Keywords
scapholunate dissociation - scaphoid - lunate
Scapholunate dissociation can occur after a fall on an outstretched hand and is seen
as gapping between the scaphoid and lunate and as changes in their angular alignment
in the sagittal plane.[1] Surgical reconstruction of the torn scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) is
performed to reduce the gap and restore the normal alignment of the bones.[1] Several studies have shown that scaphoid pronation ([Fig. 1]) occurs following SLIL tears.[2]
[3] Salva-Coll et al[3] identified the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) muscle as causing scaphoid pronation
especially in wrists with scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC). Based on their study
using static tendon loading, the authors suggested that in the presence of SLAC, one
should avoid ECU muscle contraction.
Fig. 1 Transverse and volar views of the scaphoid, lunate, distal radius, and ulna, with
the wrist in a neutral flexion/extension and neutral radioulnar deviation position.
The left column of images shows the position of the scaphoid and lunate with all ligaments
intact, the middle column following sectioning of the scapholunate interosseous ligament,
radioscaphocapitate ligament, and scaphotrapezial ligament, and the right column after
1,000 cycles of wrist motion following ligament sectioning. These models do not include
cartilage; therefore, when the ligaments are intact, a slight gap between the subchondral
bone surfaces is visible. In this illustrative arm, after 1,000 cycles of motion,
the scaphoid pronates. The direction of lunate supination is shown to illustrate this
direction. (Adapted with permission from Short et al.[5])
Several studies[4]
[5]
[6] have examined changes in scaphoid flexion/extension and radioulnar deviation during
wrist motion following simulated SLIL tears. Less is known about scaphoid and lunate
supination and pronation. Information about these changes may explain why some reconstructions
have failed and lead to the development of new techniques.
The purpose of this study was to (1) compare changes in scaphoid pronation and lunate
supination during dynamic wrist motions after different groups of ligamentous stabilizers
between the scaphoid and lunate were sectioned and (2) determine whether the ECU tendon
force is greater following SLIL sectioning. Our hypotheses were that following ligamentous
sectioning, greater ECU forces would be required to achieve the same wrist motions
and that scaphoid pronation and lunate supination would be greater following SLIL
sectioning.
Materials and Methods
Data from 37 fresh cadaver wrists (average 68 years, 20 males, 17 females) previously
tested in a computer-controlled wrist joint motion simulator were analyzed. In the
original studies,[4]
[5]
[6] a sample size of eight wrists had been determined to have sufficient power to detect
changes in scaphoid and lunate motion when different stabilizing ligaments were sectioned
in different sequences.
Each wrist was prepared by identifying five wrist tendons (ECU, extensor carpi radialis
brevis, extensor carpi radialis longus, flexor carpi radialis, and flexor carpi ulnaris).
By pulling on these tendons with individual servo actuators, each wrist was cyclically
moved through a flexion/extension motion, a radioulnar deviation motion, and a dart-throwing
motion.[4]
[7]
Electromagnetic motion sensors were attached to the scaphoid, lunate, and third metacarpal
so that the motion of each bone was recorded during each wrist motion relative to
a fourth sensor attached to the distal radius. The accuracy of these sensors in this
setting was previously reported to be 0.2 degrees and 0.2 mm.[8] Data were acquired with the wrist intact in all 37 wrists and then in 22 after 1,000
cycles of repetitive motion following sectioning of the SLIL and two volar ligaments,
the scaphotrapezial ligament (STT) and the radioscaphocapitate ligament (RSC). In
the remaining 15 wrists, data were collected after sectioning three ligaments; the
dorsal intercarpal ligament (DIC), the dorsal radiocarpal ligament (DRC), and the
SLIL, followed by 1000 cycles of motion.
The SLIL was sectioned midway between the scaphoid and lunate and included all three
sections of the ligament. The STT and RSC ligaments were sectioned halfway between
their origin and insertion. The DRC was sectioned at its origin on the radius. The
DIC was sectioned as the DIC traversed between the scaphoid and capitate. During each
motion, the tendon forces required to achieve each motion were also measured. During
the fourth cycle of each motion, at every 12 ms, the percent ratio of the ECU force
to the sum of all tendon forces was determined. The average ratio over the cycle and
the ratio at the maximums at each extreme of motion were determined. Similarly, for
each motion, the amount of scaphoid and lunate pronation relative to the third metacarpal
pronation/supination angle was determined. Changes in carpal motion were computed
on average over the fourth cycle of wrist motion, the largest change, and the change
at specific extremes of wrist motion.
A mixed-mode two-way analysis of variance was used to compare differences in the collected
data between the intact wrist and after ligamentous sectioning and between the two
groups of sectioned ligaments.
Results
Scaphoid pronation significantly increased with ligamentous sectioning during each
wrist motion. During the wrist flexion/extension motion ([Table 1]) and the dart-throwing motion ([Table 2]), there were significant increases (p < 0.004) in all of the cases shown in each table (at the extremes of wrist motion,
for the average over the wrist motion, and for the largest increase during the motion
compared with before sectioning). During the radioulnar deviation motion, there were
significant increases (p < 0.019) for all cases shown in [Table 3], except at maximum ulnar deviation (p = 0.63).
Table 1
Average increase in scaphoid pronation and lunate supination after ligamentous sectioning
(degree) during the wrist flexion/extension motion
|
Average over cycle of motion
|
At max wrist flexion
|
At max wrist extension
|
Largest increase during motion
|
|
Scaphoid pronation after SLIL and volar ligaments cut
|
3.5 (4.7)
|
3.1 (3.4)
|
3.1 (6.5)
|
7 (4.3)
|
|
Scaphoid pronation after SLIL and dorsal ligaments cut
|
2.9 (2.7)
|
2.3 (3.5)
|
2.4 (2)
|
6.2 (3.2)
|
|
Lunate supination after SLIL and volar ligaments cut
|
–0.2 (2.3)
|
–2.7 (3)
|
0.2 (2.3)
|
3.1 (3.9)
|
|
Lunate supination after SLIL and dorsal ligaments cut
|
2.7 (2.3)
|
2.7 (2.9)
|
1.8 (2.4)
|
5.6 (3.2)
|
Abbreviation: SLIL, scapholunate interosseous ligament.
Note: Standard deviation is given in parentheses.
Table 2
Average increase in scaphoid pronation and lunate supination after ligamentous sectioning
(degree) during the dart-throwing motion
|
Average over cycle of motion
|
At max wrist flexion
|
At max wrist extension
|
Largest increase during motion
|
|
Scaphoid pronation after SLIL and volar ligaments cut
|
2.8 (4.7)
|
2.2 (3.9)
|
3.2 (5.2)
|
6.1 (3.9)
|
|
Scaphoid pronation after SLIL and dorsal ligaments cut
|
2.9 (2.1)
|
3.6 (2.9)
|
1.7 (1.2)
|
5.3 (3)
|
|
Lunate supination after SLIL and volar ligaments cut
|
0.3 (2.2)
|
–0.6 (2.1)
|
0.5 (2.3)
|
2.5 (3.3)
|
|
Lunate supination after SLIL and dorsal ligaments cut
|
2.2 (2.4)
|
1.7 (2.5)
|
1.8 (2.7)
|
4 (2.7)
|
Abbreviation: SLIL, scapholunate interosseous ligament.
Note: Standard deviation is given in parentheses.
Table 3
Average increase in scaphoid pronation and lunate supination after ligamentous sectioning
(degree) during the wrist radioulnar deviation motion
|
Average over cycle of motion
|
At max wrist radial deviation
|
At max wrist ulnar deviation
|
Largest increase during motion
|
|
Scaphoid pronation after SLIL and volar ligaments cut
|
1.8 (5.9)
|
5.1 (6)
|
–2 (6.3)
|
6.5 (4.7)
|
|
Scaphoid pronation after SLIL and dorsal ligaments cut
|
2.2 (3)
|
2.1 (2.4)
|
1.1 (4.8)
|
4.8 (3.2)
|
|
Lunate supination after SLIL and volar ligaments cut
|
0.3 (2.2)
|
1 (2.9)
|
–0.6 (2.7)
|
2.2 (2.7)
|
|
Lunate supination after SLIL and dorsal ligaments cut
|
2.5 (2.9)
|
2.8 (3.4)
|
1.5 (2.6)
|
4 (3.1)
|
Abbreviation: SLIL, scapholunate interosseous ligament.
Note: Standard deviation is given in parentheses.
There was also a significant increase in lunate supination with ligamentous sectioning
at maximum wrist extension (p = 0.015) and for the largest increase during the motion (p = 0.001) during the wrist flexion/extension motion ([Table 1]). There were also significant increases for all cases shown in [Table 3] during the radioulnar deviation motion (p < 0.002, except at maximum ulnar deviation). During the dart-throwing motion ([Table 2]), there were again significant increases in lunate supination (p < 0.009, except at maximum flexion).
There was no significant difference in the increase of scaphoid pronation between
the two groups of sectioned ligaments in any of the cases in [Tables 1], [2], or [3] during the wrist flexion/extension motion (p > 0.52), during the radioulnar deviation motion (p > 0.08), and during the dart-throwing motion (p > 0.28). However, there was a significant difference in the amount of lunate supination
between the two groups of sectioned ligaments during the wrist flexion/extension motion
at maximum wrist flexion (p = 0.001), at maximum wrist extension (p = 0.048), and for the average over the wrist motion (p = 0.001). There was a significant difference between the two groups of ligaments
during the wrist radioulnar deviation motion for the average over the wrist motion
(p = 0.012) and at maximum ulnar deviation (p = 0.021). There was also a significant difference between the two groups of ligaments
during the dart-throwing motion for the average over the wrist motion (p = 0.019) and at maximum extension (p = 0.005).
Greater percentage ECU forces were required with ligamentous sectioning to achieve
the same wrist motions ([Table 4], p < 0.013 for all three wrist motions). No significant differences were observed between
the two sectioned groups of ligaments (p > 0.30).
Table 4
Average increase in the ECU force as percent of all tendon forces after ligamentous
sectioning during the three wrist motions
|
During wrist flexion/extension motion
|
During wrist radioulnar deviation motion
|
During wrist dart-throwing motion
|
|
At max wrist extension
|
At max wrist ulnar deviation
|
At max flexion and ulnar deviation
|
|
With SLIL and volar ligaments cut
|
5.6 (11.1)
|
10.5 (11.4)
|
7.4 (9.6)
|
|
With SLIL and dorsal ligaments cut
|
2.4 (5.9)
|
10.6 (9.9)
|
12.5 (8.5)
|
Abbreviations: ECU, extensor carpi ulnaris; SLIL, scapholunate interosseous ligament.
Note: Standard deviation is given in parentheses.
Discussion
The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether scaphoid pronation and
lunate supination increased following simulated injury to various scapholunate stabilizers.
Our results demonstrate that there is increased scaphoid pronation and lunate supination
during each of the tested wrist motions for most of the parameters considered (average,
maximum, and at the end points of motion). The second purpose of this study was to
determine whether the ECU tendon force needs to be greater to achieve the same motions
as before ligamentous sectioning. This was also shown to occur.
One limitation of this study is that the results are based on sectioning ligaments
to simulate injury and in the absence of any healing that would occur in vivo. However,
each arm served as its own control, which strengthens the findings.
In this study, we found that the scaphoid pronated and the lunate supinated with sectioning
of the SLIL and secondary stabilizing structures. Short et al[2] also found the scaphoid pronated with SLIL sectioning but did not see a change in
lunate supination/pronation, perhaps due to them not sectioning any secondary ligaments.
In this study, the changes in lunate supination were significantly related to which
set of secondary ligaments was sectioned. This may imply that there are different
types of SLIL instabilities.
Greater ECU tendon forces were required after ligamentous sectioning to cause the
wrist to go through the same dynamic wrist motions. Salva-Coll et al[3] identified the ECU muscle as causing scaphoid pronation especially in wrists with
SLAC. In our study, there appears to be an association between increased ECU force
and scaphoid pronation, but it is unclear which is the cause and which is the effect.
It is the authors' opinion that the cause for the increase in scaphoid pronation and
lunate supination is decreased ligamentous restraints and the indirect forces on these
carpal bones from the forces applied to the wrist tendons. It may be that after ligament
sectioning, the scaphoid and lunate motion is more under the control of the bony geometry.[9] In the intact specimen, ligamentous restraints control carpal bone position. It
is our conclusion that after ligament sectioning, there is a change in position of
the scaphoid and lunate, which necessitates altering the forces on the wrist tendons
to maintain the same wrist motion. The data also suggest that there may be several
variations of scapholunate instability, depending upon which ligaments are sectioned.
These results that show the forces causing the scaphoid to pronate and pull away from
the lunate may provide a reason why some methods used to repair or reconstruct the
dorsal SLIL have had limited success. When performing a surgical repair or reconstruction
to reduce the scaphoid and lunate, one might want to consider that the scaphoid may
have pronated following injury. This type of separation may be a greater problem following
injury to the dorsal stabilizers.
