Yearbook of Medical Informatics, Inhaltsverzeichnis Yearb Med Inform 2006; 15(01): 11-15DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638487 Survey Georg Thieme Verlag KG StuttgartSpecial Section: Assessing Information Technologies for Health: Evaluation and Implementation: A Call for Action Autor*innen Institutsangaben J. L. Talmon 1 Department of Medical Informatics, Maastricht University, Maastricht Artikel empfehlen Abstract Volltext als PDF herunterladen(opens in new window) Keywords KeywordsMedical informatics - medical informatics evaluation - assessement Referenzen References 1 Adams ID, Chan M, Clifford PC, Cooke WM, Dallos V, de Dombal FT. et al. Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986; 293 6550 800-4. 2 Willems JL. Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography. J Med Eng Technol 1985; 09 (05) 209-17. 3 Berner ES, Webster GD, Shugerman AA, Jackson JR, Algina J, Baker AL. et al. Performance of four computer-based diagnostic systems. N Engl J Med 1994; 330 (25) 1792-6. 4 Talmon J, Fox J. editors. Knowledge Based Systems in Medicine: Methods, Applications and Evaluation. Berlin: Springer; 1991 5 van Gennip E, Talmon J. editors. Assessment and Evaluation of Information Technologies in Medicine. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995 6 Talmon J, Enning J, Castaneda G, Eurlings F, Hoyer D, Nykanen P. et al. The VATAM guidelines. Int J Med Inform 1999; 56 1-3 107-15. 7 Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Organizational Aspects of Health Informatics: Managing Technological Change. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995 8 Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, Ball MJ, Douglas JV. Transforming Health Care through Information: Case Studies. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995 9 Jørgensen T. Measuring effect. In: van Gennip E, Talmon J. editors. Assessment and Evaluation of Information Technologies in Meicine. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995: 99-109. 10 Stoop AP, Berg M. Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in patient care information system evaluation: guidance for the organizational decision maker. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (04) 458-62. 11 Clarke K, O’Moore R, Smeets R, Talmon J, Brender J, McNair P. et al. A methodology for evaluation of knowledge-based systems in medicine. Artif Intell Med 1994; 06 (02) 107-21. 12 Brender J, Talmon J, Nykanen P, McNair P, Demeester M, Beuscart R. On the Evaluation of System Integration. In: van Gennip E, Talmon J. editors. Assessment and Evaluation of Information Technologies in Medicine. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995: 189-208. 13 Kaplan B, Shaw NT. Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational, and social issues. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (03) 215-31. 14 Berg M, Aarts J, van der Lei J. ICT in health care: sociotechnical approaches. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (04) 297-301. 15 Ammenwerth E, Brender J, Nykanen P, Prokosch HU, Rigby M, Talmon J. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73 (06) 479-91. 16 Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (01) 44-56. 17 Bend J. Public Value and e-Health. In: Insitute for Public Policy Research 2004 18 Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. editors. To err is human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2000 19 Medicine Io. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC: National Academic Press; 2001 20 Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio AR, Kimmel SE. et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. Jama 2005; 293 (10) 1197-203. 21 Shortliffe EH. CPOE and the facilitation of medication errors. J Biomed Inform 2005; 38 (04) 257-8. 22 Bates DW. Computerized physician order entry and medication errors: finding a balance. J Biomed Inform 2005; 38 (04) 259-61. 23 Nemeth C, Cook R. Hiding in plain sight: what Koppel et al. tell us about healthcare IT. J Biomed Inform 2005; 38 (04) 262-3. 24 Horsky J, Zhang J, Patel VL. To err is not entirely human: complex technology and user cognition. J Biomed Inform 2005; 38 (04) 264-6. 25 Briggs R, deVreede G-J, Nunamaker J, Sprague R. Special issue: Information systems success. editorial. J Management Information Systems 2003; 19 (04) 5-8. 26 Scott JT, Rundall TG, Vogt TM, Hsu J. Kaiser Permanente’s experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study. Bmj 2005; 331 7528 1313-6. 27 Brender J, Ammenwerth E, Nykanen P, Talmon J. Factors influencing success and failure of health informatics systems—a pilot Delphi study. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (01) 125-36. 28 Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, Clark RS, Watson RS, Nguyen TC. et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (06) 1506-12. 29 Tenner E. Why things bite back: technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. NewYork, NY: Vintage Books; 1997 30 de Keizer N, Ammenwerth E. Trends in Evaluation Research 1982 - 2002: A Study on how the Quality of IT Evaluation Studies Develop. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 581-6. 31 Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I. et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. Jama 1996; 276 (08) 637-9.