Yearbook of Medical Informatics, Table of Contents Yearb Med Inform 2006; 15(01): 5-10DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638488 Keynote Georg Thieme Verlag KG StuttgartAssessment of Education and Research in Biomedical Informatics Authors Author Affiliations J.H. van Bemmel 1 Erasmus University and Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Recommend Article Abstract Full Text PDF Download(opens in new window) Keywords KeywordsResearch - education - biomedicine - assessment - peer review - quality management References References 1 See http://www.iso.org/iso 2 See, e.g. http://www.hero.ac.uk/uk/research http://www.qanu.nl http://www.stratresearch.se http://www.inserm.fr/fr/inserm/evaluation http://www.dfg.de/ranking 3 See http://www.fda.gov/oc/gcp 4 See http://www.htai.org 5 Yu VL, Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH, Wraith SM, Davis R, Scott AC. et al. Evaluating the performance of a computer-based consultant. Comp Progr Biomed 1979; 09: 95-102. (This is early work, done in Stanford) 6 Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L. A metaanalysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computerbased clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 03: 399-409. 7 Miller RA, Pople Jr HE, Myers JD. INTERNIST-1, An Experimental Computer-based Diagnostic Consultant for General Internal Medicine. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 468-76. (This is early work, done in Pittsburgh) 8 Krishna S, Balas EA, Spencer DC, Griffin JZ, Boren SA. Clinical trials of interactive computerized patient education: implications for family practice. J Fam Pract 1997; 45 (01) 25-33. 9 Tierney WM, McDonald CJ. Testing informatics innovations: the value of negative trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; Sep-Oct; 03 (05) 358-9. 10 Dexter PD, Wolinsky FD, Gramelspacher GP, Zhou XH, Eckert GJ, Waisburd M. et al. Effectiveness of computer-generated reminders for increasing discussions about advance directives and completion of advance directive forms. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 102-10. 11 Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 1998; 280: 1360-1. 12 Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J. et al. Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes. A Systematic Review. JAMA 2005; 293: 1223-38. 13 Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, van Bemmel JH, Brohet C, Degani R. et al. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 1767-73. 14 Van der Lei J, Van der Does E, Man in ’t Veld AJ, Musen MA, Van Bemmel JH. Response of general practitioners to computer-generated critiques of hypertension therapy. Methods Inf Med 1993; 32: 146-53. 15 Van Wijk MA, van der Lei J, Mosseveld M, Bohnen AM, van Bemmel JH. Assessment of decision support for blood test ordering in primary care. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 274-81. 16 Ammenwerth E, De Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care: Trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 44-56. 17 See, e.g., National Academy of Science. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2004 18 www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esys/4assess.htm 19 See www.knaw.nl 20 See www.efqm.org 21 See www.nwo.nl 22 http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/fp6
