Relation Between Implant Position and Perceptual Threshold in a Patient with Epiretinal Prosthesis System

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2016; 233(04): 493-495
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-111749

Der interessante Fall

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Beziehung zwischen Implantatposition und Perzeptionsschwelle bei einem Patient mit Epiretinaler Sehprothese

B.-K. Tran

Department of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Jules Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

,

T. J. Wolfensberger

Department of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Jules Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

References
1 Hartong DT, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet 2006; 368: 1795-1809
2 Rizzo 3rd JF, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J et al. Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 5362-5369
3 Dorn JD, Ahuja AK, Caspi A et al. The Detection of Motion by Blind Subjects With the Epiretinal 60-Electrode (Argus II) Retinal Prosthesis. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013; 131: 183-189
4 Sekirnjak C, Hottowy P, Sher A et al. High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 4446-4456
5 Ahuja AK, Behrend MR, Kuroda M et al. An in vitro model of a retinal prosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008; 55: 1744-1753
6 Ziv OR, Rizzo JF, Jensen RJ. In vitro activation of retinal cells: estimating location of stimulated cell by using a mathematical model. J Neural Eng 2005; 2: S5-S15
7 Ahuja AK, Yeoh J, Dorn JD et al. Factors Affecting Perceptual Threshold in Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Subjects. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2013; 2: 1
8 de Balthasar C, Patel S, Roy A et al. Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 2303-2314