Aktuelle Urol 2016; 47(02): 136-140
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-103446
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Aktuelle Therapie organbegrenzter Hodentumoren

Recent Therapy of Organ-confined Testis Cancer
C. Breunig
1   Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm
,
F. Zengerling
1   Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm
,
T. Schnöller
1   Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm
,
M. Schrader
1   Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm
,
F. Jentzmik
1   Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 April 2016 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: In Deutschland entfallen ca. 1–2% aller bösartigen Tumoren auf testikuläre Keimzelltumoren. Es handelt sich somit zwar um einen seltenen Tumor, dennoch nimmt er in mehrerlei Hinsicht eine Sonderrolle ein. In der Gruppe der 20- bis 35-jährigen Männer ist er der häufigste bösartige Tumor. Dadurch sind ganz unmittelbar die Familienplanung und der Lebensentwurf des jungen Mannes gefährdet, die gerade in diesem Alter eine bedeutende Rolle spielen. Eine weitere Besonderheit bösartiger Hodentumore besteht in der exzellenten Heilungsrate seit der Einführung platinhaltiger Chemotherapie-Regimes. Dadurch hat sich zuletzt der Fokus der medizinisch-therapeutischen Innovationen hin zur Therapiereduktion verschoben, zumal die Therapie über die akute Toxizität hinaus schwerwiegende Langzeitfolgen bis hin zur Induktion eines Sekundärmalignoms bedingen kann.

Ziel der Arbeit: Der vorliegende Artikel fasst den aktuellen therapeutischen Standard der malignen Hodentumoren im klinischen Stadium I zusammen.

Material und Methoden: Selektive Literaturrecherche in PubMed

Ergebnisse und Diskussion: Neben möglichen Implikationen für eine organerhaltende operative Therapie werden der Nutzen risikoadaptierter Vorgehensweisen sowie Möglichkeiten zur Anwendung einer Surveillance-Strategie bei lokalisierten Hodentumoren erläutert.

Abstract

Background: In Germany, testicular cancer accounts for about 1–2% of all malignant tumours. Although, therefore, this is a rare tumour, it assumes an exceptional position among malignant tumours in several respects. In male patients aged 20–35 years it is the most common tumour, which directly affects the family and life planning of young men, a matter of prime importance at this age. Another aspect of testicular cancer is its excellent prognosis since the introduction of platinum-based chemotherapy into the armamentarium of testicular cancer therapy. Therefore, therapeutic innovations increasingly focus on reducing the radicality of treatment, even more so since this therapy, in addition to acute toxicity, can cause severe long-term consequences up to and including secondary malignancies.

Objectives: This article gives an overview of the present therapeutic standard of stage I testicular cancer treatment.

Material and Methods: Selective PubMed research

Results and Discussion: Besides potential implications for organ-sparing surgery, the article elucidates the benefits of a risk-adapted therapeutic approach and indications for a surveillance strategy for patients with localised testicular cancer.

Editorial Comment

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Reinhardt K. Die Diagnostik und Therapie der Hodentumoren. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1956; 81: 852-857
  • 2 Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ Cell Cancer: A Report of the Second Meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): Part I. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 478-496
  • 3 Kier MGG, Lauritsen J, Almstrup K et al. Screening for carcinoma in situ in the contralateral testicle in patients with testicular cancer: a population-based study (DaTeCa 03 study). Ann Oncol 2014; 26: 737-742
  • 4 Dieckmann K-P. Contralateral biopsies in patients with testicular germ-cell tumour-nuisance or new sense?. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 620-621
  • 5 Dieckmann K-P, Loy V. False-negative biopsies for the diagnosis of testicular intraepithelial neoplasia (TIN) – an update. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 516-521
  • 6 Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F et al. EAU guidelines on testicular cancer: 2011 update. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 304-319
  • 7 Heidenreich A, Angerer-Shpilenya M. Organ-preserving surgery for testicular tumours. BJU Int 2012; 109: 474-490
  • 8 Sargos P, Ferretti L, Henriques de Figueiredo B et al Radiotherapy after testicular-sparing surgery for bilateral or monorchide testicular tumours: an innovative approach. Cancer Radiothérapie J Société Fr Radiothérapie Oncol 2013; 17: 317-322
  • 9 Giannarini G, Dieckmann K-P, Albers P et al. Organ-sparing surgery for adult testicular tumours: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 780-790
  • 10 Heidenreich A, Weissbach L, Höltl W et al. Organ sparing surgery for malignant germ cell tumor of the testis. J Urol 2001; 166: 2161-2165
  • 11 Hallak J, Cocuzza M, Sarkis AS et al. Organ-Sparing Microsurgical Resection of Incidental Testicular Tumors Plus Microdissection for Sperm Extraction and Cryopreservation in Azoospermic Patients: Surgical Aspects and Technical Refinements. Urology 2009; 73: 887-891
  • 12 Albers P. Management of stage I testis cancer. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 34-43 discussion 43–44
  • 13 Krug B, Heidenreich A, Dietlein M et al. The lymph node staging of malignant testicular germ-cell tumors. RöFo Fortschr Röntgenstr 1999; 171: 87-94
  • 14 White PM, Howard GC, Best JJ et al. The role of computed tomographic examination of the pelvis in the management of testicular germ cell tumours. Clin Radiol 1997; 52: 124-129
  • 15 White PM, Adamson DJ, Howard GC et al. Imaging of the thorax in the management of germ cell testicular tumours. Clin Radiol 1999; 54: 207-211
  • 16 Warde P, Specht L, Horwich A et al. Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma managed by surveillance: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 4448-4452
  • 17 Tandstad T, Smaaland R, Solberg A et al. Management of seminomatous testicular cancer: a binational prospective population-based study from the Swedish norwegian testicular cancer study group. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 719-725
  • 18 Hallemeier CL, Choo R, Davis BJ et al Excellent long-term disease control with modern radiotherapy techniques for stage I testicular seminoma–the Mayo Clinic experience. Urol Oncol 2014; 32: 24.e1-24.e6
  • 19 Lewinshtein D, Gulati R, Nelson PS et al. Incidence of second malignancies after external beam radiotherapy for clinical stage I testicular seminoma. BJU Int 2012; 109: 706-712
  • 20 Oliver RTD, Mason MD, Mead GM et al. Radiotherapy versus single-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: a randomised trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 293-300
  • 21 Tandstad T, Dahl O, Haugnes HS et al. Management of clinical stage I seminomatous testicular cancer: A report from SWENOTECA. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 5s (suppl; abstr 4508)
  • 22 Beyer J, Albers P, Altena R et al. Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 878-888
  • 23 Mortensen MS, Lauritsen J, Gundgaard MG et al. A nationwide cohort study of stage I seminoma patients followed on a surveillance program. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 1172-1178
  • 24 Yu H, Madison RA, Setodji CM et al. Quality of surveillance for stage I testis cancer in the community. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4327-4332
  • 25 Tandstad T, Dahl O, Cohn-Cedermark G et al. Risk-Adapted Treatment in Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Cancer: The SWENOTECA Management Program. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2122-2128
  • 26 Maroto P, García del Muro X, Aparicio J et al. Multicentre risk-adapted management for stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours. Ann Oncol 2005; 16: 1915-1920
  • 27 Cullen MH, Stenning SP, Parkinson MC et al. Short-course adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: a Medical Research Council report. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 1106-1113
  • 28 Fung C, Fossa SD, Milano MT et al. Solid tumors after chemotherapy or surgery for testicular nonseminoma: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3807-3814
  • 29 Haugnes HS, Wethal T, Aass N et al. Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Morbidity in Long-Term Survivors of Testicular Cancer: A 20-Year Follow-Up Study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 4649-4657
  • 30 de Haas EC, Altena R, Boezen HM et al. Early development of the metabolic syndrome after chemotherapy for testicular cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 749-755
  • 31 Sturgeon JF, Moore MJ, Kakiashvili DM et al Non-risk-adapted surveillance in clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: the Princess Margaret Hospital’s experience. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 556-562
  • 32 Kollmannsberger C, Tandstad T, Bedard PL et al. Patterns of relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular cancer managed with active surveillance. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 51-57
  • 33 Heidenreich A, Albers P, Hartmann M et al. Complications of primary nerve sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: experience of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. J Urol 2003; 169: 1710-1714
  • 34 Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F et al. Guidelines on Testicular Cancer: 2015 Update. Eur Urol 2015;