J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80(S 01): S1-S244
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1679441
Oral Presentations
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical Implications of Histopathologic Diagnostic Discrepancies in Sinonasal Malignancies

Karen Y. Choi
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Moran Amit
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Diana Bell
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Kedrick Harrison
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Jack Phan
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Steven Frank
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Renata Ferrarroto
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Shaan Raza
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Franco Demonte
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Michael Kupferman
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Ehab Hanna
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Shirley Y. Su
1   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
06. Februar 2019 (online)

 
 

    Aims/Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of histopathologic diagnostic discrepancy for patients referred to our institution, identify pathologies susceptible to diagnostic error and to assess the impact on survival of histopathologic diagnostic discrepancies.

    Materials/Methods: Four hundred and five patients with sinonasal cancers were identified from our institutional sinonasal database. Discordance between the outside pathologic report and the pathologic report performed at our institution was assessed. Chi-square and ANOVA methods were utilized to compare the significance of using additional studies (immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and genetic markers testing) in obtaining histopathologic diagnoses. Overall survival and disease specific survival were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and log rank methods.

    Results: Discordance of overall histopathologic diagnoses was present in 23.9% (97/405) of reports, with sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, sarcoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and poorly differentiated carcinoma pathologies having the highest change in diagnosis (p < 0.01). A further 60% (244/405) had changes in histologic grade, subtype, or stage, with sarcoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma pathologies being most susceptible to change (p < 0.02). The change from a prior benign diagnosis to a malignant diagnosis upon review occurred in 1.7% of cases. The use of additional immunohistochemistry testing lead to a change in overall histopathologic diagnosis (p = 0.012), while in situ hybridization and testing for genetic markers testing did not. The 5-year overall and disease specific survival in patients with a change in histopathologic diagnosis was 55% and 70% compared with 72 and 82% respectively, in patients with no change in their diagnosis (p = 0.002 and p = 0.024, respectively). The 5-year overall survival in patients who had treatment prior to presentation at our institution was higher for those who did not have a change histopathologic diagnosis (75%) compared with those who had a change in histopathologic diagnosis (50%, p = 0.001).

    Conclusion: Sinonasal pathology, and in particular, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, sarcoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinoma are prone to histopathologic misdiagnoses. Incorrect diagnosis is associated with reduced survival, which may be attributable to inadequate, inappropriate, or delays in treatment. Obtaining second opinions from experienced head and neck pathologists at a high-volume institution may potentially lead to a change in treatment recommendations that could result in improved survival in patients with sinonasal malignancies.


    #

    Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.