Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15(04): 233-239
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632745
Clinical Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Management of comminuted supracondylar fractures of the humerus with closed reduction and a hybrid type Ml external fixator

S. M. Fearnside
1   West Chermside Veterinary Specialist and Referral Centre, Stafford Heights, Queensland, Australia
,
R. D. Eaton-Wells
1   West Chermside Veterinary Specialist and Referral Centre, Stafford Heights, Queensland, Australia
,
R. A. S. Mitchell
1   West Chermside Veterinary Specialist and Referral Centre, Stafford Heights, Queensland, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 11 March 2002

Accepted 05 June 2002

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Closed reduction and a hybrid type I-II external skeletal fixator (ESF) were utilised for the repair of comminuted supracondylar humeral fractures in seven dogs and two cats. The modified design of the ESF afforded significant flexibility in the management of these fractures, with closed reduction allowing the principles of biological osteosynthesis to be applied. Successful bone healing was achieved in eight cases. During implant removal, refracture occurred in one case. In comminuted supracondylar fractures of the humerus, where accurate fragment reduction is not feasible or where reconstruction may lead to further soft tissue damage and compromised blood supply to the bony fragments, the construct appeared to offer advantages, both mechanically and biologically, over other external fixator designs or bone plating. The design was used successfully in both large and small dog breeds and cats. The aim of this study is to report on the management and outcomes of comminuted supracondylar fractures managed using closed reduction and a hybrid type I-II ESF.

Keywords

Humerus - supracondylar fractures - closed reduction - external fixators
 

  • References

  • 1 Anderson MA, Aron DN. Repairing humeral and femoral fractures with external skeletal fixation. Vet Med 1998; 93: 455-61.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Anderson MA, Palmer RH, Aron DN. Improving pin selection and insertion technique for external skeletal fixation. Comp Cont Ed Pract Vet 1997; 19: 485-93.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Aron DN. Practical techniques for fractures. In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery. 4th ed. Bojrab MJ. (ed). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1998: 934-41.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Aron DN, Foutz TL, Keller WG, Brown J. Experimental and clinical experience with an IM pin external skeletal fixator tie-in configuration. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1991; 04: 86-94.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Aron DN, Palmer RH, Johnson AL. Biologic strategies and a balanced concept for repair of highly comminuted long bone fractures. Comp Cont Ed Pract Vet 1995; 17: 35-49.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Aron DN, Toombs JP. Updated principles of external skeletal fixation. Comp Cont Ed Pract Vet 1984; 06: 845-58.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Aron DN, Toombs JP, Hollingsworth SC. Primary treatment of severe fractures by external skeletal fixation: threaded pins compared with smooth pins. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 659-70.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bardet JF, Hohn RB, Rudy RL, Olmstead ML. Fractures of the humerus in dogs and cats. A retrospective study of 130 cases. Vet Surg 1983; 12: 73-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Beck JA, Simpson DJ. Type 1-2 hybrid external fixator with tied-in intramedullary pin for treating comminuted distal humeral fractures in a dog and a cat. Aust Vet J 1999; 77: 18-20.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Brinker WO, Verstraete MC. Stiffness studies on various configurations and types of external fixators. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1985; 21: 801-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bouvy BM, Markel MD, Chelikani S, Egger EL, Piermattei DL, Vanderby R. Ex vivo biomechanics of Kirschner-Ehmer external skeletal fixation applied to canine tibiae. Vet Surg 1993; 22: 194-207.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Clary EM, Roe SC. In vitro biomechanical and histological assessment of pilot hole diameter for positive-profile external skeletal fixation pins in canine tibiae. Vet Surg 1996; 25: 453-62.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dewey CW, Aron DN, Foutz TL, Marks MA, Budsberg SC. Static strength evaluation of two modified unilateral external skeletal fixators. J Small Anim Pract 1994; 35: 211-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Egger EL. Static strength evaluation of six external skeletal fixation configurations. Vet Surg 1983; 12: 130-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Egger EL, Histand MB, Norrdin RW, Konde LJ, Schwarz PD. Canine osteotomy healing when stabilised with decreasingly rigid fixation compared to constantly rigid fixation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 06: 182-7.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Egger EL, Runyon CL, Rigg DL. Use of the type 1 double connecting bar configuration of external skeletal fixation on long bone fractures in dogs: A review of 10 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 57-64.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Field JR, Tornkvist H. Biological fracture fixation: a perspective. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2001; 14: 169-78.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Guerin SR, Lewis DD, Lanz OI, Stalling JT. Comminuted supracondylar humeral fractures repaired with a modified type 1 external fixator construct. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 525-32.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Johnson AL, DeCamp CE. External skeletal fixation. Linear Fixators. Vet Clin of North Am Small Anim Pract 1999; 29: 1135-52.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Johnson AL, Seitz SE, Smith CW, Johnson JM, Schaeffer DJ. Closed reduction and type-II external fixation of comminuted fractures of the radius and tibia in dogs: 23 cases (1990-1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996; 209: 1445-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Klause SE, Schwarz PD, Egger EL, Piermattei DL. A modification of the unilateral type 1 external fixator configuration for primary or secondary support of supracondylar humeral and femoral fractures. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1990; 03: 130-4.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Langley-Hobbs SJ, Carmichael S, McCartney WT. External skeletal fixation for stabilisation of comminuted humeral fractures in cats. J Small Anim Pract 1997; 38: 280-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lauer SK, Aron DN, Evans MD. Finite element method evaluation: articulations and diagonals in an 8-pin type IB external skeletal fixator. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 28-37.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lewis DD, Cross AR, Carmichael S, Anderson MA. Recent advances in external skeletal fixation. J Small Anim Pract 2001; 42: 103-12.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Marti JM, Miller A. Delimitation of safe corridors for the insertion of external fixator pins in the dog. 2: Forelimb. J Small Anim Pract 1994; 35: 78-85.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Matthiesen DT. Fractures of the humerus. Vet Clin of North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 121-33.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 McPherron MA, Schwarz PD, Histand MB. Mechanical evaluation of half-pin (type 1) external skeletal fixation in combination with a single intramedullary pin. Vet Surg 1992; 21: 178-82.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Palmer RH. Biological osteosynthesis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1999; 29: 1171-85.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Fractures of the humerus. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 3rd edn. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1997: 261-87.
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Polio FE, Hyman WA, Hulse DA. The role of the external bar in a 6-pin type I external skeletal fixation device. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 06: 75-9.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ross JT, Matthiesen DT. The use of multiple pin and methylmethacrylate external skeletal fixation for the treatment of orthopaedic injuries in the dog and cat. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 06: 115-21.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar