Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2020; 37(11): 1134-1139
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692392
Original Article

Anal Sphincter Injury Associated with Vaginal Twin Delivery

Bobby D. O'Leary 
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
Tariq Bholah
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
Tamara Kalisse
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
Mark P. Hehir
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
Michael P. Geary
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Obstetric anal sphincter injury remains the most common cause of fecal incontinence in women, and research in twin pregnancies is sparse. This study aimed to examine risk factors for sphincter injury in twin deliveries over a 10-year period.

Study Design This was a retrospective study of twin vaginal deliveries in a tertiary-level hospital over 10 years. We examined the demographics of women who had a vaginal delivery of at least one twin. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine risk factors.

Results There were 1,783 (2.1%) twin pregnancies, of which 556 (31%) had a vaginal delivery of at least one twin. Sphincter injury occurred in 1.1% (6/556) women with twins compared with 2.9% (1720/59,944) singleton vaginal deliveries. Women with sphincter injury had more instrumental deliveries (83.3 vs. 27.6%; p = 0.008). On univariate analysis, only instrumental delivery was a significant risk factor (odds ratio: 2.93; p = 0.019).

Conclusion Sphincter injury occurs at a lower rate in vaginal twin pregnancies than in singletons. No twin-specific risk factors were identified. Discussion of the risk of sphincter injury should form part of patient counseling with regard to the mode of delivery.

Keywords

obstetric anal sphincter injury - twin delivery - perineal trauma

Author Contributions

B.D.O. contributed to project development, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing. T.B. contributed to the data analysis, manuscript, and writing. T.K. contributed to data analysis and manuscript writing. M.P.H. contributed to project development, data analysis, and manuscript writing. M.P.G. contributed to data analysis and manuscript writing.




Publication History

Received: 03 December 2018

Accepted: 02 May 2019

Article published online:
06 June 2019

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 

  • References

  • 1 Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993; 329 (26) 1905-1911
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Fenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JO. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189 (06) 1543-1549
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L, Kirwan C, O'Herlihy C, O'Connell PR. Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196 (03) 217.e1-217.e5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Jha S, Parker V. Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2016; 27 (06) 849-857
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Spydslaug A, Trogstad LIS, Skrondal A, Eskild A. Recurrent risk of anal sphincter laceration among women with vaginal deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (02) 307-313
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Harkin R, Fitzpatrick M, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Anal sphincter disruption at vaginal delivery: is recurrence predictable?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 109 (02) 149-152
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Boggs EW, Berger H, Urquia M, McDermott CD. Recurrence of obstetric third-degree and fourth-degree anal sphincter injuries. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (06) 1128-1134
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Ali A, Glennon K, Kirkham C, Yousif S, Eogan M. Delivery outcomes and events in subsequent pregnancies after previous anal sphincter injury. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 174: 51-53
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC. , et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG 2013; 120 (12) 1516-1525
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Ekéus C, Nilsson E, Gottvall K. Increasing incidence of anal sphincter tears among primiparas in Sweden: a population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87 (05) 564-573
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Richter HE, Brumfield CG, Cliver SP, Burgio KL, Neely CL, Varner RE. Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear: a comparison of primiparous patients, vaginal births after cesarean deliveries, and patients with previous vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187 (05) 1194-1198
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hehir MP, O'Connor HD, Higgins S. , et al. Obstetric anal sphincter injury, risk factors and method of delivery - an 8-year analysis across two tertiary referral centers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26 (15) 1514-1516
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Porat S, Baud D, Farine D. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries in vaginal delivery of twins: associated risk factors and comparison with singletons. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2013; 24 (05) 769-774
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Rosen H, Barrett J, Okby R, Nevo O, Melamed N. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in twin deliveries: a retrospective review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2016; 27 (05) 757-762
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Bateni ZH, Clark SL, Sangi-Haghpeykar H. , et al. Trends in the delivery route of twin pregnancies in the United States, 2006-2013. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 205: 120-126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Breathnach FM, McAuliffe FM, Geary M. , et al; Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium. Prediction of safe and successful vaginal twin birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (03) 237.e1-237.e7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Barrett JFR. Twin delivery: method, timing and conduct. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28 (02) 327-338
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Hehir MP, Rubeo Z, Flood K. , et al. Anal sphincter injury in vaginal deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2018; 29 (03) 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Hehir MP, Fitzpatrick M, Cassidy M, Murphy M, O'Herlihy C. Are women having a vaginal birth after a previous caesarean delivery at increased risk of anal sphincter injury?. BJOG 2014; 121 (12) 1515-1520
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Powell J, Gilo N, Foote M, Gil K, Lavin JP. Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency. J Perinatol 2007; 27 (06) 343-346
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Smith RP. Resident technical experience in obstetrics and gynecology before and after implementation of work-hour rules. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115 (06) 1166-1171
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Abenhaim HA, Morin L, Benjamin A, Kinch RA. Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 134 (02) 164-168
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Hamilton DF, Lane JV, Gaston P. , et al. What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement. BMJ Open 2013; 3 (04) e002525
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Chan SW, Tulloch E, Cooper ES, Smith A, Wojcik W, Norman JE. Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now?. BMJ 2017; 357 (May): j2224
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar