Synthesis 2020; 52(10): 1544-1560
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1690826
paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Chelation and Stereodirecting Group Effects on Regio- and Diastereoselective Samarium(II)-Water Allylic Benzoate Reductions

Trevor F. Stockdale
,
Michael A. Leitch
,
Gregory W. O’Neil
Department of Chemistry, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA   Email: oneilg@wwu.edu
› Author Affiliations
National Science Foundation (CHE-1760918)
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 31 December 2019

Accepted after revision: 28 January 2020

Publication Date:
20 February 2020 (online)

 


Abstract

SmI2(H2O)n reductions of allylic benzoates adjacent to a trisubstituted alkene occur in high yields with complete regioselectivity and good diastereoselectivity (up to 90:10) for substrates containing properly positioned stereodirecting- and chelating groups. The outcome of these reactions can be rationalized by ring conformation considerations of a proposed chelated organosamarium intermediate, and a mechanism involving intramolecular protonation by a samarium-bound water.


#

Since its introduction more than 40 years ago,[1] samarium(II) iodide (SmI2) has proven to be an extremely useful and versatile reductant available to the synthetic chemist.[2] Much of this success relies on the use of certain additives, which change the coordination sphere and redox potential of the reagent,[3] allowing for the selective and efficient reduction of a wide range of functional groups. Among the additives commonly employed, proton donors are of special interest.[4] In particular, the addition of water to SmI2 [often represented as SmI2(H2O)n] has been shown to have a significant impact on its reducing capability,[5] enabling for instance the reduction of carboxylic acid derivatives[6] while avoiding the use of toxic and/or less green additives like HMPA, DMPU, or TPPA.[3b] [7] A number of investigations have been conducted to understand the special role of water in these transformations that have revealed higher redox potentials[8] and rate enhancements for water relative to other proton sources (e.g., methanol).[9] Recent studies indicate that the mechanism for many of these processes may involve both concerted and asynchronous proton-coupled electron-transfer.[10]

Our group became interested in the use of SmI2 for the reduction of acyloxysulfones as part of a masked-alkene metathesis protocol.[11] More recently we reported that allylic benzoates 1a or 1b can be reduced with SmI2 in the presence of an alcohol additive (R′OH),[12] converging to the corresponding reduced products 2 with high regioselectivity (Scheme [1]). The regioselectivity of this reaction can be rationalized by steric considerations of the organosamarium intermediate, and a pericyclic protonation mechanism involving a samarium-bound alcohol molecule. This method then featured in our synthesis of the biologically active natural product honokiol to simultaneously install both allyl substituents found in the target compound from the bis-allylic­ benzoate precursor 3.[13]

Zoom Image
Scheme 1 (A) Regioselective SmI2 allyl benzoate reductions and (B) its application to a synthesis of honokiol

Applied to trisubstituted alkene-containing substrates, we recognized that the reaction would generate a new stereocenter (*), and became interested in finding ways to develop this reaction as a new strategy for stereoselective synthesis (Scheme [2]).[14] We hypothesized that incorporation of a Lewis basic chelating element (e.g., OP) and stereo­directing group (R) would render SmI2(H2O)n reductions of compounds of type 4 both regio- and diastereoselective. Together, these groups could impart facial selectivity during the intramolecular protonation event from a chelated intermediate. The importance of chelation to our design was supported by the reduction of compound 5 to product 6, which proved to be non-diastereoselective.

Zoom Image
Scheme 2 (A) Proposed regio- and diastereoselective allylic benzoate reductions proceeding through a chelated organosamarium intermediate. (B) The importance of chelation for stereoselectivity is supported by the non-diastereoselective reaction of compound 5, which lacks this ability.

For the chelating element we chose to focus on oxygen given the well-established oxophilicity of samarium.[15] This also introduced an obvious synthetic disconnection (i.e., a carbonyl addition) when designing the synthesis of our desired substrates. With these considerations in mind, initial investigations began with the preparation of compound 8 by zirconium-catalyzed carboalumination[16] of phenyacetylene and addition of the resulting vinylalane into Roche ester­-derived aldehyde (S)-7 [17] (Scheme [3]). The stere­ochemistry of the newly formed hydroxyl in 8 for the major isomer is assumed to be (S) arising from chelation control,[18] but was not rigorously determined as this stereocenter proved unimportant for the subsequent eliminations (vide infra). After benzoylation, unfortunately the reduction of 9 in the presence of various additives proceeded with low dia­stereoselectivity (50:50 to 60:40) and only modest regio­selectivity (up to 5:1).

Zoom Image
Scheme 3 Synthesis of substrate 9 and initial screening of its reduction with SmI2(H2O)n in the presence of various additives
Zoom Image
Scheme 4 SmI2 reduction of compound 12 and determination of absolute stereochemistry by ozonolysis of 13

Gratifyingly after PMB-removal, reduction of the corresponding free hydroxyl compound 12 proceeded with both enhanced regio- and diastereoselectivity (d.r.), presumably as a result of greater chelation to samarium,[19] although secondary coordination sphere effects (e.g., hydrogen-bond networks) cannot be ruled out at this time (Scheme [4], Table [1]).[8] [10a] The impact of different additives on the outcome of the reaction with 12 were investigated as outlined in Table [1]. Interestingly, the highest (and nearly identical) diastereoselectivities were obtained using either anhydrous conditions (DMPU; entry 1) followed by quenching (aq NH4Cl) or in the presence of water (entry 5),[20] suggestive against an internal protonation by the hydroxyl group per se (performing the reaction in D2O resulted in >90% deuterium incorporation by 1H NMR at C5). Both reactions produced compound 13 as a 3:1 mixture of diastereomers and exclusively as the trans-isomer, however, regioselectivity for the DMPU reaction was much lower (2:1 vs 15:1 for H2O). Colder conditions (i.e., 0 °C, entry 6) also led to an erosion of regioselectivity. The reaction proved non-stereospecific to the stereochemistry of the OBz stereocenter, with identical results obtained when 12 was used as a 50:50 (entry 7) or 70:30 (entry 5, ref. Scheme [3]) mixture of diastereomers.[21] This is attractive from a synthetic standpoint, allowing us to prepare and use substrates epimeric at this position without any impact on the subsequent reductions. The amount of water used also had little effect on the d.r. of the reactions [e.g., 76:24 for 70 equiv (entry 8) vs 75:25 for 1400 equiv (entry 6)], consistent with other studies showing that even high concentrations of water do not lead to complete saturation of Sm(II).[3b] Regioselectivity, however, tended to be higher at fewer equivalents of H2O, perhaps as a result of a competing intermolecular protonation at the higher equivalents (ref. Scheme [1]). Yields also increased with decreased H2O [with the exception of 1 equiv (66% yield)], where side-products that we have tentatively assigned as radical dimers were observed.[22] The absolute configuration of the newly formed stereocenter was determined by ozonolysis of 13 and comparison of the optical activity of the resulting aldehyde 15 to that previously reported.[23] This analysis revealed that the sample was enriched in the (S)-(+)-enantiomer, indicating that the major diastereomer of 13 had the (2R,5R)-configuration. Our working model to explain the stereochemical outcome of this reaction is based on the ring-conformation energetics of a fused 5,6-bicyclic organosamarium transition state structure Sm-I,[24] involving hydroxyl chelation of samarium[25] followed by intra­molecular protonation by a coordinated water molecule.

Table 1 Additive Effects on SmI2 Reductions of Compound 12 (ref. Scheme [4])

Entry

Additivea

13:14 b

d.r.b of 13

1

DMPU

 2:1

75:25

2

t-BuOH

 1:0c

67:33

3

i-PrOH

 2.3:1

67:33

4

MeOH

 1:0c

60:40

5

H2O

15:1

76:24

6

H2Od

 5:1

75:25

7

H2Oe

15:1

76:24

8

H2Of

15:1

76:24

a Reactions were performed by adding the additive (16 equiv DMPU or 1400 equiv ROH) to SmI2 (7 equiv) followed by the substrate and stirring for 30 min.

b Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.

c Compound 14 was not detected by NMR spectroscopy.

d Performed at 0 °C.

e Compound 12 was used as a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers.

f Performed using 70 equiv of H2O.

In thinking about other suitable and available aldehyde starting materials from which we could prepare additional substrates to further investigate this transformation, we were drawn to lactate-derived aldehyde 16 [26] (Scheme [5]). Using similar chemistry to that employed in the synthesis of 12, we prepared compounds 19 and 20 and investigated their reduction with SmI2(H2O)n. Treatment of 19 or 20 to our optimized conditions from experiments with 12 (e.g., 15 equiv H2O relative to SmI2, r.t.) gave the desired products 21 or 22 with complete regioselectivity and high diastereoselectivity [84:16; higher than for compound 12 (75:25)], however, in low yield due to a competing elimination and formation of the corresponding diene (presumably β-elimination of the hydroxyl group after benzoate cleavage). Increasing the equivalents of water to either 100 or 200 equivalents suppressed this elimination to some extent (presumably by increasing the rate of protonation), allowing for the isolation of 21 in 60% yield. The highest d.r. (90:10) was obtained for the n-butyl substrate 20 using 50 equivalents of water, giving compound 22 in 50% isolated yield. The absolute configuration of the newly formed stereocenter was determined by ozonolysis of the product which produced primarily (S)-(+)-aldehyde 15 by polarimetry.[23] A possible model to explain this selectivity based on that previously proposed for the one-carbon homologated samarium intermediate is shown in Scheme [5], with the organosamarium transition state structure Sm-II existing in this case as an η3-complex.[27]

Zoom Image
Scheme 5 Synthesis and elimination of lactate-derived compounds 21 and 22
Zoom Image
Scheme 6 Comparison of chelation size effects on SmI2(H2O)n allylic benzoate reductions. The reaction of 30 (B) gave lower diastereoselectivity than compound 25 (A), presumably due to formation of a less conformationally rigid 7-membered organosamarium chelate Sm-IV.

Comparing results for lactate substrate 19 and Roche ester-derived compound 12 demonstrates that the location of the hydroxyl group (i.e., linker length) can impact both the yield and selectivity for this reaction. To further investigate this effect, we synthesized and examined the SmI2(H2O)n reductions of compounds 25 and 30, which contain hydroxyl groups three and four carbons away (as opposed to one and two carbons for compounds 19 and 12, respectively) from the allylic benzoate position (Scheme [6]). The reduction of 25 proceeded with comparable diastereoselectivity (78:22) to compound 12, giving 26 via a mechanism presumably involving the 6-membered chelate Sm-III. The methyl group in Sm-III assumes a preferred equatorial conformation, controlling the facial selectivity of the protonation event and explaining the stereochemistry observed in the final product. It was anticipated that the reaction of compound 30 would give lower selectivity as the 7-membered organosamarium ring chelate Sm-IV would be less stable and/or less conformationally rigid than 5- and 6-membered chelate substrates.[28] Indeed, the reaction of 30 with SmI2(H2O)n gave 31 with not only a lower diastereomeric ratio (63:37), but was accompanied by large amounts of what we have assigned as radical dimers.[22] This result indicates that favorable chelation not only improves d.r., but also controls the product selectivity in these reactions.

Within the 5- and 6-membered chelate series we also set out to evaluate the impact of stereodirecting group location. To that end, several additional substrates 38ac were prepared (Scheme [7]). Combined with compounds 12 and 25, we obtained data for SmI2(H2O)n reductions for all permutations of compounds proceeding through 5- or 6-membered chelates containing an α, β, or γ methyl stereodirecting group (Table [2]). From these results certain trends emerged. For instance, comparing results for compounds 12 and 38a (Table [2], entries 2 and 4) indicates that shifting the stereocenter away from the allylic benzoate position results in a slight loss of diastereoselectivity (75:25 for 12 vs 70:30 for 38a) with essentially no change in regioselectivity. This could potentially be explained by the difference between the primary alcohol in 12 and a secondary alcohol in 38a, with a more sterically hindered alcohol resulting in a loss of samarium chelation and therefore a less conformationally restricted transition state. However, a similar shift of the methyl group in the 6-membered chelate system (entries 3 and 5) resulted in a significant loss of diastereoselectivity (78:22 for 25 vs 57:43 for 38b). This result cannot be explained by a change in the strength of the chelating group as both 25 and 38b contain primary alcohols. Rather, it seems that having the stereodirecting group closest to the allylic benzoate position (and thus the resulting carbon-bound samarium) is optimal for maximizing the diastereoselectivity of this reaction. Further evidence is provided from the reduction of compound 38c (entry 6), with the stereodirecting methyl group now further remote, and the reaction giving low (and essentially identical to compound 38b) diastereoselectivity.

Zoom Image
Scheme 7 Synthesis of additional elimination substrates 37ac containing differing methyl stereocenter positioning

Table 2 Comparison of Chelation Size and Methyl Stereocenter Position on Regio- and Diastereoselectivity for SmI2(H2O)n Allylic Benzoate Reductionsa

Entry

Starting material

Product

d.r.b

r.r.b

1

86:14

 98:2

2

75:25

 98:2

3

78:22

100:0

4

70:30

 88:12

5

57:43c

 94:6

6

56:44

 83:17

a All reactions were preformed using 105 equiv of H2O and 7 equiv of SmI2 in degassed THF at r.t. under N2.

b Determined by 1H NMR and GC-FID analysis.

c Identical results were obtained when the reaction was performed under argon.

Ozonolysis of the product mixtures obtained from the reductions of compounds 25 and 38a produced oppositely enantioenriched mixtures of aldehyde 15. From 25 we obtained primarily S-(+)-15 whereas 38a gave primarily the R-(–)-enantiomer.[23] Both results are consistent with the formation of chelated organosamarium transition state structures Sm-III and Sm-IV, with the methyl group (Me) assuming a preferred equatorial position (Scheme [8]).

Zoom Image
Scheme 8 Determination of absolute stereochemistry for the major diastereomers produced from the reactions of compounds 25 and 38a and models Sm-III and Sm-IV to explain the outcome

We also prepared a series of compounds 50ae in order to examine the effect of stereodirecting group identity in these reactions (Scheme [9], Table [3]). It was hypothesized that larger groups might impart better diastereoselectivities based on, for instance, larger energy differences between axial and equatorial conformations. With the exception of substrates containing a hydroxyl (50e, entry 6) or phenyl (50c, entry 4) stereodirecting group where elimination was an issue, all other substrates gave the desired products in good yield and diastereoselectivity. Increasing the size of the stereodirecting group appears to play a modest role in the diastereoselectivity of the reaction. For instance, a change in stereocenter identity from methyl (12, entry 1) to isopropyl (50a, entry 2) resulted in an increase in diastereoselectivity from 75:25 to 83:17; however, incorporation of an even larger tert-butyl group (50b, entry 3) showed no further increase but rather a small drop in diastereoselectivity (80:20). Reduction of the substrate 50c containing a phenyl stereocenter (entry 4) gave the product with a d.r. similar to that of a methyl stereodirecting group (73:27 vs 75:25) but with a lower isolated yield (25%) due to competing elimination to form the fully conjugated diene. The use of a benzyl (Bn) stereocenter (50d, entry 5) resulted in a d.r. similar to that obtained for an i-Pr group (81:19). Regioselectivity for all reactions was high (from 93:7 to 100:0) suggestive of a dominant intramolecular protonation pathway.

Zoom Image
Scheme 9 Reagents and conditions: (1) AlMe3, Cp2ZrCl2, then 40, 41, 42, 43, or 44; (2) BzCl, pyridine; (3) DDQ; (4) BzCl, pyridine; (5) pTSA, MeOH.

Table 3 Stereodirecting Group Identity Effects on Regio- and Diastereoselectivity for SmI2(H2O)n Allylic Benzoate Reductionsa

Entry

R

d.r.b

r.r.b

Yield (%)c

1

Me (12)

75:25

 98:2

90

2

i-Pr (50a)

83:17

 93:7

80

3

t-Bu (50b)

80:20

 95:5

73

4

Ph (50c)

73:27

100:0

25

5

Bn (50d)

81:19

 96:4

82

6

OH (50e)

 –

  –

 0

a All reductions were performed at r.t. using 7 equiv of SmI2 and 105 equiv of H2O.

b Determined by 1H NMR analysis.

c Isolated yield.

Based on the results in Tables 2 and 3, we sought to design an optimized substrate for maximizing diastereoselectivity in our SmI2(H2O)n allylic benzoate reductions. For instance, comparing results for compounds 12 and 25 (Table [2], entries 2 and 3) indicates a slightly higher d.r. from a 6-membered ring chelated organosamarium intermediate over a 5-membered ring chelate. Additionally, we also observed an enhancement in d.r. by incorporation of i-Pr or Bn-stereodirecting groups (Table [3], entries 2 and 5). Combining these effects we thought it might therefore lead to even further enhanced d.r. while still maintaining high yield and regioselectivity. In order to test this hypothesis, we synthesized the 6-membered chelate Bn-stereocenter containing substrate 56 (Scheme [10]). The synthesis began by alkylation of oxazolidinone 52 [29] with benzyl bromide giving 53 in 62% yield as a single diastereomer after chromatography on silica gel. DIBAL-H reduction of 53 gave aldehyde 54 to which was then added the lithium anion generated from vinyl iodide 27 [30] by lithium–halogen exchange. This reaction produced secondary alcohol 55 as a 62:38 mixture of diastereomers in 93% yield. Benzoylation followed by deprotection of the TBS ether using HF·pyr then gave the final allylic benzoate ‘optimized substrate’ 56 in 81% over the two steps.

Zoom Image
Scheme 10 Synthesis of an optimized substrate 56 based on results from Tables 2 and 3

Surprisingly upon reduction of 56 with SmI2(H2O)n, the expected product 57 was obtained in only 32% yield with a d.r. of 74:26 and as a 69:31 mixture of regioisomers (r.r., Scheme [11]). The low yield was due in part to a significant level of side-product formation (e.g., radical dimers), which were observed in the 1H NMR spectrum of the crude reaction mixture. Other studies have shown that larger ions such as samarium prefer smaller ring systems.[31] This may explain the higher diastereo- and regioselectivity obtained with the lactate derived substrate 20 (90:10) as it had the smallest ring chelate size (nominal 4-membered[32]). Additionally as the stereodirecting group becomes larger, steric strain may be introduced into the rigid chelated organosamarium Sm-V. Formation of the 6-membered chelate Sm-V from reduction of 56 may therefore not be as favorable, leading to a greater percentage of side-products and lower diastereo- and regioselectivity. Nonetheless, sufficient amounts of 57 were obtained to determine its absolute configuration. Ozonolysis of 57 followed by reduction with NaBH4 gave (S)-(–)-58 [33] indicating the absolute stereochemistry of the major diastereomer of 57 is (3S,6R). This is consistent with a mechanism involving the 6-6 bicyclic organosamarium transition state structure Sm-V, with the benzyl stereodirecting group occupying a preferred equatorial position, followed by intramolecular proton delivery from a samarium bound water.

Zoom Image
Scheme 11 Results from the SmI2(H2O)n reduction of an ‘optimized’ substrate 56. The d.r. and regioselectivity (r.r.) obtained suggest that the trends observed in Tables 2 and 3 may not be additive.

In summary, samarium-mediated allylic benzoate reductions can occur diastereoselectively when adjacent to a trisubstituted alkene and flanked by a stereodirecting and chelating group. The reaction can achieve high yields, regio­selectivity, and diastereoselectivity (up to 90:10). Stereo­directing- and chelating group location appear to have the most significant impact on yield and selectivity in these reactions. Diastereoselectivity tends to increase with shorter chain lengths between the allylic benzoate and the chelating group (e.g., 63:37 d.r. when separated by four carbons vs 90:10 when separated by two). However, the highest dia­stereoselectivity obtained (90:10) by having a chelating hydroxyl­ immediately adjacent α to the allylic benzoate, was accompanied by competing β-elimination leading to lower yields. Increasing the size of the stereodirecting group also increased diastereoselectivity, although to a lesser extent (e.g., 75:25 for methyl vs 80:20 for tert-butyl). Combining the results from experiments investigating stereodirecting and chelating group location along with stereodirecting group identity effects, which led to the design and synthesis of an ‘optimized substrate’ containing an α-benzyl stereodirecting group and a hydroxyl group that would generate a 6-membered ring chelate organosamarium intermediate. Reduction of this compound with SmI2(H2O), however, proceeded with low yield (32%) of the desired product and modest diastereoselectivity (74:26). The low yield was the result of moderate regioselectivity (69:31) and the formation of side-products that we assume may include radical dimerization processes. Formation of larger-ring-chelated organosamarium intermediates containing sterically demanding groups might therefore not be favorable. Models have been proposed to account for these results based on ring-conformation considerations of a chelated organosamarium intermediate and a mechanism involving intramolecular protonation by a samarium-bound water.

All reactions were carried out under N2 in flame-dried glassware, unless otherwise specified. The solvents used were dried by passing the solvent through a column of activated Al2O3 under N2 immediately prior to use. SmI2 was prepared according to the method of Procter.[34] All other reagents were purchased and used as received, unless otherwise mentioned. TLC analysis used 0.25 mm silica gel layer fluorescence UV254 plates. Flash chromatography: silica gel (230–400 mesh). NMR: Spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury 300 or Bruker 500 spectrometer in the solvents indicated; chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm, coupling constants (J) in hertz (Hz). The solvent signals were used as references (CDCl3: δc = 77.0; residual CHCl3 in CDCl3: δH = 7.26). MS (EI): Bruker MaXis Impact mass spectrometer. Spectral data listed are for stereoisomeric mixtures unless specifically labelled to the contrary.


#

Zirconium-Catalyzed Carboalumination; General Procedure

To a Schlenk tube filled with DCM (0.3 M relative to alkyne) and Cp2ZrCl2 (0.1 equiv) at –20 °C was added AlMe3 (2.0 equiv) dropwise resulting in a yellow solution, which was stirred for 10 min. Deionized H2O (1.0 equiv) was then added dropwise turning the solution a darker shade of yellow, which was then stirred for another 10 min. The reaction was then warmed to r.t. for 10 min and then cooled to 0 °C. Phenylacetylene (1.0 equiv) was added dropwise and the solution was stirred for 40 min at 0 °C. The aldehyde (0.8 equiv) was then added dropwise and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at 0 °C. The reaction was quenched slowly with cold H2O and then aq HCl, and extracted with DCM (3 ×). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo.


#

Benzoylation of Alcohols; General Procedure

Pyridine (2 equiv) was added to a Schlenk tube containing substrate (1 equiv) in DCM (0.2 M relative to substrate). The mixture was then cooled to 0 °C followed by the addition of benzoyl chloride (1.2 equiv). The reaction was allowed to warm to r.t. for 15 h., before quenching with aq NaHCO3 and extracting with DCM (3 ×). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo.


#

DDQ Removal of a PMB; General Procedure

Substrate was added to a round-bottomed flask containing a 50:50 mixture of DCM:pH 7 buffer (0.1 M relative to substrate). The reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C and stirred vigorously at which time DDQ (3 equiv) was added portionwise over 30 min. The reaction was stirred vigorously for 1 h and then quenched with aq NaOH (1.0 M) and extracted with DCM (3 ×). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine (2 ×), dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo.


#

SmI2(H2O)n Reductions; General Procedure

To a dry Schlenk tube containing a solution of SmI2 in THF (0.1 M, 7 equiv) was added degassed nano-pure H2O (105 equiv) turning the solution to a deep red color. The solution was stirred for 5 min before the substrate (1 equiv) was then added. After 30 min, the reaction was quenched with aq NaHCO3 and extracted with EtOAc (3 ×). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo.


#

(E)-2,5-Diphenylhex-4-en-3-yl Benzoate (5)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using (E)-2,5-diphenylhex-4-en-3-ol[35] (0.5 g, 1.98 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 5 (0.64 g, 90%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 80:20); Rf = 0.52 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3059, 3028, 2970, 1712, 1601, 1584, 1494, 1450, 1377, 1265, 998, 864, 710, 696 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.08 (ddd, J = 8.2, 3.2, 1.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.57 (dd, J = 6.8, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.46 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.44–7.33 (m, 2 H), 7.33–7.26 (m, 5 H), 7.26–7.20 (m, 3 H), 6.01 (dd, J = 9.4, 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.64 (dq, J = 9.3, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.29 (dq, J = 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.01 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.47 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 165.97, 143.02, 142.29, 139.89, 132.94, 130.60, 129.68, 128.42, 128.41, 128.27, 128.19, 127.35, 126.79, 125.99, 124.75, 76.04, 44.62, 17.16, 16.72.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [379.1674]+ calcd for C25H24O2Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 379.1640.


#

(2S,E)-1-[(4-Methoxybenzyl)oxy]-2-methyl-5-phenylhex-4-en-3-ol (8)

Prepared according to the general Zr-catalyzed carboalumination procedure using aldehyde 7 [17] (1.0 g, 4.7 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 8 (1.31 g, 85%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 70:30); Rf = 0.65 (1:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3320, 3028, 2986, 2962, 2851, 1713, 1611, 1595, 1576, 1440, 1246, 1035, 699 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.43 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.34 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.29 (t, J = 8.7 Hz 3 H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 5.78 (dq, J = 8.9, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.50 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.51 (m, 1 H), 4.47 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.83 (s, 3 H), 3.66 (dd, J = 9.3, 4.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.51 (dd, J = 9.3, 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.12 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 2.03 (qd, J = 7.4, 4.3 Hz, 1 H). 0.93 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.27, 143.22, 137.42, 129.87, 129.50, 129.34, 128.15, 127.10, 125.88, 113.84, 74.49, 73.11, 73.10, 55.25, 39.34, 16.52, 13.45.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [349.1780]+ calcd for C21H26O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 349.1771.


#

(2S,E)-1-[(4-Methoxybenzyl)oxy]-2-methyl-5-phenylhex-4-en-3-yl Benzoate (9)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 8 (1.31 g, 4.00 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 9 (1.72 g, quant.) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.48 (4:1 hexanes: EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3063, 3032, 2999, 2962, 2934, 2917, 2851, 1786, 1713, 1611, 1599, 1584, 1450, 1246, 1035, 699 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.02 (dd, J = 7.0, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.54 (dd, J = 8.2, 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.42 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.38 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.25–7.21 (m, 2 H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 5.96 (dd, J = 9.5, 6.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.77 (dq, J = 9.5, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.45 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.40 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.77 (s, 3 H), 3.49 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.44 (dd, J = 6.0, 9.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.35 (hept, J = 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.27 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 1.11 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 165.73, 159.06, 143.00, 140.35, 134.54, 132.73, 130.59, 129.59, 129.24, 128.89, 128.29, 128.21, 127.40, 126.00, 124.06, 113.70, 73.37, 72.79, 71.60, 55.23, 38.33, 16.81, 13.09.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [453.2042]+ calcd for C28H30O4Na + [M + Na]+; found: 453.2039.


#

1-Methoxy-4-({[(2R,E)-2-methyl-5-phenylhex-3-en-1-yl]oxy}methyl)benzene (10)

To a dry Schlenk flask containing a solution of SmI2 in THF (0.1 M, 16.1 mL) at 0 °C was added DMPU (0.445 mL, 1.61 mmol) resulting in a dark purple solution, which was stirred for 1 h. Compound 9 (0.100 g, 0.23 mmol) was then added and the solution was stirred for 1 h. The reaction was then quenched with aq NH4Cl (20 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 10 (0.051 g, 70%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 60:40); Rf = 0.60 (10:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3080, 3057, 3025, 2957, 2926, 2850, 1948, 1877, 1804, 1730, 1611, 1511, 1452, 1360, 1245, 1087, 1035, 819, 757, 698 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.29 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4 H), 7.20 (dd, J = 11.1, 2.3 Hz, 4 H), 7.17 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4 H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 4 H), 5.63 (ddd, J = 15.5, 6.7, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 5.39 (ddd, J = 15.5, 7.1, 1.4 Hz, 2 H), 4.42 (d, J = 6.53 Hz, 4 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 3.78 (s, 3 H), 3.43 (pent, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.32 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.31 (dd, J = 9.1, 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.24 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.23 (dd, J = 7.1, 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.48 (hept, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H), 1.31 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 1.00 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H). 0.99 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.04, 134.62, 131.63, 129.13, 129.08, 128.30, 128.10, 127.18, 125.89, 113.70, 75.14, 72.50, 55.23, 42.20, 36.76, 21.48, 17.12.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [333.1830]+ calcd for C21H26O2Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 333.1836.


#

(2S,E)-1-Hydroxy-2-methyl-5-phenylhex-4-en-3-yl Benzoate (12)

Prepared according to the general procedure for removal of a PMB group with DDQ using 9 (1.2 g, 2.78 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 12 (0.6 g, 70%) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.18 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3420, 3060, 3032, 2964, 2922, 2880, 1714, 1450, 1268, 1110, 932, 711 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.07 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.42 (dd, J = 7.2, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.95 (dd, J = 9.4, 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.84 (dq, J = 9.4, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.68 (qd, J = 11.3, 4.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.23 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 2.15 (m, 1 H), 1.10 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 166.48, 142.73, 140.69, 133.05, 130.20, 129.67, 128.38, 128.25, 127.54, 125.96, 124.33, 73.31, 64.09, 40.55, 16.88, 12.92.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [333.1467]+ calcd for C21H26O2Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 333.1472.


#

(2R,5R,E)-2-Methyl-5-phenylhex-3-en-1-ol (13)

Prepared according to the general procedure for SmI2(H2O)n reductions using compound 12 (0.025 g, 0.08 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 15 (0.0135 g, 90%) as a pale yellow oil; Rf = 0.31 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3360, 3083, 3061, 3025, 2961, 2925, 2871, 1950, 1876, 1803, 1716, 1601, 1492, 1415, 1373, 1272, 1029, 971, 760, 698 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.38 (t, J = 4.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.30 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 5.74 (ddd, J = 15.5, 6.8, 1.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.33 (ddd, J = 15.5, 7.9, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.47 (m, 2 H), 3.38 (dd, J =10.6, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (hept, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.36 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 1.01 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 146.04, 136.89, 131.00, 128.43, 127.07, 126.06, 67.35, 42.27, 39.66, 21.48, 16.60.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [190.1358]+ calcd for C13H18O+ [M]+; found: 190.1358.


#

(S)-2-Phenylpropanal (15)

To a round-bottomed flask open to air containing 13, 21, 26, or 39a in DCM (0.1 M relative to substrate) at –78 °C, O3 was bubbled into the solution until the reaction mixture turned to an electric blue color. The reaction was left at this temperature without stirring for 5 min and then N2 was bubbled though the reaction until the solution became colorless. The reaction was quenched with Me2S (5 equiv), warmed to r.t., and stirred for 1 h. The reaction mixture was washed with brine (15 mL) and extracted with DCM (3 × 15mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo. Aldehyde 15 was then isolated by flash chromatography on silica gel; Rf = 0.63 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc). NMR spectra for 15 matched with that previously reported.[23]

Polarimetry value for (S)-15 from 21: [α]D +88.5 (c 0.4, CHCl3) {Lit.[23] for (R)-15: [α]D –88.6 (c 0.93, CHCl3).


#

(2R,E)-2-[(4-Methoxybenzyl)oxy]-5-phenylhex-4-en-3-ol (17)

Prepared according to the general procedure for Zr-catalyzed carboaluminations using aldehyde 16 [26] (0.500 g, 2.6 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography over silica gel gave 17 (0.688 g, 82%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 58:42); Rf (diastereomerα) = 0.30; Rf (diastereomerβ) = 0.20 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3328, 3058, 3016, 2928, 1268, 1110, 932, 711 cm–1.


#

Diastereomer α

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.40 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 5.70 (dq, J = 8.9, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.66 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.43 (d, J = 11.3 Hz 1 H), 4.38 (dd, J = 8.9, 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.82 (s, 3 H), 3.50 (dq, J = 7.7, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.13 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.20 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.32, 142.98, 139.81, 130.21, 129.48, 128.18, 127.30, 126.40, 125.88, 113.92, 78.64, 72.44, 70.91, 55.26, 16.90, 15.52.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [335.1623]+ calcd for C20H24O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 335.1612.


#

Diastereomer β

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.40 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.19 Hz, 2 H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 5.80 (dq, J = 8.4, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.62 (dd, J = 8.4, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.62 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.50 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.81 (s, 3 H), 3.66 (qd, J = 6.4, 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.08 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.20 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.26, 143.03, 138.24, 130.57, 129.53, 129.31, 128.23, 127.26, 126.55, 125.89, 113.88, 77.19, 70.92, 70.62, 55.31, 16.56, 14.42.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [335.1623]+ calcd for C20H24O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 335.1612.


#

(2R,E)-2-Hydroxy-5-phenylhex-4-en-3-yl Benzoate (19)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 17 (0.371 g, 1.18 mmol). The general procedure for DDQ removal of the PMB was then performed on the crude benzoylation product mixture obtained. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 19 (0.281 g, 80% over two steps) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.24 (4:1 hexanes: EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3450, 3062, 3031, 2976, 2929, 1712, 1600, 1583, 1450, 1266, 1110, 1025, 963, 909, 709 cm–1.


#

Diastereomer α

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.07 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.45 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.41 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.77 (m, 2 H), 4.10 (pent, J = 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.29 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3 H), 1.30 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 166.01, 142.54, 141.90, 133.09, 130.16, 129.66, 128.41, 128.27, 127.68, 125.96, 122.37, 69.74, 18.81, 17.07.


#

Diastereomer β

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.07 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.45 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.43 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.91 (dq, J = 9.3, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.85 (dd, J = 9.3, 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.15 (qd, J = 6.5, 4.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.25 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 1.31 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 165.94, 142.47, 142.03, 133.06, 130.15, 129.64, 128.39, 128.25, 127.66, 125.95, 122.37, 121.60, 76.73, 75.88, 69.59, 18.19, 16.90.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [319.1310]+ calcd for C19H20O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 319.1314.


#

(2R,E)-2-[(4-Methoxybenzyl)oxy]-5-methylnon-4-en-3-ol (18)

Prepared according to the general procedure for Zr-catalyzed carboaluminations using 1-hexyne (0.373 mL, 3.25 mmol) and aldehyde 16 [26] (0.500 g, 2.6 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 18 (0.441 g, 58%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 56:44); Rf (diastereomerα) = 0.38; Rf (diastereomerβ) = 0.34 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3420, 2980, 2928, 1614, 1570, 1265, 1110, 932, 886, 711 cm–1.


#

Diastereomer α

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.29 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 5.13 (dq, J = 9.0, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.64 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.42 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.21 (dd, J = 9.0, 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.82 (s, 3 H), 3.39 (dq, J = 8.0, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.04 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 1.71 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.42 (m, 2 H), 1.31 (hept, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 1.13 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3 H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.22, 141.64, 130.31, 129.37, 123.08, 113.84, 78.91, 72.09, 70.80, 55.20, 39.38, 29.79, 22.29, 16.97, 15.36, 13.92.


#

Diastereomer β

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.27 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 5.20 (dq, J = 8.5, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.57 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.47 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.46 (dd, J = 8.3, 3.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.81 (s, 3 H), 3.55 (qd, J = 6.4, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.01 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 1.64 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.39 (pent, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.29 (m, 2 H), 1.12 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.17, 140.08, 130.70, 129.20, 122.97, 113.81, 77.32, 70.50, 70.37, 55.28, 39.39, 29.91, 22.34, 16.66, 14.17, 13.97.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [315.1936]+ calcd for C18H28O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 315.1944.


#

(2R,E)-2-Hydroxy-5-methylnon-4-en-3-yl Benzoate (20)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 18 (0.431 g, 1.3 mmol). The general procedure for DDQ removal of the PMB was then performed on the crude benzoylation product mixture obtained. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 20 (0.344 g, 89%) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.32 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3462, 3062, 2956, 2929, 2871, 1714, 1600, 1578, 1450, 1315, 1266, 1111, 1068, 962, 709 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.05 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.3 Hz, 4 H), 7.55 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 4 H), 5.66 (dd, J = 9.2, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.57 (dd, J = 9.5, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.32 (dq, J = 9.2, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.20 (dq, J = 9.5, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.03 (qd, J = 6.3, 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.97 (pent, J = 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.06 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.04 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 1.84 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.81 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.40 (m, 4 H), 1.29 (pent, J = 7.4 Hz, 4 H), 1.24 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3 H), 1.22 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3 H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3 H), 0.88 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 166.05, 165.96, 144.48, 144.07, 132.97, 132.95, 130.44, 130.42, 129.64, 129.63, 128.37, 119.36, 118.42, 76.80, 75.83, 69.74, 69.54, 39.50, 39.46, 29.86, 29.80, 22.32, 22.30, 18.73, 18.12, 17.20, 17.09, 13.94.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [319.1310]+ calcd for C19H20O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 319.1314.


#

(2R,5R,E)-5-Phenylhex-3-en-2-ol (21)

To a dry Schlenk tube containing a solution of SmI2 in THF (0.1 M, 7.0 mL, 7 equiv) was added degassed nano-pure H2O (2.5 mL, 1400 equiv) turning the solution to a deep red color. The solution was stirred for 5 min before compound 19 (0.030 g, 0.10 mmol) was then added. After 30 min, the reaction was quenched with aq NaHCO3 (15 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 21 (0.011 g, 60%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 84:16); Rf = 0.30 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3462, 3062, 2956, 2929, 2871, 1714, 1600, 1578, 1450, 1315, 1266, 1111, 1068, 962, 709 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.30 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.22–7.18 (m, 3 H), 5.82 (ddd, J = 15.4, 6.7, 1.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.56 (ddd, J = 15.5, 6.6, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.30 (pent, J = 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.46 (pent, J = 7.0, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.36 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 1.28 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 145.56, 135.41, 132.87, 128.44, 127.16, 126.16, 68.87, 41.83, 23.42, 21.17.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [159.1174]+ calcd for C12H15 [M – OH]+; found: 159.1175.


#

(2R,5S,E)-5-Methylnon-3-en-2-ol (22)

To a dry Schlenk tube containing a solution of SmI2 in THF (0.1 M, 7.7 mL, 7 equiv) was added degassed nano-pure H2O (2.75 mL, 1400 equiv) turning the solution to a deep red color. The solution was stirred for 5 min before compound 20 (0.030 g, 0.11 mmol) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was quenched with aq NaHCO3 (15 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 22 (0.010 g, 60%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 90:10); Rf = 0.38 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3347, 2958, 2925, 2871, 2857, 1606, 1457, 1371, 1258, 1150, 1123, 1060, 969, 730 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 5.54 (dd, J = 15.4, 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 5.48 (dd, J = 15.4, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.28 (pent, J = 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.11 (pent, J = 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.29 (m, 6 H), 1.28 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3 H), 0.99 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 136.99, 132.24, 69.03, 36.56, 36.14, 29.48, 23.49, 22.79, 20.40, 14.08.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [139.1487]+ calcd for C10H19 [M – OH]+; found: 139.1482.


#

(5S,E)-7-[(4-Methoxybenzyl)oxy]-5-methyl-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-ol (24)

Prepared according to the general procedure for Zr-catalyzed carboaluminations using (2S)-4-​{[(1,​1-​dimethylethyl)​dimethylsilyl]​oxy}​-​2-​methylbutanal (23;[36] 0.29 g, 1.3 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography­ on silica gel gave 24 (0.288 g, 65%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 60:40); Rf = 0.65 (1:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3396, 3102, 3080, 3056, 3028, 2931, 2863, 1611, 1585, 1511, 1493, 1444, 1364, 1301, 1245, 1081, 1032, 909, 820, 757, 731, 696 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.42–7.38 (m, 4 H), 7.32 (t, 7.32, J = 7.3 Hz, 4 H), 7.27 (dd, J = 5.6, 2.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.26 (dd, J = 7.0, 2.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.25 (tt, J = 6.3, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 5.82 (dq, J = 8.7, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.77 (dq, J = 8.9, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.47 (s, 2 H), 4.47 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.44 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.43 (dd, J = 9.1, 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.30 (dd, J = 8.8, 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.81 (s, 3 H), 3.80 (s, 3 H), 3.63–3.56 (m, 2 H), 3.54–3.49 (m, 2 H), 2.63 (br, OH), 2.40 (br, OH), 2.08 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 2.07 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.92–1.81 (m, 4 H), 1.64 (sept, J = 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.50 (sept, J = 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 0.98 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3 H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.23, 143.31, 137.56, 137.26, 130.20, 129.55, 129.39, 129.37, 129.19, 128.20, 127.14, 125.90, 113.84, 113.83, 72.78, 72.77 72.71, 72.20, 68.36, 68.03, 55.28, 37.80, 37.56, 32.96, 32.77, 16.61, 16.51, 16.00, 15.21.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [363.1936]+ calcd for C22H28O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 363.1939.


#

(5S,E)-7-Hydroxy-5-methyl-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-yl Benzoate (25)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 24 (0.288 g, 0.85 mmol). The general procedure for DDQ removal of the PMB was then performed on the crude benzoylation product mixture obtained. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 25 (0.238 g, 86% over two steps) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.15 (4:1 hexanes: EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3047, 3059, 3031, 2967, 2931, 2877 1713, 1600, 1583, 1450, 1314, 1266, 1175, 1108, 1068, 909, 848, 731 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.40 (dt, J = 8.4, 1.5 Hz, 4 H), 7.33 (tt, J = 8.3, 1.0 Hz, 4 H), 7.27 (tt, J = 4.1, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4 H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 5.80 (dq, J = 8.9, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.78 (dq, J = 9.0, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.44 (s, 2 H), 4.43 (s, 2 H), 4.38 (dd, J = 8.9, 5.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.35 (dd, J = 8.9, 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.80 (s, 3 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 3.48–3.42 (m, 4 H), 2.10 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 2.09 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.80–1.59 (m 10 H), 1.00 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 166.33, 166.30, 143.26, 143.23, 140.64, 140.32, 133.21, 130.95, 129.96, 129.95, 128.71, 128.59, 127.82, 127.80, 126.33, 124.91, 124.56, 75.94, 75.78, 61.33, 61.24, 35.77, 35.74, 35.20, 34.97, 17.27, 17.18, 15.78, 15.61.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [347.1623]+ calcd for C21H24O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 347.1622.


#

(5S,E)-8-[(4-Methoxybenzyl)oxy]-5-methyl-2-phenyloct-2-en-4-ol (29)

To a Schlenk flask containing Et2O (5.2 mL) and t-BuLi (1.7 M, 0.917 mL, 1.56 mL) at –78 °C was added vinyl iodide 27 [30] (0.190 g, 0.78 mmol) dropwise. The solution was stirred for 10 min at –78 °C before adding (2S)-5-[(4-​methoxyphenyl)​methoxy]​-​2-​methylpentanal (28;[37] 0.123g, 0.520 mmol) dropwise, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at –78 °C. The reaction was quenched with aq NH4Cl (30 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography over silica gel gave 29 (0.097 g, 58%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = ~50:50); Rf = 0.64 (1:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3412, 3080, 3056, 3031, 2931, 2856, 1611, 1585, 1511, 1493, 1444, 1362, 1301, 1245, 1172, 1092, 1032, 821, 758, 735, 696 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.40 (dt, J = 8.4, 1.5 Hz, 4 H), 7.33 (tt, J = 8.3, 1.0 Hz, 4 H), 7.27 (tt, J = 4.1, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4 H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 5.80 (dq, J = 8.9, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.78 (dq, J = 9.0, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.44 (s, 2 H), 4.43 (s, 2 H), 4.38 (dd, J = 8.9, 5.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.35 (dd, J = 8.9, 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.80 (s, 3 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 3.48–3.42 (m, 4 H), 2.10 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 2.09 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.80–1.59 (m 10 H), 1.00 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.09, 143.17, 138.01, 137.65, 130.68, 129.38, 129.24, 129.22, 128.98, 128.24, 127.25, 127.22, 125.86, 113.75, 72.67, 72.65, 72.57, 72.55, 70.38, 70.32, 55.27, 39.51, 39.44, 28.96, 28.93, 27.53, 27.21, 16.59, 16.50, 14.97, 14.95.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [377.2093]+ calcd for C23H30O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 377.2094.


#

(5S,E)-8-Hydroxy-5-methyl-2-phenyloct-2-en-4-yl Benzoate (30)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 29 (0.097 g, 0.27 mmol). The general procedure for DDQ removal of the PMB was then performed on the crude benzoylation product mixture obtained. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 30 (0.065 g, 71%) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.13 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3400, 3059, 3031, 2931, 2876, 1712, 1600, 1583, 1493, 1450, 1380, 1314, 1266, 1175, 1107, 1068, 1025, 908, 731 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.06 (dt, J = 8.4, 1.0 Hz, 4 H), 7.55 (tq, J = 6.9, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4 H), 7.40 (dt, J = 8.5, 1.5 Hz, 4 H), 7.31 (tt, J = 7.38, 1.0 Hz, 4 H), 7.26 (tq, J = 7.2, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 5.82 (m, 4 H), 3.67 (tt, J = 6.5, 2.0 Hz, 4 H), 2.24 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 3 H), 2.23 (s, 3 H), 2.04 (m, 1 H), 1.97 (m, 1 H), 1.77–1.54 (m, 8 H), 1.12 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 1.09 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 165.97, 165.94, 142.93, 142.89, 140.14, 139.65, 132.79, 130.65, 129.57, 128.31, 128.20, 127.40, 127.38, 125.95, 125.94, 124.83, 124.27, 75.53, 75.45, 63.07, 63.06, 38.05, 37.56, 30.45, 30.17, 28.60, 28.56, 16.87, 16.78, 15.30, 15.05.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [361.1780]+ calcd for C22H26O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 361.1780.


#

(6S,E)-6-[(tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-ol (35)

Prepared according to the general procedure for Zr-catalyzed carboaluminations using (S)-3-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]butanal (32;[38] 0.231 g, 1.15 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 35 (0.234 g, 63%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 54:46); Rf = 0.52 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3413, 3081, 3057, 3027, 2955, 2928, 2855, 1612, 1512, 1494, 1462, 1374, 1248, 1143, 1077, 1001, 834, 807, 774, 756, 731, 695 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.41 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 4 H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 4 H), 7.24 (t, J = 7.2 Hz 2 H), 5.83 (dq, J = 8.6, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.79 (dq, J = 8.2, 1.4 Hz, 2 H), 4.90 (dt, J = 8.9, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.72 (dt, J = 8.9, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.23 (pentd, J = 6.2, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.16 (dtd, J = 12.2, 6.1, 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.35 (br, OH), 3.13 (br, OH), 2.10 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 2.10 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.83 (ddd, J = 9.1, 7.0, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.80 (ddd, J = 9.2, 5.2, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.63 (dddd, J = 14.3, 6.91, 3.8, 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.60 (dddd, J = 14.3, 8.7, 6.2, 2.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.28 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3 H), 1.23 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 3 H), 0.93 (s, 18 H), 0.14 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 6 H), 0.12 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 143.24, 143.21, 136.54, 135.96, 131.13, 130.86, 128.33, 127.25, 127.22, 125.99, 125.94, 69.63, 68.69, 67.20, 66.06, 46.31, 45.03, 25.97, 24.71, 23.29, 18.11, 18.07, 16.52, 16.28, –3.66, –4.26, –4.65, –4.83.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [343.2069]+ calcd for C19H32O2SiNa+ [M + Na]+; found: 343.2065.


#

(6S,E)-6-Hydroxy-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-yl Benzoate (38a)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 35 (0.234 g, 0.729 mmol). The crude product mixture was placed into a Teflon reaction vessel containing THF (7.3 mL), cooled to 0 °C, and treated with HF·pyr (70% HF, 0.400 mL, 12.064 mmol) and left to sit for 18 h at 4 °C without stirring. The reaction was quenched with aq NaHCO3 and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography over silica gel gave 38a (0.194 g, 86% over two steps) as a colorless oil; Rf (diastereomerα) = 0.24; Rf (diastereomerβ) = 0.18 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3428, 3060, 3032, 1713, 1600, 1584, 1450, 1266, 1108, 1068, 1025, 934, 847, 731 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.06 (t, J = 9.2 Hz, 4 H), 7.58 (tt, J = 7.4, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.55 (tt, J = 7.4, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.45 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 4 H), 7.41 (d, J = 7.51 Hz, 4 H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.27 (tt, J = 5.88, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 6.19 (dd, J = 8.8, 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.10 (dt, J = 6.90 Hz, 1 H), 5.90 (dq, J = 8.7, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.80 (dq, J = 9.2, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.97 (qd, J = 6.2, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.86 (qd, J = 6.2, 2.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.26 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3 H), 2.19 (t, J = 1.2 Hz, 3 H), 2.13 (ddd, J =14.0, 8.3, 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.99 (ddd, J = 13.3, 10.4, 2.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.88 (ddd, J = 11.5, 7.3, 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.80 (ddd, J = 13.7, 10.0, 3.3 Hz, 1 H), 1.29 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3 H), 1.24 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 167.10, 165.91, 142.66, 142.52, 139.76, 139.26, 133.20, 132.91, 130.52, 130.02, 129.79, 129.60, 128.42, 128.36, 128.30, 128.26, 127.59, 127.53, 125.96, 125.93, 125.87, 125.76, 70.75, 69.88, 65.46, 63.63, 45.08, 44.24, 24.14, 23.08, 16.66.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [333.1467]+ calcd for C20H22O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 333.1483.


#

(E)-7-[(tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]-6-methyl-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-ol (36)

Prepared according to the general procedure for Zr-catalyzed carboaluminations using 4-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]-3-methylbutanal (33;[39] 0.500 g, 2.31 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 36 (0.658 g, 85%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 54:46); Rf = 0.51 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3347, 3082, 3058, 3028, 2954, 2927, 2855, 1598, 1495, 1471, 1462, 1387, 1360, 1250, 1153, 1089, 1028, 1005, 833, 774, 755, 694 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.43 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 4 H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 4 H), 7.26 (tq, J = 7.4, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 5.83 (tq, J = 8.5, 1.4 Hz, 2 H), 4.72 (td, J = 7.3, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.64 (td, J = 8.8, 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.60 (dd, J = 10, 4.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.58 (dd, 5.2, 9.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.52 (dd, J = 9.9, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.48 (dd, J = 10.0, 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.25 (br, OH), 2.95 (br, OH), 2.12 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 6 H), 1.89 (octet, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 1.72 (ddd, J = 14.3, 9.2, 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 1.66 (ddd, J = 7.2, 6.1, 3.6 Hz, 2 H), 1.49 (ddd, J = 14.1, 5.9, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 0.98 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6 H), 0.95 (s, 9 H), 0.95 (s, 9 H), 0.12 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 6 H), 0.11 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 143.07, 143.05, 136.02, 135.69, 131.58, 131.19, 128.08, 126.97, 126.94, 125.74, 69.01, 68.39, 67.71, 66.58, 43.19, 42.31, 33.90, 32.30, 25.85, 18.26, 18.23, 17.76, 17.38, 16.14, –5.46, –5.51, –5.53.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [357.2226]+ calcd for C20H34O2SiNa+ [M + Na]+; found: 357.2222.


#

(E)-7-Hydroxy-6-methyl-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-yl Benzoate (38b)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 36 (0.250g, 0.747 mmol). The crude product mixture was placed into a Teflon reaction vessel containing THF (7.4 mL), cooled to 0 °C, and treated with HF·pyr (70% HF, 0.400 mL, 12.064 mmol) and left to sit for 18 h at 4 °C without stirring. The reaction was quenched with aq NaHCO3 and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 38b (0.240 g, 99% over two steps) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.18 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3429, 3065, 3032, 2962, 2919, 2877, 1712, 1600, 1583, 1450, 1314, 1267, 1108, 1069, 1025, 931, 711 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.05 (d, 8.0 Hz, 4 H), 7.55 (tt, 7.5, 1.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4 H), 7.41 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.8 Hz, 4 H), 7.32 (t, 7.2 Hz, 4 H), 7.26 (tt, J = 7.3, 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 6.06 (dt, J = 6.8, 9.1 Hz, 1 H), 6.04 (dt, J = 8.7, 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.81 (dq, J = 9.0, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.78 (dq, J = 9.2, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.57 (dd, J = 5.6, 1.8 Hz, 4 H), 2.24 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 2.23 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 1.98 (m, 2 H), 1.94–1.78 (m, 4 H), 1.05 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H), 1.04 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 166.15, 166.10, 142.72, 142.69, 139.52, 138.98, 132.89, 132.87, 130.60, 130.53, 129.63, 129.62, 128.35, 128.26, 127.50, 127.47, 126.59, 126.35, 125.97, 125.96, 71.00, 70.58, 68.16, 68.02, 38.67, 32.47, 32.37, 17.17, 16.83, 16.71, 16.65.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [347.1623]+ calcd for C21H24O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 347.1619.


#

(E)-7-[(4-Methoxybenzyl)oxy]-2-phenyloct-2-en-4-ol (37)

Prepared according to the general procedure for Zr-catalyzed carboaluminations using 4-[(4-methoxybenzyl)oxy]pentanal (34;[40] 0.300 g, 1.3 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 37 (0.254 g, 57%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 50:50); Rf = 0.61 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3395, 3080, 3056, 3030, 2930, 2861, 1611, 1585, 1512, 1493, 1443, 1374, 1337, 1301, 1172, 1032, 911, 821, 757, 733, 696 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.41 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 4 H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 4 H), 7.28 (dd, J = 8.8, 1.5 Hz, 4 H), 7.26 (tt, J = 6.5, 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 6.88 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.0 Hz, 4 H), 5.78 (dq, J = 5.4, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.77 (dq J = 5.4, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.54 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 4 H), 4.40 (dd, J = 11.3, 2.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.80 (s, 6 H), 3.57 (hex, 5.9 Hz, 2 H), 2.08 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 2.08 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 1.81–1.56 (m, 8 H), 1.22 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.06, 142.97, 142.95, 136.80, 136.72, 130.86, 130.84, 129.26, 129.24, 128.18, 127.15, 125.78, 113.74, 74.44, 74.43, 70.02, 69.98, 68.96, 68.89, 55.22, 33.67, 33.58, 32.56, 32.51, 19.49, 19.47, 16.29, 16.27.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [377.2093]+ calcd for C23H30O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 377.2094.


#

(E)-7-Hydroxy-2-phenyloct-2-en-4-yl Benzoate (38c)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 37 (0.288 g, 0.845 mmol). The general procedure for DDQ removal of the PMB was then performed on the crude benzoylation product mixture obtained. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 38c (0.180 g, 74% over two steps) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.15 (4:1 hexanes: EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3411, 3059, 3031, 2967, 2927, 2866, 1712, 1601, 1583, 1493, 1450, 1376, 1314, 1267, 1175, 1109, 1069, 1025, 710 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.06 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.3 Hz, 4 H), 7.55 (tt, J = 7.4, 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.44 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 4 H), 7.41 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.6 Hz, 4 H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4 H), 7.26 (tt, J = 7.2, 1.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.95 (dt, J = 6.9, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.94 (dt, J = 6.9, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.81 (dq, J = 9.0, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 3.88 (hex, J = 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.22 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 2.21 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 2.05 (qt, J = 6.94, 5.49 Hz, 1 H), 1.95 (dt, J = 6.8, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.93 (dt, J = 6.7, 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.83 (qt, J = 6.0, 3.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.63–1.54 (m, 4 H), 1.23 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 166.08, 166.03, 142.72, 142.70, 139.39, 139.32, 133.63, 132.86, 132.85, 130.60, 130.17, 129.62, 128.48, 128.33, 128.25, 127.49, 127.47, 126.16, 126.14, 125.96, 72.28, 72.15, 67.93, 67.88, 34.70, 34.56, 31.42, 31.31, 23.70, 23.67, 16.71.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [361.1780]+ calcd for C22H26O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 361.1780.


#

(E)-5-{[(4-Methoxybenzyl)oxy]methyl}-6-methyl-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-ol (45)

Prepared according to the general procedure for Zr-catalyzed carboaluminations using 2-{[(4-methoxybenzyl)oxy]methyl}-3-methylbutanal (40;[41] 0.346 g, 1.46 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 45 (0.392 g, 75%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 91:9); Rf = 0.34 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3456, 3080, 3055, 3028, 2956, 2870, 1611, 1585, 1512, 1443, 1418, 1366, 1301, 1246, 1173, 1079, 1032, 987, 909, 819, 757, 732, 696 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.37 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.27 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.25 (tt, J = 7.3, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.89 (dt, J = 8.7, 2.1 Hz, 2 H), 5.81 (dq, J = 8.5, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.72 (dt, J = 8.6, 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.49 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.45 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.81 (s, 3 H), 3.79 (dd, J = 9.5, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.68 (dd, J = 9.5, 5.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.06 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 2.04 (hex, J = 6.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.47 (qd, J = 6.0, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.05 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.34, 143.20, 135.77, 131.06, 129.69, 129.47, 128.13, 126.98, 125.82, 113.86, 73.24, 70.87, 69.43, 55.25, 50.01, 26.35, 21.52, 19.25, 16.12.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [377.2093]+ calcd for C23H30O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 377.2076.


#

(E)-5-(Hydroxymethyl)-6-methyl-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-yl Benzoate (50a)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 45 (0.392 g, 1.11 mmol). The general procedure for DDQ removal of the PMB was then performed on the crude benzoylation product mixture obtained. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 50a (0.281 g, 75% over two steps) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.50 (4:1 hexanes: EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3459, 3083, 3060, 3080, 2958, 2930, 2884, 1712, 1600, 1583, 1493, 1450, 1387, 1314, 1266, 1176, 1109, 1069, 1025, 920, 710 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.03 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.57 (tt, J = 7.4, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.45 (tt, J = 7.9, 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.41 (dd, J = 7.4, 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.27 (tt, J = 7.3, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.19 (dd, J = 9.3, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.90 (dq, J = 9.3, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.90 (dd, J = 4.5, 3.7 Hz, 2 H), 2.26 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 2.00 (hexd, J = 6.9, 5.1 Hz, 1 H), 1.79 (dtd, J = 6.7, 5.0, 4.1 Hz, 1 H), 1.09 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 1.04 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 166.06, 142.67, 139.70, 133.07, 130.29, 129.57, 128.48, 128.26, 127.53, 125.95, 125.46, 73.06, 60.79, 51.30, 27.00, 21.42, 19.50, 16.69.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [361.1780]+ calcd for C22H26O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 361.1758.


#

(E)-5-{[(4-Methoxybenzyl)oxy]methyl}-6,6-dimethyl-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-ol (46)

Prepared according to the general procedure for Zr-catalyzed carboaluminations using 2-{[(4-methoxybenzyl)oxy]methyl}-3,3-dimethylbutanal (41;[42] 0.387 g, 1.54 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 46 (0.175 g, 38%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 77:23); Rf = 0.43 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3445, 3080, 3056, 3027, 2954, 2868, 1611, 1586, 1512, 1493, 1464, 1443, 1363, 1301, 1246, 1206, 1075, 1034, 986, 819, 757, 696 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.33 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.26 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.24 (tt, J = 6.0, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 5.98 (dq, J = 8.3, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.89 (td, J = 8.3, 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.46 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.42 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.83 (dd, J = 4.1, 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 3.80 (s, 3 H), 3.32 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.05 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 1.42 (td, J = 4.2, 2.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.10 (s, 9 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.26, 143.33, 133.83, 132.89, 129.81, 129.45, 128.10, 126.85, 125.81, 113.81, 73.19, 69.71, 68.84, 55.23, 52.86, 33.39, 29.26, 15.95.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [391.2249]+ calcd for C24H32O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 391.2257.


#

(E)-5-(Hydroxymethyl)-6,6-dimethyl-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-yl Benzoate (50b)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 46 (0.144 g, 0.391 mmol). The general procedure for DDQ removal of the PMB was then performed on the crude benzoylation product mixture obtained. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 50b (0.060 g, 42% over two steps) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.35 (4:1 hexanes: EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3459, 3059, 3030, 2958, 2873, 1713, 1600, 1583, 1493, 1476, 1450, 1367, 1269, 1175, 1110, 1040, 910, 711 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.02 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.56 (tt, J = 7.0, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.45 (tt, J = 7.7, 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.40 (dd, J = 7.0, 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (tt, J = 7.1, 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.24 (tt, J = 7.1, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.33 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.06 (dq, J = 9.0, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.18 (dd, J = 11.7, 6.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.08 (dd, J = 11.7, 4.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.27 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.72 (ddd, J = 6.2, 4.1, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.08 (s, 9 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 165.60, 142.74, 137.24, 132.99, 130.44, 129.47, 128.47, 128.19, 127.33, 127.10, 125.93, 72.25, 60.94, 55.52, 33.20, 28.82, 16.51.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [375.1936]+ calcd for C23H28O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 375.1937.


#

(E)-1-[(4-Methoxybenzyl)oxy]-2,5-diphenylhex-4-en-3-ol (47)

Prepared according to the general procedure for Zr-catalyzed carboaluminations using 3-[(4-methoxybenzyl)oxy]-2-phenylpropanal (42;[43] (0.113 g, 0.42 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 47 (0.097 g, 59%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 98:2); Rf = 0.19 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3419, 3082, 3059, 3028, 2999, 2915, 2858, 1611, 1585, 1512, 1493, 1452, 1362, 1301, 1246, 1173, 1076, 1030, 908, 819, 730, 697 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.35–7.27 (m, 2 H), 7.26 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.24–7.15 (m, 8 H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 5.60 (dq, J = 8.9, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.88 (td, J = 8.6, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.55 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.51 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.99 (dd, J = 9.4, 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.88 (dd, J = 9.4, 4.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.81 (s, 3 H), 3.45 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, OH), 3.14 (td, J = 8.1, 4.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.82 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.35, 143.37, 139.37, 137.61, 129.65, 129.44, 129.06, 128.65, 128.30, 128.03, 126.97, 126.89, 125.90, 113.89, 73.23, 73.11, 72.64, 55.28, 51.75, 16.40.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [411.1936]+ calcd for C26H28O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 411.1938.


#

(E)-1-Hydroxy-2,5-diphenylhex-4-en-3-yl Benzoate (50c)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure was using 47 (0.097 g, 0.249 mmol). The general procedure for DDQ removal of the PMB was then performed on the crude benzoylation product mixture obtained. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 50c (0.065 g, 78% over two steps) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.37 (4:1 hexanes­:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3460, 3083, 3060, 3029, 2923, 1713, 1600, 1583, 1511, 1493, 1450, 1315, 1266, 1109, 1068, 1025, 907, 710 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.99 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.49 (tt, 7.0, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.37 (tt, J = 7.9, 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.25 (dd, J = 4.2, 1.0 Hz, 4 H), 7.19–7.16 (m, 2 H), 7.16–7.12 (m, 2 H), 7.12–7.09 (m, 2 H), 6.17 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.56 (dq, J = 9.5, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.97 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 2 H), 3.26 (dt, J = 8.7, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.93 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 166.14, 142.79, 140.52, 138.28, 133.10, 130.13, 129.68, 129.05, 128.56, 128.41, 128.10, 127.38, 127.36, 125.92, 124.40, 72.63, 63.45, 53.03, 16.76.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [395.1623]+ calcd for C25H24O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 395.1610.


#

(E)-2-Benzyl-1-[(4-methoxybenzyl)oxy]-5-phenylhex-4-en-3-ol (48)

To a Schlenk flask containing Et2O (3.5 mL) and t-BuLi (1.7 M, 0.905 mL, 1.54 mL) at –78 °C was added vinyl iodide 27 [30] (0.171 g, 0.702 mmol) dropwise. The solution was stirred for 10 min at –78 °C and 2-benzyl-3-[(4-methoxybenzyl)oxy]propanal (43;[43] 0.100 g, 0.351 mmol) was then added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at –78 °C before being brought to r.t. for 30 min. The reaction was quenched with aq NH4Cl (30 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography over silica gel gave 48 (0.051 g, 36%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 50:50); Rf = 0.22 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3430, 3034, 2917, 2849, 1600, 1594, 1493, 1454, 1442, 1382, 1333, 1244, 1201, 1160, 1033, 968, 919, 836, 745, 687 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.40–7.33 (m, 6 H), 7.33–7.28 (m, 4 H), 7.28–7.24 (m, 8 H), 7.23–7.14 (m, 6 H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 4 H), 5.89 (dq, J = 8.9, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.87 (dq, J = 8.6, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.75 (dd, J = 8.9, 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.60 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.46 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.44 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.41 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 2 H), 4.36 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.81 (s, 6 H), 3.71 (dd, J = 9.4, 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.51 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.48 (dd, J = 9.7, 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.46 (dd, J = 9.4, 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.26 (br, OH), 3.10 (br, OH), 2.93 (dd, J = 13.7, 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.83 (dd, J = 13.7, 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.70 (dd, J = 9.5, 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.67 (dd, J = 9.5, 3.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.27 (dtt, J = 9.7, 5.8, 4.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.08 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 2.05 (m, 1 H), 2.02 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 159.30, 159.28, 143.17, 143.09, 140.33, 140.29, 137.46, 136.81, 130.04, 129.86, 129.81, 129.47, 129.43, 129.10, 129.07, 128.36, 128.32, 128.30, 128.18, 128.15, 127.15, 127.10, 125.97, 125.92, 125.86, 125.83, 113.82, 73.12, 73.10, 71.23, 71.22, 70.48, 70.12, 55.23, 46.39, 46.36, 34.74, 32.93, 16.48, 16.27.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [425.2093]+ calcd for C27H30O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 425.2112.


#

(E)-2-Benzyl-1-hydroxy-5-phenylhex-4-en-3-yl Benzoate (50d)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 48 (0.102 g, 0.254 mmol). The general procedure for DDQ removal of the PMB was then performed on the crude benzoylation product mixture obtained. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 50d (0.081 g, 82% over two steps) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.32 (4:1 hexanes: EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3467, 3104, 3083, 3061, 3026, 2926, 1713, 1600, 1583, 1493, 1450, 1373, 1314, 1266, 1175, 1111, 1068, 1025, 909, 758, 733, 711 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.08 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 8.06 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.59 (m, 1 H), 7.58 (m, 1 H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4 H), 7.44–7.40 (m, 2 H), 7.40–7.32 (m, 6 H), 7.32–7.27 (m, 6 H), 7.26–7.19 (m, 6 H), 6.23 (dd, J = 8.9, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.10 (dd, J = 9.4, 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.97 (dq, J = 6.1, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.95 (dq, J = 6.5, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.71 (dd, J = 11.7, 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.66 (dd, J = 11.5, 4.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.61–3.55 (m, 2 H), 3.05 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.87 (dd, J = 13.6, 5.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.80 (dd, J = 13.6, 9.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.69 (dd, J = 14.0, 9.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.39 (ddq, J = 9.6, 7.2, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.24 (m, 1 H), 2.23 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H), 2.21 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 166.46, 166.45, 142.66, 142.64, 140.96, 139.94, 139.92, 139.91, 133.14, 133.11, 130.16, 130.10, 129.71, 129.69, 129.19, 128.97, 128.53, 128.49, 128.43, 128.29, 128.26, 127.63, 127.54, 126.18, 125.99, 125.93, 124.47, 124.32, 72.31, 61.79, 60.15, 48.05, 47.63, 33.17, 33.04, 16.86, 16.72.


#

(E)-1-[(R)-2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]-3-phenylbut-2-en-1-ol (49)

Prepared according to the general procedure for Zr-catalyzed carboaluminations using (R)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane-4-carboxaldehyde (44; 0.500 g, 3.8 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 49 (0.586 g, 50%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 74:26); Rf = 0.66 (1:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3450, 3060, 3034, 2990, 2800, 1665, 1601, 1585, 1501, 1453, 1386, 1310, 1076, 853 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.40 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.27 (tt, J = 7.2, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.68 (dq, J = 8.5, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.73 (ddd, J = 8.4, 3.9, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.20 (td, J = 6.9, 4.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.02 (dd, J = 8.2, 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.00 (dd, 8.4, 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.14 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 1.48 (s, 3 H), 1.39 (s, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 142.57, 139.96, 128.29, 127.55, 125.93, 125.89, 125.05, 109.28, 78.14, 68.35, 64.70, 26.45, 25.22, 16.78.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [271.1310]+ calcd for C15H20O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 271.1316.


#

(2R,E)-1,2-Dihydroxy-5-phenylhex-4-en-3-yl Benzoate (50e)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 49 (0.45 g, 2.13 mmol). The crude product was then redissolved in MeOH (8.5 mL) and pTSA (0.404 g, 2.128 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min before quenching with aq NaHCO3 (10 mL) and extracting with DCM (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 50e (0.223 g, 83%) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.25 (1:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3389, 3061, 3032, 2926, 2881, 1712, 1600, 1583, 1493, 1450, 1382, 1265, 1176, 1111, 1068, 1025, 907, 710 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.08 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.59 (tt, J = 7.4, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.47 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.45 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.35 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (tt, J = 7.15, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.99 (dd, J = 9.3, 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.94 (dq, J = 9.1, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.03 (td, J = 5.9, 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.85 (dd, J = 11.7, 3.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.76 (dd, J = 11.7, 6.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.26 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 166.22, 142.54, 142.26, 133.30, 129.75, 128.45, 128.29, 127.80, 125.97, 121.93, 73.59, 72.10, 62.78, 16.95.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [335.1259]+ calcd for C19H20O4Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 335.1265.


#

2-Isopropyl-5-phenylhex-3-en-1-ol (51a)

Prepared according to the general procedure for SmI2(H2O)n reductions using 50a (0.050 g, 0.147 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 51a (0.026 g, 80%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 83:17); Rf = 0.37 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3352, 3056, 2959, 2926, 2870, 1600, 1580, 1492, 1451, 1367, 1303, 1208, 1108, 1031, 908, 732, 699 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.31 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.22 (dd, J = 6.6, 1.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.20 (tt, J = 6.7, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.76 (ddd, J = 15.4, 6.7, 0.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.28 (ddd, J = 15.4, 9.5, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.65 (dd, J = 10.5, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.51 (pent, J = 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.41 (dd, J = 10.5, 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.00 (tdd, J = 9.6, 6.9, 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 1.67 (octet, J = 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.38 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 0.89 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 146.01, 139.51, 128.45, 128.05, 127.04, 126.06, 64.15, 52.46, 42.47, 28.89, 21.54, 20.86, 19.65.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [241.1568]+ calcd for C15H22ONa+ [M + Na]+; found: 241.1558.


#

2-(tert-Butyl)-5-phenylhex-3-en-1-ol (51b)

Prepared according to the general procedure for SmI2(H2O)n reductions using 50b (0.075 g, 0.212 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 51b (0.027 g, 73%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 80:20); Rf = 0.33 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3436, 3055, 2963, 2873, 1599, 1597, 1512, 1441, 1365, 1255, 1108, 1032, 909, 732 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.30 (t, J = 7.65 Hz, 2 H), 7.23–7.17 (m, 3 H), 5.78 (ddd, J = 15.3, 6.8, 0.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.36 (ddd, J = 15.3, 9.9, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.74 (dd, J = 10.3, 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.53 (pent, J = 6.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.36 (t, J = 10.3 Hz, 1 H), 1.95 (td, J = 10.3, 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.38 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 0.91 (s, 9 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 145.99, 140.50, 128.51, 127.52, 127.01, 126.12, 61.84, 56.49, 42.55, 32.07, 28.08, 21.54.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [255.1725]+ calcd for C16H24ONa+ [M + Na]+; found: 255.1725.


#

2,5-Diphenylhex-3-en-1-ol (51c)

Prepared according to the general procedure for SmI2(H2O)n reductions using 50c (0.066 g, 0.176 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 51c (0.012 g, 25%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 73:27); Rf = 0.28 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3427, 3026, 2924, 1601, 1492, 1451, 1271, 1031, 758 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.34 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.26–7.17 (m, 6 H), 5.82 (ddd, J = 15.6, 6.7, 0.88 Hz, 1 H), 5.66 (ddd, J = 15.4, 8.0, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.87 (m, 1 H), 3.77 (pent, J = 8.15 Hz, 2 H), 3.51 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H). 1.36 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 138.13, 128.73, 128.48, 127.90, 127.12, 126.83, 126.15, 66.51, 51.46, 42.38, 21.40.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [275.1412]+ calcd for C18H20ONa+ [M + Na]+; found: 275.1412.


#

2-Benzyl-5-phenylhex-3-en-1-ol (51d)

Prepared according to the general procedure for SmI2(H2O)n reductions using 50d (0.050 g, 0.147 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 51d (0.030 g, 82%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 81:19); Rf = 0.37 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3352, 3056, 3026, 2964, 2925, 2869, 1600, 1580, 1493, 1452, 1424, 1303, 1208, 1108, 1031, 973, 840, 800, 700 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.29 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.24 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.21 (tt, J = 6.2, 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.19–7.08 (m, 3 H), 7.03 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 5.64 (ddd, J = 15.5, 6.4, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.31 (ddd, J = 15.4, 8.4, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.61 (dd, J = 10.5, 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.48 (dd, J = 10.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.42 (pent, J = 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.80 (dd, J = 13.1, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.60 (dd, J = 13.2, 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.54 (dtd, J = 13.8, 7.8, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.28 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 145.83, 139.81, 138.48, 129.25, 129.00, 128.36, 128.23, 127.09, 126.01, 125.92, 65.44, 47.45, 42.14, 37.88, 21.31.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [289.1568]+ calcd for C19H22ONa+ [M + Na]+; found: 289.1563.


#

(S)-4-Benzyl-3-{(S)-2-benzyl-4-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]-butanoyl­}oxazolidin-2-one (53)

To a Schlenk flask containing oxazolidinone 52 [26] (1.56 g, 4.14 mmol) in THF (20.73 mL) at –78 °C was added KHMDS (1 M in THF, 9.94 mL, 9.94 mmol) dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred at –78 °C for 1 h before freshly distilled benzyl bromide (1.22 mL, 9.94 mmol) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 12 h at –78 °C before quenching with aq NH4Cl (40 mL) and extracting with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 53 (1.01 g, 62%) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.51 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3087, 3064, 3028, 2953, 2927, 2855, 1778, 1697, 1603, 1496, 1384, 1348, 1248, 1205, 1098, 1029, 834, 775, 732, 699 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.28 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 4 H), 7.25 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.19 (tt, J = 5.9, 2.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 4.61 (ddt, J = 9.7, 7.8, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.35 (ddd, J = 7.7, 4.6, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.09 (ddd, J = 8.6, 7.9, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.04, (dd, J = 9.0, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.65 (dd, J = 5.9, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.64 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.07 (dd, J = 13.3, 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.02 (dd, J = 13.5, 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.80 (dd, J = 13.3, 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.36 (dd, J = 13.5, 9.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.05 (ddt, J = 13.6, 9.1, 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.71 (dtd, J = 13.7, 5.8, 4.3 Hz 1 H), 0.85 (s, 9 H), –0.01 (s, 3 H), –0.02 (s, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 175.83, 152.99, 138.79, 135.42, 130.12, 129.44, 129.34, 128.87, 128.56, 128.47, 128.31, 127.18, 126.42, 65.66, 61.41, 55.12, 41.71, 39.15, 37.67, 34.55, 25.93, 25.85, 18.27, –5.49, –5.50.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [490.2390]+ calcd for C27H37NO4SiNa+ [M + Na]+; found: 490.2386.


#

(S)-2-Benzyl-4-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]butanal (54)

To a Schlenk flask containing DCM (100 mL) and 53 (1.014 g, 2.17 mmol) at –78 °C was added DIBAL-H (1.15 mL, 6.50 mmol) dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred at –78 °C for 4 h before being warmed to r.t. and quenched with 2 M Rochelle’s salt (100 mL) and stirred for 3 h. The aqueous layer was extracted with DCM (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine (50 mL), dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 54 (0.358 g, 56%) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.74 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3087, 3064, 3028, 2952, 2927, 2855, 2737, 2713, 1724, 1603, 1496, 1471, 1388, 1252, 1098, 1029, 987, 833, 809, 774, 730, 698 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = δ 9.71 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.29 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.20 (tt, J = 6.7, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.17 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H), 3.67 (ddd, J = 10.3, 6.9, 5.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.62 (ddd, J = 10.3, 6.7, 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.04 (dd, J = 13.4, 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.77 (dddt, J = 12.0, 7.6, 4.1, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.71 (dd, J = 13.4, 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.89 (dddd, J = 14.5, 7.9, 6.7, 5.1 Hz, 1 H) 1.72 (dddd, J = 14.3, 6.8, 5.2, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 0.87 (s, 9 H), 0.03 (s, 3 H), 0.02 (s, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 204.15, 138.87, 128.99, 128.50, 126.35, 60.48, 50.68, 34.69, 31.75, 25.86, 18.22, –5.51.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [315.1756]+ calcd for C17H28O2SiNa+ [M + Na]+; found: 315.1757.


#

(5S,E)-5-Benzyl-7-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-ol (55)

To a Schlenk flask containing Et2O (12.0 mL) and t-BuLi (1.7 M, 2.82 mL, 4.8 mmol) at –78 °C was added vinyl iodide 27 [30] (0.190 g, 0.78 mmol) dropwise. The solution was stirred for 5 min at –78 °C, 54 (0.585g, 2.4 mmol) was then added dropwise, and the reaction was stirred for 1 h at –78 °C. The reaction was quenched with aq NH4Cl (30 mL), and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 55 (0.394 g, 93%) as a colorless oil (d.r. = 62:38); Rf = 0.44 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3396, 3083, 3061, 3021, 2927, 2856, 1601, 1494, 1471, 1445, 1386, 1254, 1084, 1005, 908, 833, 775, 757, 730, 696, 664 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.42 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.40 (d J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.32–7.23 (m, 10 H), 7.19 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.17 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 5.95 (dq, J = 8.8, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.89 (dq, J = 8.7, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.61 (dt, J = 8.8, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.42 (dt, J = 8.7, 5.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.80–3.73 (m, 2 H), 3.62–3.56 (m, 2 H), 3.55 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, OH), 3.49 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, OH), 2.89 (dd, J = 13.7, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.83 (dd, J = 13.9, 5.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.54 (dd, J = 13.9, 9.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.51 (dd, J = 13.7, 9.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.21 (octet, J = 4.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.08 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 2.04 (m, 1 H), 2.01 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 1.80 (m, 1 H), 1.75 (dtd, J = 15.3, 7.9, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.66 (m, 1 H), 1.55 (ddt, J = 9.0, 6.5, 4.3 Hz, 1 H), 0.91 (s, 9 H), 0.90 (s, 9 H), 0.09 (s, 3 H), 0.08 (s, 3 H), 0.07 (s, 3 H), 0.06 (s, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 143.42, 143.35, 140.80, 140.78, 137.38, 136.93, 130.46, 129.13, 128.64, 128.33, 128.28, 128.17, 128.13, 127.09, 127.01, 125.89, 125.87, 125.84, 70.60, 70.53, 62.15, 61.21, 45.27, 45.24, 36.97, 36.87, 32.40, 31.98, 25.90, 25.89, 18.25, 16.59, 16.41, –5.43, –5.46, –5.48.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [433.2539]+ calcd for C26H38O2SiNa+ [M + Na]+; found: 433.2544.


#

(5S,E)-5-Benzyl-7-hydroxy-2-phenylhept-2-en-4-yl Benzoate (56)

Prepared according to the general benzoylation procedure using 55 (0.394 g, 0.961 mmol). The crude product mixture was placed into a Teflon reaction vessel containing THF (10 mL), cooled to 0 °C, and treated with HF·pyr (70% HF, 0.400 mL, 12.064 mmol) and left to sit for 18 h at 4 °C without stirring. The reaction was quenched with aq NaHCO3 (15 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography over silica gel gave 56 (0.312 g, 81% over two steps) as a colorless oil; Rf = 0.63 (1:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3411, 3084, 3061, 3026, 2931, 2880, 1712, 1600, 1583, 1494, 1450, 1381, 1314, 1267, 1175, 1111, 1068, 1025, 907, 757, 730, 710, 696 cm–1.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 8.04 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4 H), 7.57 (tt, J = 7.5, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.56 (tt, J = 7.4, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 4 H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 4 H), 7.35–7.27 (m, 10 H), 7.24–7.18 (m, 6 H), 6.01 (dd, J = 9.1, 4.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.94 (dd, J = 9.2, 4.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.91 (dq, J = 9.2, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.90 (dq, J = 9.2, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.71 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 4 H), 2.98 (dd, J = 14.0, 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.97 (dd, J = 13.7, 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.70 (dd, J = 14.0, 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.67 (dd, J = 13.7, 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.45 (dddd, J = 12.6, 8.4, 6.2, 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.36 (dddd, J = 12.5, 8.2, 6.2, 4.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.19 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 2.12 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3 H), 1.88 (dq, J = 13.6, 6.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.87 (dq, J = 13.0, 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.76 (dq, J = 13.5, 6.5 Hz, 1 H) 1.66 (dq, J = 13.2, 6.6 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 165.87, 142.82, 142.78, 140.52, 140.25, 140.13, 132.93, 132.92, 130.46, 129.61, 129.59, 129.10, 129.05, 128.50, 128.49, 128.38, 128.25, 128.23, 127.53, 127.49, 126.17, 125.97, 125.96, 124.23, 123.86, 73.88, 73.71, 61.17, 61.13, 42.22, 41.48, 37.08, 36.92, 32.94, 32.87, 16.86, 16.69.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [423.1936]+ calcd for C27H28O3Na+ [M + Na]+; found: 423.1933.


#

(3S,E)-3-Benzyl-6-phenylhept-4-en-1-ol (57)

Prepared according to the general procedure for SmI2(H2O)n reductions using 56 (0.312 g, 0.786 mmol). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel gave 57 (0.13 g, 32%) as mixture of diastereomers (d.r. = 74:26), Rf = 0.28 (4:1 hexanes:EtOAc).

IR (ATR): 3084, 3056, 2928, 1600, 1583, 1494, 1450, 1381, 1068, 1025, 907, 757, 696 cm–1.


#

Major Diastereomer

1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 7.40 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.36–7.23 (m, 4 H), 7.23–7.02 (m, 4 H), 5.50 (dd, J = 15.7, 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 5.28 (ddd, J = 15.6, 9.3, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.77–3.57 (m, 2 H), 3.40 (m, 1 H), 2.74 (dd, J = 13.3, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.63 (dd, J = 13.5, 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.48 (m, 1 H), 2.24 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.75 (dtd, J = 14.0, 7.1, 3.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.56 (m, 1 H), 1.27 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 146.08, 140.91, 140.34, 136.11, 132.10, 129.42, 129.40, 129.24, 128.59, 128.34, 128.31, 128.20, 128.15, 128.11, 127.69, 127.15, 127.13, 127.01, 126.63, 126.38, 125.95, 125.92, 125.84, 125.83, 125.67, 65.40, 61.45, 61.43, 61.13, 42.54, 42.46, 42.00, 41.98, 41.74, 40.77, 37.63, 37.48, 37.37, 36.68, 32.72, 21.29, 16.10.

HRMS (ES+): m/z [303.1725]+ calcd for C20H24ONa+ [M + Na]+; found: 303.1725.

Zoom Image
Scheme 12

#
#

Supporting Information

  • References

    • 1a Namy JL, Girard P, Kagan HB. New J. Chem. 1977; 1: 5
    • 1b Kagan HB. Tetrahedron 2003; 59: 10351
    • 2a Nicolaou KC, Ellery SP, Chen JS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 7140
    • 2b Edmonds DJ, Johnston D, Procter DJ. Chem. Rev. 2004; 104: 3371
    • 2c Molander GA, Harris CR. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 843
    • 2d Szostak M, Spain M, Parmar D, Procter DJ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013; 42: 9155
    • 2e Procter DJ, Flowers RA. II, Skrydstrup T. Organic Synthesis using Samarium Diiodide . RSC Publishing; Cambridge: 2010
    • 2f Plesniak MP, Huang H-M, Procter DJ. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017; 1: 0077
    • 3a Enemærke RJ, Daasbjerg K, Skrydstrup T. Chem. Commun. 1999; 343
    • 3b Miller RS, Sealy JM, Shabangi M, Kuhlman ML, Fuchs JR, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 7718
    • 3c Dahlén A, Hilmersson G. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004; 3393
    • 3d Sadasivam DV, Teprovich JA, Procter DJ, Flowers RA. II. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 4140
    • 4a Hutton TK, Muir KW, Procter DJ. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 4811
    • 4b Chopade PR, Prasad E, Flowers RA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 44
    • 4c Teprovich JA. Jr, Balili MN, Pintauer T, Flowers RA. II. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 8160
    • 4d Amiel-Levy M, Hoz S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 8280
    • 5a Curran DP, Hasegawa E. J. Org. Chem. 1993; 58: 5008
    • 5b Szostak M, Spain M, Parmar D, Procter DJ. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 330
    • 5c Szostak M, Spain M, Procter DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 8459
    • 6a Yasuko K, Tadahiro K. Chem. Lett. 1993; 22: 1495
    • 6b Szostak M, Spain M, Procter DJ. Nat. Protoc. 2012; 7: 970
    • 6c Szostak M, Spain M, Eberhart AJ, Procter DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 2268
    • 6d Huang H-M, Procter DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 7770
  • 7 Berndt M, Hölemann A, Niermann A, Bentz C, Zimmer R, Reissig H-U. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 18093
  • 8 Prasad E, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 1299
  • 9 Chopade PR, Prasad E, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 44
    • 10a Chciuk TV, Anderson WR, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 8738
    • 10b Chciuk TV, Anderson WR, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 15342
    • 10c Chciuk TV, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 11526
    • 10d Kolmar SS, Mayer JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 10687
    • 11a O’Neil GW, Moser DJ, Volz EO. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 7355
    • 11b Volz EO, O’Neil GW. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 8428
  • 12 Schaefer SL, Roberts CL, Volz EO, Grasso MR, O’Neil GW. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013; 54: 6125
  • 13 Wright AM, O’Neil GW. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 3441
  • 14 Stockdale TF, O’Neil GW. Synlett 2017; 28: 2267
  • 16 Wipf P, Lim S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1993; 32: 1068
  • 17 Mulzer J, Mantoulidis A, Öhler E. J. Org. Chem. 2000; 65: 7456
    • 18a Cram DJ, Kopecky KR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959; 81: 2748
    • 18b Reetz MT. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993; 26: 462
  • 19 Keck GE, Wager CA. Org. Lett. 2000; 2: 2307
  • 20 The reaction was also performed using DMPU and H2O together and gave the same d.r. (75:25) as that obtained when using DMPU (Table 1, entry 1) or H2O (entry 5).
  • 21 Compound 6 was converted to a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers by oxidation with Dess–Martin periodinane followed by reduction with NaBH4. See reference 13.
    • 22a Banik BK, Venkatraman MS, Banik I, Basu MK. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 4737
    • 22b Banik BK, Banik I, Aounallah N, Castillo M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005; 46: 7065
    • 22c Williams DB. G, Caddy J, Blann K, Grove JJ. C, Holzapfel CW. Synthesis 2009; 2009
    • 22d Gómez AM, Uriel C, Company MD, López JC. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 7116
    • 22e Powell JR, Dixon S, Light ME, Kilburn JD. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 3564
    • 22f Ankner T, Hilmersson G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 5707
  • 23 Corey EJ, Hannon FJ, Boaz NW. Tetrahedron 1989; 45: 545
  • 24 Eleil EL, Pillar C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955; 77: 3600
  • 25 Prasad E, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 6357
  • 26 Yu W, Zhang Y, Jin Z. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 1447
  • 27 Bied C, Kagan HB. Tetrahedron 1992; 48: 3877
  • 28 Hancock RD. J. Chem. Educ. 1992; 69: 615
  • 29 Bajpai R, Yang F, Curran DP. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 7965
  • 30 Mousseau JJ, Bull JA, Charette AB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 1115
  • 31 Hancock RD, Martell AE. Chem. Rev. 1989; 89: 1875
  • 32 Instead of an η3-complex, Sm-II could also be considered as the 4-membered chelate Sm-II′ (Scheme 12).
  • 33 Kiyotsuka Y, Acharya HP, Katayama Y, Hyodo T, Kobayashi Y. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 1719
  • 34 Szostak M, Spain M, Procter DJ. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 3049
  • 35 Spino C, Granger M.-C, Tremblay M.-C. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 4735
  • 36 Fuerst R, Lentch C, Rinner U. Synthesis 2014; 46: 357
  • 37 Tanaka-Yanuma A, Watanabe S, Ogawa K, Watanabe S, Aoki N, Ogura T, Usuki T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015; 56: 6777
  • 38 Fernandes RA, Mulay SV. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 7029
  • 39 Udagawa S, Satoshi S, Takemura T, Sato M, Arai T, Nitta A, Takumi A, Kawai K, Iwamura T, Okazaki S, Takahashi T, Kaino M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013; 23: 1617
  • 40 Sanaboina C, Chidara S, Jana S, Eppakayala L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 1767
  • 41 Angle SR, Bernier DS, Chann K, Jones DE, Kim M, Neitzel ML, White SL. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 8195
  • 42 Mydock LK, Spilling CD, Demchenko AV. C. R. Chim. 2011; 14: 301
  • 43 Yadav JS, Nanda S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001; 12: 3223

  • References

    • 1a Namy JL, Girard P, Kagan HB. New J. Chem. 1977; 1: 5
    • 1b Kagan HB. Tetrahedron 2003; 59: 10351
    • 2a Nicolaou KC, Ellery SP, Chen JS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 7140
    • 2b Edmonds DJ, Johnston D, Procter DJ. Chem. Rev. 2004; 104: 3371
    • 2c Molander GA, Harris CR. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 843
    • 2d Szostak M, Spain M, Parmar D, Procter DJ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013; 42: 9155
    • 2e Procter DJ, Flowers RA. II, Skrydstrup T. Organic Synthesis using Samarium Diiodide . RSC Publishing; Cambridge: 2010
    • 2f Plesniak MP, Huang H-M, Procter DJ. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017; 1: 0077
    • 3a Enemærke RJ, Daasbjerg K, Skrydstrup T. Chem. Commun. 1999; 343
    • 3b Miller RS, Sealy JM, Shabangi M, Kuhlman ML, Fuchs JR, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 7718
    • 3c Dahlén A, Hilmersson G. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004; 3393
    • 3d Sadasivam DV, Teprovich JA, Procter DJ, Flowers RA. II. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 4140
    • 4a Hutton TK, Muir KW, Procter DJ. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 4811
    • 4b Chopade PR, Prasad E, Flowers RA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 44
    • 4c Teprovich JA. Jr, Balili MN, Pintauer T, Flowers RA. II. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 8160
    • 4d Amiel-Levy M, Hoz S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 8280
    • 5a Curran DP, Hasegawa E. J. Org. Chem. 1993; 58: 5008
    • 5b Szostak M, Spain M, Parmar D, Procter DJ. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 330
    • 5c Szostak M, Spain M, Procter DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 8459
    • 6a Yasuko K, Tadahiro K. Chem. Lett. 1993; 22: 1495
    • 6b Szostak M, Spain M, Procter DJ. Nat. Protoc. 2012; 7: 970
    • 6c Szostak M, Spain M, Eberhart AJ, Procter DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 2268
    • 6d Huang H-M, Procter DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 7770
  • 7 Berndt M, Hölemann A, Niermann A, Bentz C, Zimmer R, Reissig H-U. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 18093
  • 8 Prasad E, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 1299
  • 9 Chopade PR, Prasad E, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 44
    • 10a Chciuk TV, Anderson WR, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 8738
    • 10b Chciuk TV, Anderson WR, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 15342
    • 10c Chciuk TV, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 11526
    • 10d Kolmar SS, Mayer JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 10687
    • 11a O’Neil GW, Moser DJ, Volz EO. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 7355
    • 11b Volz EO, O’Neil GW. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 8428
  • 12 Schaefer SL, Roberts CL, Volz EO, Grasso MR, O’Neil GW. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013; 54: 6125
  • 13 Wright AM, O’Neil GW. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 3441
  • 14 Stockdale TF, O’Neil GW. Synlett 2017; 28: 2267
  • 16 Wipf P, Lim S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1993; 32: 1068
  • 17 Mulzer J, Mantoulidis A, Öhler E. J. Org. Chem. 2000; 65: 7456
    • 18a Cram DJ, Kopecky KR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959; 81: 2748
    • 18b Reetz MT. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993; 26: 462
  • 19 Keck GE, Wager CA. Org. Lett. 2000; 2: 2307
  • 20 The reaction was also performed using DMPU and H2O together and gave the same d.r. (75:25) as that obtained when using DMPU (Table 1, entry 1) or H2O (entry 5).
  • 21 Compound 6 was converted to a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers by oxidation with Dess–Martin periodinane followed by reduction with NaBH4. See reference 13.
    • 22a Banik BK, Venkatraman MS, Banik I, Basu MK. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 4737
    • 22b Banik BK, Banik I, Aounallah N, Castillo M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005; 46: 7065
    • 22c Williams DB. G, Caddy J, Blann K, Grove JJ. C, Holzapfel CW. Synthesis 2009; 2009
    • 22d Gómez AM, Uriel C, Company MD, López JC. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 7116
    • 22e Powell JR, Dixon S, Light ME, Kilburn JD. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 3564
    • 22f Ankner T, Hilmersson G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 5707
  • 23 Corey EJ, Hannon FJ, Boaz NW. Tetrahedron 1989; 45: 545
  • 24 Eleil EL, Pillar C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955; 77: 3600
  • 25 Prasad E, Flowers RA. II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 6357
  • 26 Yu W, Zhang Y, Jin Z. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 1447
  • 27 Bied C, Kagan HB. Tetrahedron 1992; 48: 3877
  • 28 Hancock RD. J. Chem. Educ. 1992; 69: 615
  • 29 Bajpai R, Yang F, Curran DP. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 7965
  • 30 Mousseau JJ, Bull JA, Charette AB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 1115
  • 31 Hancock RD, Martell AE. Chem. Rev. 1989; 89: 1875
  • 32 Instead of an η3-complex, Sm-II could also be considered as the 4-membered chelate Sm-II′ (Scheme 12).
  • 33 Kiyotsuka Y, Acharya HP, Katayama Y, Hyodo T, Kobayashi Y. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 1719
  • 34 Szostak M, Spain M, Procter DJ. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 3049
  • 35 Spino C, Granger M.-C, Tremblay M.-C. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 4735
  • 36 Fuerst R, Lentch C, Rinner U. Synthesis 2014; 46: 357
  • 37 Tanaka-Yanuma A, Watanabe S, Ogawa K, Watanabe S, Aoki N, Ogura T, Usuki T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015; 56: 6777
  • 38 Fernandes RA, Mulay SV. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 7029
  • 39 Udagawa S, Satoshi S, Takemura T, Sato M, Arai T, Nitta A, Takumi A, Kawai K, Iwamura T, Okazaki S, Takahashi T, Kaino M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013; 23: 1617
  • 40 Sanaboina C, Chidara S, Jana S, Eppakayala L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 1767
  • 41 Angle SR, Bernier DS, Chann K, Jones DE, Kim M, Neitzel ML, White SL. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 8195
  • 42 Mydock LK, Spilling CD, Demchenko AV. C. R. Chim. 2011; 14: 301
  • 43 Yadav JS, Nanda S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001; 12: 3223

Zoom Image
Scheme 1 (A) Regioselective SmI2 allyl benzoate reductions and (B) its application to a synthesis of honokiol
Zoom Image
Scheme 2 (A) Proposed regio- and diastereoselective allylic benzoate reductions proceeding through a chelated organosamarium intermediate. (B) The importance of chelation for stereoselectivity is supported by the non-diastereoselective reaction of compound 5, which lacks this ability.
Zoom Image
Scheme 3 Synthesis of substrate 9 and initial screening of its reduction with SmI2(H2O)n in the presence of various additives
Zoom Image
Scheme 4 SmI2 reduction of compound 12 and determination of absolute stereochemistry by ozonolysis of 13
Zoom Image
Scheme 5 Synthesis and elimination of lactate-derived compounds 21 and 22
Zoom Image
Scheme 6 Comparison of chelation size effects on SmI2(H2O)n allylic benzoate reductions. The reaction of 30 (B) gave lower diastereoselectivity than compound 25 (A), presumably due to formation of a less conformationally rigid 7-membered organosamarium chelate Sm-IV.
Zoom Image
Scheme 7 Synthesis of additional elimination substrates 37ac containing differing methyl stereocenter positioning
Zoom Image
Scheme 8 Determination of absolute stereochemistry for the major diastereomers produced from the reactions of compounds 25 and 38a and models Sm-III and Sm-IV to explain the outcome
Zoom Image
Scheme 9 Reagents and conditions: (1) AlMe3, Cp2ZrCl2, then 40, 41, 42, 43, or 44; (2) BzCl, pyridine; (3) DDQ; (4) BzCl, pyridine; (5) pTSA, MeOH.
Zoom Image
Scheme 10 Synthesis of an optimized substrate 56 based on results from Tables 2 and 3
Zoom Image
Scheme 11 Results from the SmI2(H2O)n reduction of an ‘optimized’ substrate 56. The d.r. and regioselectivity (r.r.) obtained suggest that the trends observed in Tables 2 and 3 may not be additive.
Zoom Image
Scheme 12