Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18(02): 83-93
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632936
Brief Communication
Schattauer GmbH

The ComPact UniLock 2.0/2.4 system and its clinical application in small animal orthopedics

M. A. Keller
1   Clinic for Small Animal Surgery, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Switzerland
,
K. Voss
1   Clinic for Small Animal Surgery, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Switzerland
,
P. M. Montavon
1   Clinic for Small Animal Surgery, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 10 September 2003

Accepted 06 February 2004

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

This study describes the titanium ComPact UniLock 2.0/2.4™ locking plate system (Stratec Medical, Oberdorf, Switzerland) and reports its application in nine selected clinical cases. The system was found useful for a variety of indications. Three categories of clinical applications are illustrated. They include (a) long bone fractures, (b) cervical spinal fractures and instabilities and (c) joint instabilities and luxations. A brief introduction to the system has already been published (1).

Keywords

UniLock - internal fixator - biological internal fixation
 

  • References

  • 1 Keller MA, Voss K. UniLock: Applications in small animals. AO Dialogue 2002; 15: 20-1.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lindqvist C. et al. A comparative study on four screw-plate locking systems in sheep: A clinical and radiological study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 2: 160-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Tepic S, Perren SM. The biomechanics of the PC-Fix internal fixator. Injury 1995; 26: 2SB5-SB10.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sönderholm A. et al. Bridging of mandibular defects with two different reconstruction systems: An experimental study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49: 1098-105.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sikes JW. et al. Comparison of fixation strengths of locking head and conventional screws, in fracture and reconstruction models. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56: 468-73.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gutwald R. et al. Biomechanical stability of an internal mini-fixation-system in maxillofacial osteosynthesis. Med Biol Eng Comp. 1999 37. (suppl 2)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tepic S. et al. Strength recovery in fractured sheep tibia treated with a plate or an internal fixator: An experimental study with a two-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 14-23.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Fractures: Classification, diagnosis and treatment. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. Piermattei DL, Flo GL. (eds) Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1997: 24-146.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Herford AS, Ellis 3rd E. Use of a locking reconstruction bone plate/screw system for mandibular surgery. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56: 1261-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84: 1093-110.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Vattolo M. Der Einfluss von Rillen in Osteosynthese platten auf den Umbau der Kortikalis. Universität Bern; 1986
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Wheeler SJ, Sharp NJH. Trauma. In: Small Animal Spinal Disorders: Diagnosis and Surgery. Wheeler SJ, Sharp NJH. (eds) London: Mosby-Wolfe; 2000: 171-91.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Beverly K. Vertebral fractures and luxations. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter D. (ed) Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2002: 1244-61.
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Walter MC, Smith GK, Newton CD. Canine lumbar spinal internal fixation techniques: A comparative biomechanicalstudy. JVetSurg 1986; 15: 191-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fernandez Dell' Oca AA. et al. Treating forearm fractures using an internal fixator: A prospective study. Clin Orthop 2001; 389: 196-205.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Savoldelli D, Montavon PM. Clinical handling: small animals. Injury 1995; 26 (suppl 2) 47-50.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Fractures and other orthopedic injuries ofthe tarsus, metatarsus, and phalanges. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. Piermattei DL, Flo GL. (eds) Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1997: 607-55.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Montavon PM. et al. The mini instrument and implant set and its clinical application. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1988; 1: 44-51.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Fractures and other orthopedic injuries of the carpus, metacarpus, and phalanges. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. Piermattei DL, Flo GL. (eds) Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1997: 344-89.
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Salter RB. et al. The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of full-thickness defects in articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62: 1232-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Principle of joint surgery. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. Piermattei DL, Flo GL. (eds) Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1997: 201-17.
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Doverspike M, Vasseur PB. Clinical findings and complications after talocrural arthrodesis in dogs: Experience with 6 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 27: 553-59.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Klause SE, Piermattei DL, Schwarz PD. Tarsocrural arthrodesis: Complications and recommendations. Vet Comp Orthop Trauma 1989; 12: 119.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Herron MR. Atraumatic ventral coxofemoral luxation in dogs (abstr). J Vet Surg 1986; 15: 123.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wadsworth PL, Lesser AS. Use ofmuscle transfer to prevent reluxation of the hip: Two case reports. Proc Vet Orthop Soc. 14th Annual Meeting 1986
    PubMedGoogle Scholar