Keywords
paraoxonase-1 - hypothyroidism - pancreatitis
Introduction
Paraoxonase (PON) is one of the more important antioxidants and antiatherogenic enzymes. It is mainly synthesized in the liver and metabolizes organophosphate, carbamate, aromatic carboxylic acid ester, unsaturated aliphatic ester, cyclic carbonate, and lactone compounds. It plays a significant role in the detoxification of nerve gases such as sarin, soman, and tabun.[1]
[2]
[3] The PON family consists of three genes: PON1, PON2, PON3, with each encoding a unique protein. The PON genes, located adjacent to each other on chromosome 7 in humans, show approximately 65% similarity in amino acids.[4]
[5]
PON1 stimulates high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mediated cholesterol flow, protects against oxidative damage, and has peroxidase-like activity. Proteins encoded by the PON1 and PON3 are found in the blood circulation,[6] while the intracellular enzyme encoded by PON2 is not found in the circulation. However, all the enzymes prevent oxidation of lipids[7]
[8] and are important for components of the antioxidant system in humans. Therefore, dysfunction in these enzymes can be associated with some diseases related to oxidative stress such as cancer and cardiovascular disease.[9]
PON1 variation is the most studied member of the PON gene family. The coding region of PON1 has two polymorphic sites, which are leucine (L)/methionine (M) at position 55 (L55M, rs854560) and glutamine (Q)/arginine (R) at position 192 (Q192R, rs662).[10] The rs854560 polymorphism leads to changes in the serum enzyme concentration. PON1 enzyme concentration is higher in AA genotypes than TT genotypes.[11]
[12]
[13] The rs662 polymorphism affects substrate specificity of the PON1 hydrolytic activity. Diazinon, soman, and sarin are hydrolyzed more efficiently in 192Q isoform of the PON1 enzyme, which is encoded A allele, whereas paraxon is hydrolyzed at a higher rate than 192R isoform of PON1 enzyme, which is encoded by G allele. Also, A allele prevents the accumulation of lipid peroxides more than G allele[14]
[15] ([Fig. 1]).
Fig. 1 Relation between the rs854560 and rs662 polymorphisms of PON1 and disease development.
PON1 enzymatic activity is also affected by many physiological and pathological factors such as pregnancy, aging, diabetes, and renal disease.[16] PON1 activity has been found decreased in type 1 and 2 diabetes as well as metabolic syndrome, which could be related with reduced secretion of insulin and decreased ability of HDL.[17] Some researchers reported that PON1 polymorphisms could be related to diseases associated with oxidative stress-related inflammation like acute pancreatitis and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's.[18]
[19] Oxidative stress lead to reduction in PON1 and PON3 enzymatic activity, while PON2 enzyme activity increases under oxidative stress conditions.[10]
Oxidative stress plays a key role in the pathogenesis of several diseases via numerous pathways. Although thyroid hormones mainly regulate protein, vitamin and antioxidant enzymes synthesis and degradation, they also play a role in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production.[20] ROS are highly reactive molecules that mainly attack membrane lipids, and inadequate removal of ROS could result in lipid peroxidation, metabolic dysfunctions, damaged macromolecules and eventually cell death.
Since PON1, a known antioxidant, has a peroxidase-like activity, it could prevent oxidative stress in hypothyroidism. However, several reports indicated elevated oxidative stress parameters[21]
[22] and decreased PON1 activity[23] in hypothyroid patients. It is well-known that increased level of ROS is related to many cancers including colorectal cancers. PON1 enzyme is a phase 1 detoxification enzyme with a wide range of substrate specificity. Therefore, PON1 enzyme activities may alter ROS production or the rate of chemical metabolism, and this may influence the risk of colorectal cancer.[24] Acute pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease mediated by cytokines, bioactive lipids, and oxidative stress.[25] Paraoxonase activity is regulated by interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-a[26]; besides oxidative response, PON1 may also be a part of the inflammatory response.
Based on the significant role of PON1 in oxidant-antioxidant balance, the present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between PON1 polymorphism and disease susceptibility in a small-sized patient population with hypothyroidism, colorectal cancer, and pancreatitis.
Material and Methods
Sample Collection
The study was conducted as a cross-sectional study with Turkish participants recruited from Istanbul University Medical Faculty between February 2017 and March 2018. The effects of the PON1 polymorphisms on hypothyroidism, colorectal cancer, and pancreatitis susceptibility were evaluated among a total of 200 participants who volunteered. Fifty patients with secondary hypothyroidism caused by total thyroidectomies; 50 patients with histopathologically confirmed colorectal cancer; and 50 patients clinically diagnosed with mild or severe acute pancreatitis were included. Fifty ethnic, age and gender-matched controls who had no history of these conditions were selected randomly from hospital patients. The sample size was proper to evaluate the relationship between selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and diseases based on power analysis (http://osse.bii.a-star.edu.sg). The study was approved by the ethical committee of Istanbul University (2017/1370) and performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. All participants were provided informed consent. Demographic and anthropometric factors (ethnicity, age, body mass index [BMI, kg/cm2]) were assessed using a short questionnaire.
Genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood samples by High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche, Germany) and kept at 4°C. Genotyping was performed on real-time PCR platform (LightCycler 480, Roche, Germany) using LightCycler FastStart DNA Master HybProbe and Roche LightSNP assay probes (Roche, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In a final volume of 20 µL reaction mix per sample, the following mixtures was added: 1X FastStart DNA Master Mix, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 µM LightSNP HybProbe, appropriate amount of PCR grade water, and 500 ng DNA sample. In each run, sterile water and a known genotyped sample were used as negative and positive controls, respectively, to achieve 100% concordance. Details of custom-designed LightSNiP assay probes were summarized in [Table 1].
Table 1
Reference sequences of custom-designed LightSNiP assay probes
LightSNiP
|
Reference sequence
|
Melting temperatures
|
rs662
(575A > G)
|
TCACTATTTTCTTgACCCCTACTTAC [A/g]
ATCCTgggAgATgTATTTgggTTTA
|
52.56 °C for allele [G]
60.28 °C for allele [A]
|
rs854560
(163T > A)
|
AgCCAgTCCATTAggCAgTATCTCCA[A/T] gTCTTCAgAgCCAgTTTCTgCCAgA
|
60.23 °C for allele [A]
65.50 °C for allele [T]
|
Abbreviation: rs: reference SNP number; alleles in the square brackets indicates the polymorphisms.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (Version 20, Chicago, USA). The Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) analysis was performed to compare the observed and expected genotype frequencies of subject by using the Chi-squared (χ2) test. Data comparisons were done by using Fisher's exact test. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated to evaluate the association between cases and controls. A two-tailed value of p < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference.
Results
In the present study, two SNPs of the PON1, rs662 and rs854560, were genotyped in a Turkish population. The cases and controls were evaluated to determine the effects of PON1 polymorphisms on hypothyroidism, colorectal cancer, and pancreatitis susceptibility. All participants were Caucasian, and the characteristics of the studied population were summarized in [Table 2]. Gender distribution was almost the same in all groups except hypothyroidism where females had a representation of 91%. In disease groups, patients who were ≥ 50 years old represented at least 61.3% of cases, whereas the control group was relatively young with volunteers who are ≥ 50 years old accounting for 44.5%. Nonsmokers represented at least 60% of all patients; however, approximately one third of the patients were overweight. As shown in [Table 3], the genotype distribution was found to be consistent with the HWE among all participants (p > 0.05), indicating that the studied population was randomized and unbiased. The minor allele frequencies of the studied SNPs were found notably similar to Europeans[15]
[17]
[27]; however, highly different from Asians.[28]
[29]
Table 2
Demographic and anthropometric factors of cases and controls
Variable
|
Percentile (%)
|
Control
(n = 50)
|
Hypothyroidism
(n = 50)
|
Colorectal cancer
(n = 50)
|
Pancreatitis
(n = 50)
|
Gender
|
|
Male
|
44.4
|
8.2
|
59.4
|
51.3
|
Female
|
55.6
|
91.8
|
40.6
|
48.7
|
Age
|
|
≥ 50
|
44.5
|
78.6
|
61.3
|
72.9
|
< 50
|
55.5
|
21.4
|
38.7
|
27.1
|
BMI
|
|
□ 25
|
18.6
|
31.8
|
30
|
48.6
|
> 25
|
81.4
|
68.2
|
70
|
51.4
|
Smoking status
|
|
Nonsmoking
|
62.9
|
86.4
|
90
|
59.4
|
Smoking
|
37.1
|
13.6
|
10
|
40.6
|
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index (kg/m2).
Table 3
Genotype distribution of rs662 and rs854560 in the Turkish population
SNPs
|
Genotypes
|
Observed (n)
|
Expected (n)
|
χ2
|
p-Value
|
rs662 (575A > G)
|
A/A
|
109
|
103
|
4.13
|
0.134
|
A/G
|
69
|
54
|
G/G
|
22
|
16
|
rs854560 (163T > A)
|
A/A
|
83
|
79
|
4.09
|
0.167
|
T/A
|
85
|
93
|
T/T
|
32
|
28
|
Abbreviations: n, number of subjects; rs, reference SNP number; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; χ2, Chi-square.
Note: p <0.05, significance level.
The dominant model was used to evaluate whether PON1 polymorphisms increase the risk of hypothyroidism, colorectal cancer, or pancreatitis. The genotype distributions, allele frequencies and estimated ORs with 95% CI among all cases and controls are summarized in [Table 4]. The genotyping analysis based on a dominant model showed that individuals with G allele of rs662 had an approximately two-fold risk of developing hypothyroidism (OR = 2.05; 95% CI = 1.05 to 3.97; p = 0.047). In addition, it was observed that individuals with T allele of rs854560 had an approximately 1.5-fold risk of developing pancreatitis (OR = 1.44; 95% CI = 0.79 to 2.60); however, the association did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.292).
Table 4
Genotype distributions and allele frequencies of PON1 polymorphisms among cases and controls
Subject (n)
|
rs662 (575A > G)
|
|
|
Genotype distributions (n)
|
Allele frequencies
|
OR (95% CI)
|
p-Value
|
|
AA
|
AG
|
GG
|
A
|
G
|
A versus any G
|
Controls (50)
|
26
|
17
|
7
|
0.69
|
0.31
|
|
Hypothyroidism (50)
|
34
|
14
|
2
|
0.82
|
0.18
|
2.05 (1.05–3.97)
|
0.047
|
Colorectal cancer (50)
|
26
|
14
|
10
|
0.66
|
0.34
|
0.87 (0.48–1.57)
|
0.762
|
Pancreatitis (50)
|
23
|
24
|
3
|
0.70
|
0.30
|
1.05 (0.57–1.91)
|
1.000
|
|
rs854560 (
163T
>
A
)
|
|
|
Genotype distributions (n)
|
Allele frequencies
|
OR (95% CI)
|
p
-Value
|
|
AA
|
TA
|
TT
|
A
|
T
|
A versus any T
|
Controls (50)
|
20
|
23
|
7
|
0.63
|
0.37
|
|
Hypothyroidism (50)
|
20
|
10
|
0.60
|
0.40
|
0.88 (0.49–1.55)
|
0.771
|
Colorectal cancer (50)
|
17
|
23
|
10
|
0.57
|
0.43
|
0.78 (0.44–1.37)
|
0.471
|
Pancreatitis (50)
|
26
|
19
|
5
|
0.71
|
0.29
|
1.44 (0.79–2.60)
|
0.292
|
Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals; n, number of subjects; OR, odds ratio; rs, reference SNP number.
Note: p < 0.05, significance level.
Discussion
Genetic polymorphism studies contribute to the generation and identification of gene maps related to various diseases such as cancer, development of new drugs by targeting proteins encoded by specific genes, elucidation of molecular basis of different responses of individuals to drugs, and determination of the factors to be considered in drug selection in treatment. The importance of genetic differences in recent years has attracted the attention of researchers.[30]
[31] PON1 activity shows different distribution in different ethnic groups. The guanine exchange of cytosine at position 55 in the 3rd exon (rs854560) and the adenine thymine change at position 192 in the 4th exon (rs662) are the most important gene variants in PON1 activity. The C/G nucleotide change at position 55 leads to the change of leucine to methionine (Leu55Met, L55M, rs854560) in amino acid sequence, while the changes from glutamine to arginine (Gln192Arg, Q192R, rs662) appear as a result of A/T nucleotide change at position 192.[32]
[33]
[34]
There are some studies related to PON1 polymorphism in the Turkish population. In a study conducted on a group of individuals with cardiovascular disease, the G allele frequency of PON1 rs662 was higher in the patient group, but no statistically significant difference was found than the healthy individuals.[35] In another study, the relation between cardiovascular diseases and PON1 rs662 and rs854560 polymorphisms was investigated. The T allele frequency of PON1 rs854560 was higher in the patient group. It is stated that rs854560 polymorphism can be considered as a risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease among the Turkish population.[27] A study was conducted to determine PON1 rs662 and rs854560 polymorphisms distribution in diabetic patients with complications and the changes in enzyme activity. Individuals with TT genotypes of rs854560 and with AA genotypes of rs662 were seen very frequently in type 2 diabetes group; also, enzyme activity was found to be lower in the patients' group.[36] In another study conducted in diabetic patients, a significant relationship between the two polymorphisms and the disease was determined. PON1 enzyme, which is heterozygote for rs662, was found to be three times more effective in the occurrence of complications; also, it was found to be more effective in relation to the risk of diabetic complications.[37]
It is well-known that higher levels of oxidative stress are one of the main causes for cancer development. In normal conditions, PON1 activity protects the organisms against oxidative stress via ROS detoxification. PON1 activity is highly variable during pathogenesis and its complex regulation involves both genetic and environmental factors. It can be expected that variations on PON1 gene may cause alterations on the PON1 activity; and, decreased PON1 activity may cause cancers. Stevens et al[38] observed no association between prostate cancer and PON1 rs662 and rs854560 polymorphisms; however, when they combined these SNPs, they suggested that men with PON1 genotypes face an increased risk of contracting aggressive prostate cancer. On the other hand, Antognelli et al[39] found that rs662 AG and rs854560 TA/TT genotypes had a significantly higher risk of prostate cancer. Most research works have been focused on the effects of PON1 polymorphisms in breast cancer; however, they have yielded conflicting results. According a meta-analysis conducted by Saadat,[40]
G allele of rs662 was associated with decreased risk of breast cancer, whereas both TA and TT genotypes of rs854560 were associated with increased risk of breast cancer. It is reasonable to expect that PON1 polymorphisms, due to their lipid peroxidation scavenging activity, may influence colorectal cancer development as well. Similar to Van der Logt et al,[24] our results indicated that in PON1 rs662 and rs854560 polymorphisms have no effect on colorectal cancer susceptibility.
Considering the crucial role of PON1 in the regulation of the oxidative stress and inflammation, it might be involved in the pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis. Unal et al[41] showed significantly decreased PON1 activity and positive correlation to HDL level, with significantly increased malondialdehyde levels in acute pancreatitis among Wistar albino rats. Since genetic variations may result in altered activity of PON1, Verlaan et al[42] investigated PON1 variants as a modifying factor of chronic pancreatitis. It was observed that allele frequencies of PON1 rs854560 did not differ between chronic pancreatitis patients and controls, whereas it was found in subgroup analysis that PON1 rs662 A allele was significantly higher in idiopathic chronic pancreatitis patients compared with controls. Our results are the first in the literature which showed that individuals with T allele of rs854560 had an approximately 1.5-fold risk of developing acute pancreatitis; however, the association did not reach statistical significance.
According to some researchers, both hypo- and hyperthyroidism are associated with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation.[43]
[44] Yavuz et al[45] reported iatrogenic thyroid hormone excess might affect thyroid hormone excess on PON1 activity. Also, it was reported that dyslipidemia in thyroid diseases and lipid oxidation, due to oxidative stress, played an important role in the pathogenesis of thyroid diseases. Several studies[20]
[23]
[46] revealed that serum PON1 activity was significantly decreased in hypothyroidism. Although the mechanism is unclear, several possible mechanisms, which involve increased ROS production and oxidative stress, are suggested.[47] Since the Q to R (A > G) substitution of PON1 rs662 forms more active PON1 with higher capacity of detoxification,[39] individuals carrying A allele should be less vulnerable to oxidative stress products and lipid peroxidation. Our results showed that individuals carrying G allele of rs662 had an approximately two-fold risk of developing hypothyroidism (OR = 2.05; 95% CI = 1.05 to 3.97; p = 0.047). In accordance to recent knowledge, it can be suggested that PON1 rs662 polymorphisms had a substantial effect on hypothyroidism pathogenesis.
Conclusion
The present study is a comprehensive cross-sectional study, and the first study regarding the effects of PON1, an oxidative stress-related gene, and polymorphisms on disease susceptibility in a Turkish population diagnosed with colorectal cancer, hypothyroidism or pancreatitis. There are limited studies about the effects of PON1 polymorphisms on common diseases; thus, it is believed that preliminary results of this study will elucidate the relation. In the present study, a substantial association between PON1 G allele of rs662 and hypothyroidism and a weak association between PON1 T allele of rs854560 and pancreatitis were identified. No effect of both PON1 variants was observed on colorectal cancer development. Considering the lack of data, further studies with larger number of hypothyroidism patients and detailed biochemical parameters are needed.