Download PDF
Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie up2date 2015; 9(3): 157-176
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-100382
Interventionelle und diagnostische Endoskopie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoskopie beim postoperativen Komplikationsmanagement

Teil 1: Drainage, Stent, Clip und Schwamm
M. Kantowski
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 June 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Die flexible Endoskopie hat beim Auftreten von postoperativen Komplikationen wie einer Anastomosenleckage im Gastrointestinaltrakt in den letzten Jahren einen starken Wandel in der Therapie bewirkt. Die Entwicklung geht von der rein diagnostischen Endoskopie mit anschließender Re-Operation oder radiologischer Abszessdrainage immer mehr hin zu verschiedenen Methoden der interventionellen Endoskopie.

In diesem 1. Teil des Beitrags werden das diagnostische Vorgehen bei V. a. Anastomosenleckage sowie die folgenden endoskopischen Methoden zur Abdichtung der Leckage und Abszessdrainage beschrieben:

  • Clip

  • Stent

  • Vakuummethode

    • Platzierung des Schwamms mit Schleppfaden

    • Platzierung mit der Zange

    • Platzierung via Draht

    • Durchzugmethode

    • Platzierung via PEG

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Iannettoni MD, Whyte RI, Orringer MB. Catastrophic complications of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110: 1493-1500
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sharma A, Deeb AP, Rickles AS et al. Closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy is associated with considerable morbidity. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 458-462
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Karliczek A, Jesus EC, Matos D et al. Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 259-265
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kessler H, Hermanek jr. P, Wiebelt H. Operative mortality in carcinoma of the rectum. Results of the German Multicentre Study. Int J Colorectal Dis 1993; 8: 158-166
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cong ZJ, Fu CG, Wang HT et al. Influencing factors of symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer. World J Surg 2009; 33: 1292-1297
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Farke S, Gögler H. Anastomoseninsuffizienz nach kontinenzerhaltenden Rektumresektionen. Coloproctology 2000; 15: 161-169
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Bartels H. Anastomotic leaks in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Chirurg 2004; 75: 1063-1070
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M et al. Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 554-559
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM. Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 174-180
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Daams F, Wu Z. , Lahaye MJ et al. Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 6: 14-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sauvanet A, Baltar J, Le Mee J et al. Diagnosis and conservative management of intrathoracic leakage after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1446-1449
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ortega-Deballon P, Radais F, Facy O et al. C-reactive protein is an early predictor of septic complications after elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg 2010; 34: 808-814
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Doeksen A, Tanis PJ, Wüst AF et al. Radiological evaluation of colorectal anastomoses. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 863-868
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Doerfer J, Meyer T, Klein P et al. The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery – a retrospective cohort study. Patient Saf Surg 2010; 4: 17
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Grund KE, Stüker D. Diagnostik der Nahtinsuffizienz im Gastrointestinaltrakt „Suffizienz“ von Radiologie und Endoskopie. Kongressbericht. Langenbecks Archiv Chir Supp II 1998; 1146-1149
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Cassivi SD. Leaks, strictures, and necrosis: a review of anastomotic complications following esophagectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 16: 124-132
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Jiang F, Yu MF, Ren BH et al. Nasogastric placement of sump tube through the leak for the treatment of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Res 2011; 171: 448-451
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lee DH, Kim HR, Kim SR et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes after conservative and surgical treatment of isolated anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2013; 26: 609-615
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cellier C, Landi B, Faye A et al. Upper gastrointestinal tract fistulae: endoscopic obliteration with fibrin sealant. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 731-733
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Groitel H, Horbach T. Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic insufficiency perforations in the oesophagus with fibrin glue. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 1996; 113: 753-754
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Truong S, Bohm G, Klinge U et al. Results after endoscopic treatment of postoperative upper gastrointestinal fistulas and leaks using combined Vicryl plug and fibrin glue. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1105-1108
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Changela K, Virk MA, Patel N et al. Role over the scope clips in the management of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 11460-11462
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jayaraman V, Hammerle C, Lo SK et al. Clinical application and outcomes of over the scope clip device: initial US experience in humans. Diagn Ther Endosc 2013; 2013: 183-187
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Lee WC, Ko WJ, Cho JH et al. Endoscopic treatment of various gastrointestinal tract defects with an over-the-scope clip: case series from a tertiary referral hospital. Clin Endosc 2014; 47: 178-182
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sulz MC, Bertolini R, Frei R et al. Multipurpose use of the over-the-scope-clip system (“Bear claw”) in the gastrointestinal tract: Swiss experience in a tertiary center. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 16287-16292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kirschniak A, Subotova N, Zieker D et al. The Over-The-Scope Clip (OTSC) for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding, perforations, and fistulas. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2901-2905
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hoeppner J, Kulemann B, Seifert G et al. Covered self-expanding stent treatment for anastomotic leakage: outcomes in esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 1703-1711
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 van Boeckel PG, Dua KS, Weusten BL et al. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS), partially covered SEMS and self-expandable plastic stents for the treatment of benign esophageal ruptures and anastomotic leaks. BMC Gastroenterol 2012; 12: 19
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Schaheen L, Blackmon SH, Nason KS. Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review. Am J Surg 2014; 208: 536-543
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Grund KE, Stüker D. Stentextraktion im GIT. Endo heute 2009; 22: 222-226
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Grund KE, Farin G, Ingenpaß R. Stententfernung: Leichter gesagt als getan. Teil 1. Endo-Praxis 2010; 26: 10-25
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Grund KE, Ingenpaß R, Farin G et al. Stententfernung: Leichter gesagt als getan. Teil 2. Endo-Praxis 2010; 26: 54-61
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Weidenhagen R, Hartl WH, Gruetzner KU et al. Anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection: new treatment options by endoluminal vacuum therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90: 1674-1681
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lenzen H, Negm AA, Erichsen TJ et al. Successful treatment of cervical esophageal leakage by endoscopic-vacuum assisted closure therapy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5: 340-345
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wedemeyer J, Brangewitz M, Kubicka S et al. Management of major postsurgical gastroesophageal intrathoracic leaks with an endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 382-386
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Bludau M, Hölscher AH, Herbold T et al. Management of upper intestinal leaks using an endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (E-VAC). Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 896-901
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Weidenhagen R, Grützner KU, Kopp R et al. Role of vacuum therapy in the management of the septic abdomen. Zentralbl Chir 2006; 131 (Suppl. 01) 115-119
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schorsch T, Müller C, Loske G. Endoscopic vacuum therapy of perforations and anastomotic insufficiency of the esophagus. Chirurg 2014; 85: 1081-1093
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Loske G, Strauss T, Riefel B et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy in the management of anastomotic insufficiency after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Endoscopy 2012; 44 (Suppl. 02) E94-95
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Fischer A, Baier PK, Hopt UT et al. Laparoendoscopic mediastinal vacuum therapy of a gastric perforation through the diaphragm. Endoscopy 2011; 43 (Suppl. 02) E393-E394
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Urschel JD. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 634-640
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar