Epidemiology
Epidemiological studies about prevalence, incidence, and natural history of NAFLD and NASH in lean subjects suffer from several limitations: on one hand, the “classic” bias of the criteria adopted to define NAFLD in the general population (liver function tests vs. imaging vs. algorithms) and the lack of noninvasive markers for NASH; on the other hand, the heterogeneous definition of lean across studies. In fact, while most of these studies compared patients using 25 as BMI cutoff, in Asian cohorts the term lean should be used according to the ethnic-specific BMI cutoff of 23, while patients with BMI < 25 kg/m2 should be commonly indicated as “nonobese.”[4] In this regard, interpreting BMI values with the simplistic association between low BMI and low body fat is misleading because BMI is an imperfect index of adiposity, particularly in truncal fat accumulation, and does not take into account body composition. Adding to the confusion is that the definition of MetS, commonly used to detect metabolic abnormalities, varies across studies and even more at the individual level, so that the association between the degree of obesity and development of insulin resistance may not be so clear-cut.
Population studies had being describing NAFLD in nonobese subjects since 2006 ([Table 2]). In a study including 2520 residents of the Shengang Township in Taiwan, NAFLD (by abdominal ultrasound) was found in 61 over 1,444 nonobese participants (4.2%), in the absence of other etiologies of chronic liver disease.[5] In a prospective epidemiological study carried in a very poor, rural area of West Bengal, India, NAFLD was identified in 8.6% of the overall population, but 75% of NAFLD subjects belonged to the nonobese group.[6] The nonobese and lean individuals with NAFLD had more subcutaneous fat, higher fasting blood glucose, and higher levels of triglycerides. However, this population also included 47% with malnutrition, which can be associated with NAFLD by a different mechanism (choline deficiency).
Table 2
Main epidemiological, cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies describing the characteristics of lean patients in NAFLD
|
Epidemiological Studies
|
|
Main findings[a]
|
Ethnicity
|
|
Chen et al, 2006[5]
|
2520 Taiwanese subjects included. NAFLD was found in 4.2% of nonobese participants.
|
Asian
|
|
Das K et al, 2010[6]
|
Of the 1911 individuals included, NAFLD was found in 8.6% of the population, of whom 75% were nonobese.
|
Indian
|
|
Kwon et al, 2012[9]
|
Large Korean population study (n = 29944). NAFLD reported a prevalence of 12.6% in the nonobese participants.
|
Asian
|
|
Kim et al, 2011[14]
|
Icelandic study including 2945 patients. Hepatic steatosis was shown even in patients with a median BMI of 22.7 kg/m2
|
Caucasian
|
|
Browning et al, 2004[15]
|
In the Dallas Heart Study cohort, the prevalence of steatosis in subjects with BMI < 30 kg/m2 was 17%
|
Caucasian
|
|
Younossi et al, 2012[16]
|
Among the 11613 subjects of the NHANES III cohort, the prevalence of NAFLD in lean individuals was 7.4%
|
Caucasian
|
|
Cross-sectional Studies
|
|
C. Selvakumar, 2018[17]
|
Among 1482 U.S. lean adolescence, 8% had NAFLD, and had a higher prevalence of low HDL, hypertriglyceridemia and insulin resistance.
|
Caucasian
|
|
Younossi et al, 2012[16]
|
Lean NAFLD was associated with younger age, female sex, insulin resistance, and hypercholesterolemia
|
Caucasian
|
|
Feldman et al, 2017[46]
|
Although lean NAFLD patients have a better metabolic profile, they have lower adiponectin levels when compared with healthy controls.
|
Caucasian
|
|
Feng et al, 2014[8]
|
Lean NAFLD have a more active and proinflammatory visceral adipose tissue
|
Asian
|
|
Wong et al, 2015[31]
|
Waist circumference and triglyceride levels predicted the incidence of steatosis in lean individuals
|
Asian
|
|
Fracanzani et al, 2017[30]
|
Lean patients had a lower rate of MetS, diabetes, lower cardiovascular damage, and lower hepatic histological damage
|
Caucasian
|
|
Akyuz et al, 2015[52]
|
Turkish cohort with lean prevalence of 7.6%. High hemoglobin levels were the only independent predictor of NASH and fibrosis in lean subjects.
|
Caucasian
|
|
Longitudinal Studies
|
|
Leung et al, 2017[3]
|
Median follow-up of 49-months. Hypertriglyceridemia and higher creatinine were associated with advanced liver disease in lean. Death and HCC were recorded only in the obese group.
|
Asian
|
|
Cruz et al, 2014[55]
|
Despite a better metabolic profile, less insulin resistance, and fibrosis, lean subjects have a higher overall mortality than patients with NAFLD who are overweight or obese.
|
Mixed
|
|
Hagstrom et al, 2018[56]
|
After a median follow-up of 19.9 years, although patients with lean NAFLD showed lower fibrosis, they were at higher risk for development of severe liver disease compared with patients with NAFLD and a higher BMI, independent of available confounders.
|
Caucasian
|
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NHANES, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
a In all studies, alternative etiologies of liver disease has been excluded.
After these two pioneer epidemiological surveys, most of the studies investigating the nonobese pattern of NAFLD had been performed in the Asian continent. In China, the Zhejiang Zhenhai Study evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of NAFLD in 6,905 nonobese individuals (BMI < 25 kg/m2). NAFLD was diagnosed by ultrasound in 7.27% of the study participants.[7] Similarly, in a cohort of 2,000 Chinese subjects who received annual physical examinations, NAFLD was found in nearly 18% of the nonobese subjects (BMI < 24 kg/m2).[8] A large Korean population study recruiting 29,994 individuals who presented for a routine health evaluation, reported a prevalence of NAFLD of 12.6% in the nonobese participants (n = 3,014).[9] These findings were confirmed in another Korean general medical check-up program where 22.4% of nonobese subjects (333 of 1,487) had NAFLD.[10] In Japan, the overall prevalence of NAFLD in 3,271 subjects who received health checkups from 2011 to 2012 was 68.5% in obese subjects and 15.2% in nonobese subjects. Metabolic factors such as waist circumference and triglycerides were predictors of nonobese NAFLD. Interestingly, weight gain since early adulthood (around the age of 20) was significantly associated with NAFLD in nonobese subjects of both genders.[11] In a community-based Hong-Kong cohort, NAFLD was detected by proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in 19.3% of the lean cases (BMI < 23 kg/m2), compared with 61% in those with a higher BMI.[12]
Compared with the Asian surveys described earlier, studies in the Caucasian population are less numerous and, in general, involved a smaller number of subjects. In Italy, the Dionysus Study showed that the prevalence of lean NAFLD (BMI < 25 kg/m2) assessed by ultrasonography was 16%, compared with 75.8% in obese.[13] In Iceland, the AGES-Reykjavik Study Investigators highlighted an association between the central axes of obesity with the presence of MetS in lean patients.[14] In this study, CT scan showed the presence of hepatic steatosis even in patients with a median BMI of 22.7 kg/m2. In the Dallas Heart Study, the prevalence of steatosis (defined as a hepatic triglyceride content > 5.5% by 1H-MRS) in subjects with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 was 17%, compared with 34% in the overall study subjects.[15] The prevalence of NAFLD was significantly lower in nonobese African Americans (11%) but comparable in nonobese Caucasians and nonobese Hispanics (20% vs. 26%; p = 0.12).[15] However, the largest epidemiological study analyzing prevalence and features of lean Caucasian NAFLD patients has been carried in the United States, using data of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III).[16] Among 11,613 subjects, the prevalence of NAFLD at ultrasonography was as high as 27.7% in overweight/obese subjects, significantly higher than the 7.4% observed in subjects with normal BMI (< 25 kg/m2).
The presence of a lean phenotype with NAFLD is observed across all age groups, including adolescents. Cross-sectional data from 1,482 lean subjects (BMI < 85th percentile) aged between 12 and 18 years, enrolled in the NHANES during the 2005 to 2014 cycles, reported a 8% prevalence of suspected NAFLD (by ALT above the low gender-specific cutoff) among lean adolescents. Low HDL, hypertriglyceridemia, and presence of insulin resistance were more common among lean NAFLD compared with their non-NAFLD counterparts.[17]
Overall, epidemiologic data suggest that the prevalence of lean NAFLD is approximately 5 to 26% in the Asian population and 7 to 20% in the Western one. This suggests that factors independent from body weight may be important in a subset of NAFLD subjects.
Pathophysiology of Lean NAFLD
Pathologic pathways underlying the development of NAFLD in lean subjects are not entirely understood. However, studies on adipose tissue functions, genetic analyses, studies in vitro and in vivo on animal models, and finally gut microbiome research can provide some hints to mechanisms ([Fig. 1]).
Fig. 1 Pathophysiological determinants of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in lean subjects. AT indicates adipose tissue; FFA, free fatty acids; PNPLA3, patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3; TM6SF2, transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2; CETP, cholesteryl ester transfer protein; IFN, interferon; PEMT, phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase.
Insulin Resistance and Fat Distribution
Despite a reduced likelihood of being associated with the components of MetS, subjects with lean NAFLD are nonetheless insulin resistant when compared with healthy controls. In a cohort of subjects with biopsy-proven NAFLD, free of diabetes, obesity, and MetS, the metabolic pattern of insulin resistance in the main target tissues (muscle, liver, and adipose tissue) was similar to that observed in obesity, with adipose tissue insulin resistance playing an important role despite a low BMI and normal subcutaneous fat.[18] This early finding was further supported by more recent studies, showing higher circulating concentration of free fatty acids (FFA) in lean NAFLD patients compared with healthy controls and a higher portal FFA flow, which may induce intrahepatic fat accumulation.[19]
[20]
It is likely that a vast part of lean NAFLD belong to the phenotype of “metabolically obese normal weight” (MONW) subjects, described in at least 5% of the occidental population, who display altered insulin sensitivity and increased cardiovascular risk.[21] When comparing metabolically healthy and unhealthy normal weight subjects, the latter population has increased liver fat content, visceral fat mass, and carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), but lower subcutaneous fat mass, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion.[22] These key characteristic of MONW are consistent across studies in humans; increased liver fat is probably due to a decreased capacity for storing fat in subcutaneous adipose tissue, coupled with reduced mitochondrial function and increased de novo lipogenesis in the liver.[22] Furthermore, MONW subjects also have a proinflammatory circulating milieu characterized by decreased adiponectin concentration and a unique T cell signature.[21] Ethnicity has a significant impact on the variability of MONW across studies. In the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, the prevalence of metabolically unhealthy with normal weight ranged from 21% in whites, 32% in Chinese Americans, 31% in African Americans, 38.5% in Hispanics, and 43.6% in South Asians.[23] In the same study, the prevalence of nonobese NAFLD (BMI < 30 kg/m2) assessed by CT scan was 11%, including 9% among Caucasians, 6% among African Americans, and 18% among Hispanic Americans.[23]
At the extreme end of the spectrum of MONW lays the lipodystrophy phenotype. These subjects typically display absence of fat in the classic subcutaneous depots but large ectopic accumulation of lipids in the skeletal muscle and in the liver associated with severe insulin resistance.[24] While the genetic forms are relatively rare, acquired lipodystrophy can be found in HIV patients under highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) therapy and can be also found in some lean people not having been diagnosed with lipodystrophy.
The importance of body composition in the onset and progression of NAFLD is also supported by the finding that sarcopenia, defined as a progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function, is a novel risk factor for the development of NAFLD.[25] Recently, we found elevated plasma amino acid concentrations in NAFLD subjects either with or without obesity, likely to be related to peripheral resistance and resulting in increased muscle proteolysis during the fasting state, which lends support to the pathogenesis of sarcopenia in NAFLD.[26]
Genetic and Environmental Factors
The data discussed earlier suggest that lean NAFLD have an increased susceptibility to develop NAFLD that can be partially attributed to genetic factors or epigenetic changes induced early in life.
The search for genetic causes that contribute to the incidence of NAFLD in lean patients is still in its infancy. As reported by genome-wide association analyses, first performed within the Dallas Heart Study and widely confirmed in literature, a single variant in the patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3), the rs738409[G], encoding I148M, is associated with an increase in both liver fat and hepatic inflammation.[27] Comparing obese and nonobese subjects with NAFLD, the prevalence of the PNPLA3 [G] allele was significantly higher among nonobese individuals (78.4% vs. 59.8%) and was independently associated with NAFLD even in the multivariate analysis.[12] A study recruiting lean Japanese NAFLD patients (BMI < 23 kg/m2) confirmed the previous findings. Although there were no GG homozygous carriers in their population, in the lean group the G allele was a predictor of NAFLD in all multivariate analysis steps, while it was not in the obese population.[28] Another Japanese study recruiting 540 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients (134 nonobese) found a higher rs738409 GG homozygous genotype rate in nonobese NAFLD patients compared with obese individuals with fatty liver. Again, the GG-single-nucleotide polymorphism was an independent predictor of NAFLD, together with diabetes, in the nonobese cohort only.[29] In a retrospective study on patients with lean NAFLD, the only variable associated independently with NASH and a fibrosis score of 2 or higher was rs738409 C > G in PNPLA3.[30] However, in a prospective general population study in Hong Kong including 565 cases (BMI < 23 kg/m2 in 72%) without evidence of NAFLD (by 1H-MRS) at baseline, the presence of the common variant in the PNPLA3 gene did not provide any relevant clue for incident NAFLD.[31]
Other variants in different loci may be involved in individual cases. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is involved in triglyceride exchange between lipoproteins.[32] Two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs12447924 and rs12597002) were associated with fatty liver disease in adolescent lean Caucasian females (BMI < 25 kg/m2). The highest risk of NAFLD was found in the group with the lowest adiposity assessed by skinfold thickness, where the prevalence of NAFLD in lean homozygotes, heterozygotes, and wild type was more than 30%, 10 to 15% and 3.5% respectively.[33] A single-nucleotide polymorphism in transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2) was associated with NAFLD and fibrosis independent of age, diabetes, obesity, and the PNPLA3 genotype.[34] In a retrospective cohort, a significantly greater proportion of patients with lean NAFLD carried rs58542926 C > T in TM6SF2 (4%) than obese or overweight individuals.[30] The interferon (IFN) lambda 4 rs368234815 TT > δG variant, influencing innate immunity regulation, has been linked to liver damage in patients with NAFLD. The impact of rs368234815 seems generally more marked in nonobese individuals, where an association with severe fibrosis, necroinflammation, and NASH has been observed.[35]
Finally, a recent study on animal models hypothesized that a deficiency of the phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) could play a key role in the development of NASH in lean individuals.[36] PEMT is an enzyme involved in the synthesis of phosphatidylcholines in liver cells. PEMT −/− mice on high fat-high sucrose diet did not develop obesity or insulin resistance compared with the PEMT +/+ and presented normal cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Nonetheless, PEMT −/− developed NASH and after 90 weeks all PEMT −/− mice developed liver tumors. When PEMT mRNA expression in human liver biopsies was quantified, a lower expression of PEMT was found in patients with NASH. A correlation with lower BMI has been also reported, suggesting that PEMT deficiency could be an etiologic agent of lean NASH.[36]
Insulin resistance in adipose tissue develops early during fetal growth restriction and is maintained during the neonatal period and adulthood.[37] Besides genetic factors, intrauterine growth might play a role in favoring NAFLD, particularly in children. An Italian group first described the association of intrauterine growth retardation with pediatric NAFLD and more severe disease activity at histology, independent of and in addition to insulin resistance. At an average age of 11 years, most study subjects (80%) were insulin resistant, despite normal BMI and a very low prevalence of metabolic abnormalities. Notably, the family history of type 2 diabetes was less common, suggesting that genetic factors have lower relevance in the onset of NAFLD in this cohort.[38]
The setting of a smaller adipocyte number during early life let lean population mostly change their adipocyte volume in adulthood, developing MetS features at a lower fat mass,[39] partially explaining why these subjects easily develop NAFLD for small increases in body weight, still in the nonobese range.[31]
Finally, among the most common environmental causes, a high fructose intake is an additional risk factor for NAFLD and NASH, particularly in children and adolescents. In a study on young nonobese subjects without obvious metabolic risk factors, the only independent predictor for the presence of NAFLD was a higher soft drink and juices consumption, up to fourfold compared with healthy controls.[40] Thus, preventing fructose intake may represent a readily modifiable environmental factor, particularly in younger lean NAFLD patients.
Gut Microbiome and Metabolomics
Fatty liver has been associated with a lower rate of Bacteroidetes and a higher rate of Prevotella and Porphyromonas, as well as a higher number of ethanol-producing bacteria.[41] Duarte et al described a significant difference in the abundance of Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium in patients with NASH when compared with controls.[42] The subgroup of lean patients with NASH had had less abundance of Ruminococcus and a deficiency of Lactobacilli when compared with overweight and obese patients with NASH.[43]
Lyso-phosphatidylcholines (lyso-PCs) are phospholipids with anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizer effects and lower levels of lyso-PCs are observed in obesity.[42]
[44]
[45] Metabolomic analyses demonstrated lower levels of lyso-PCs in both lean and obese NAFLD patients when compared with healthy controls.[46] On the other hand, when compared their obese counterpart, lean patients with NAFLD showed a higher level of lysine concentration.[46] Being related to visceral fat accumulation,[47] lysine may represent a sign of the dysfunctional metabolic environment underpinning lean NAFLD individuals.
Clinical and Pathological Features
Compared with their healthy counterpart, lean NAFLD have a reduced likelihood of being associated with the components of MetS; nonetheless subjects have an increased prevalence of metabolic derangements, above all diabetes and higher plasma triglycerides, although both abnormalities are usually less severe than in obese NAFLD patients.[16]
[48] In the NHANES III population, when compared with overweight/obese NAFLD subjects, lean NAFLD was independently associated with younger age, female sex, insulin resistance, and hypercholesterolemia. Among individuals who fulfilled the clinical definition of NASH, as it was adapted for that cohort (i.e., NAFLD patients with elevated aminotransferases in the presence of either diabetes or insulin resistance), the prevalence of lean subjects was as low as 1.38%.[16] Another study in Caucasians confirmed that patients with lean NAFLD have a better metabolic profile than overweight and obese, that is, higher levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), lower triglyceride, and fasting glucose levels, in addition to a lower concentration of the proinflammatory cytokines Interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha. In addition, leptin levels were similar to healthy controls and significantly lower than in obese NAFLD patients. Conversely, in lean NAFLD adiponectin levels have been found significantly lower than healthy controls, but similar to the obese NAFLD.[46] In Asian cohorts, features of MetS have been associated with the development of NAFLD across the entire BMI spectrum, but lean NAFLD patients presented the strongest correlations.[7]
[8] Furthermore, lean NAFLD seems to have a more active visceral adipose tissue, in terms of visceral adiposity index (an indicator of visceral fat function associated with cardiometabolic risk), when compared with overweight or obese population.[8]
[49] Noteworthy, in some lean healthy subjects, relatively small changes in their metabolic profile and body weight can be associated with incident lean NAFLD. A prospective cohort study from Hong Kong included a subgroup of 406 lean (BMI < 23.0 kg/m2) subjects, of whom 7.9% developed incident steatosis (by 1H-MRS) after an interval of 3 to 5 years (median: 47 months).[31] At multivariable analysis, increased waist circumference and serum triglyceride levels during follow-up were associated with incident fatty liver, although some of these patients did not develop a full MetS.
Even though a better metabolic profile is supposed to be associated with a less severe histological damage, there is no agreement on this issue and some studies suggest the contrary in lean NAFLD. A seminal Italian study[50] reported the presence of NASH in 50% of lean NAFLD patients (BMI < 25 kg/m2). The prevalence of NASH was quite similar across BMI classes (normal weight, 65%; overweight, 73%; and obese, 84%; p = 0.184). Another study, including 430 biopsy-proven NAFLD, showed that 55% of patients without visceral obesity according to waist circumference had NASH and fibrosis ≥ F2, despite milder metabolic alterations.[51] On the contrary, in another retrospective series including 669 biopsy-proven Caucasian NAFLD patients, when compared with overweight and obese patients, NAFLD subjects with a BMI < 25 kg/m2 had a lower rate of MetS and diabetes, lower cardiovascular damage, expressed as cIMT, and prevalence of carotid plaques as well as lower prevalence of histologically diagnosed NASH and fibrosis F2 or higher.[30] Of interest, in a Turkish cohort of 483 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients, with a prevalence of lean NAFLD (BMI < 25 kg/m2) of 7.6%, high hemoglobin levels was the only independent predictor of NASH and advanced fibrosis in lean individuals and not in the obese/overweight group.[52]
In a study from China, similar proportions of obese and nonobese patients had NASH (51.9 vs. 43.5%, p = 0.217), although the latter ones had a lower degree of steatosis and hepatocyte ballooning, and the proportion of patients with advanced fibrosis was not different in the two groups.[3] Triglyceride levels independently predicted disease severity in nonobese NAFLD group and were associated with both higher grade of steatosis and hepatocyte ballooning.[3] Similarly, Kumar et al found no difference in NASH prevalence between lean (BMI < 23 kg/m2) and non-lean subjects among 110 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients of Indian ethnicity.[53] In a Japanese cohort of biopsy-proven NAFLD patients, lobular inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning, and NAFLD activity score were strictly associated with the GG-PNPLA3 single-nucleotide polymorphism, which was more prevalent in the nonobese cohort and was not associated with histological severity in NAFLD obese patients.[29]
Thus, lean NAFLD patients may present milder histological features or may show the same characteristics when compared with obese patients with NAFLD, but overall they can display the full spectrum of liver damage. This suggests that the risk of cirrhosis for lean NAFLD patients may not be that different after all, and that, once NASH is established, obesity may not be the main driver of fibrosis progression. The next important question is whether lean NAFLD subjects have an adverse outcome related to liver-related morbidity and mortality.
Outcome and Prognosis of Lean NAFLD patients
Since lean NAFLD usually present with less obesity-related comorbidities, it is commonly believed that this group would follow a relatively benign clinical course. Within the cohort of the NHANES III,[54] mortality of metabolically normal NAFLD patients was similar to the cohort without liver disease. However, the longitudinal risk of mortality in lean NAFLD has been scarcely explored. In the Hong Kong cohort of Leung et al, where 307 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD (23.5% nonobese, BMI < 25 kg/m2) had been followed up for a median period of 49 months, clinical events similarly occurred in obese (11.9%) and nonobese patients (8.3%). Cardiovascular morbidity accounted for about two-thirds of all major events in both groups. All deaths (n = 6) occurred in the obese group, but definite conclusions are difficult to make as follow-up was relatively short.[3] An international study with a longer follow-up period, published so far only in abstract form, challenged the concept that the prognosis of patients with NAFLD who have normal BMI is better than in those who are overweight or obese.[55] In a total of 1090 prospectively recruited patients, 125 (11.5%) were classified as lean (BMI < 25 kg/m2 for non-Asians and < 23 kg/m2 for Asians). Lean NAFLD were more commonly men of non-Caucasian origin and, as expected, showed less features of the MetS. Histologically, they had less severe fibrosis but a higher grade of lobular inflammation. Interestingly, median survival free of liver transplantation was significantly shorter in lean than in non-lean patients (18.1 vs. 26.6 years, respectively, p < 0.001). The higher risk of death/liver transplantation in lean NAFLD was independent of the classic risk factors that may influence the development of this outcome.
In another retrospective study including 646 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, at enrolment in NAFLD, 19% of patients were lean, 52% overweight, and 29% obese. Patients with lean NAFLD were older, had lower transaminases, lower stages of fibrosis, and lower prevalence of NASH compared with patients with a higher BMI. During a mean follow-up of 19.9 years (range: 0.4–40 years) patients with lean NAFLD had no increased risk for overall mortality, but they were more likely to develop severe liver disease than patients with NAFLD who were overweight (hazard ratio: 2.69; p = 0.007), independent of available confounders.[56] Three prognostic indicators for mortality in lean NAFLD were identified: older age, fibrosis stage, and hypertension. Noteworthy, of the 19 patients with lean NAFLD who developed severe liver disease, 58% (n = 11) had fibrosis of stage 0 to 2 at baseline. A limitation of the longitudinal retrospective studies is the limited ability to determine whether or not subjects developed additional risk factors over time that are known to predispose to advanced liver disease, such as diabetes or changes in alcohol intake and body weight.
Certainly future longitudinal prospective studies are needed to define the prognosis in lean NAFLD and to elucidate potential pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying progression; nevertheless data available suggest that carefully selected patients with lean NAFLD likely require long-term follow-up and reassessment of progression of liver disease over time.
Management
When it comes to the prevention and treatment of lean NAFLD, current European guideline states that follow-up is mandatory in obesity, but it also suggests follow-up in lean persons with NAFLD because of possible disease progression, even though they have less severe metabolic disturbance (B2 strength of evidence)[57]. Careful identification and correction of environmental causes, such as significant fructose consumption, may be effective particularly in young patients. General recommendations include an adoption of a healthy lifestyle and the initiation of pharmacological treatments for elevated blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia, if necessary.[57] However, these guidelines do not provide much information as to whether and to what extent prevention and treatment should be adapted in lean patients, given the harder correction of underlying risk factors. Weight loss remains the background therapy in all cases with overweight/obesity, but in lean NAFLD the efficacy of calorie restriction has not been tested. Nevertheless, diet should be prescribed when a weight gain even within the nonobese BMI range was preceding the development of lean NAFLD. Importantly, habitual physical activity should certainly be indicated because it can specifically decrease visceral fat.[58] Treatment with the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone also reduced the diabetes risk and improved insulin secretion in nonobese subjects with impaired glucose tolerance,[59] but no analysis had been performed in normal-weight individuals. Incretin-based treatments may be more effective in overweight and obese subjects than in normal-weight individuals because its efficacy is associated with weight loss.[60] In the Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes (LEADER) study, which included 9,340 patients, treatment with liraglutide was associated with lower incidence of the primary composite outcome in obese patients with type 2 diabetes, but not in nonobese.[61]
