RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00034612.xml

Yearb Med Inform 1993; 02(01): 399-401
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637984
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637984
Synopsis
Knowledge-Based Systems
Weitere Informationen
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
05. März 2018 (online)
#
-
References
- 1 Musen MA. Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 435-67.
- 2 Sandblad B, Meinzer HP. Modelling and simulation of complex control structures in cell biology. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 36-43.
- 3 Heckerman DE, Nathwani BN. Toward normative expert systems: Part II. Probability-based representations. for efficient knowledge acquisition and inference. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 106-16.
- 4 Koski EMJ, Makivirta A, Sukuvaara T, Kari A. Development of an expert system for haemodynamic monitoring: computerized symbolization of on-line monitoring data. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1991; 8: 289-93.
- 5 Verdaguer A, Patak A, Sancho JJ, Sierra C, Sanz F. Validation of the medical expert system PNEUMON-IA. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 511-268.
- 6 Kotzke K, Pretschner DP. Possibilities of software phantoms for quality control of KBS in nuclear medicine. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 126-34.
- 7 Van Bemmel JH, McCray AT. Eds. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1992. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1992
- 8 Wyatt J, Spiegelhalter D. Evaluating medical expert systems: What to test and how?. Med Inform 1990; 15: 205-17.
- 9 Compton P, Hom K, Quinlan JR, Lazarus L, Ho K. Maintaining an expert system. In: Quinlan JR. ed. Applications of Expert Systems Glasgow, Scotland: Turing Institute Press; 1989: 366-84.
- 10 Miller PL, Sittig DF. The evaluation of clinical decision support systems: What is necessary versus what is interesting. Med Inform 1990; 15: 185-90.
-
References
- 1 Musen MA. Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 435-67.
- 2 Sandblad B, Meinzer HP. Modelling and simulation of complex control structures in cell biology. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 36-43.
- 3 Heckerman DE, Nathwani BN. Toward normative expert systems: Part II. Probability-based representations. for efficient knowledge acquisition and inference. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 106-16.
- 4 Koski EMJ, Makivirta A, Sukuvaara T, Kari A. Development of an expert system for haemodynamic monitoring: computerized symbolization of on-line monitoring data. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1991; 8: 289-93.
- 5 Verdaguer A, Patak A, Sancho JJ, Sierra C, Sanz F. Validation of the medical expert system PNEUMON-IA. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 511-268.
- 6 Kotzke K, Pretschner DP. Possibilities of software phantoms for quality control of KBS in nuclear medicine. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 126-34.
- 7 Van Bemmel JH, McCray AT. Eds. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1992. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1992
- 8 Wyatt J, Spiegelhalter D. Evaluating medical expert systems: What to test and how?. Med Inform 1990; 15: 205-17.
- 9 Compton P, Hom K, Quinlan JR, Lazarus L, Ho K. Maintaining an expert system. In: Quinlan JR. ed. Applications of Expert Systems Glasgow, Scotland: Turing Institute Press; 1989: 366-84.
- 10 Miller PL, Sittig DF. The evaluation of clinical decision support systems: What is necessary versus what is interesting. Med Inform 1990; 15: 185-90.