Keywords
advanced glycation end products - cell receptor for age - soluble RAGE - atrial fibrillation - atrial structural remodeling - atrial electrical remodeling - treatment modalities
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained clinical cardiac arrhythmia.[1] Some people with AF have no symptoms and are observed during physical examination. Individuals with AF may have palpitation, irregular heartbeat, weakness, lightheadedness, fatigue, shortness of breath, chest pain, and dizziness. AF itself usually is not life threatening but is a serious condition and may contribute to morbidity and mortality. AF is a risk factor for heart failure, thromboembolism, hospitalization, morbidity, and death. Besides those problems, AF has socioeconomic consequences. Untreated AF increases the risk of stroke, heart failure, systemic embolism, increased mortality due to altered hemodynamics, atrial and ventricular dyssynchrony, and progressive atrial and ventricular mechanical dysfunction. Various mechanisms have been proposed for AF, including remodeling of atrium due to changes in atrial structure and function[2]
[3]
[4] and electrophysiologic mechanisms. Advanced glycation end products (AGE)–receptor for AGE (RAGE) axis has been implicated in numerous diseases, including myocardial infaction,[5] hyperthyroidism,[6] and pulmonary hypertension.[7] Recently, AGE–RAGE axis has been implicated in the development of AF.[1]
[8] This article provides a brief review of epidemiology, association of AF with some cardiovascular complications, pathophysiology and mechanisms of AF, AGE–RAGE axis, role of AGE–RAGE axis in the induction of AF, and possible therapeutic measures for the treatment of AF.
Epidemiology
Annual incidence rate of AF vary depending on the studied population (0.8–28.3 cases/1,000 person-years[8] and incidence density rate over time was 27.3/1,000 life-years in 1993 compared with 28.3/1,000 life-years in 2007.[9] Incidence of AF in the United States and Canada is 4.5%/year with lifetime risk of 25% in individuals aged ≥40 years.[10] The incidence rate varies with geographical regions, the lowest incidence rates were 33.8/100,000 person-year in male, and 19.8/100,000 person-year in female in Asia Pacific region in 2010. The incidence was highest in North America (264.5/100,000 person-year in male population and 196.3/100,000 person-year in female population). The overall prevalence of AF has been reported to be 1 to 2% in general population.[9] The global prevalence rates of AF in 2010 in men and women were, respectively, 596.2/100,000 and 373.1/100,000 population.[11] There is a regional variation in prevalence rate, the highest being in North America (925.7/100,000 population for males and 520.8/100,000 population for females) and the lowest prevalence rates were in Asia Pacific region (340.2/100,000 population for male and 196.0/100,000 population for female).[11] These authors also reported that the prevalence and incidence of AF increase with age. The projected prevalence of AF in the United States in 2050 will increase from 5.6 million (excluding paroxysmal and silent) to 12.1 to 15.9 million.[12]
[13] Prevalence of AF in Canada and the United States is 700 to 775/100,000 persons.[11]
Classification of Atrial Fibrillation
Classification of Atrial Fibrillation
AF is classified into four groups:
-
Paroxysmal AF: AF episode comes and goes, and terminates spontaneously within 7 days, normally within 24 hours.
-
Persistent AF: AF episode lasts longer than 7 days and usually treatment is required.
-
Long-lasting AF: AF episode lasts longer than 12 months. Restoration to normal rhythm may be attempted but less effective.
-
Permanent AF: AF episode lasts longer than 1 year despite treatment. Rate control strategy therapy should be adopted.
Possible Causes of Atrial Fibrillation
Possible Causes of Atrial Fibrillation
Possible common causes of AF are hypertension, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass surgery, and valvular damage due to disease.[14] Age is a major risk factor.[15] Other less common factors are cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, hyperthyroidism,[16] sleep apnea,[17] pulmonary embolism, atrial septal defect, heavy alcohol use, caffeine, tobacco, congenital heart disease, diabetes, chronic renal disease, sick sinus syndrome, obesity, viral infection, surgical stress, pneumonia, genetic, and lone AF which occurs without any heart disease.[18] Over 70% of AF is associated with heart disease. There is an association of hypertension (140/90 mm Hg) and AF,[19] but the risk increase is modest (1.2–1.5). Hypertension is responsible for 14% of all cases of AF.[20] The systolic arterial pressure of 130 to 139 mm Hg and increase in pulse pressure are risk of AF.[21] Genetic factor is also involved in AF.[22] AF is associated with three- to fivefold increase in risk of ischemic stroke.[23]
[24]
Pathogenesis of Atrial Fibrillation
Pathogenesis of Atrial Fibrillation
The pathogenesis of AF is complex and varies with individuals.[25] Mechanisms including atrial structural remodeling, electrical remodeling, autonomic remodeling, and epicardial adipose tissue have been implicated in the development of AF. In this review, however, stress will be given to atrial structural remodeling and electrical remodeling. This will help in understanding the role of AGE–RAGE axis in the development of AF.
Atrial Structural Remodeling
Evidence indicates that structural remodeling particularly interstitial fibrosis is an important contributor to AF.[2] Profibrotic agents include proinflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, extracellular matrix (ECM) regulatory proteins, and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and endothelin-1 system,[25]
[26]
[27] and act synergistically. CTGF is also known as insulin-like growth factor binding protein-related protein-2 (TGFBR-rP2). CTGF, a cytokine, is a potent inducer of ECM.[28] In vitro studies have been shown that there is an increase in both CTGF gene and protein expression in mesangial cells after exposure to high glucose, and in vitro studies assessing CTGF expression in diabetic rat kidney.[29] Secretome from human epicardial fat tissue of patients undergoing routine cardiac bypass surgery is known to induce fibrosis through release of adipo-fibrokine activin A in an organo culture of rat atria.[30] There are two types of fibrosis, interstitial and reparative. Interstitial fibrosis separates muscle bundles and reparative fibrosis replaces dead cardiomyocytes which interferes with electrical continuity and slows the conduction.[2]
[31] Fibroblasts couple electrically with cardiomyocytes and may promote reentry and/or ectopic activity when in large number.[32] Fibroblasts ion channel may be used for suppressing arrhythmias caused by fibroblast–cardiomyocyte electric interactions and through inhibition of collagen formation.[32] Fibrosis leads to progression of AF to permanent form of AF.[31]
[33] Studies suggest that atrial fibrosis can be reduced with inhibition of angiotensin–renin–aldosterone system,[34] and simvastatin.[35] Studies have also shown that reversal of risk factor for AF can reduce the atrial fibrosis.[36]
[37]
AF is associated with increased atrial fibrosis.[3]
[4] Remodeling of atrium due to changes in atrial structure and function can generate AF. Rapid ectopic firing and reentry maintains AF. Atrial remodeling can produce unidirectional block and slow conduction. Atrial remodeling can create after local differences in membrane potential due to differences in repolarization of action potential and reentrant excitation in region of conduction delay and unidirectional block. Unidirectional block is a common cause of coupled extrasystole and a variety of sustained ectopic beats, flutter, and fibrillation. Factors that favor reentrant type of arrhythmias are long pathway due to local block, cardiac cells with short refractory period, and slow conduction.
Electrical Remodeling
Risk of AF is increased 3.5-fold in patients with coronary artery disease.[38] Foci of rapid ectopic activity are located at the junction of atrium and pulmonary veins in human.[39] Atrial action potential is not the same as action potential of ventricular cells. Gelband et al[40] have identified two types of action potential in right atrial tissue of human: electrical characteristics of atrial contractile cells and fibers where automaticity develops. Prasad[41] reported that the action potential in the human atrial tissue had also two types of action potentials: pacemaker type of action potential with two humps in the plateau phase observed in spontaneously beating atria and associated with triple contraction, and a nonpacemaker type of action potential in quiescent fiber stimulated electrically. There are three mechanisms of ectopic beats: diastolic depolarization, early afterdepolarization (EAD), and delayed afterdepolarization (DAD).[26] Increased diastolic depolarization creates automatic activity (ectopic beat). EAD occurs during repolarization phase when the action potential duration (APD) is prolonged. Occurrence of EAD increases the prevalence of AF in congenital long QT syndrome.[42] EAD in prolonged APD allows L-type Ca2+ to recover from inactivation resulting in depolarizing inward movement of Ca2+ ions.[43] DAD is due to abnormal diastolic release of Ca2+ from sarcoplasmic reticulum.[44] EAD cells close to normally repolarizing cells raise the normally repolarizing cells to threshold to fire and initiate focal activity.[45]
Reentrant excitation is a common cause of coupled extrasystole as well as a variety of sustained ectopic rhythm, flutter, and fibrillation. Factors that favor reentrant arrhythmias are (1) long pathway due to local block, (2) cardiac cells with short refractory period, and (3) slow conduction. Early capture of excitability due to decrease in the refractory period as a result of decrease in APD leads to sustained re-entrant impulses throughout the circuit. Slow conduction would allow the impulse to reenter without short refractory period. Atrial structural changes such as dilation and fibrosis increase pathway and slow conduction that would favor reentrant arrhythmias.[33]
AGE–RAGE Axis
Advanced glycation end products are heterogeneous groups of irreversible adducts formed by nonenzymatic glycation of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids with reducing sugars.[46]
[47] Physiologically, this process occurs at a low rate but is accelerated in hyperglycemia, inflammation, renal failure, Alzheimer's disease, and micro- and macrovascular disease.[48]
[49] AGE has two potentially harmful effects. First, it forms cross-links with collagen and elastin, resulting in stiffness of the artery,[50] and it upregulates CTGF.[29] Second, AGE interacts with its cell receptor (RAGE) to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) through activation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase[51] which activates nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB).[52] Activated NF-kB activates numerous genes such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-9.[53]
[54] Proinflammatory cytokines upregulate NADPH oxidase[55] and increase the generation of ROS.[56] There are two isoforms of RAGE: cleaved RAGE (cRAGE), which is proteolytically cleaved from full-length RAGE,[57] and endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE), which is produced from splicing of full-length RAGE mRNA.[49] sRAGE is composed of both cRAGE and esRAGE. In healthy subjects, the levels of serum sRAGE are four to five times greater than the levels of serum cRAGE.[58]
[59] Since the extracellular domain in sRAGE is maintained as RAGE, the ligand-binding capacity is similar to RAGE receptor. sRAGE, therefore, acts as a decoy for RAGE by binding with RAGE ligands.[60] Binding of sRAGE with ligands does not activate intracellular signaling. sRAGE also is a competitive inhibitor of ligand–RAGE interaction.[61] sRAGE has cytoprotective effects against adverse effects of AGE–RAGE interaction.
Serum and Atrial Levels of AGE in AF
Serum and Atrial Levels of AGE in AF
Plasma levels of fluorescent AGE were significantly higher in patients with AF compared with control subjects (74.9 ± 25.6 vs. 61.8 ± 20.1 a.u.). Raposeiras-Roubín et al[8] also reported that the plasma levels of fluorescence AGE were higher in patients with AF than in patients with sinus rhythm in nondiabetic group (72.3 ± 25.2 vs. 57.8 ± 20.3 a.u.). The fluorescence AGE levels were elevated in patients with chronic heart failure and AF.[62] Patients with AF have elevated levels of AGE in atrial tissue and serum compared with those with sinus rhythm, and myocardial AGE levels were positively correlated with fibrosis.[1]
[8] The data suggest that the levels of AGE in plasma and tissue are elevated in patients with AF.
RAGE Levels in Atrium in AF
RAGE Levels in Atrium in AF
Using immunostaining and Western blotting, the expression of RAGE protein in atria of diabetic rats has been shown to be elevated compared with control.[63] They also reported that expression of CTGF immune-reactive protein was increased by threefold in atria of diabetic rats as compared with control nondiabetic rats. These investigators reported that streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats had diffuse interstitial fibrosis in atria. The inhibition of AGE formation with OPB-9195 compound suppressed the diabetic-induced AF and reduced the expression of CTGF. Suppression of AGE with OPB-9195 would have reduced the interaction of RAGE with AGE and hence reduced the generation of proinflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, and chemokines resulting in reduced fibrosis and prevention of AF. The data indicate that expression of RAGE is elevated in diabetic rats with AF.
Plasma/Serum Levels of sRAGE in AF
Plasma/Serum Levels of sRAGE in AF
Raposeiras-Roubín et al[8] reported that patients with AF had higher plasma levels of sRAGE compared with control subjects (1,714.2 ± 1,105.5 vs. 996.1 ± 820.7 pg/mL, p = 0.001). The plasma levels of sRAGE were higher in nondiabetic AF group compared with nondiabetic group with sinus rhythm (1,614.7 ± 1,068.5 vs. 934.9 ± 778.5 pg/mL, p = 0.011) and AF with diabetes compared with sinus rhythm with diabetes (1,897.8 ± 1,192.4 vs. 1,081.7 ± 885.5, p = 0.022). Serum sRAGE levels tended to be higher but not significantly in patients with AF than in patients without AF (737.9 ± 446.7 pg/mL vs. 624.0 ± 443.5 pg/mL, p = 0.254).[64] Lancefield et al[65] showed that sRAGE levels were higher in patients with persistent AF compared with paroxysmal AF (median: 1,196 [724–2,041] vs. 799 [583–1,033] pg/mL), and higher in persistent AF compared with sinus rhythm (1,196 [724–2,041] vs. 782 [576–1,039]). They also reported that serum sRAGE levels were elevated in Caucasian patients with persistent AF. sRAGE levels are elevated in patients with persistent AF compared with paroxysmal AF and compared with patients with sinus rhythm.[66] However, Al Rifai et al[67] reported that there was no significant association of sRAGE and risk of AF. Yang et al[68] showed that high level of plasma sRAGE is independently associated with low recurrence of AF after catheter ablation in diabetic patients. These data suggest that the serum levels of sRAGE are higher in patients with AF as compared with individuals with sinus rhythm and that the elevation is higher in patients with persistent AF compared with patients with paroxysmal AF.
esRAGE and cRAGE in AF
It has been reported that cRAGE levels were higher in patients with persistent AF compared with patients with paroxysmal AF and the levels were higher in these two groups compared with controls (control, 480.8 ± 214.3; paroxysmal AF, 692.1 ± 287.2; and persistent AF, 965.6 ± 312.9 pg/mL).[66] However, esRAGE levels were lower in both paroxysmal AF and persistent AF compared with control subjects (286.7 ± 161.4, 170.4 ± 113.9, and 412.6 ± 178.5 pg/mL). The levels were lower in persistent AF patients than in paroxysmal AF group.[66] Yan et al[64] showed that esRAGE levels were lower in AF patients as compared with non-AF patients (0.29 ± 0.12 vs. 0.34 ± 0.15 ng/mL; p = 0.005). Chinese patients with persistent AF had lower levels of esRAGE compared with patients with paroxysmal AF.[64]
[66] However, serum esRAGE levels were significantly elevated in Caucasian patients with persistent AF.[65] Both serum sRAGE and esRAGE are associated with increased risk of persistent AF compared with paroxysmal AF.[65] These data suggest that the serum levels of cRAGE are higher in both persistent and paroxysmal AF as compared with control subjects, and higher in patients with persistent AF compared with patients with paroxysmal AF. Plasma levels of esRAGE were lower in patients with AF compared with control subjects.
Mechanism by which AGE and RAGE Stress Induces AF
Mechanism by which AGE and RAGE Stress Induces AF
There are three ways by which AGE can induce AF: (1) alteration of cellular protein resulting in cellular function, (2) alteration in ECM (structural modification of atria), and (3) interaction of AGE with RAGE receptor resulting in ROS that activates NF-kB.[52] Activated NF-kB activates numerous genes, such as TNF-α, IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8. And IL-9,[53]
[54] as well as adhesion molecules.[69] Proinflammatory cytokines upregulate NADPH oxidase[55] and increase the generation of ROS.[56] Thus, AGE may play a role in the pathophysiology of AF through the aforementioned mechanisms. The following section discusses the role of AGE and its interaction with RAGE-induced atrial structural and electrical remodeling in the pathophysiology of AF.
Structural Remodeling of Atrium
Structural remodeling is due to fibrosis. Both AGE and its interaction with RAGE take part in atrial fibrosis.
AGE-Induced Structural Remodeling of Atrium
Accumulation of AGE on protein of ECM forms cross-links. Cross-linking of AGE on collagen and elastin increases the ECM area.[70] AGE promotes protein cross-linking that alters protein structure and function of collagen and elastin resulting in atrial fibrosis.[71] Twigg et al[29] reported that AGE upregulates CTGF, also known as insulin-like growth factor binding protein-related protein-2 (IGFBR-rP2) and TGF-β1 mRNA protein expression. CTGF is a potent inducer of ECM.[72] AGE significantly increases the potent profibrotic growth factor, TGF-β1.[73] CTGF acts as a downstream mediator of TGF-β1-induced fibrosis.[74] Zhau et al[75] reported that AGE-induced CTGF expression occurs predominantly through TGF-β1-dependent pathway and plays a role in ECM deposition.
AGE and RAGE Interaction–Induced Structural Remodeling of Atrium
AGE not only changes atrial structure and physiological function but also modulates inflammatory and fibrotic reactions through binding with RAGE receptor. As discussed earlier, interaction of AGE and RAGE produces ROS, proinflammatory cytokine, and cell adhesion molecules. Stimuli such as ROS, cytokines, adhesion molecules, and growth factor stimulate fibroblast proliferation, migration, and differentiation into myofibroblast.[32] Myofibroblasts produce MMPs and ECM proteins. Increased ECM expression and activity increases extracellular deposition.[76] TGF-β stored in ECM is involved in the regulation of atrial fibrosis. ROS induces the CTGF.[77] ROS activates TGF-β which regulates NOX4 expression and NOX4-dependent generation of hydrogen peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide is required for TGF-β-induced myofibroblast differentiation and ECM production.[78]
[79] TNF activates TGF-β signaling pathway and myofibroblasts, and increases secretion of MMP-2 and MMP-9 which modulate atrial remodeling.[80] sVCAM-1 is associated with long-term risk of AF.[81] Verdejo et al[82] reported that elevated sVCAM-1 predicts a higher risk of postoperative AF in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.
Electrical Remodeling of Atrium
AGE and Electrical Remodeling
Increased fibrosis due to elevated levels of AGE would induce electrical remodeling in atria leading to AF. It is supported by the fact that increased fibrosis promotes EAD and triggered activity at left atrial pulmonary vein junction.[83] EAD could be due to increase in diastolic Ca2+.[83] Mitochondria could be the other source of Ca2+.[84] AF arising from structurally remodeled atria could be due to changes in the electrical properties of ECM. Fibrosis causes localized slowing of conduction and increasing conduction heterogeiety[85] which may result in unidirectional block and macro-entry.[86]
AGE–RAGE-Induced Inflammation and Electrical Remodeling
As described earlier, interaction of AGE with RAGE generates ROS, inflammatory mediators, and PDGF. Inflammation, atrial fibrosis, and oxidative stress are important factors that initiate AF.
ROS (H2 O2) prolongs APD and induces triggered activity via EAD and DAD. ROS directly stimulates L-type Ca2+ current, which results in abnormal intracellular Ca2+ cycling in myocytes and facilitates EAD.[87] H2 O2–induced prolongation of APD and EAD is due to development of enhanced sodium current.[88] Increase in late sodium current may result in arrhythmias via an EAD mechanism by ROS. ROS induces fibrosis in atria.[32]
[76]
[77] ROS enhances fibroblast proliferation and collagen gene expression.[89] Atrial fibrosis would promote EAD and triggered actvity[83] and unidirectional block.[86] TNF produces abnormal Ca2+ handling and arrhythmogeneity in pulmonary vein cardiomyocytes.[90]
Overexpression of TNF in cardiac tissue prolongs APD and Ca2+ transient duration.[91] These investigators also reported that TNF directly alters Ca2+ handling in cardiomyocytes which is crucial for initiation of AF and atrial electrical modeling. PDGF from myofibroblasts reduces APD and Ca2+ transients.[92] Inflammation increases the heterogeneity of conduction and AF duration.[93] Heterogeneity of conduction could be due to altered expression or distribution of gap junction L-5 protein or atrial fibrosis.[94]
Treatment Modalities for Atrial Fibrillation
Treatment Modalities for Atrial Fibrillation
Aforementioned data suggest that AGE–RAGE stress is involved in the development of AF. The treatment strategy for AF, therefore, should be directed toward lowering of AGE–RAGE stress. AGE–RAGE stress reduction would prevent, regress, and slow the progression of AF. Three-pronged attack—reduction of AGE and expression RAGE levels, blocking of AGE binding to RAGE, and elevation of sRAGE levels—should be attempted in the treatment of AF. Additionally, antioxidants and anti-inflammatory agents would be helpful in the treatment of AF. The details of reduction of AGE, and expression of RAGE, blockers of AGE binding to RAGE and elevation of sRAGE have been reported earlier by Prasad[95] and Prasad and Mishra.[96] Hence, only a summary of treatment modalities is provided later.
Reduction in Levels of AGE
Low levels of AGE in the body can be accomplished by reducing dietary consumption of AGE-rich diet, preventing AGE formation, using pharmaceutical agents, and increasing degradation of AGE. Reduction in consumption of high AGE-rich diet such as red meat, cheese, cream, butter, and animal fat should be advised. Consumption of food with lowest amount of AGE such as grains, legumes, breads, vegetable, fruits, and milk, especially fat-free milk, should be encouraged. Cooking at high temperature in dry heat for long period should be advised since it increases the formation of AGE. Frying, broiling, and roasting generate more AGE than poaching, stewing, steaming, and boiling. Cooking in moist heat at low temperature for short duration should, therefore, be advised. Cigarette smoking elevates serum levels of AGE and hence cigarette smoking should be completely stopped. Exercise should be advised and encouraged because exercise reduces the serum levels of AGE.
Consumption of acidic ingredients such as lemon and vinegar should be advised as they inhibit formation of AGE. Use of vitamins such as benfotiamine, pyridoxine, vitamin B6, vitamin C, vitamin D, and vitamin E should be advised as they inhibit the formation of AGE. Carnosine also inhibits AGE formation and hence its use can be advocated.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ramipril), angiotensin II receptor blockers (telmisartan, losartan, valsartan, and candesartan), statins (cerivastatin, atorvastatin), and other drugs (pioglitazone, α-lipoic acid, pentoxifylline, resveratrol, curcumin, and aspirin) reduce the levels of AGE in serum. Patients who are using one or more of these drugs will benefit.
Suppression of RAGE Expression
Agents such as simvastatin, atorvastatin, telmisartan, candesartan, thiazolidinediones, nifedipine, and curcumin downregulate the expression of RAGE.
Blocking of Binding of AGE to RAGE
Azeliragon prevents the binding of AGE to RAGE.[97] In low dose, it has been shown to have some beneficial effects in patients with Alzheimer's disease.[98] This drug has not been tried in any other disease. sRAGE is considered a blocking agent for RAGE as it competes with RAG to bind with AGE. Increases in the levels of sRAGE would reduce the levels of AGE to combine with RAGE. This would reduce the adverse effects of interaction of AGE with RAGE.
Elevation of sRAGE
Because sRAGE competes with RAGE for binding with AGE and since interaction of AGE with sRAGE does not activate intracellular signaling, elevation of sRAGE would benefit patients with AF. The levels of sRAGE can be elevated in two ways: use of pharmaceutical agents and exogenous administration of sRAGE. Statins (pitavastatin, pravastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, and lovastatin), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ramipril, perindopril), and antidiabetic drug (rosiglitazone) increase the sRAGE levels in serum and/or in isolated cell lines. Administration of sRAGE exogenously has been shown to suppress the development of atherosclerosis in apoE-deficient mice,[99] carotid artery restenosis in mice,[100] and AGE-induced vasculopathy in diabetic rats.[101] sRAGE administration reduced the amyloid-β levels[102] and increased the capacity of space recognition, learning, and memory improvement[103] in mouse with Alzheimer's disease.
Antioxidants
Since AGE interacts with RAGE to generate ROS,[51]
[56] which is involved in structural and electrical remodeling of AF,[104] and antioxidant may serve as an additional option for the treatment of AF. Few studies have been performed with antioxidants in the treatment of AF. Vitamin E and vitamin C reduced the effective refractory period shortening,[105] while they had no effects in reducing atrial excitability or vulnerability[106] to AF in animal model. Integrated use of Cordarone with antioxidants such as sodium bicarbonate and Q10 stabilized electrical process in heart of patients with AF.[107] Long-term consumption of antioxidant-rich diet reduced the incidence of postoperative AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.[108] Vitamins C and E have been effective as a prophylactic therapy to prevent postoperative AF.[109]
[110]
[111] Review of literature by Rasoli et al[112] has shown that vitamin E and vitamin C play a role in the prevention of AF both in animal and small clinical studies.
Perspectives
The data suggest that both AGE alone and its interaction with RAGE could induce AF. AGE induces atrial structural remodeling[70]
[71]
[72]
[73] and atrial electrical remodeling[83]
[84]
[85]
[86] which have been suggested to be involved in the development of AF. Similarly, production of ROS, inflammatory cytokines, and cell adhesion molecules as a result of interaction of AGE with RAGE induce atrial structural remodeling[76]
[77]
[78]
[79]
[80]
[81]
[82] and electrical remodeling.[87]
[88]
[89]
[90]
[91]
[92]
[93]
[94] As described earlier, it is known that atrial structural and electrical remodeling are involved in the development of AF. These data suggest that AGE–RAGE axis in part is responsible for the development of AF. In all the aforementioned studies, AGE and sRAGE have been measured not in the same patients or animals. No consideration has been given for measurement of sRAGE which has a protective effect against adverse effects of AGE–RAGE interaction, and sRAGE is a RAGE blocking agent. Measuring AGE, sRAGE separately, is not useful because sRAGE is elevated along with AGE in patients with AF. May be the elevation of sRAGE is smaller than the elevation of AGE levels. For example, sRAGE and AGE levels are elevated in diabetes[113]
[114] and end-stage renal disease,[59] but the ratio of AGE/sRAGE is high in all these studies. It would be useful to measure AGE and sRAGE in the same patient because this will help in the assessment of AGE–RAGE stress which is measured as the ratio of AGE/sRAGE.[115] This ratio is risk factor for disease and a high ratio indicates the presence of disease and its complications.[115] The serum levels of sRAGE is elevated in patients with AF.[8]
[65] sRAGE should have protected from the development of AF but it did not. May be the elevation of AGE is greater than the elevation of sRAGE. It would be useful to measure both AGE and sRAGE in the same patient and use AGE–RAGE stress as a marker of AF.
Considering the involvement of AGE–RAGE axis in the pathogenesis of AF, the treatment modalities should include a reduction in the levels of AGE and RAGE, blockage of RAGE to bind with AGE, elevation of sRAGE, and use of antioxidants. As mentioned earlier in the section of antioxidants in the treatment of AF, antioxidants seem to have beneficial effects in the treatment of AF. However, systematic study should be performed with selected antioxidants (combination of vitamins C and E in effective doses, melatonin). Combination of vitamins will be effective in two ways: by scavenging ROS and by reducing the formation of AGE. Studies should be designed to investigate if the agents prevent, regress, and slow the progression of AF. It is to note that AGE–RAGE axis may not be the only risk factor in the pathogenesis of AF. Therefore, one should not expect that AGE–RAGE targeted treatment would completely prevent, regress, and slow the progression of AF.
Conclusions
The data suggest that AGE–RAGE axis may be involved in the pathogenesis of AF through atrial structural and electrical remodeling. The treatment should be directed toward AGE, RAGE, and sRAGE, the three important components of AGE–RAGE axis. Three-pronged attack—reduction in AGE and RAGE levels, blocking of RAGE binding to AGE, and elevation of sRAGE—should be made in the treatment of AF. Additionally, antioxidants may also be beneficial in the treatment of AF.
