Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2019; 36(14): 1423-1430
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1691765
SMFM Fellowship Series Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Impact of Fetal Anomalies on Contemporary Labor Patterns

Anna C. McCormick
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
,
Jennifer J. McIntosh
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
,
Weihua Gao
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
,
Judith U. Hibbard
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
,
Meredith O. Cruz
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 January 2019

15 April 2019

Publication Date:
14 June 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To compare labor patterns in pregnancies affected by fetal anomalies to low-risk singletons.

Study Design Labor data from the Consortium on Safe Labor, a multicenter retrospective study from 19 U.S. hospitals, including 98,674 low-risk singletons compared with 6,343 pregnancies with fetal anomalies were analyzed. Repeated-measures analysis constructed mean labor curves by parity, gestational age, and presence of fetal anomaly in women who reached full dilation. Interval-censored regression analysis adjusted for covariables was used to determine the median traverse times for labor progression.

Results Labor curves for all groups indicated slower labor progress for patients with fetal anomalies. The most significant trends in median traverse times were observed in the preterm nulliparous and term multiparous groups. The median traverse times from 4 cm to complete dilation in the preterm nulliparous control versus anomaly groups were 5.0 and 5.4 hours (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion Labor proceeds at a slower rate in pregnancies affected by anomalies.

Keywords

fetal anomalies - labor progress - labor curves - chromosome abnormalities

Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 National Center for Health and Statistics. Birth defects monitoring program. NCfHSBdm. Available at: www.marchofdimes.org/peristats . Accessed February 29, 2016
    PubMed
  • 2 Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW. , et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (06) 1281-1287
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM. , et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (04) 326.e1-326.e10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187 (04) 824-828
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Albers LL. The duration of labor in healthy women. J Perinatol 1999; 19 (02) 114-119
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Kilpatrick SJ, Laros Jr RK. Characteristics of normal labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74 (01) 85-87
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Neal JL, Lowe NK, Ahijevych KL, Patrick TE, Cabbage LA, Corwin EJ. “Active labor” duration and dilation rates among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset: a systematic review. J Midwifery Womens Health 2010; 55 (04) 308-318
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Friedman E. The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954; 68 (06) 1568-1575
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Sharshiner R, Silver RM. Management of fetal malpresentation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58 (02) 246-255
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Rossi RM, Divanovic A, DeFranco EA. Obstetric outcomes associated with fetal cyanotic congenital heart disease. Am J Perinatol 2018
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Walsh CA, MacTiernan A, Farrell S. , et al. Mode of delivery in pregnancies complicated by major fetal congenital heart disease: a retrospective cohort study. J Perinatol 2014; 34 (12) 901-905
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Zaki MN, Hibbard JU, Kominiarek MA. Contemporary labor patterns and maternal age. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 1018-1024
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Kominiarek MA, Vanveldhuisen P, Hibbard J. , et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. The maternal body mass index: a strong association with delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (03) 264.e1-264.e7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Craigo SD. Indicated preterm birth for fetal anomalies. Semin Perinatol 2011; 35 (05) 270-276
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Clark SL, DeVore GR, Platt LD. The role of ultrasound in the aggressive management of obstructed labor secondary to fetal malformations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152 (08) 1042-1044
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Mostello D, Chang JJ, Bai F. , et al. Breech presentation at delivery: a marker for congenital anomaly?. J Perinatol 2014; 34 (01) 11-15
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Shipp TD, Bromley B, Benacerraf B. The prognostic significance of hyperextension of the fetal head detected antenatally with ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15 (05) 391-396
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 de la Vega A, Verdiales M. High incidence of emergency cesarean section among fetuses with unrecognized chromosomal abnormalities. P R Health Sci J 2001; 20 (04) 347-349
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Feghali M, Timofeev J, Huang CC. , et al. Preterm induction of labor: predictors of vaginal delivery and labor curves. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (01) 91.e1-91.e7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (05) 1181-1193
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (03) 179-193
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Dotters-Katz SK, Humphrey WM, Senz KL, Lee VR, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB. The effects of Turner syndrome, 45, X on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort evaluation. Am J Perinatol 2016; 33 (12) 1152-1158
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar