliminary report. Gillespie JR, Robinson NE. 2nd International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology ICEEP Publications, Davis, CA; 1987: 607-14.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Denoix J-M. Spinal biomechanics and functional anatomy. Vet Clin No Amer (Eq Pract) 1999; 15: 27-60.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Gertzbein SD, Seligman J, Holtby R. et al. Centrode characteristics of the lumbar spine as a function of segmental instability. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1986; 208: 48-51.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Gregersen GG, Lucas DB. An in vivo study of the axial rotation of the human thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Jt Surg 1967; 49-A: 247-62.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Gunzburg R, Hutton W, Fraser R. Axial rotation of the lumbar spine and the effect of flexion. An in vitro and in vivo biomechanical study. Spine 1991; 16: 22-8.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Haussler KK, Stover SM, Willits NH. Developmental variation in lumbosacropelvic anatomy of Thoroughbred racehorses. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 1083-91.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Haussler KK, Stover SM, Willits NH. Pathology of the lumbosacral spine and pelvis in Thoroughbred racehorses. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 143-53.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Jeffcott LB. Disorders of the thoracolumbar spine of the horse a su rvey of 443 cases. Equine Vet J 1980; 12: 197-210.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Jeffcott LB, Dalin G. Nat ural rigidity of the horse ‘s backbone. Equine Vet J 1980; 12: 101-8.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kaigle AM, Pope MH, Fleming BC. et al. A method for the intravital measurement of interspinous kinematics. J Biomech 1992; 25: 451-6.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Keegan KG, Baker GJ, Boero MJ. et al. Evaluation of support bandaging during measurement of proximal sesamoidean ligament strain in horses by use of a mercury strain gauge. Am J Vet Res 1992; 53: 1203-8.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Klopsteg PE, Wilson PD. Human limbs and their substitutes. J Bone Jt Surg 1972; 54-B: 456-62.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Koogle TA, Piziali RL, Nagel DA. et al. A motion transducer for use in the intact in vitro human lumbar spine. J Biomech Eng 1977; 99: 160-5.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Licka T, Peham C. An objective method for evaluating the flexibility of the back of standing horses. Equine Vet J 1998; 30: 412-5.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lumsden RM, Morris JM. An in vivo study of axial rotation and immobilization at the lumbosacral joint. J Bone Jt Surg 1968; 50-A: 1591-602.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Lundberg A. On the use of bone and skin markers in kinematics research. Human Movement Science 1996; 15: 411-22.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Meglan D, Berme N, Zuelzer W. On the construction, circuitry and properties of liquid metal strain gages. J Biomech 1988; 21: 681-5.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Panjabi MM, Krag MH, Goel VK. A technique for measurement and description of three-dimensional six degree-of-freedom motion of a body joint with an application to the human spine. J Biomech 1981; 14: 447-60.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Yamamoto L. et al. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Jt Surg 1994; 76-A: 413-24.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Pearcy MJ, Bogduk N. Instantaneous axes of rotation of the lumbar intervertebral joints. Spine 1988; 13: 1033-41.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Pourcelot P, Audigié F, Degueurce C. et al. Kinematics of the equine back: a method to study the thoracolumbar flexion-extension movements at the trot. Vet Res 1998; 29: 519-25.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Schendel MJ, Dekutoski MB, Ogilvie JW. et al. Kinematics of the canine lumbar intervertebral joints: An in vivo study before and after adjacent instrumentation. Spine 1995; 20: 2555-64.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Steffen T, Rubin RK, Baramki HG. et al. A new technique for measuring lumbar segmental motion in vivo. Spine 1997; 22: 156-66.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Stone JE, Madsen NH, Milton JL. et al. Developments in the design and use of liquid-metal strain gages. Exp Mech 1983; 129-39.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Thurston AJ, Harris JD. Normal kinematics of the lumbar spine and pelvis. Spine 1983; 08: 199-205.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Townsend HGG, Leach DH. Relationship between intervertebral joint morphology and mobility in the equine thoracolumbar spine. Equine Vet J 1984; 16: 461-5.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Townsend HGG, Leach DH, Fretz PB. Kinematics of the equine thoracolumbar spine. Equine Vet J 1983; 15: 117-22.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 van Weeren PR, van den Bogert AJ, Barneveld A. Quantification of skin displacement in the proximal parts of the limbs of the walking horse. Equine Vet J 1990; 110-8.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 White AA, Panjabi MM. The basic kinematics of the human spine: A review of past and current knowledge. Spine 1978; 03: 12-20.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Willems JM, Jull GA, Ng JKF. An in vivo study of the primary and coupled rotations of the thoracic spine. Clin Biomech 1996; 11: 311-6.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Wood KB, Schendel MJ, Pashman RS. et al. In vivo analysis of canine intervertebral and facet motion. Spine 1992; 17: 1180-6.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar