CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2020; 99(S 02): S252-S253
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1711073
Abstracts
Otology

Comparison of cochlear-implant magnets and their MRI-artifact size

M Aljubeh
1   Klinikum Bielefeld, HNO Klinik Bielefeld
,
R Gürkov
1   Klinikum Bielefeld, HNO Klinik Bielefeld
,
H Sudhoff
1   Klinikum Bielefeld, HNO Klinik Bielefeld
,
I Todt
1   Klinikum Bielefeld, HNO Klinik Bielefeld
› Author Affiliations
 
 

    ABSTRACT Introduction Recent developments regarding cochlear implant magnets (e.g., a bipolar diametral magnet) and refined surgical techniques (e.g., implant positioning) have had a significant impact on the relation between cochlear implants and MRIs, making the reproducible visibility of cochlea and IAC possible. MRI scanning has changed from a contraindication to a diagnostic tool. Magnet artifact size plays a central role in the visual assessment of the cochlea and IAC-.

    Objective The aim of this study is to compare the CI magnet-related artifact sizes of various cochlea implant systems.

    Material and Methods We performed an in vivo measurement of MRI artifacts at 1.5 and 3 Tesla with three cochlear implant magnet systems (AB 3D, Medel Synchrony, Oticon ZTI). The implant, including the magnet, was positioned with a head bandage 7.0 cm and 120° from the nasion, external auditory canal. We used a TSE T2w MRI sequence on the axial and coronal plains and compared the artifacts in two volunteers for each tesla strength.

    Results Intra-individual artifact-size differences between the three magnets are smaller than inter-individual artifact-size differences. 3T MRI scans, in comparison to 1.5 T MRI scans, show a difference between soft artifact areas.

    Conclusion We observed no major difference between implant-magnet artifact sizes of the three implant magnet types.

    Poster-PDF A-1643.PDF


    #
    Mohammed Aljubeh
    Klinikum Bielefeld, HNO Klinik
    Teutoburger Straße 50
    33604 Bielefeld

    Publication History

    Article published online:
    10 June 2020

    © 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Stuttgart · New York