Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402356
Importance of Effective Retraction for Exposing Loose Areolar Plane in Suprafascial Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Raising
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Received: 25 October 2019
Accepted after revision: 01 November 2019
Publication Date:
26 December 2019 (online)
In recent years, perforator flaps have become an important tool in the reconstructive surgery armamentarium. In this technique, careful dissection of vascular perforators allows transfer of well-perfused tissue locally, regionally, and even distantly as free flaps.[1] Even though the importance of adequate retraction has been emphasized in the past,[2] this article presents a technical tip for suprafascial identification and dissection of perforators, particularly useful for deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Suprafascial flap raising usually involves dissecting through the plane between the fascia and the superficial adipose tissue until perforators are visualized. The senior author has noticed that standard upward retraction ([Fig. 1]), even though useful for optimizing cutting through tissues, can actually hide perforators behind the fascia as this is pulled up. Instead, if upward retraction is combined with gently pulling of the flap away from the surgeon, a loose areolar plane is exposed, aiding safe raising of the flap ([Fig. 2]). This technique also helps preserve the suprafascial vascular plexus on the flap side, which may reduce fat necrosis. The particular way of retracting presented in this technical note allows adequate visualization of the right areolar plane facilitating identification and dissection of vascular perforators ([Video 1]). In the context of pressures for increasing operating efficiency,[3] the authors advocate using every single tool at hand to facilitate this task.
#
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Declaration
This technical tip was presented at the World Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery in Bologna, Italy 12th to 15th June, 2019.
-
References
- 1 Koshima I, Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Mihara M, Iida T. Perforator flaps and supermicrosurgery. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (04) 683-689, vii–iii
- 2 Steele PRC, Curran JF, Mountain RE. Current and future practices in surgical retraction. Surgeon 2013; 11 (06) 330-337
- 3 Marsh D, Patel NG, Rozen WM, Chowdhry M, Sharma H, Ramakrishnan VV. Three routine free flaps per day in a single operating theatre: principles of a process mapping approach to improving surgical efficiency. Gland Surg 2016; 5 (02) 107-114
Address for correspondence
-
References
- 1 Koshima I, Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Mihara M, Iida T. Perforator flaps and supermicrosurgery. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (04) 683-689, vii–iii
- 2 Steele PRC, Curran JF, Mountain RE. Current and future practices in surgical retraction. Surgeon 2013; 11 (06) 330-337
- 3 Marsh D, Patel NG, Rozen WM, Chowdhry M, Sharma H, Ramakrishnan VV. Three routine free flaps per day in a single operating theatre: principles of a process mapping approach to improving surgical efficiency. Gland Surg 2016; 5 (02) 107-114