Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721369
Four-corner Arthrodesis: Comparative Analysis of Open Surgery Versus Percutaneous Technique with Arthroscopic Assistance
Article in several languages: español | EnglishAbstract
Introduction Four-corner arthrodesis is a salvage technique for patients with advanced carpal osteoarthritis. This procedure aims to reduce pain and preserve wrist motion. Even though percutaneous techniques with arthroscopic assistance reportedly have favorable outcomes and the advantages of minimal invasiveness, open surgery remains the gold standard for four-corner arthrodesis.
Objective The present study aims to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of patients with scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) submitted to open surgery versus percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance.
Materials and Methods Retrospective case-control study of clinical records and radiological images of patients with advanced carpal osteoarthritis submitted to percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance versus open surgery. Demographic variables, pain score using the visual analog scale (VAS), function ranges of motion, time until consolidation, and correction of the capitolunate angle were analyzed. Both techniques are described.
Results In total, 22 male patients with an average age of 32.5 years were studied, including 13 patients from the case group (percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance) and 9 patients from the control group (open surgery). The VAS score for pain at discharge was of 3 for the cases and of 5 for the controls (p = 0.008); 30 days postoperatively, it was of 0 and 3 respectively (p = 0.00). The ranges of extension and flexion were of 52.6° and 38.7° for the case group, and of 35.7° and 32.4° for the control group (p = 0.119 and 0.0016 respectively). The capitolunate angle was of 10° for the controls and of 5° for the cases (p = 0.0008). The time until consolidation was of 8.8 weeks for the cases and of 12.5 weeks for the controls (p = 0.039).
Discussion Both four-corner arthrodesis techniques are reproducible and effective in achieving consolidation, pain reduction and preservation of wrist motion.
Conclusion The present study demonstrates the superiority of the percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance over open surgery. Further prospective studies are required for an adequate recommendation.
#
Introduction
Non-inflammatory osteoarthritis of the carpus is a chronic degenerative disease of the articular cartilage. It may result in structural changes and carpal collapse,[1] [2] [3] and most cases have a traumatic etiology.[2] Posttraumatic osteoarthritis secondary to chronic carpal instability usually progresses in a relatively constant sequence.[1] It can cause chronic pain and significant impairment in wrist function. Although it is frequently well-tolerated for years, it is not unusual for symptoms to arise during the early stages of the disease.[2]
The most common form of carpal collapse is the scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC),[1] resulting from a carpal misalignment due to a chronic change at the scapholunate ligament. A similar degenerative pattern can lead to scaphoid nonunion, causing a carpal collapse known as scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC).[3] [4]
In both cases, chronic carpal instability generates progressive joint damage with carpal misalignment, leading to advanced carpal collapse and severe panarthritis in subsequent stages.[1] [4] [5] There are four evolutionary stages. Stage I is characterized by radial styloid involvement. In stage II, the entire radioscaphoid joint is affected; in stage III, there is also degenerative involvement of the midcarpal joint, specifically with joint damage between the lunate and capitate bones. Finally, stage IV is characterized by generalized osteoarthritis with complete involvement of the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints, in addition to potential damage to the distal radioulnar joint.[1] [5]
Different therapeutic modalities have been described for each of these stages. In early the stages, the goal is to reduce pain while preserving wrist mobility.[5] In the advanced stages, this is difficult, because of the cartilaginous damage to the carpus, and a total wrist arthrodesis is the procedure of choice.[5]
Four-corner arthrodesis is indicated to patients with stage-II and -III SLAC and SNAC wrists and capitate bone osteoarthritis.[2] [4] This technique consists of an arthrodesis of the lunate, capitate, hamate and triquetrum bones associated with a scaphoid excision.[4] Fixation techniques with Kirschner wires, dorsal plates and cannulated screws have been described; the latter are the most frequently used hardware. The procedure can be performed through open surgery or a percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance.[4] [6] [7] The literature reports good medium to long-term outcomes with both techniques,[8] achieving ranges of motion of up to 50% compared to the contralateral wrist,[2] pain reduction of up to 80%, and absence of pain in half of the patients.[2] [9] This type of arthrodesis may be unacceptable for some subjects because it prevents the “dart-throwing” movement, and this phenomenon needs to be addressed before surgery.[2]
Although it is demanding and requires training in wrist arthroscopy, the percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance has certain advantages over the open surgery because it improves the visualization of the articular cartilage, spares proprioceptive innervation, and better preserves the vascular supply to the carpus, which improves bone consolidation and decreases soft-tissue injury.[7]
The present study aims to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of subjects with SLAC and SNAC wrists and midcarpal osteoarthritis submitted to open surgery or percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance, and to describe the surgical technique performed in both groups of patients.
#
Materials and Methods
The present is a retrospective case-control study of 22 consecutive patients submitted to four-corner arthrodesis performed in a Level-V Trauma Center by the same surgical team from 2011 to 2016. The control group consisted of patients submitted to open surgery from 2011 to 2013, whereas the case group was formed by patients submitted to percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance from 2014 to 2016.
The inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years of age with clinico-radiological diagnosis of SLAC/SNAC in stages II or III and preoperative pain during daily activities greater than 4 according to the visual analog scale (VAS). Patients with SNAC/SLAC in stages I or IV were excluded.The following variables were analyzed in both groups: demographic variables; functional outcomes, that is, flexion and extension ranges of motion measured with a goniometer 6 months after surgery; postoperative pain at rest both at hospital discharge and 30 days after surgery, according to the VAS; radiological consolidation time; and correction of the capitolunate angle ([Fig. 1]).
Radiological consolidation was evaluated using anteroposterior (AP) and lateral wrist radiographs taken every 15 days starting the fourth week after surgery. The images were reviewed by the two senior surgeons from the study. Consolidation was defined by bony trabeculae between the capitolunate joint, the triquetrum-hamate joint, and the corners of these four bones.
A statistical study was carried out using the Stata (StataCorp, LLC, College Station, TX, US) software, version 15. The Shapiro Wilk test demonstrated variable normality, the Student t-test compared the mean values, and the Mann-Whitney U test compared the median values. The variables expressed as mean values presented normal distribution, in contrast to those expressed as median values. The significance was set as p < 0.05.
Surgical Technique for Percutaneous Surgery with Arthroscopic Assistance
The patient is placed in supine position on the surgical table and the hand table after regional anesthesia with brachial-plexus block. Ischemia is performed with an ischemia cuff inflated 100 mm Hg higher than the patient's diastolic blood pressure.
A mini-open, longitudinal approach is performed at the radial fossa of the wrist, followed by dissection, sparing the dorsal branch of the radial artery. Next, the radial joint capsule is opened to reach the scaphoid, which is divided into two parts with a chisel, and all the ligaments joining to the radius, lunate, capitate, trapezoid and trapezius bones are sectioned with a scalpel. Both scaphoid poles are resected with a Rongeur forceps, and a scaphoid graft is harvested ([Fig. 2]). Under fluoroscopic view, the dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI) is reduced with the correct alignment of the radius and lunate bones at the lateral view, and radiolunate fixation with a 1.6-mm Kirschner wire ([Fig. 3]).
Next, the limb is placed in a 15-lb ACUMED (Hillsboro, OR, US) traction tower, secured by the index and middle fingers, paying special attention to the point of attachment at the level of the arm, and using an ischemia cuff to prevent skin and neurological lesions.
The midcarpal ulnar (MCU) portal and the midcarpal radial (MCR) portal are prepared, and a diagnostic arthroscopy of the midcarpal joint with 2.7-mm optics evaluates the articular cartilage of the carpal bones.
The articular cartilage of the lunate, triquetrum, capitate, and hamate bones is resected with a handpiece motor and burr tip ([Fig. 4]). The intermittent supply of normal saline solution through a 20-mL syringe connected to the optic sleeve is important for joint cleaning and to reduce the heat generated by the burr.
A cancellous graft is taken from the previously-resected scaphoid and introduced into the joint space through a 2.5-mm drill protector from the small fragment cage using the same midcarpal portals. The graft is reduced under arthroscopic visualization ([Fig. 5]) of the entire bony surface of the capitolunate joints and between the triquetrum and hamate bones.
Wrist traction is released, and fixation with cannulated screws is performed percutaneously under fluoroscopic view, beginning with a capitolunate screw, followed by a screw from the triquetrum to the lunate bones, and a screw fixating the triquetrum, hamate and capitate bones ([Fig. 6] and [7]). This is the screw configuration described by Ho.[6] Next, the radiolunate wire is withdrawn. The maximum ischemia time should be lower than 120 minutes.
Finally, the skin from the portals and radial area is closed, the ischemia is released, and a short arm split cast is placed. Clinical follow-up is performed at 2 weeks for suture removal; the cast is kept until the fourth week. Kinesitherapy begins after cast removal. Follow-up radiographs are taken at 4 and 8 weeks, and then every 2 weeks until consolidation is detected. [Figure 8] shows consolidation at 8 weeks.
#
Surgical Technique for Open Surgery
The patient is placed in supine position on the surgical table and the hand table after regional anesthesia with brachial-plexus block. Ischemia is performed with an ischemia cuff inflated 100 mm Hg higher than the patient's diastolic blood pressure.
A dorsal wrist approach is performed ([Fig. 9]); the extensor retinaculum is opened through the third extensor compartment, sparing the extensor pollicis longus tendon and approaching the joint capsule as described by Berger et al.[10] ([Fig. 10]). The posterior interosseous nerve is identified and sectioned proximally. Next, the scaphoid is resected with a Rongeur forceps and a bone graft is extracted from it. The articular cartilage from the lunate, triquetrum, hamate, and capitate bones is resected with a spoon and Rongeur forceps. A 1.25-mm Kirshner wire is inserted into the lunate from a dorsal point to be used as a joystick. The DISI is reduced with the correct alignment of the radius and lunate bones on lateral view ([Fig. 11]), and radiolunate fixation is performed with a 1.6-mm Kirschner wire. Next, the previously-resected morselized scaphoid bone graft is added, and a 2-column fixation is carried out with two 2.4-mm HFS cannulated screws (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, US) in an antegrade fashion from the lunate to the capitate bones; another screw is placed from the triquetrum to the hamate bone ([Fig. 12]). Adequate reduction and fixation are confirmed through fluoroscopy. The joint capsule, the extensor retinaculum, and the skin are closed, and a protective bandage with short arm split cast is placed. Clinical and imaging follow-up, immobilization and rehabilitation are carried out as described for the percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance.
#
#
Results
Our sample consisted of 9 male patients in the control group and 13 male patients in the case group. The mean age of both groups was 32.5 years with 32.3 years (standard deviation [SD]: 6.6) for the control group and 32.6 years (SD: 6.2) for the case group, with no statistical difference (p = 0.82). The mean follow-up time was of 12 months. Ischemia time was lower than 120 minutes in all patients.
At the time of hospital discharge, pain at rest was reported as 3 for the case group and 5 for the control group (p = 0.008). Thirty days after surgery, pain at rest was assessed again and reported as 0 for case group and 3 for the control group (p = 0.00). Results are shown in [Table 1].
Control group |
Case group |
p-value |
|
---|---|---|---|
VAS at discharge Median value (range) |
5 (3–8) |
3 (1–5) |
0.008* |
VAS 30 days after surgery Median value (range) |
3 (1–5) |
0 (0–0) |
0.00* |
VAS reduction Median value (range) |
3 (1–5) |
3 (1–5) |
0.069 |
Six months after surgery, the ranges of motion in flexion and extension were of 52.6° and 38.7° for the case group, and of 35.7° and 32.4° for the control group (p = 0.1119 and 0.0016 respectively), as shown in [Table 2].
Control group |
Case group |
p-value |
|
---|---|---|---|
Final flexion Mean (standard deviation) |
32.4° (9.2°) |
38.7° (6.3°) |
0.1119 |
Final Extension Mean (standard deviation) |
35.7° (6.4°) |
52.6° (11.4°) |
0.0016* |
Correction of the position of the lunate regarding the capitate bone was assessed using the capitolunate angle, which was of 10° (SD: 3.5°) for the control group, and of 5° (SD: 3.5°) for the case group (p = 0.0008).
The mean consolidation time was of 12.5 weeks (SD: 1.58 weeks) for the control group, and of 8.8 weeks (SD: 1.16 weeks) for the case group (p = 0.039).
[Figures 13] and [14] show examples of the imaging outcomes of patients from both groups.
#
Discussion
Four-corner arthrodesis has proven to be a salvage treatment for patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the carpus, such as those with SNAC or SLAC wrists, reducing pain and preserving a certain degree of mobility.[6] [11] The success of the surgery is based on bone consolidation between the capitolunate and hamate-triquetrum joints for correct DISI reduction.[1] [6] [7] [12]
The gold standard for four-corner arthrodesis is open surgery. The most commonly used screw configuration for carpal bone fixation is the two-column configuration, with a screw between the lunate and capitate bones, and another screw between the triquetrum and the hamate bones.[4] [8] [9]
In recent years, this surgical technique has been performed percutaneously with arthroscopic assistance. Some publications[6] [7] reported good outcomes, and the authors described some advantages of the percutaneous procedure over the open technique. As a minimally-invasive technique, percutaneous surgery is associated with lower tissue damage, greater sparing of the blood supply, preservation of proprioception, and better esthetic outcomes.[6] [7]
The present work shows the surgical technique for the open procedure and the minimally-invasive procedure with arthroscopic assistance, both with good outcomes.
Pain at rest at the time of hospital discharge and 30 days after surgery is significantly better in patients submitted to percutaneous surgery; however, both groups presented a decrease in pain. The patients included in the present study had persistent chronic pain, with VAS scores of up to 4 in their daily-life activities, resulting from their underlying SLAC/SNAC wrist pathology. We believe that this difference may be due to the lower soft-tissue damage associated with the percutaneous technique. However, since this is not an isolated factor, it does not enable an adequate recommendation. On the other hand, no mid- and long-term evaluations of active wrist pain were performed, so we cannot make recommendations about it.
The consolidation time was significantly shorter among the patients submitted to the percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance. Although we believe that minimally-invasive surgery favors bone consolidation, it is not possible to isolate this factor here because the configuration of the screw differs in both techniques ([Fig. 8] and [9]). This different configuration can influence the stability provided by the osteosynthesis material and alter consolidation outcomes. Although there is no recommendation regarding screw configuration in the international literature, we believe that the one used in the percutaneous technique is optimal to achieve greater stability, since the lunate-capitate column is fixated on one side (the midcarpal radial column) with a retrograde screw, whereas the triquetrum-hamate column (the midcarpal ulnar column) is fixated with an antegrade oblique screw, which also fixates the ulnar spine to the capitate bone. Lastly, the screw from the triquetrum to the lunate bones also fixates the ulnar spine to the radial spine. Therefore, a two-column fixation is carried out as in the open surgery, but both columns are joined by the transverse screw coming from the triquetrum bone.[6]
The use of cannulated screws has proven to result in better pain and mobility compared to other types of osteosynthesis.[13] As such, we believe that it is the most appropriate method for the four-corner arthrodesis surgery.
In both groups of patients, the ranges of motion were similar to those reported in the literature.[7] [8] In the present study, the extension was significantly better among the patients submitted to the percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance. This could be due to the intrinsic advantages of the minimally-invasive technique, with reduced soft-tissue damage, lower level of scarring and, therefore, less rigidity, theoretically.
The relationship between the lunate and the capitate bones was evaluated using the capitolunate angle. This angle was within normal limits after both surgeries,[14] [15] but with a statistical difference. However, this difference should not have clinical repercussions, since, as previously mentioned, the capitolunate angle was within the normal range in both groups.
We believe that the arthroscopically-assisted percutaneous technique with fixation of cannulated screws is a reproducible and effective procedure to achieve consolidation, pain relief, and sustained wrist mobility. Further prospective, randomized, comparative studies are required to recommend one technique over the other.
#
Conclusion
Four-corner arthrodesis for patients with advanced carpal osteoarthritis is a reproducible technique with good outcomes regarding pain reduction, ranges of motion, and bone consolidation. Both techniques, namely open surgery and percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance, present favorable outcomes, achieving 100% of consolidation. In the present series, the groups differed regarding reduction in pain at rest during the early postoperative period, range of flexion-extension of the wrist, and time until to consolidation, but these differences cannot be attributed exclusively to the use of arthroscopic assistance.
#
#
-
Referencias
- 1 Watson HK, Ballet FL. The SLAC wrist: scapholunate advanced collapse pattern of degenerative arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9 (03) 358-365
- 2 Laulan J, Marteau E, Bacle G. Wrist osteoarthritis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; 101 (1, Suppl): S1-S9
- 3 Crema MD, Zentner J, Guermazi A, Jomaah N, Marra MD, Roemer FW. Scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse: MDCT arthrography features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (02) W202-7
- 4 Mamede J, Castro Adeodato S, Aquino Leal R. Four-Corner Arthrodesis: Description of Surgical Technique Using Headless Retrograde Crossed Screws. Hand (N Y) 2018; 13 (02) 156-163
- 5 Weiss KE, Rodner CM. Osteoarthritis of the wrist. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (05) 725-746
- 6 Ho PC. Arthroscopic partial wrist fusion. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2008; 12 (04) 242-265
- 7 del Piñal F, Klausmeyer M, Thams C, Moraleda E, Galindo C. Early experience with (dry) arthroscopic 4-corner arthrodesis: from a 4-hour operation to a tourniquet time. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (11) 2389-2399
- 8 Traverso P, Wong A, Wollstein R, Carlson L, Ashmead D, Watson HK. Ten-Year Minimum Follow-Up of 4-Corner Fusion for SLAC and SNAC Wrist. Hand (N Y) 2017; 12 (06) 568-572
- 9 Neubrech F, Mühldorfer-Fodor M, Pillukat T, Schoonhoven Jv, Prommersberger KJ. Long-term results after midcarpal arthrodesis. J Wrist Surg 2012; 1 (02) 123-128
- 10 Berger RA, Bishop AT, Bettinger PC. New dorsal capsulotomy for the surgical exposure of the wrist. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35 (01) 54-59
- 11 Trail IA, Murali R, Stanley JK. et al. The long-term outcome of four-corner fusion. J Wrist Surg 2015; 4 (02) 128-133
- 12 Kraisarin J, Dennison DG, Berglund LJ, An KN, Shin AY. Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques used for four-corner arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011; 36 (07) 560-567
- 13 Erne HC, Broer PN, Weiss F. et al. Four-corner fusion: Comparing outcomes of conventional K-wire-, locking plate-, and retrograde headless compression screw fixations. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (06) 909-917 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.033.
- 14 Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH, Beabout JW, Bryan RS. Traumatic instability of the wrist. Diagnosis, classification, and pathomechanics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972; 54 (08) 1612-1632
- 15 Larsen CF, Mathisen FK, Lindequist S. Measurements of carpiano bone angles on lateral wrist radiographs. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16A: 688-693
Dirección para correspondencia
Publication History
Received: 05 May 2019
Accepted: 10 October 2020
Article published online:
02 June 2021
© 2021. Sociedad Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referencias
- 1 Watson HK, Ballet FL. The SLAC wrist: scapholunate advanced collapse pattern of degenerative arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9 (03) 358-365
- 2 Laulan J, Marteau E, Bacle G. Wrist osteoarthritis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; 101 (1, Suppl): S1-S9
- 3 Crema MD, Zentner J, Guermazi A, Jomaah N, Marra MD, Roemer FW. Scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse: MDCT arthrography features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (02) W202-7
- 4 Mamede J, Castro Adeodato S, Aquino Leal R. Four-Corner Arthrodesis: Description of Surgical Technique Using Headless Retrograde Crossed Screws. Hand (N Y) 2018; 13 (02) 156-163
- 5 Weiss KE, Rodner CM. Osteoarthritis of the wrist. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (05) 725-746
- 6 Ho PC. Arthroscopic partial wrist fusion. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2008; 12 (04) 242-265
- 7 del Piñal F, Klausmeyer M, Thams C, Moraleda E, Galindo C. Early experience with (dry) arthroscopic 4-corner arthrodesis: from a 4-hour operation to a tourniquet time. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (11) 2389-2399
- 8 Traverso P, Wong A, Wollstein R, Carlson L, Ashmead D, Watson HK. Ten-Year Minimum Follow-Up of 4-Corner Fusion for SLAC and SNAC Wrist. Hand (N Y) 2017; 12 (06) 568-572
- 9 Neubrech F, Mühldorfer-Fodor M, Pillukat T, Schoonhoven Jv, Prommersberger KJ. Long-term results after midcarpal arthrodesis. J Wrist Surg 2012; 1 (02) 123-128
- 10 Berger RA, Bishop AT, Bettinger PC. New dorsal capsulotomy for the surgical exposure of the wrist. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35 (01) 54-59
- 11 Trail IA, Murali R, Stanley JK. et al. The long-term outcome of four-corner fusion. J Wrist Surg 2015; 4 (02) 128-133
- 12 Kraisarin J, Dennison DG, Berglund LJ, An KN, Shin AY. Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques used for four-corner arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011; 36 (07) 560-567
- 13 Erne HC, Broer PN, Weiss F. et al. Four-corner fusion: Comparing outcomes of conventional K-wire-, locking plate-, and retrograde headless compression screw fixations. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (06) 909-917 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.033.
- 14 Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH, Beabout JW, Bryan RS. Traumatic instability of the wrist. Diagnosis, classification, and pathomechanics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972; 54 (08) 1612-1632
- 15 Larsen CF, Mathisen FK, Lindequist S. Measurements of carpiano bone angles on lateral wrist radiographs. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16A: 688-693