Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1668115
Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histological Comparison of Normal Canine Menisci
Funding The HSS MRI Laboratory receives institutional research support from General Electric Healthcare; however, no funding was provided for this study.Publication History
21 March 2018
09 June 2018
Publication Date:
22 October 2018 (online)
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this observational study was to establish normative data for the canine menisci using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Methods Ten fresh stifles from five normal male Beagles were obtained from animals with no known lameness. Conventional MRI and ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging were performed and T2* values calculated. Five stifles were assessed histologically.
Results The caudal horn of the medial meniscus had significantly prolonged T2* values (4.6 ± 1.27 ms; p = 0.002) as compared with the cranial horn of the medial meniscus (3.25 ± 0.86 ms), and the cranial (3.06 ± 0.54 ms) and caudal (3.64 ± 0.72 ms) horns of the lateral meniscus. Histology demonstrated normal tibial, femoral, interior and peripheral meniscal margins, and normal cellularity. The medial meniscus was noted to be obliquely oriented to the scan plane compared with the relatively perpendicular orientation of the lateral meniscus as compared with the bore of the magnet in a limb-extended orientation.
Clinical Significance Variability of MRI UTE T2* is seen in the normal canine meniscus, with prolongation of the caudal horn, medial meniscus. Prolongation may be due to magic angle effects, as the medial meniscus of the Beagle is not perpendicular to the axis of the main magnetic field. Canine meniscal injury is a common sequela to cruciate tear, and detecting meniscal damage is important for directing patient care. The non-invasive quantitative MRI technique of UTE imaging can be used for the evaluation of collagen orientation, while acknowledging inherent regions of prolongation.
Author Contributions
Sarah L. Pownder, Kei Hayashi, Ryan E. Breighner and Matthew F. Koff contributed to conception of study, study design, and acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. Brian G. Caserto and Mary Lou Norman contributed to acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. Hollis G. Potter contributed to conception of study and acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.
-
References
- 1 Franklin SP, Gilley RS, Palmer RH. Meniscal injury in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Compend Contin Educ Vet 2010; 32 (10) E1-E10 , quiz E11
- 2 Libicher M, Ivancic M, Hoffmann M, Wenz W. Early changes in experimental osteoarthritis using the Pond-Nuki dog model: technical procedure and initial results of in vivo MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2005; 15 (02) 390-394
- 3 Starborg T, Lu Y, Kadler KE, Holmes DF. Electron microscopy of collagen fibril structure in vitro and in vivo including three-dimensional reconstruction. Methods Cell Biol 2008; 88: 319-345
- 4 Noone TJ, Millis DL, Korvick DL. , et al. Influence of canine recombinant somatotropin hormone on biomechanical and biochemical properties of the medial meniscus in stifles with altered stability. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63 (03) 419-426
- 5 Chevrier A, Nelea M, Hurtig MB, Hoemann CD, Buschmann MD. Meniscus structure in human, sheep, and rabbit for animal models of meniscus repair. J Orthop Res 2009; 27 (09) 1197-1203
- 6 Villegas DF, Donahue TL. Collagen morphology in human meniscal attachments: a SEM study. Connect Tissue Res 2010; 51 (05) 327-336
- 7 Martig S, Konar M, Schmökel HG. , et al. Low-field MRI and arthroscopy of meniscal lesions in ten dogs with experimentally induced cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47 (06) 515-522
- 8 Olive J, d'Anjou MA, Cabassu J, Chailleux N, Blond L. Fast presurgical magnetic resonance imaging of meniscal tears and concurrent subchondral bone marrow lesions. Study of dogs with naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27 (01) 1-7
- 9 Harper TA, Jones JC, Saunders GK, Daniel GB, Leroith T, Rossmeissl E. Sensitivity of low-field T2 images for detecting the presence and severity of histopathologic meniscal lesions in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011; 52 (04) 428-435
- 10 Du J, Takahashi AM, Chung CB. Ultrashort TE spectroscopic imaging (UTESI): application to the imaging of short T2 relaxation tissues in the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29 (02) 412-421
- 11 Robson MD, Gatehouse PD, Bydder M, Bydder GM. Magnetic resonance: an introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003; 27 (06) 825-846
- 12 Koff MF, Shah P, Pownder S. , et al. Correlation of meniscal T2* with multiphoton microscopy, and change of articular cartilage T2 in an ovine model of meniscal repair. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21 (08) 1083-1091
- 13 Englund M, Guermazi A, Roemer FW. , et al. Meniscal tear in knees without surgery and the development of radiographic osteoarthritis among middle-aged and elderly persons: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60 (03) 831-839
- 14 Pauli C, Grogan SP, Patil S. , et al. Macroscopic and histopathologic analysis of human knee menisci in aging and osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19 (09) 1132-1141
- 15 Cignoni P, Callieri M, Corsini M, Dellepiane M, Ganovelli F, Ranzuglia G. . MeshLab: an Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool, Sixth Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference, 2008: 129–136
- 16 Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC. , et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006; 31 (03) 1116-1128
- 17 Kirsch S, Kreinest M, Reisig G, Schwarz ML, Ströbel P, Schad LR. In vitro mapping of 1H ultrashort T2* and T2 of porcine menisci. NMR Biomed 2013; 26 (09) 1167-1175
- 18 Peterfy CG, Janzen DL, Tirman PF, van Dijke CF, Pollack M, Genant HK. “Magic-angle” phenomenon: a cause of increased signal in the normal lateral meniscus on short-TE MR images of the knee. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163 (01) 149-154