J Knee Surg 2019; 32(03): 222-226
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641138
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Ten-Year Results of the Press Fit Condylar Sigma Cobalt–Chrome Total Knee Replacement

Oisin Keenan
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, Fife, United Kingdom
,
Ivan Brenkel
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, Fife, United Kingdom
,
Phil Walmsley
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, Fife, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 November 2017

25 February 2018

Publication Date:
10 April 2018 (online)

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is reliant on safe and effective implants. The Press Fit Condylar Sigma Cobalt–Chrome (PFCSCC) was introduced in 2006, but no reports have examined long-term failure rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The primary aim of this study was to assess survival outcomes of the PFCSCC at 10 years after implantation. Prospective data collection was performed on all patients undergoing primary TKA in one orthopaedic department using this prosthesis exclusively from February 1, 2006, to January 31, 2007. Follow-up was at 10 years. Survival analysis was performed using two primary outcome measures: (1) all-cause joint revision and (2) aseptic revision. Secondary outcomes measures included the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). In total, 249 knees of 233 patients underwent primary TKA. Mean patient age was 66.7 years (range 34–80), and mean body mass index (BMI) was 30 kg/m2 (20.7–40.1). Reviewing all causes of revisions, 14 joints (5.6%) of 14 patients required reoperation. Of these, nine were for deep infection, including six in the first year. Four (1.6%) underwent aseptic revision. Mean AKSS changed from 47.6 to 90.4 (n = 140; p < 0.001) at 10 years, and mean OKS changed from 38.3 to 23.2 (n = 149; p < 0.001). Prospective analysis of consecutive TKA cases using this design of prosthesis demonstrated high survival rates of 94.4% (all-cause revision) and 98.4% (aseptic revision) at 10 years. Postoperative gains in PROMs were sustained at 10 years. These real-world data represent a substantial extension to previous reports for the PFCSCC and suggest that it is not prone to late mechanical failure.

 
  • References

  • 1 Digital NHS. 2016. Finalised Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in England - April 2014 to March 2015. Available at: http://content.digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB21189 . Accessed July 30, 2017
  • 2 The National Joint Registry Editorial Board. 13th annual report of the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Hemel, Hempstead: National Joint Registry; 2016. . Available at: http://www.njrreports.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2013th%20Annual(%20Report%202016.pdf . Accessed November 1, 2017
  • 3 Patil SS, Branovacki G, Martin MR, Pulido PA, Levy YD, Colwell Jr CW. 14-year median follow-up using the press-fit condylar sigma design for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (08) 1286-1290
  • 4 Patil S, McCauley JC, Pulido P, Colwell Jr CW. How do knee implants perform past the second decade? Nineteen- to 25-year followup of the Press-fit Condylar design TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (01) 135-140
  • 5 Wood A, McIlwain L, Arthur C. , et al. PFC Sigma Cobalt-Chrome total knee replacement: early outcomes demonstrate no significant early failures at the three-year mark. Open J Orthop 2014; 4: 1-6
  • 6 DePuy Synthes. Sigma Total Knee System. Leeds, England: Depuy Synthes; 2017. . Available at: https://www.depuysynthes.com/hcp/knee/products/qs/SIGMA-Total-Knee-System#tab2
  • 7 Hinrichs F, Kuhl M, Boudriot U, Griss P. A comparative clinical outcome evaluation of smooth (10–13 year results) versus rough surface finish (5–8 year results) in an otherwise identically designed cemented titanium alloy stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003; 123 (06) 268-272
  • 8 Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248) 13-14
  • 9 Bennett P. A comparison of methods used for the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease among orthopaedic surgeons at Wolverhampton, United Kingdom and Auckland, New Zealand. J R Nav Med Serv 2009; 95 (02) 81-88
  • 10 Arthur CA, Wood AM, Keenan ACM, Clayton RAE, Brenkel IJ. Ten-year results of the Press Fit Condylar Sigma total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2013; 95 (B2): 1-4
  • 11 Bettinson KA, Pinder IM, Moran CG, Weir DJ, Lingard EA. All-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty at ten years. A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (07) 1587-1594
  • 12 Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Ten-year follow-up of a rotating-platform, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (05) 426-432
  • 13 Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS. High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: survivorship and prevalence of osteolysis: results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (15) 1378-1384
  • 14 Sando T, McCalden RW, Bourne RB, MacDonald SJ, Somerville LE. Ten-year results comparing posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (02) 210-215
  • 15 Ahmed I, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Watanabe H, Roe JP, Pinczewski LA. Total knee arthroplasty with an oxidised zirconium femoral component: ten-year survivorship analysis. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (01) 58-64
  • 16 Maniar RN, Singhi T, Maniar PR, Kumar V. Ten- to 13-year results of mobile bearing posterior-stabilized rotating-platform knee implants, reported by nondesigner surgeon. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (03) 830-835
  • 17 Mayne A, Harshavardhan HP, Johnston LR, Wang W, Jariwala A. Cruciate retaining compared with Posterior Stabilised Nexgen total knee arthroplasty: results at 10 years in a matched cohort. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2017; 99 (08) 602-606
  • 18 Beyond Compliance. Available at: http://www.beyondcompliance.org.uk . Accessed September 31, 2016