Keywords
appendix - diverticulosis - computed tomography
Introduction
Appendicular diverticulosis (AD) is an extremely rare condition. They are either incidentally
detected in a normal or inflamed appendix or as diverticulitis manifesting clinically
as appendicitis. It is commonly a radiological or pathological diagnosis. Computed
tomography (CT) aids in the diagnosis of AD, and the commonest differential is a focal
perforation. There are reported associations between AD and appendicular adenocarcinoma.
This case report highlights the classical features of AD on CT with background appendicitis.
Case Report
A 49-year-old male presented to the emergency department with right lower abdominal
pain for 2 days, low-grade fever, and nausea. On clinical examination, the patient
was febrile. Tenderness was elicited in the right iliac fossa, otherwise the abdomen
was soft on palpation. Laboratory investigations revealed mild lymphocytosis. Contrast-enhanced
CT (CECT) was ordered for further evaluation. Images were acquired in the venous phase
after intravenous administration of Omnipaque (Iohexol 360 mg/mL) at a dose of 1.5
mL/kg.
On CECT, the appendix was dilated and fluid-filled, measuring 12 mm in caliber. Diffuse
wall thickening, enhancement, and periappendiceal fat stranding were seen. Additionally,
multiple diverticular outpouchings were noted (at least eight to nine) from the appendix,
which were not separately inflamed ([Fig. 1A]
[C]). No solid enhancing lesion was seen in the appendix. Cecum showed few diverticula
([Fig. 1D]). A diagnosis of acute appendicitis with incidental AD was made. The patient was
taken up for laparoscopic appendectomy. Intraoperatively, the appendix was inflamed
and hyperemic, with multiple nodules studded on the surface ([Fig. 2A]). Appendectomy was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful.
Fig. 1 (A, B) Coronal Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images show a dilated fluid-filled
appendix with wall thickening and periappendicular inflammation (arrowhead). Arrows
show multiple diverticular outpouchings from the appendicular lumen. (C) Note clear communication with the lumen. (D) Also noted is a cecal diverticulum.
Fig. 2 (A) Intraoperative picture of appendicular diverticulosis seen as multifocal surface
nodularity (arrows). Also note hyperemia suggesting inflammation. (B) Resected specimen reveals the same findings (arrows).
On pathological examination, the appendix showed multiple diverticular outpouchings
([Fig. 2B]). On histopathology, the appendicular wall showed multiple outpouchings with inflammatory
infiltrate. Areas of dysplasia were additionally noted. No obvious malignancy was
seen ([Fig. 3A]
[B]).
Fig. 3 (A, B) Low-magnification hematoxylin and eosin staining shows appendicular lumen with multiple
diverticula (arrows) and areas of lymphocytic infiltration.
Discussion
AD is a rare condition occurring in 0.004 (2.1%) of appendicectomies.[1] It was first described by Kelynack in 1893.[2] These are protrusions of the mucosa and submucosa through muscularis defect and
hence are pseudodiverticula. There may be associated colonic diverticulosis. Some
suggest that these occur due to raised intraluminal pressure secondary to luminal
obstruction by enterolith or inflammation or tumor.[3] Imaging features of uncomplicated AD is rarely reported in the literature. They
can be incidentally seen on barium enema studies conducted for different indications.[4] The prevalence of appendicitis in AD is not clear as very few reports are available
in the literature.[5] Diverticulitis is, however, seen in two-thirds of cases.[6]
[7]
[8] Many of the diverticulitis cases were diagnosed based on postoperative histopathology
rather than preoperative imaging, as differentiation from just appendicitis may be
difficult on imaging unless the radiologists are aware of this entity and specifically
look for them. Appendicular diverticulitis has a different epidemiology from pure
appendicitis, with the latter being prevalent in older age group[6]
[9] and presenting with intermittent pain. Early perforation, hemorrhage, and pseudomyxoma
peritonei are reported with diverticulitis.[6]
[7]
[8] On CT, features are similar to those of diverticulosis elsewhere, for example, colonic.[10] They can be fluid- or air-filled small outpouchings with a thin wall. Single outpouching
in the appendiceal wall resembles focal perforation. Focal perforation, however, shows
complete wall discontinuity with adjacent collection and significant fat inflammation
([Fig. 4A]
[B]). This differentiation is mandatory as contained perforations are initially managed
conservatively including drainage followed by interval removal of the appendix. The
association of AD with neoplasms has a high figure (~7–48%).[11]
[12] Neoplasms reported include adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and carcinoids. Hence, isolated
AD without inflammation is managed by prophylactic appendectomy. Though rare, due
to eventual inflammation or tumor association, AD mandates diagnosis and mention in
the radiology report whenever relevant features, as described, are seen.
Fig. 4 Demonstration of the differences between appendicitis with contained perforation
(A) and appendicular diverticulosis (B) on computed tomography.
