Extracorporeal Life Support in Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock: A View on Scenario, Outcome, and Risk Factors in 261 Patients

Abstract

Background Weaning failure from cardiopulmonary bypass, postoperative low cardiac output (LCO), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are common scenarios preceding extracorporeal life support (ECLS) implantation after cardiac surgery. The impact of these scenarios on short- and long-term outcome are not well described.

Methods Between March 2006 and December 2018, 261 patients received ECLS support after cardiac surgery. Data of patients with weaning failure (NW), postoperative LCO, and CPR leading to ECLS implantation were retrospectively analyzed regarding outcome. Risk factors for outcome after postcardiotomy ECLS were assessed by uni- or multivariate regression analysis.

Results Median duration of extracorporeal support was 5.5 ± 8.5 days. Overall mortality on ECLS was 39.1%. Scenario analysis revealed weaning failure from cardiopulmonary bypass in 40.6%, postoperative LCO in 24.5%, and postoperative CPR in 34.9% leading to initiation of ECLS. Most common cause of death was refractory LCO (25.3%). Overall follow-up survival was 23.7%. Survival after weaning and during follow-up in all subgroups was 9.2% (CPR), 5.0% (LCO), and 9.6% (NW), respectively. Uni- or multivariate regression analysis revealed age, aortic surgery, and vasopressor medication level on day 1 as risk for death on support, as well as postoperative renal failure, and body mass index (BMI) as risk factors for death during follow-up.

Conclusion Mortality after postcardiotomy ECLS is high. Overall, outcome after CPR, NW, weaning failure and LCO is comparable. Postoperative resuscitation does not negatively affect outcome after postcardiotomy ECLS. Neurological status of ECLS survivors is good.

Keywords

extracorporeal life support - postcardiotomy - resuscitation - low cardiac output - weaning failure

Note

This study has been presented at the annual DGTHG meeting 2019 (presentation number V144).

Publication History

Received: 19 March 2020

Accepted: 08 June 2020

Article published online:
04 September 2020

• References

• 1 Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Registry Report International Summary. Accessed June 23, 2020 at: https://www.elso.org/Registry/Statistics/InternationalSummary.aspx
• 2 Smedira NG, Moazami N, Golding CM. et al. Clinical experience with 202 adults receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac failure: survival at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122 (01) 92-102
• 3 Rastan AJ, Dege A, Mohr M. et al. Early and late outcomes of 517 consecutive adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139 (02) 302-311 , 311.e1
• 4 Rao V, Ivanov J, Weisel RD, Ikonomidis JS, Christakis GT, David TE. Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112 (01) 38-51
• 5 Ge M, Pan T, Wang JX, Chen ZJ, Wang DJ. Outcomes of early versus delayed initiation of extracorporeal life support in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 14 (01) 129
• 6 Sidebotham D, McGeorge A, McGuinness S, Edwards M, Willcox T, Beca J. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treating severe cardiac and respiratory failure in adults: part 2-technical considerations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24 (01) 164-172
• 7 Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975; 1 (7905): 480-484
• 8 Chen YS, Yu HY, Huang SC. et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support can extend the duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 2008; 36 (09) 2529-2535
• 9 Lorusso R, Raffa GM, Alenizy K. et al. Structured review of post-cardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: part 1-Adult patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019; 38 (11) 1125-1143
• 10 Smedira NG, Blackstone EH. Postcardiotomy mechanical support: risk factors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71 (03) S60-S66 , discussion S82–S85
• 11 Elsharkawy HA, Li L, Esa WA, Sessler DI, Bashour CA. Outcome in patients who require venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24 (06) 946-951
• 12 Saxena P, Neal J, Joyce LD. et al. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation supportin postcardiotomy elderly patients: the Mayo Clinic experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99 (06) 2053-2060
• 13 Distelmaier K, Schrutka L, Binder C. et al. Cardiac arrest does not affect survival in post-operative cardiovascular surgery patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Resuscitation 2016; 104: 24-27
• 14 Rohlin O, Taeri T, Netzereab S, Ullemark E, Djärv T. Duration of CPR and impact on 30-day survival after ROSC for in-hospital cardiac arrest-A Swedish cohort study. Resuscitation 2018; 132: 1-5
• 15 Magovern Jr. GJ, Simpson KA. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adult cardiac support: the Allegheny experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68 (02) 655-661
• 16 Fiser SM, Tribble CG, Kaza AK. et al. When to discontinue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy support. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71 (01) 210-214