Keywords
Diabetes - non-communicable diseases - Peto and Pike test
Introduction
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) account for deaths of 40 million people annually,
which is analogous to around 70 percent of all deaths globally. Also, it is responsible
for 15 million premature deaths each year between the ages 30 to 69 years, more than
80 percent of which is contributed by low and middle-income countries including India.[1]
Being a large country, India presents a substantial assortment of physical features
and cultural patterns. It is a land of diversity in terms of religion, caste, language,
habitat, socio-economic status, lifestyle, and food habits.[2] In a nutshell, India is “the epitome of the world”. Although India has been successful
in controlling several infectious and parasitic diseases yet, NCDs are becoming increasingly
common, resulting in an enormous burden on the healthcare system.[3] It still finds itself loitering behind other countries on health care outcomes as
the response from the government has not been resilient.[4] This is probably due to the large size of the population which generate difficulties
for the effective availability of health services to all. Diabetes is among the most
common chronic NCD affecting both developed and developing countries, including India.[3] Globally, diabetes contributes to around 1.6 million deaths every year.[1] The global prevalence among the population over 18 years of age has risen from 4.7
percent in 1980 to 8.5 percent in 2014.[5] Diabetes is ranked sixth on the global list of causes of death in 2015.[6] Diabetes is fast gaining the status of the potential epidemic with more than 62
million individuals currently suffering from diabetes and more than 77 million suffering
from pre-diabetes in India.[7] According to International Diabetes Federation (2015), the prevalence of diabetes
in India is predicted to be 109 million by 2035.[8] This higher disease prevalence exerts an enormous economic burden in all parts of
the world including India.[3]
[9] The major challenges posed by diabetes in India are the rising prevalence in urban
areas, among young people, delayed diagnoses, low disease awareness among people,
limited healthcare facilities, the high cost of disease management, suboptimal diabetes
control.[10] The major risk factors involved are high blood pressure, smoking, and physical inactivity.
Diabetes being a chronic disease comprises of life-threatening complications along
with economic burden to society associated with this disease.[11] Most of the studies in this respect focused on calculating survival function for
experimental studies based on follow-up studies using the Kaplan Meier Estimates[12] and thus failed to throw light on the prevalence of a disease in any geographical
setup. The present study focuses on computation and comparison of survival functions
based on socio-economic and demographic variables by age groups for a cross-sectional
data. The main objective of this study is to analyze survival functions by five year
age groups and further compare these survival functions for their significance.
Materials and Methods
Data source
The basic data used in this paper is taken from the fourth round of District Level
Household and Facility Survey (DLHS) conducted by the International Institute for
Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai during 2012-13, under the stewardship of Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), Government of India.
Data availability
The data is available online on the institute' s website and can be easily downloaded.
International Institute for Population Sciences was the nodal agency for DLHS-4; being
faculty and student here, data has been assessed from the institute' s data center.
Ethical approval
This analysis is based on a secondary data set, where there is no identifiable information
on the survey participants. It is worth mentioning that before implementation of DLHS-4,
all the survey protocols were approved by the Institute' s Ethical Review Board.
The present analysis is concentrated to individuals who have completed 18 years of
age and belong to the eighteen states of India with better demographic indicators.
Description of Variables
Dependent variables
The study used the presence of diabetes as the dependent variable for the analysis.
A respondent was considered as diabetic if the random blood sugar level was greater
than or equal to 140 mg/dl.[8]
Independent variables
Independent variables include socio-economic and demographic characteristics of a
respondent like sex (male, female), place of residence (urban, rural), social group
(Schedule Caste (SC), /Schedule Tribe (ST), Other Backward Caste (OBC), non-SC/ST
and non-OBC), standard of living index (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, richest)
and region of residence (Eastern [West Bengal], Western [Maharashtra and Goa], Northern
[Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, and Haryana], North-eastern [Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh,
Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, and Meghalaya], Southern [Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka,
Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana]).
Methodology
The present study gives the probability of living a diabetes-free life for various
five years age groups under the assumption that none of the respondents was found
to be diabetic before completing 18 years of age. Following method to obtain survival
function with grouped data from a homogeneous population is given below;
Notation
Bi: [bi-1, bi), (i = 1,2,………,n) is the ith interval of width (bi-bi-1), where b0 = 0.
Ti: number of respondents at the beginning of the interval Bi.
Ai: number of respondents having diabetes in the interval Bi.
nmi: age specific rates of being diabetic of respondents in the i-th interval.
qi: estimated conditional probability of completing the age with diabetes during the
interval Bi
Si: estimate of the probability of diabetes-free life in the interval Bi.
fi: proportion of respondents who are found to be diabetic at the beginning of interval
Bi.
The mathematical expression for the above are given below (n=5),
The survival function Si is estimated by computing the continued products of the pi' s. Thus S1 = p1, S2 = p2p1and so on. We define p0 = 1, so that we have for ith interval (i = 1,2,……., n)
For each time interval, survival probability is calculated as the number of subjects
surviving divided by the number of patients at risk. Subjects who have died, are not
counted as “at risk” i.e., subjects who are lost are considered “censored” and are
not counted in the denominator. Total probability of survival till that time interval
is calculated by multiplying all the probabilities of survival at all-time intervals
preceding that time (by applying the law of multiplication of probability to calculate
cumulative probability).
It is desirable to examine whether there are significant differences among the survival
functions belonging to different categories of an independent variable. For this purpose,
the hypothesis of no difference between survival functions corresponding to different
categories of an independent variable is examined with the help of Peto and Pike'
s test. A Peto and Pike' s test in simple terms is a K- Sample Test of Survival Function.
Suppose that we have k (≥2) samples of survival times and the problem is to decide
whether they belong to the same population of the survival times. For testing this
hypothesis Peto and Pike (1973) proposed a k- sample test, which can be described
as follows:
Suppose that in a pooled sample, failures occur at times t1<t2<t3….< tn. Let nij be the number of samples in the jth sample still at risk prior to ti, and let cij be the number of failure in the jthsample at time ti. Let the corresponding number in the pooled sample be ni+and ci+, respectively (ni+ = ∑nij and ci+ = ∑cij). Under the hypothesis of no difference between samples, the conditionally expected
frequency of cij, given nij, can be estimated as
. Then the test statistics suggested by Peto and Pike is:
which is treated as a Chi-square with (k-1) degree of freedom, k being the number
of samples involved.
All the statistical analysis has been done in MS-Excel and STATA-13 software (Stata
Corp, College Station, Texas).
Results
For illustration, a detailed procedure of getting a survival function is given in
the [Table 1(a)] and [Table 1(b)]. Column 1 of these tables show the time interval (age-groups) used for grouping
the observations. All the intervals are of length five years and the last one is kept
open. The intervals are one-sided closed and one-sided open, that is, if we consider
the interval B1: [18, 23), this means that the lower limit of the interval is included in B1 but the upper limit is included in B2. Column 2 shows the number of respondents found to be diabetic during the ith time interval. In the table, if we consider the interval B1, the number 1607 under Ai, represents the number of respondents found to be diabetic during the interval B1. In column 3, T1 = 45593, represents the total number of respondents in the sample. Column 4 gives
the age specific rates of being diabetic in the i-th interval. Column 5 gives the
conditional probability of being diabetic in the period. The value of q1 = 0.03, represents that about 3 percent of the total respondent are estimated to
suffer with diabetes before completing 23 years of age, provided they have not suffered
with diabetes before 18 years of age. Column 6 gives pi = 1- qi, i = 1, 2, 3…,n. Thus, p1 = 0.97, p2 = 0.96, p3 = 0.94 and so on. Column 7 shows the estimated survival function. From this, we can
estimate the probability of being diabetic within first five years of becoming an
adult. Thus, here we have made an assumption that initially (till age 18 years) all
respondents are found to be living a diabetes-free life. Lastly, column 7 which is
denoted by fi, shows the probability of getting diabetes in the ithinterval. It is clear from [Table 1(a)] that chances of becoming diabetic are highest (8%) in between the age groups 38
years and 58 years. Also, the probability of living a diabetes- free life shows a
declining trend over ages with only 30 percent of the total respondent living without
diabetes even after 77 years of age. Survival functions of men and women show a similar
pattern [Table 1(a)] and [[Table 1(b)]] Whereas in age 33 years to 63 years women have a higher probability of surviving
without diabetes than men.
Table 1(a)
Pattern of diabetes-free survival (Si) among adult men, DLHS-4, 2012-13
|
Age group
|
Ai
|
Ti
|
nMi = Ai/Ti.
|
qi
|
Pi = 1-qi
|
Si = P0.P1...Pi-1.Pi
|
fi = Si-Si+1
|
|
[18-23)
|
1607
|
45593
|
0.04
|
0.03
|
0.97
|
1.00
|
0.03
|
|
[23-28)
|
2145
|
42935
|
0.05
|
0.04
|
0.96
|
0.97
|
0.05
|
|
[28-33)
|
3210
|
43509
|
0.07
|
0.06
|
0.94
|
0.92
|
0.05
|
|
[33-38)
|
3761
|
37555
|
0.10
|
0.08
|
0.92
|
0.87
|
0.07
|
|
[38-43)
|
4958
|
39454
|
0.13
|
0.10
|
0.80
|
0.80
|
0.08
|
|
[43-48)
|
5104
|
32996
|
0.15
|
0.11
|
0.89
|
0.72
|
0.08
|
|
[48-53)
|
5869
|
32053
|
0.18
|
0.13
|
0.87
|
0.64
|
0.08
|
|
[53-58)
|
5306
|
25630
|
0.21
|
0.14
|
0.86
|
0.56
|
0.08
|
|
[58-63)
|
5695
|
25665
|
0.22
|
0.14
|
0.86
|
0.48
|
0.07
|
|
[63-68)
|
4444
|
18724
|
0.24
|
0.15
|
0.85
|
0.41
|
0.06
|
|
[68-73)
|
3432
|
13892
|
0.25
|
0.15
|
0.85
|
0.35
|
0.06
|
|
[73-78)
|
1901
|
7089
|
0.27
|
0.16
|
0.84
|
0.30
|
-
|
|
[78+)
|
2092
|
7968
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1(b)
Pattern of diabetes-free survival (Si) among adult women, DLHS-4, 2012-13
|
Age group
|
Ai
|
Ti
|
nMi = Ai/Ti.
|
qi
|
Pi = 1-qi
|
Si = P0.P1...Pi-1.Pi
|
fi = Si-Si+1
|
|
[18-23)
|
2013
|
56345
|
0.04
|
0.03
|
0.97
|
1.00
|
0.03
|
|
[23-28)
|
2835
|
58942
|
0.05
|
0.04
|
0.96
|
0.97
|
0.04
|
|
[28-33)
|
3776
|
57682
|
0.07
|
0.06
|
0.94
|
0.93
|
0.06
|
|
[33-38)
|
4417
|
50152
|
0.09
|
0.07
|
0.93
|
0.87
|
0.06
|
|
[38-43)
|
5594
|
48614
|
0.12
|
0.09
|
0.91
|
0.81
|
0.07
|
|
[43-48)
|
5638
|
38321
|
0.15
|
0.11
|
0.89
|
0.74
|
0.08
|
|
[48-53)
|
7534
|
41136
|
0.18
|
0.13
|
0.87
|
0.66
|
0.08
|
|
[53-58)
|
6243
|
29240
|
0.21
|
0.14
|
0.86
|
0.58
|
0.08
|
|
[58-63)
|
6213
|
27093
|
0.23
|
0.15
|
0.85
|
0.50
|
0.08
|
|
[63-68)
|
4699
|
19146
|
0.25
|
0.15
|
0.85
|
0.42
|
0.06
|
|
[68-73)
|
3364
|
13605
|
0.25
|
0.15
|
0.85
|
0.36
|
0.06
|
|
[73-78)
|
1767
|
6412
|
0.28
|
0.16
|
0.84
|
0.30
|
-
|
|
[78+)
|
2244
|
8257
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
The same technique is applied to obtain the survival function with different socio-economic
and demographic variables such as place of residence, social group, the standard of
living index, and region of residence [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]. About 79 percent of urban men and 82 percent of the urban women survive without
diabetes by age 42 years while 80 percent of rural men and 80 percent of rural women
live a diabetes-free life by age 42 years. Thus, men from rural areas have higher
chances of living diabetes-free life than urban men, however, urban women are at an
advantageous position with higher chances of living a diabetes-free life than their
rural counterparts.
Table 2
Pattern of diabetes free survival among adult respondent by place of residence, DLHS-4,
2012-13
|
Age group
|
Urban
|
Rural
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
[18-23)
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
|
[23-28)
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
|
[28-33)
|
0.93
|
0.93
|
0.92
|
0.93
|
|
[33-38)
|
0.87
|
0.87
|
0.87
|
0.87
|
|
[38-43)
|
0.79
|
0.82
|
0.80
|
0.80
|
|
[43-48)
|
0.71
|
0.75
|
0.73
|
0.73
|
|
[48-53)
|
0.62
|
0.67
|
0.65
|
0.64
|
|
[53-58)
|
0.54
|
0.60
|
0.58
|
0.55
|
|
[58-63)
|
0.45
|
0.52
|
0.51
|
0.46
|
|
[63-68)
|
0.38
|
0.45
|
0.44
|
0.39
|
|
[68-73)
|
0.32
|
0.39
|
0.38
|
0.32
|
|
[73-78)
|
0.26
|
0.33
|
0.32
|
0.27
|
Table 3
Pattern of diabetes free survival among adult respondent by social group, DLHS-4,
2012-13
|
Age group
|
|
ST/SC
|
OBC
|
Non-ST/SC and non-OBC
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
[18-23)
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
|
[23-28)
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.96
|
|
[28-33)
|
0.93
|
0.93
|
0.93
|
0.93
|
0.92
|
0.92
|
|
[33-38)
|
0.87
|
0.88
|
0.87
|
0.88
|
0.86
|
0.86
|
|
[38-43)
|
0.81
|
0.82
|
0.80
|
0.82
|
0.78
|
0.79
|
|
[43-48)
|
0.74
|
0.75
|
0.72
|
0.74
|
0.70
|
0.72
|
|
[48-53)
|
0.66
|
0.67
|
0.64
|
0.66
|
0.62
|
0.64
|
|
[53-58)
|
0.58
|
0.60
|
0.56
|
0.57
|
0.53
|
0.55
|
|
[58-63)
|
0.51
|
0.52
|
0.48
|
0.49
|
0.46
|
0.47
|
|
[63-68)
|
0.45
|
0.45
|
0.41
|
0.42
|
0.38
|
0.39
|
|
[68-73)
|
0.39
|
0.39
|
0.34
|
0.36
|
0.32
|
0.33
|
|
[73-78)
|
0.33
|
0.33
|
0.29
|
0.30
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
Table 4
Pattern of diabetes free survival among adult respondent by standard of living index,
DLHS-4, 2012-13
|
Age group
|
Poorest
|
Poorer
|
Middle
|
Richer
|
Richest
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
[18-23)
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
|
[23-28)
|
0.97
|
0.98
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.96
|
|
[28-33)
|
0.92
|
0.94
|
0.93
|
0.93
|
0.93
|
0.93
|
0.92
|
0.92
|
0.92
|
0.92
|
|
[33-38)
|
0.89
|
0.89
|
0.88
|
0.88
|
0.87
|
0.88
|
0.86
|
0.87
|
0.85
|
0.86
|
|
[38-43)
|
0.83
|
0.83
|
0.82
|
0.82
|
0.80
|
0.82
|
0.79
|
0.80
|
0.78
|
0.80
|
|
[43-48)
|
0.77
|
0.77
|
0.75
|
0.76
|
0.73
|
0.75
|
0.70
|
0.72
|
0.69
|
0.72
|
|
[48-53)
|
0.69
|
0.69
|
0.67
|
0.68
|
0.65
|
0.67
|
0.62
|
0.64
|
0.60
|
0.63
|
|
[53-58)
|
0.63
|
0.61
|
0.60
|
0.61
|
0.58
|
0.59
|
0.53
|
0.55
|
0.52
|
0.54
|
|
[58-63)
|
0.55
|
0.54
|
0.53
|
0.54
|
0.50
|
0.51
|
0.45
|
0.47
|
0.43
|
0.45
|
|
[63-68)
|
0.49
|
0.48
|
0.46
|
0.47
|
0.43
|
0.44
|
0.38
|
0.39
|
0.36
|
0.37
|
|
[68-73)
|
0.42
|
0.42
|
0.40
|
0.40
|
0.37
|
0.37
|
0.32
|
0.33
|
0.30
|
0.31
|
|
[73-78)
|
0.41
|
0.36
|
0.40
|
0.34
|
0.31
|
0.31
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.24
|
0.25
|
Table 5
Pattern of diabetes free survival among adult respondent by region, DLHS-4, 2012-13
|
Age group
|
Eastern
|
Western
|
Northern
|
North-eastern
|
Southern
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
[18-23)
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
|
[23-28)
|
0.96
|
0.95
|
0.96
|
0,96
|
0.96
|
0.96
|
0.97
|
0.97
|
0.98
|
0.98
|
|
[28-33)
|
0.89
|
0.89
|
0.91
|
0.92
|
0.91
|
0.91
|
0.94
|
0.93
|
0.95
|
0.94
|
|
[33-38)
|
0.82
|
0.82
|
0.85
|
0.87
|
0.84
|
0.85
|
0.88
|
0.88
|
0.89
|
0.90
|
|
[38-43)
|
0.74
|
0.74
|
0.78
|
0.80
|
0.76
|
0.78
|
0.83
|
0.83
|
0.83
|
0.84
|
|
[43-48)
|
0.65
|
0.66
|
0.70
|
0.73
|
0.69
|
0.70
|
0.76
|
0.77
|
0.75
|
0.77
|
|
[48-53)
|
0.56
|
0.58
|
0.62
|
0.65
|
0.60
|
0.62
|
0.69
|
0.70
|
0.67
|
0.69
|
|
[53-58)
|
0.48
|
0.50
|
0.54
|
0.57
|
0.52
|
0.53
|
0.62
|
0.63
|
0.58
|
0.60
|
|
[58-63)
|
0.41
|
0.42
|
0.47
|
0.50
|
0.45
|
0.45
|
0.55
|
0.56
|
0.50
|
0.52
|
|
[63-68)
|
0.34
|
0.36
|
0.40
|
0.43
|
0.38
|
0.38
|
0.48
|
0.49
|
0.43
|
0.44
|
|
[68-73)
|
0.28
|
0.30
|
0.34
|
0.36
|
0.32
|
0.32
|
0.43
|
0.43
|
0.37
|
0.38
|
|
[73-78)
|
0.23
|
0.25
|
0.29
|
0.31
|
0.27
|
0.26
|
0.37
|
0.37
|
0.31
|
0.32
|
Also, the probability of surviving without diabetes is highest amongst respondent
belonging to Schedule Tribe (ST)/Schedule Caste (SC) followed by respondents from
Other Backward Caste (OBC) and is least for respondents from non ST/SC and non OBC
category. This gap is clearly visible after 38 years of age and widens as the age
of respondent increases [[Table 3]]. The same pattern is observed for both men and women.
The probability of surviving without diabetes is higher for the poorer category than
their middle Socio-Economic Status (SES) group counterparts and a similar pattern
is followed for other categories also where lower Socio-Economic Status groups have
higher chances of surviving without diabetes. This gap becomes more apparent for respondents
over 58 years of age. About 55 percent men in age group [58-63 years) survive without
becoming diabetic in poorest class whereas only 50 percent of the respondent from
the middle class, 45 percent respondent from richer class, and 43 percent from richest
wealth quintiles are able to survive without diabetes. Similarly, about 54 percent
women from poorer SES, between ages 58–63 years survive without becoming diabetic
whereas only 51 percent of the respondent from the middle class, 47 percent respondent
from richer class, and 45 percent from richest wealth quintiles are able to survive
without diabetes. Thus, the probability of surviving without diabetes is higher for
lower Socioeconomic Status (SES) group. This finding holds true for both men and women.
It is to be taken into consideration that these findings become more distinct when
results of poorer and higher classes are taken into consideration.
On having an overall view it is apparently visible that the probability of surviving
without diabetes is lowest for the respondents residing in the Eastern region of India,
this region is comprised of West Bengal followed by Northern (Himachal Pradesh, Punjab,
and Haryana), and Western region (Maharashtra and Goa) of India. The probability of
surviving without diabetes is higher among adults from the Southern (Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana) and North-eastern (Sikkim, Arunachal
Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, and Meghalaya) regions of the country.
After obtaining these results, it becomes important to test whether these results
are statistically true i.e. do these differences actually exist or it is simply because
of chance. For the purpose of comparing these survival functions, Peto and Pike (1973)
applied the k-sample test. The complete exercise of implementing Peto and Pike test
in case of a place of residence is demonstrated in [Table 6].
Table 6
Comparison of the diabetes-free survival of women by type of residence DLHS-4, 2012-13
|
Age group
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
Total
|
|
Oi
|
ei = (Oi'/Ti')*Ti
|
Ti
|
Oi
|
ei = (Oi'/Ti'KTi
|
Ti
|
Oi' = Sum(Oi)
|
Ti' = Sum(Ti)
|
|
[18-23)
|
1219
|
1238
|
34620
|
793
|
774
|
21657
|
2012
|
56278
|
|
[23-28)
|
1734
|
1710
|
35584
|
1098
|
1122
|
23338
|
2832
|
58922
|
|
[28-33)
|
2176
|
2251
|
34338
|
1606
|
1532
|
23363
|
3783
|
57701
|
|
[33-38)
|
2425
|
2591
|
29333
|
2009
|
1844
|
20877
|
4435
|
50210
|
|
[38-43)
|
3015
|
3278
|
28383
|
2606
|
2343
|
20291
|
5621
|
48674
|
|
[43-48)
|
2861
|
3291
|
22242
|
2818
|
2388
|
16137
|
5679
|
38379
|
|
[48-53)
|
4051
|
4543
|
24684
|
3520
|
3028
|
16450
|
7571
|
41134
|
|
[53-58)
|
3346
|
3775
|
17590
|
2928
|
2499
|
11645
|
6274
|
29235
|
|
[58-63)
|
3331
|
3839
|
16639
|
2913
|
2405
|
10422
|
6244
|
27061
|
|
[63-68)
|
2551
|
2922
|
11836
|
2170
|
1798
|
7281
|
4720
|
19117
|
|
[68-73)
|
1925
|
2108
|
8489
|
1446
|
1264
|
5089
|
3372
|
13578
|
|
[73-78)
|
973
|
1037
|
3753
|
800
|
737
|
2666
|
1774
|
6419
|
|
[78+)
|
1318
|
1411
|
5177
|
928
|
835
|
3061
|
2246
|
8239
|
|
Total
|
30926
|
33995
|
272669
|
25636
|
22567
|
182276
|
|
|
It was found that there is a significant difference between the survival functions
of women who belong to rural and urban residences
but
. Similarly, Peto and Pike test is also applied to other independent variables which
are taken into consideration. Results obtained from them depicts that diabetes-free
survival is affected by sex, caste, wealth
but
, and region
but
.
Discussion
Existing literature confirms a strong genetic predisposition to diabetes among Indians,
which easily uncovered under adverse environmental conditions.[2] Studies suggested Asian Indians develop diabetes at younger ages, than other races
of the World.[13]
[14] Studies establish age as a very strong indicator of diabetes in India with the prevalence
of diabetes showing a different trend in various age groups.[10] The study provides computation and comparison of diabetes-free survival functions
of nationally representative adult sample from eighteen states of India. This study
is an improved approach to previous nationwide studies which focused solely on the
follow-up cohort data.[6]
As diabetes is majorly contributed by lifestyle factors, it becomes immensely important
to compare the diabetes-free survival of respondents with the factors such as the
place of residence, sex, social group, the standard of living (wealth index), and
region of residence, which affects the lifestyle of a respondent. The study points
out that the diabetes-free survival of a respondent is affected by factors such as
the place of residence, sex, social group, the standard of living (wealth) index,
and region of residence.
Male preponderance is clearly visible in some studies, which easily tally with the
present study.[15]
[16] The reason for such difference may be contributed to the genetics of men and women
and use of oral pill by women, which may act as a protection against diabetes as pointed
out by some studies.[17]
As predicted in previous researches, the respondent from rural areas have higher chances
of living diabetes-free life than their urban counterparts.[18] Studies speculated that this interaction may have been the result of lifestyle changes
such as unhealthy dietary pattern, stress, and sedentary lifestyle as a consequence
of urbanization.[19] Currently, nearly three-fourths of the Indian population resides in rural areas,
but according to World Health Organization (WHO) estimates it is expected to decrease
by nearly 18 percent by the year 2030. This 18 percent of the population would be
added to the urban areas.[20] Thus, in future, the rural areas presently under transition of urbanization could
emerge as pockets of increased prevalence of diabetes in India.
The rise in the prevalence level of diabetes can be linked to the factors such as
dietary and lifestyle changes which are brought about by the transition to a sedentary
lifestyle contributed by an increased level of wealth.[21] Similar findings are also set by the present study where the respondents from lower
wealth quintile are more prone to survive without diabetes as compared to their higher
wealth quintile counterparts.
White rice is an essential part of food amongst people residing in West Bengal. Existing
literature suggests an association between consumption of white rice and risk of diabetes
in Indian population.[16] Thus, having an overall view it is apparently visible that the probability of surviving
without diabetes is lowest for the respondents residing in the Eastern region of India,
which comprises of West Bengal followed by Northern (Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, and
Haryana) attributing to high level of abdominal obesity in this region,[22] and Western region (Maharashtra and Goa) which can be attributed to high level of
fat intake in the diet.[16]
The probability of surviving without diabetes is higher for Southern (Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana) and North-eastern (Sikkim, Arunachal
Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, and Meghalaya) regions of India. The
variations observed in the prevalence of diabetes are largely contributed by diversity
in terms of diet, physical activity, urbanization, and some unknown social factors.
Conclusions
The findings of this study underline the ongoing epidemiological transition in India
and help to understand the progression of diabetes in population across various background
characteristics and also highlight the increasing burden of diabetes in India. The
probability of surviving without diabetes is particularly less among men than women,
among those residing in urban areas, and those belonging to upper social and economic
classes. It is evident from the pattern of distribution of diabetes-free survival
that the major determinants of progression of the diabetes epidemic in India are urbanization
and betterment of economic status. The diabetes-free survivor is particularly reduced
in population groups which are experiencing the resultant changes in lifestyle in
terms of unhealthy dietary pattern and physical inactivity. This study also emphasizes
the relatively earlier age at which the significant reduction in diabetes-free survival
is taking place in India and the agglomeration of diabetes in older age groups. With
the increase in life expectancy and ongoing urbanization, there will be a tremendous
increase in the burden of diabetes in India.
Recommendations
The current scenario of diabetes in India warrants a timely response to prevailing
risk factors and determinants of diabetes like appropriate changes in lifestyle, dietary
pattern and physical activities to prevent the occurrence of diabetes. It is necessary
to disseminate the knowledge and create awareness about diabetes, its determinants
and associated complications among people. At the same time efforts need to be directed
towards bolstering of health services so that services for screening, timely diagnosis
and adequate treatment, and palliative care for diabetes is available to people who
are already suffering from it and complications of diabetes are avoided.
Limitations
The assumption that none of the respondents would be affected by diabetes before the
age of 18 years may not hold true in some cases.
Previous presentations
None.
Contribution details
SKS apprehended the idea. SKS and JG designed the experiment and analyzed it. SKS,
SP, and PP interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript. All the authors take
responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole from inception to published
article. SKS would be the guarantor.
Statement of approval
All the authors read and approved the final manuscript. Also, the requirements for
authorship as stated have been met, and each author believes that the manuscript represents
honest work.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.