Yearbook of Medical Informatics, Table of Contents Yearb Med Inform 2013; 22(01): 103-106DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638839 Original Article Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart eHealth in North America E. M. Borycki 1 School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada 2 Canada's Health Informatics Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada , D. Newsham 2 Canada's Health Informatics Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada , D. W. Bates 3 Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA › Author Affiliations Recommend Article Abstract Full Text PDF Download Keywords KeywordsElectronic health record - adoption - diffusion of innovation - national programs References References 1 Blumenthal D. Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information Technology. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 1477-9. 2 Canada Health Infoway. Reporting to Canadians: Annual report 2009-2010.. 3 Rich P. How are we doing? Reported IT use in the National Physician Survey?. Future Practice Canadian Medical Association; 2004 4 Schoen C. et al. A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: Perspectives on care, costs, And experiences. 2009 p. w1171-83. 5 Canada Health Infoway. 2013-2014 Summary corporate plan. Available from www.infoway-inforoute.ca 6 Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty MM, Rasmussen P, Pierson R. et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff. 2012 Available from http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/12/2805.full?key-type=ref&siteid=healthaff&ijkey=Wx1r2YCsnJVL 7 Canada Health Infoway. Advancing Canada's next generation of healthcare. 2011 b. 8 Canada Health Infoway. Toward critical mass: Moving from availability to adoption. Canada Health Infoway annual report. 2011 c. 9 DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, Donelan K, Ferris TG, Jha A. et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care-- a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 (1) 50-60. 10 Lewis Dolan P. EMR Adoption Rates Up, wIth Small Practices Left Behind. American Medical News; 2010 11 Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG. Use ofelectronic health records in U. S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (16) 1628-38. 12 Health Canada, H. Health Care System. 2009 [cited 20110ct 12] Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/index-eng.php 13 Canada Health Infoway, Canadian Health Information Management Association, Canada's Health Informatics Association, Information and Communication Technology Council, Information Technology Association of Canada — Health. Health informatics and health information managment human resources repor. 2009 14 Canada's Health Informatics Asociation and Canadian Telehealth Forum. Canadian telehealth report. 2010 15 Government of Alberta. Alberta Netcareinformation. 1995-2011. [cited 2011 Nov 8] Available from: http://www.albertanetcare.ca72.htm 16 Government of Alberta. 2012 municipal affairs population list. Edmonton, Alberta: 2012 17 Government of Alberta. Registries. 2013 [cited 2013 April 29] Available from: http:/www.albertanetcare.ca/211.htm 18 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2011 [cited 2011 Oct 31] Available from: http:/www.cms.gov 19 Blumenthal D. ONC Seeks Comment on the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan 2011-2015. Health IT Buzz; 2011 20 Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (6) 501-4. 21 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). 2011 Available from: http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/community/healthit_hhs_govonc/1200 22 Bates DW. Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Aff 2005; 24 (5) 1180-9. 23 Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Jha AK. A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154 (10) 666-71. 24 Friedman CP. NCVHS Update on ONC Activities. US Department of Health and Human Services: Office of the National Coordinator; 2009 25 Tang P. HIT Policy Committee: Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; Washington, D.C.: 2009 26 Electronic Health Records and Meaningful Use. 2011 Available from: http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/community/healthit_hhs_gov__meaningful_use_announcement/2996 27 Monthly Meeting. in HIT Policy Committee. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, D.C.: 2011 28 Regional Extension Centers. 2011 Available from: http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/community/ealthit_hhs_govlisting_of_regional_exten- ion_centers/3519 29 Maxson ER, Jain SH, McKethan AN, Brammer C, Buntin MB, Cronin K. et al. Beacon communities aim to use health information technology to transform the delivery of care. Health Aff 2010; 29 (9) 1671-7. 30 Bloomrosen M, Starren J, Lorenzi NM, Ash JS, Patel VL, Shortliffe EH. Anticipating and addressing the unintended consequences ofhealth IT and policy: a report from the AMIA 2009 Health Policy Meeting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (1) 82-90. 31 Liang LL. editor. Connected for Health: Transforming Care Delivery at Kaiser Permanente. Marblehead, MA: John Wiley & Sons; 2010 32 Zhou YY, Kanter MH, Wang JJ, Garrido T. Improved quality at Kaiser Permanente through e-mail between physicians and patients. Health Aff 2010; 29 (7) 1370-5. 33 Experience Health 2010 Annual Report, 2010. Oakland, CA: Kaiser Permanente; 2010 34 Canada Health Infoway. Infowa certification services expands to include electronic medical records (EMRs). 2011 [ Cited 2011 Nov 8]; Available from https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/lang-en/about-infoway/news/news-releases/743-in-foway-certification-services-expands-to-include-electronic-medical-records-emr
