Standardized Weaning from Temporary Extracorporeal Life Support in Cardiovascular Patients

Abstract

Objectives Separation from extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is often based on individual decisions rather than evaluated standard operating procedures (SOPs). Therefore, we strived to evaluate a SOP, summarizing specific treatment paths for this group of patients.

Methods A total of 107 cardiovascular patients were supported with ECLS within a 4-year period. Fifty-three patients were treated before the SOP was introduced (group A) and 54 patients were treated afterward (group B). Patient characteristics and outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two time periods regarding baseline characteristics, compliance with SOP criteria, and the end points successful weaning and 30-day survival.

Results Successful weaning rose significantly from 56.6 to 74.1% (p = 0.045) and 30-day survival rate increased from 34.0 to 50.0% (p = 0.069) after implementation of the SOP. Successful weaning was significantly associated with daily echocardiography (p = 0.012) and circulatory support with dobutamine (p = 0.026). The investigated other criteria used in the weaning process did not show a significant correlation with better outcome.

Conclusion The SOP for ECLS weaning showed higher weaning rates compared with a weaning based on individual decisions. Although only parts of the SOP were associated with higher weaning and survival rates, the SOP was experienced as a useful guideline for standardized ECLS management.

Keywords

mechanical circulatory support - extracorporeal life support - ECLS - postcardiotomy failure - extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - weaning protocol

• References

• 1 Park SJ, Kim JB, Jung S-H, Choo SJ, Chung CH, Lee JW. Outcomes of extracorporeal life support for low cardiac output syndrome after major cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147 (01) 283-289
• 2 Papadopoulos N, Marinos S, El-Sayed Ahmad A. , et al. Risk factors associated with adverse outcome following extracorporeal life support: analysis from 360 consecutive patients. Perfusion 2015; 30 (04) 284-290
• 3 Elsharkawy HA, Li L, Esa WAS, Sessler DI, Bashour CA. Outcome in patients who require venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24 (06) 946-951
• 4 Weymann A, Schmack B, Sabashnikov A. , et al. Central extracorporeal life support with left ventricular decompression for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock and lung failure. J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 9: 60
• 5 Carl M, Alms A, Braun J. , et al. S3 guidelines for intensive care in cardiac surgery patients: hemodynamic monitoring and cardiocirculary system. Ger Med Sci 2010; 8: Doc12
• 6 Trummer G, Benk C, Klemm R. , et al. Short-term heart and lung support: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and extracorporeal life support. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 2013: mmt008
• 7 Kreibich M, Czerny M, Benk C, Beyersdorf F, Rylski B, Trummer G. Thigh compartment syndrome during extracorporeal life support. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2017; 5 (06) 859-863
• 8 Cardarelli MG, Young AJ, Griffith B. Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adults in cardiac arrest (E-CPR): a meta-analysis of observational studies. ASAIO J 2009; 55 (06) 581-586
• 9 Pappalardo F, Pieri M, Arnaez Corada B. , et al. Timing and strategy for weaning from venoarterial ECMO are complex issues. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015; 29 (04) 906-911
• 10 Khorsandi M, Dougherty S, Bouamra O. , et al. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock after adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 12 (01) 55
• 11 Camboni D, Philipp A, Rottenkolber V. , et al. Long-term survival and quality of life after extracorporeal life support: a 10-year report. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 52 (02) 241-247
• 12 Extracorporeal Life Support Organization - ECMO and ECLS > Registry > Statistics > International Summary. Available at www.elso.org/registry/statistics/internationalsummary.aspx . Accessed July 5, 2016
• 13 Barbaro RP, Odetola FO, Kidwell KM. , et al. Association of hospital-level volume of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases and mortality. Analysis of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 191 (08) 894-901
• 14 Aissaoui N, Luyt C-E, Leprince P. , et al. Predictors of successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) weaning after assistance for refractory cardiogenic shock. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37 (11) 1738-1745
• 15 Vieillard-Baron A, Charron C, Chergui K, Peyrouset O, Jardin F. Bedside echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamics in sepsis: is a qualitative evaluation sufficient?. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32 (10) 1547-1552
• 16 Platts DG, Sedgwick JF, Burstow DJ, Mullany DV, Fraser JF. The role of echocardiography in the management of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012; 25 (02) 131-141
• 17 Aissaoui N, Guerot E, Combes A. , et al. Two-dimensional strain rate and Doppler tissue myocardial velocities: analysis by echocardiography of hemodynamic and functional changes of the failed left ventricle during different degrees of extracorporeal life support. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012; 25 (06) 632-640
• 18 Rousse N, Juthier F, Pinçon C. , et al. ECMO as a bridge to decision: recovery, VAD, or heart transplantation?. Int J Cardiol 2015; 187: 620-627
• 19 Taylor MA, Taylor B. Cardiac ultrasound and extracorporeal life support: the two go together. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28 (04) A18-A19
• 20 Hilberath JN, Oakes DA, Shernan SK, Bulwer BE, D'Ambra MN, Eltzschig HK. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23 (11) 1115-1127 , quiz 1220–1221
• 21 Cavarocchi NC, Pitcher HT, Yang Q. , et al. Weaning of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using continuous hemodynamic transesophageal echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 146 (06) 1474-1479
• 22 Demondion P, Fournel L, Golmard J-L, Niculescu M, Pavie A, Leprince P. Predictors of 30-day mortality and outcome in cases of myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock treated by extracorporeal life support. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 45 (01) 47-54
• 23 Wu M-Y, Lin P-J, Tsai F-C. , et al. Postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adults: the optimal duration of bridging to recovery. ASAIO J 2009; 55 (06) 608-613