Yearb Med Inform 2003; 12(01): 170-176
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638156
Review Paper
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Virtual Rehabilitation - Benefits and Challenges[1]

G. Burdea
1   CAIP Center, Rutgers University Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Address of the author:

Grigore Burdea, Ph.D.
CAIP Center, Rutgers University
96 Frelinghuysen Rd.
Piscataway NJ, 08854 USA

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
05. März 2018 (online)

 

Abstract:

Virtual rehabilitation represents the provision of therapeutic interventions locally or at a distance, using Virtual Reality hardware and simulations. Such therapy has been applied to various patient populations, including musculo-skeletal, post-stroke, and cognitively- impaired. This article reviews the benefits brought by VR-enhanced and VR-based rehabilitation to the above patient groups. Also discussed are the many challenges in integrating this new technology into the medical care system.


#

 


#

1 Based on the Key note address with the same title given at the 1st International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation, Lausanne, Switzerland, November 7-8, 2002. © Grigore Burdea


  • References

  • 1 American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons. Broken Ankl. 2002. Also at orthoinfo.aaos.org.
  • 2 American Stroke Association. Impact of Stroke; 2002. Also at www.strokeassociation.org
  • 3 Boian R., Sharma A., Han C., Burdea G., Merians A., Adamovich S.. et al. Virtual Reality-Based Post-Stroke Hand Rehabilitation. Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2002. Newport Beach CA: IOS Press; January 23-26 2002: 64-70.
  • 4 Buckley K., Prandoni C., Tran B.. Nursing Management and the Acceptance/Use of Telehealth Technologies by Caregivers of Stroke Patients in the Home Setting. Proceedings of State of the Science Conference on Telerehabilitation and Applications of Virtual Reality. Washington DC: October 2001: 35-8.
  • 5 Dhurjaty S.. Challenges of Telerehabilitation in the Home Environment. Proceedings of State of the Science Conference on Telerehabilitation and Applications of Virtual Reality. Washington DC: October 2001: 89-93.
  • 6 Emory Health Sciences. Virtual Reality Therapy Proven Effective to Combat Fear of Flying. Press Release, December 18 2000 www.emory.edu
  • 7 Hodges L., Anderson P., Burdea G., Hoffman H., Rothbaum B.. Treating Psychological and Physical Disorders with VR. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, November/December. 2001: 25-33.
  • 8 Holden M., Todorov E.. Use of Virtual Environments in Motor Learning and Rehabilitation. In Stanney K.. editor The Handbook of Virtual Environments Technology (HVET), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 2002: 999-1026.
  • 9 National Rural Health Association. Legislative and Regulatory Agenda. NRHA e-News, Washington DC 1999 2. 3 www.nrharural.org
  • 10 North M., North S., Coble J.. Virtual Reality Therapy: An Effective Treatment for Psychological Disorders. In Stanney K.. editor The Handbook of Virtual Environments Technology (HVET). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2002: 1065-78.
  • 11 Popescu V., Burdea G., Bouzit M., Girone M., Hentz V.. Orthopedic Telerehabilitation with Virtual Force Feedback. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed March 2000; 4 (01) 45-51.
  • 12 Rizzo A., Schultheis M., Mateer C.. Analysis of Assets for Virtual Reality Applications in Neuropsychology. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (in press).

Address of the author:

Grigore Burdea, Ph.D.
CAIP Center, Rutgers University
96 Frelinghuysen Rd.
Piscataway NJ, 08854 USA

  • References

  • 1 American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons. Broken Ankl. 2002. Also at orthoinfo.aaos.org.
  • 2 American Stroke Association. Impact of Stroke; 2002. Also at www.strokeassociation.org
  • 3 Boian R., Sharma A., Han C., Burdea G., Merians A., Adamovich S.. et al. Virtual Reality-Based Post-Stroke Hand Rehabilitation. Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2002. Newport Beach CA: IOS Press; January 23-26 2002: 64-70.
  • 4 Buckley K., Prandoni C., Tran B.. Nursing Management and the Acceptance/Use of Telehealth Technologies by Caregivers of Stroke Patients in the Home Setting. Proceedings of State of the Science Conference on Telerehabilitation and Applications of Virtual Reality. Washington DC: October 2001: 35-8.
  • 5 Dhurjaty S.. Challenges of Telerehabilitation in the Home Environment. Proceedings of State of the Science Conference on Telerehabilitation and Applications of Virtual Reality. Washington DC: October 2001: 89-93.
  • 6 Emory Health Sciences. Virtual Reality Therapy Proven Effective to Combat Fear of Flying. Press Release, December 18 2000 www.emory.edu
  • 7 Hodges L., Anderson P., Burdea G., Hoffman H., Rothbaum B.. Treating Psychological and Physical Disorders with VR. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, November/December. 2001: 25-33.
  • 8 Holden M., Todorov E.. Use of Virtual Environments in Motor Learning and Rehabilitation. In Stanney K.. editor The Handbook of Virtual Environments Technology (HVET), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 2002: 999-1026.
  • 9 National Rural Health Association. Legislative and Regulatory Agenda. NRHA e-News, Washington DC 1999 2. 3 www.nrharural.org
  • 10 North M., North S., Coble J.. Virtual Reality Therapy: An Effective Treatment for Psychological Disorders. In Stanney K.. editor The Handbook of Virtual Environments Technology (HVET). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2002: 1065-78.
  • 11 Popescu V., Burdea G., Bouzit M., Girone M., Hentz V.. Orthopedic Telerehabilitation with Virtual Force Feedback. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed March 2000; 4 (01) 45-51.
  • 12 Rizzo A., Schultheis M., Mateer C.. Analysis of Assets for Virtual Reality Applications in Neuropsychology. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (in press).