Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020; 33(04): 294-300
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708522
Clinical Communication
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Locking Plate Fixation for Canine Acetabular Fractures

Francesco Piana
1   Langford Veterinary Services, Small Animal Hospital, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, United Kingdom
,
Miguel Solano
2   Fitzpatrick Referrals Orthopaedics and Neurology, Eashing, Godalming, United Kingdom
,
Stephen Kalff
3   Pacific and Santa Cruz Veterinary Specialists, Santa Cruz, California, United States
,
Russell Yeadon
4   Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists, Alton, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

31 October 2019

26 January 2020

Publication Date:
29 April 2020 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to document application of locking plates for stabilization of acetabular fractures along with complications and clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that complications and clinical outcomes would be comparable to historical reports using non-locking plate and screw constructs.

Study Design Medical records of dogs presented with acetabular fractures at a single referral centre between 2010 and 2018 were reviewed. Cases surgically managed by open reduction and internal fixation, involving placement of at least one locking plate and screws, were included. Signalment, fracture classification, type of implant used, additional methods of stabilization, along with complications and neurological deficits, were collected. Long-term follow-up was based on Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs questionnaire.

Results Eighteen acetabula were repaired in 17 dogs. Locking implants were VetLOX (4/18), string-of-pearls (7/18) and locking compression plates (7/18). Locking plates and screws were used as the sole method of fixation in 10/18 acetabula, and as adjunctive fixation with other implants in 8/18 acetabula. Two minor complications and one catastrophic complication were reported. Sixteen of seventeen dogs returned to function with radiographic documentation of fracture healing. Complication rate was comparable to historic reports using non-locking implants. Long-term outcomes assessed by Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs questionnaire were positive in most cases.

Conclusion Locking plates are a viable means of stabilizing acetabular fractures in dogs and can provide positive clinical outcomes. Surprisingly, problems including inaccurate fracture reduction and implant loosening were not fully avoided by use of locking implants but incidence was low.

Keywords

acetabular fracture - string-of-pearls - VetLOX - locking compression plates - internal fixation

Authors' Contributions

Francesco Piana wrote the manuscript, collected the data and did the literature review. Miguel Solano, Stephen Kalff and Russell Yeadon provided reviews and alterations to the initial manuscript.


Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 Denny HR. Pelvic fractures in the dog: a review of 123 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1978; 19 (03) 151-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Butterworth SJ, Gribben S, Skerry TM, Denny HR, Barr ARS, Gregory SP. Conservative and surgical treatment of canine acetabular fractures: a review of 34 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1994; 35 (03) 139-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hulse DA. Pelvic fractures: conservative and surgical management. Vet Med Report 1990; 2: 267-278
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Boudrieau RJ, Kleine LJ. Nonsurgically managed caudal acetabular fractures in dogs: 15 cases (1979-1984). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 193 (06) 701-705
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ost PC, Kaderly RE. Use of reconstruction plates for the repair of segmental ilial fractures involving acetabular comminution in four dogs. Vet Surg 1986; 15: 259-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hulse DA, Root CR. Management of acetabular fractures: long-term evaluation. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1980; 3: 189-199
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Brinker WO, Hohn RB, Prieur WD. . Manual of Internal Fixation in Small Animals. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1984: 63-79
  • 8 Moores AL, Moores AP, Brodbelt DC, Owen MR, Draper ER. Regional load bearing of the canine acetabulum. J Biomech 2007; 40 (16) 3732-3737
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lewis DD, Stubbs WP, Neuwirth L. , et al. Results of screw/wire/polymethylmethacrylate composite fixation for acetabular fracture repair in 14 dogs. Vet Surg 1997; 26 (03) 223-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P. Fractures of the acetabulum. A retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; (205) 230-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Robins GM, Dingwall JS, Sumner-Smith G. The plating of pelvic fractures in the dog. Vet Rec 1973; 93 (21) 550-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dyce J, Houlton JEF. Use of reconstruction plates for repair of acetabular fractures in 16 dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1993; 34: 547-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Anson LW, DeYoung DJ, Richardson DC, Betts CW. Clinical evaluation of canine acetabular fractures stabilized with an acetabular plate. Vet Surg 1988; 17 (04) 220-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Braden TD, Prieur WD. New plate for acetabular fractures: technique of application and long-term follow-up evaluation. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986; 188 (10) 1183-1186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Henry WB. A method of bone plating for repairing iliac and acetabular fractures. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1985; 7: 924-928
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Boswell KA, Boone Jr EG, Boudrieau RJ. Reduction and temporary stabilization of acetabular fractures using ASIF mandibular reduction forceps: technique and results using plate fixation in 25 dogs. Vet Surg 2001; 30 (01) 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Anderson GM, Cross AR, Lewis DD, Lanz OI. The effect of plate luting on reduction accuracy and biomechanics of acetabular osteotomies stabilized with 2.7-mm reconstruction plates. Vet Surg 2002; 31 (01) 3-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Herron MR. Screw-wire fixation of acetabular fractures. Canine Pract 1977; 6: 48-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Renegar WR, Griffiths RC. The use of methylmethacrylate bone cement in the repair of acetabular fractures. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1977; 13: 582-588
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hardie RJ, Bertram JE, Todhunter RJ, Trotter EJ. Biomechanical comparison of two plating techniques for fixation of acetabular osteotomies in dogs. Vet Surg 1999; 28 (03) 148-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Stubbs WP, Lewis DD, Miller GJ, Quarterman C, Hosgood G. A biomechanical evaluation and assessment of the accuracy of reduction of two methods of acetabular osteotomy fixation in dogs. Vet Surg 1998; 27 (05) 429-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Amato NS, Richards A, Knight TA, Spector D, Boudrieau RJ, Belkoff S. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of the 2.4.  mm uniLOCK reconstruction plate using 2.4 mm locking versus standard screws for fixation of acetabular osteotomy in dogs. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (08) 741-748
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Perren SM. Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (138) 175-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hulse D, Hyman B. . Biomechanics of fracture fixation failure. In: Olmstead ML. , ed. The Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice.. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1991. 24(1): 647-668
  • 25 Moffatt F, Kulendra E, Meeson RL. Repair of Y-T humeral condyle fractures with locking compression plate fixation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32 (05) 401-407
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Field MR, Butler R, Wills RW, Maxwell WM. Retrospective evaluation of perioperative and short term clinical outcomes in appendicular long bone skeleton fractures repaired via the string of pearls (SOP) locking plate system. BMC Vet Res 2018; 14 (01) 386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Scrimgeour AB, Craig A, Witte PG. Locking T-plate repair of ilial fractures in cats and small dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2017; 30 (06) 453-460
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Vallefuoco R, Le Pommellet H, Savin A. , et al. Complications of appendicular fracture repair in cats and small dogs using locking compression plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29 (01) 46-52
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Quinn MM, Keuler NS, Lu Y, Faria ML, Muir P, Markel MD. Evaluation of agreement between numerical rating scales, visual analogue scoring scales, and force plate gait analysis in dogs. Vet Surg 2007; 36 (04) 360-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Piermattei DL, Johnson KA. . An Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004: 306-308
  • 31 Cook JL, Evans R, Conzemius MG. , et al. Proposed definitions and criteria for reporting time frame, outcome, and complications for clinical orthopedic studies in veterinary medicine. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (08) 905-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Anderson A, Coughlan AR. Sacral fractures in dogs and cats: a classification scheme and review of 51 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1997; 38 (09) 404-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Strauss EJ, Schwarzkopf R, Kummer F, Egol KA. The current status of locked plating: the good, the bad, and the ugly. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22 (07) 479-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tomlinson AW, Comerford EJ, Birch RS, Innes JF, Walton MB. Mechanical performance in axial compression of a titanium polyaxial locking plate system in a fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (02) 88-94
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 McGregor RE, Buffa EA, Tan CJ, Schembri MA, Badcock CA, Lai A. A retrospective study using the string of pearls tibial plateau levelling osteotomy locking plate for the treatment of cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32 (06) 483-491
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Malenfant RC, Sod GA. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 string of pearl plate fixation to 3.5 locking compression plate fixation in a canine fracture gap model. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (04) 465-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Boero Baroncelli A, Reif U, Bignardi C, Peirone B. Effect of screw insertion torque on push-out and cantilever bending properties of five different angle-stable systems. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (03) 308-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. . Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders; 2006: 433-460
  • 39 Jacobson A, Schrader SC. Peripheral nerve injury associated with fracture or fracture-dislocation of the pelvis in dogs and cats: 34 cases (1978-1982). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987; 190 (05) 569-572
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Bookbinder PF, Flanders JA. Characteristics of pelvic fracture in the cat. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1992; 5 (03) 122-127
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Meeson RL, Geddes AT. Management and long-term outcome of pelvic fractures: a retrospective study of 43 cats. J Feline Med Surg 2017; 19 (01) 36-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Forterre F, Tomek A, Rytz U, Brunnberg L, Jaggy A, Spreng D. Iatrogenic sciatic nerve injury in eighteen dogs and nine cats (1997-2006). Vet Surg 2007; 36 (05) 464-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar