Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is widely used to control menopausal-related vasomotor
symptoms and genitourinary syndrome, and to prevent the onset of osteoporosis and
bone fractures. The benefits of HRT are most likely when it is started early in women
aged < 60 years or who are within 10 years of menopause onset.[1]
However, an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been described in patients
receiving HRT, and a rapidly growing body of evidence on this argument is available.[2]
[3]
This risk seems to be attributable to an effect of sex hormones on coagulation and
fibrinolysis systems, by increasing blood coagulation factors and reducing inhibitors
such as anti-thrombin and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 ([Fig. 1]).[4]
[5]
Fig. 1 Effect of sex hormones on coagulation and fibrinolysis systems. F, factor; F1 + 2,
pro-thrombin fragment 1 + 2; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; TFPI, tissue
factor pathway inhibitor; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator; uPA, urokinase.
Recent evidence suggested that oral versus non-oral HRT (i.e. transdermal) is associated
with an increased risk of VTE with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.66 (95% confidence interval
[CI], 1.39–1.98).[2] This increased risk of VTE was observed both in users of oral oestrogen only (OR,
1.43, 95% CI, 1.34–1.53) and of combined oral oestrogen–progestin HRT (OR, 2.35, 95%
CI, 1.9–2.9).[2] Interestingly, non-oral HRT was not associated with VTE, regardless of the type
of hormone considered.[2] Regarding the type of HRT, it is known that the addition of progestin to oestrogen
(opposed oestrogen) reduces the risk of ovarian cancer,[6] and is currently the gold standard HRT for women with a uterus.[7] Results from the Women's Health Initiative oestrogen plus progestin clinical trial
showed that oestrogen plus progestin oral administration was associated with a doubled
risk of VTE.[8] In particular, the incidence of venous thrombosis was 3.5 and 1.7 per 1,000 person-years
in women taking oestrogen plus progestin or placebo, respectively (hazard ratio [HR],
2.06, 95% CI, 1.57–2.70). This risk increased by aging (HR, 7.46, 95% CI, 4.32–14.38
for age 70–79 years), and with body weight (HR, 5.61, 95% CI, 3.12–10.11 for obesity).[8] Of note, the presence of factor V Leiden was the only factor that increased the
hormone-associated risk of thrombosis by 6.69-fold (95% CI, 3.09–14.49), while other
mutations (pro-thrombin 20210A, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T, factor
XIII Val34Leu, PAI-1 4G/5G and factor V HR2) did not confer such risk.[8]
In this issue of the journal,[9] Roetker et al performed an analysis from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities
(ARIC) Study to investigate whether circulating blood levels of endogenous hormones,
such as dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), testosterone and sex hormone-binding
globulin (SHBG), were associated with the incidence of VTE in men and post-menopausal
women receiving HRT or no HRT. The study included 3,051 women not on HRT, 1,414 women
on oral HRT and 3,925 men.[9] During a follow-up of 17.6 years, 184 (6.0%), 62 (4.4%) and 206 (5.2%) VTE events
were recorded in the three groups, respectively.[9]
The authors found no association between endogenous levels of DHEAS, testosterone
and SHBG with VTE incidence in men and women not using HRT, suggesting a lack of interference
between blood levels of endogenous hormones and VTE risk. In addition, in women on
HRT, a possible association was found for very low levels of DHEAS and a trend for
very high concentrations of SHBG. However, there are some issues to be considered
when analysing the results of this report. Thus, it should be taken into consideration
that the population included in the ARIC Study seems to be at ‘low risk’ for VTE,
as patients with previous VTE and cancer were excluded. Another issue is that plasma
hormones were measured only at baseline with a direct immunoassay, which is less specific
and sensitive than liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay and has high coefficients
of variations, as correctly acknowledged by the authors. Finally, no information regarding
the type of HRT and time of exposure during the follow-up period is available, which
is crucial to evaluate the impact of HRT on blood hormones levels and on VTE incidence.
Another interesting issue concerns how many VTE events were potentially related to
new-onset cancer in the ARIC Study. This is a critical issue as HRT has been shown
to increase the risk of breast cancer. In a nationwide breast cancer screening program,
the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project, which included 46,355 post-menopausal
women, 2,082 cases of breast cancer were identified during follow-up. Relative risk
of breast cancer was 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0–1.4) with oestrogen-only HRT and 1.4 (95% CI,
1.1–1.8) with oestrogen–progestin, and this risk increased by 0.08 (95% CI, 0.02–0.16)
for each year of oestrogen–progestin use. The authors concluded that the oestrogen–progestin
regimen increased breast cancer risk beyond that associated with oestrogen alone.[10]
How to Identify Subjects at Risk for VTE during HRT?
In addition to ‘HRT-related’ factors, such as the way of administration (i.e. oral
vs. non-oral), which has emerged as an important determinant of VTE risk, and the
type of HRT (i.e. oestrogen alone vs. oestrogen–progestin), there are also ‘patients-related’
variables influencing the risk of VTE. Similarly to unprovoked VTE, some factors may
increase the risk of future VTE, such as aging, overweight/obesity,[11] smoking, the presence of previous VTE events, recent surgery, prolonged immobilization
or other co-morbidities such as active cancer,[12] acquired/inherited thrombophilia conditions (i.e. autoimmune diseases,[13] factor V Leiden[14]) and, more recently, non-O blood groups.[11]
However, so far, there are no risk assessment models to predict the risk of VTE in
subjects under HRT. Recently, some biomarkers have been proposed to identify patients
at high risk of VTE during HRT, including lower coagulative protein C and free protein
S, and also higher D-dimer, pro-thrombin fragment 1.2 and plasmin–anti-plasmin complex
were found to be associated with risk of future thrombosis.[3] The strongest association was found for D-dimer (OR, 6.0, 95% CI, 3.6–9.8), and
women with three or more abnormal biomarkers had 15.5-fold increased odds of VTE.[3]
In conclusion, the work by Roetker et al[9] prospectively shows that endogenous hormone levels are not associated with VTE.
However, for all the above-mentioned issues, data on this topic cannot be considered
conclusive. Further studies are needed to investigate the relationship between oral/non-oral
HRT, oestrogen/oestrogen–progestin HRT, blood hormones and VTE incidence.
