Digestive Disease Interventions 2019; 03(S 01): S1-S15
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1689041
Oral Presentations
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA

Clinical and Procedural Management of Refractory Ascites

Lisa Walker
1   University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/ Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Divya Kumari
1   University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/ Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Sidhartha Tavri
1   University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/ Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Indravadan Patel
1   University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/ Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
03. Mai 2019 (online)

 
 

    Introduction: Refractory ascites is defined as ascites unresponsive to medical therapy (restricted sodium diet and high-dose diuretic treatment) or with rapid recurrence after therapeutic paracentesis. Of cirrhotic patients with ascites, 10% of these patients go on to develop refractory ascites. Within this subset of patients, interventional radiology plays an integral role in improving the morbidity and possibly the mortality. This exhibit will discuss and compare the types of procedures involved in the management of refractory ascites.

    Content Organization:

    1. Discuss the background of refractory ascites (definition and mortality rates).

    2. Pathophysiology of ascites.

    3. Different interventional radiology treatment options: large-volume paracentesis, Pleurx catheter, peritoneovenous (Denver) shunt, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

    Learning Points: Interventional radiology plays a pivotal role in the morbidity and mortality of refractory ascites, whether it be serving as a bridge to liver transplantation or the palliation of terminally ill patients. The goal of this exhibit is to discuss the pros and cons of the different types of procedures offered in these patients.


    #

    Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.