Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2000; 13(01): 9-17 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632623
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH
Dynamic Analysis of In Vivo Segmental Spinal Motion: An Instrumentation Strategy
K. K. Haussler
1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
,
J. E. A. Bertram
2
Department of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA
,
K. Gellman
1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
,
J. W. Hermanson
1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
› Author AffiliationsThe authors wish to thank David Lee for computer programming assitance; Lisa M. Mitchell and Vince Soderholm for treadmill assistance and technical advice; Normand G. Ducharme and Richard P. Hackett for surgical implant advice; and Michael A. Simmons for production of the illustrations. Research funding provided by the Traver‘s Committee Inc.
Summary A transducer for measuring threedimensional segmental spinal motion was designed to directly measure dynamic rotations (Rx, Ry and Rz) about three orthogonal axes using an array of liquid metal strain gauges (LMSGs). The configuration of the LMSG array results in differential length changes due to segmental spinal motion. In vitro calibration utilized transducer attachment to Steinmann pins implanted into the dorsal spinous processes of anatomical spinal segments. The response of the LMSGs approximated linearity (R2 ≥0.980) over the calibrated ranges of angular displacement (i.e., ± 5°). On average, artifactual mechanical noise of the LMSGs was <3% of the signal recorded during locomotion. The minimum resolution of the transducer was 0.07 degrees of flexion-extension, 0.46 degrees of lateral bending, and 0.56 degrees of rotation. Average resistive force for all transducers was 0.31 ± 0.05 Nm at the neutral articular position (0°) and 0.51 ± 0.03 Nm at 5° of flexion. Clinically, the modest mechanical resistance of the transducers did not affect spinal mobility nor locomotion. In vivo application of the transducer was demonstrated at thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spinal segments in horses treadmill locomotion. The transducer was designed and tested on an equine model, but may be adapted for other quadrupeds. The dynamic and continuous measure of three-dimensional in vivo segmental spinal motion will provide an important new perspective for evaluating normal and altered spinal motion.
A technique was developed for directly measuring threedimensional segmental spinal motion in the thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spinal segments in horses during treadmill locomotion. The dynamic and continuous measure of three-dimensional in vivo segmental spinal motion will provide an important new perspective for evaluating normal and altered spinal motion associated with back problems.
Keywords
Kinematics -
spine -
liquid metal strain gauge -
equine
REFERENCES
1
Adams MA,
Dolan P.
Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their clinical significance. Clin Biomech 1995; 10: 3-19.
4
Dekutoski MB,
Schendel MJ,
Ogilvie JW.
et al. An improved technique for measuring in vivo intervertebral motion in the canine. Spine 1994; 19: 2672-5.
5
Denoix J-M.
Kinematics of the thoracolumbar spine of the horse during dorsoventral movements: A preliminary report.
Gillespie JR,
Robinson NE.
2nd International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology ICEEP Publications, Davis, CA; 1987: 607-14.
7
Gertzbein SD,
Seligman J,
Holtby R.
et al. Centrode characteristics of the lumbar spine as a function of segmental instability. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1986; 208: 48-51.
9
Gunzburg R,
Hutton W,
Fraser R.
Axial rotation of the lumbar spine and the effect of flexion. An in vitro and in vivo biomechanical study. Spine 1991; 16: 22-8.
15
Keegan KG,
Baker GJ,
Boero MJ.
et al. Evaluation of support bandaging during measurement of proximal sesamoidean ligament strain in horses by use of a mercury strain gauge. Am J Vet Res 1992; 53: 1203-8.
22
Panjabi MM,
Krag MH,
Goel VK.
A technique for measurement and description of three-dimensional six degree-of-freedom motion of a body joint with an application to the human spine. J Biomech 1981; 14: 447-60.
23
Panjabi MM,
Oxland TR,
Yamamoto L.
et al. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Jt Surg 1994; 76-A: 413-24.
25
Pourcelot P,
Audigié F,
Degueurce C.
et al. Kinematics of the equine back: a method to study the thoracolumbar flexion-extension movements at the trot. Vet Res 1998; 29: 519-25.
26
Schendel MJ,
Dekutoski MB,
Ogilvie JW.
et al. Kinematics of the canine lumbar intervertebral joints: An in vivo study before and after adjacent instrumentation. Spine 1995; 20: 2555-64.
30
Townsend HGG,
Leach DH.
Relationship between intervertebral joint morphology and mobility in the equine thoracolumbar spine. Equine Vet J 1984; 16: 461-5.
32
van Weeren PR,
van den Bogert AJ,
Barneveld A.
Quantification of skin displacement in the proximal parts of the limbs of the walking horse. Equine Vet J 1990; 110-8.