Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2019; 36(01): 053-061
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1660467
SMFM Fellowship Series Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Mode of Delivery in Previable Births

Robert M. Rossi
1   Center for Prevention of Preterm Birth, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
2   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Emily A. DeFranco
1   Center for Prevention of Preterm Birth, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
2   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported by the Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; March of Dimes Grant 22-FY14–470
Further Information

Publication History

28 November 2017

02 May 2018

Publication Date:
08 June 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Preterm birth before 23 weeks of gestation typically results in neonatal death (5% survival). Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists published consensus guidelines recommending cesarean delivery (CD) not be performed for fetal indications between 20 and 226/7 weeks given the lack of proven benefit. We sought to quantify the previable CD rate and identify characteristics associated with previable CD.

Methods We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study of all live births in Ohio (2006–2015). Frequency of previable CD was stratified by week of gestation, defined as delivery between 16 and < 23 weeks of gestation. Maternal, obstetric, and neonatal characteristics were compared between women who underwent vaginal delivery versus CD. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the relative influence of maternal and fetal factors on the outcome of CD among previable live births.

Results Of 1,463,506 live births in Ohio during the 10-year study period, 2,865 births (0.2%) occurred during the previable period of 16 to 22 weeks. Nearly 1 in 10 live births at less than 23 weeks was delivered by cesarean (n = 273/2,865), CD rate 9.5% (95% confidence interval, 8.5–10.7). At 16 to 22 weeks of gestation, the CD rates were 0, 5.5, 7.6, 3.5, 5.4, 10.1, and 15.1%, respectively. Factors associated with CD included increasing parity, increasing birth weight, maternal corticosteroid administration, and fetal malpresentation. Previable neonates born by CD were more likely to be admitted to the NICU, receive ventilator support, and more likely to be living at the time of birth certificate filing.

Conclusion Nearly 1 out of 10 births during the previable period was delivered via cesarean. Factors associated with previable CD suggest intent for neonatal interventions, such as NICU admission and supportive therapies. Our findings support that education and adherence with guidelines for care of previable births are a potential area of focus for perinatal quality improvement efforts.

Keywords

previable - cesarean - mode of delivery

Note

This study was presented as a poster at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's 37th Annual Pregnancy Meeting, January 23–28, 2017, Las Vegas, NV, Poster Abstract # 831. This study includes data provided by the Ohio Department of Health, which should not be considered an endorsement of this study or its conclusions.


 

  • References

  • 1 Obstetric Care Consensus No. 4: periviable birth. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127 (06) e157-e169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Alfirevic Z, Milan SJ, Livio S. Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (09) CD000078
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wylie BJ, Davidson LL, Batra M, Reed SD. Method of delivery and neonatal outcome in very low-birthweight vertex-presenting fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198 (06) 640.e1-640.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kayem G, Baumann R, Goffinet F. , et al. Early preterm breech delivery: is a policy of planned vaginal delivery associated with increased risk of neonatal death?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198 (03) 289.e1-289.e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tucker Edmonds B, McKenzie F, Macheras M, Srinivas SK, Lorch SA. Morbidity and mortality associated with mode of delivery for breech periviable deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (01) 70.e1-70.e12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 National Center for Health Statistics. Guide to Completing the Facility Worksheets for the Certificate of Live Birth and Report of Fetal Death (2003 Revision). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 7 National Center for Health Statistics. 2003 Revisions of the U.S. Standard Certificates of Live Birth. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdf . Accessed August 2016
    PubMed
  • 8 Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer SE, Gregory EC. Measuring gestational age in vital statistics data: transitioning to the obstetric estimate. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015; 64 (05) 1-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87 (02) 163-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000; 894: i-xii , 1–253
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Szklo M, Nieto F. Identifying Noncausal Associations: Confounding. J Epidemiology: Beyond the basics. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2014: 159-160
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (05) 1181-1193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (03) 693-711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ. , et al. Births: Final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60/nvsr60_01.pdf . Accessed November 29, 2011
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Optimizing Antenatal Use of Steroids to Improve Outcomes for Preterm Infants. Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative. Available at: https://opqc.net/sites/bmidrupalpopqc.chmcres.cchmc.org/files/ANCS/Tools/ANCS%20Toolkit_110614.pdf . Accessed August 1, 2017
    PubMed
  • 16 Reichman NE, Schwartz-Soicher O. Accuracy of birth certificate data by risk factors and outcomes: analysis of data from New Jersey. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197 (01) 32.e1-32.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Dietz PM, Bombard JM, Hutchings YL. , et al. Validation of obstetric estimate of gestational age on US birth certificates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (04) 335.e1-335.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dietz PM, Bombard JM, Hutchings YL. , et al. Validation of obstetric estimate of gestational age on US birth certificates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (04) 335.e1-335.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Duryea EL, Hawkins JS, McIntire DD, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. A revised birth weight reference for the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (01) 16-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar