Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2022; 35(12): 1349-1356
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723012
Original Article

Sensor Use in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: Load Balancing and Posterior Femoral Rollback

Sang Jun Song
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
,
Kang Il Kim
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
,
Cheol Hee Park 
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The purpose was to investigate the proportion of severe load imbalance after appropriate conventional gap balancing and analyze the intraoperative kinematics after load balancing in cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). In total, 45 sensor-assisted CR and 45 PS TKAs using NexGen prosthesis were prospectively evaluated. After appropriate conventional gap balancing, the loads at 10, 45, and 90 degrees of knee flexion were evaluated with a wireless load sensor placed in trial implants. The proportion of severe load imbalance (medial load–lateral load >75 lbs) was investigated. After load balancing, location of the femorotibial contact point was investigated at each flexion angle to analyze femorotibial kinematics. The proportion of the severe load imbalance was significantly higher in CR TKAs at the 10 degrees knee flexion (37.8 vs. 15.6%, p = 0.031). This proportion was higher in CR TKAs than in PS TKAs at the 45 and 90 degrees knee flexion angles, but without statistical significance (31.1 vs. 15.6%, p = 0.134 and 33.3 vs. 15.6%, p = 0.085, respectively). After load balancing, consistent posterior femoral rollback occurred in medial and lateral compartments during 90 degrees flexion in CR TKAs (p < 0.001), but not in PS TKAs. Medial pivot kinematics was not observed in both TKA designs. The sensor was more beneficial in CR TKAs for achieving appropriate load balancing and consistent posterior femoral rollback compared with PS TKAs. Further studies are required to identify target load distribution to restore ideal knee kinematics after TKA. This study shows level of evidence II.

Keywords

knee - arthroplasty - sensor - load - kinematics


Publication History

Received: 07 July 2020

Accepted: 17 December 2020

Article published online:
05 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Cho MR, Lee YS, Choi WK. Relationship between lateral femoral bowing and varus knee deformity based on two-dimensional assessment of side-to-side differences. Knee Surg Relat Res 2018; 30 (01) 58-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kim SH, Park YB, Song MK, Lim JW, Lee HJ. Reliability and validity of the femorotibial mechanical axis angle in primary total knee arthroplasty: navigation versus weight bearing or supine whole leg radiographs. Knee Surg Relat Res 2018; 30 (04) 326-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Tsukada S, Fujii T, Wakui M. Impact of soft tissue imbalance on knee flexion angle after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (08) 2399-2403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Elson LC, Anderson CR. A new method for defining balance: promising short-term clinical outcomes of sensor-guided TKA. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (05) 955-960
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 MacDessi SJ, Gharaibeh MA, Harris IA. How accurately can soft tissue balance be determined in total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (02) 290-294 e291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Song SJ, Lee HW, Kim KI, Park CH. Load imbalances existed as determined by a sensor after conventional gap balancing with a tensiometer in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 28 (09) 2953-2961
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chow JC, Breslauer L. The use of intraoperative sensors significantly increases the patient-reported rate of improvement in primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2017; 40 (04) e648-e651
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Geller JA, Lakra A, Murtaugh T. The use of electronic sensor device to augment ligament balancing leads to a lower rate of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (05) 1502-1504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Scott WN, Diduch DR, Long WJ. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee. Vol 2. 6 ed.. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Broberg JS, Ndoja S, MacDonald SJ, Lanting BA, Teeter MG. Comparison of contact kinematics in posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty at long-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (01) 272-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Longo UG, Ciuffreda M, Mannering N. et al. Outcomes of posterior-stabilized compared with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (04) 321-340
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Angerame MR, Holst DC, Jennings JM, Komistek RD, Dennis DA. Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (10) 2502-2510
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Horiuchi H, Akizuki S, Tomita T, Sugamoto K, Yamazaki T, Shimizu N. In vivo kinematic analysis of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (06) 1196-1202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Inokuchi T, Ishida K, Takayama K. et al. Intraoperative posterior movement of the tibia at 90° of flexion predicts worse postoperative flexion angles in cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28 (09) 2816-2822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Song SJ, Kang SG, Lee YJ, Kim KI, Park CH. An intraoperative load sensor did not improve the early postoperative results of posterior-stabilized TKA for osteoarthritis with varus deformities. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1671-1679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Elson LC, Anderson CR. A targeted approach to ligament balancing using kinetic sensors. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (07) 2127-2132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Risitano S, Karamian B, Indelli PF. Intraoperative load-sensing drives the level of constraint in primary total knee arthroplasty: Surgical technique and review of the literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2017; 8 (03) 265-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Orthosensor. How VERASENSE technology works. Accessed November 16, 2020 at: https://www.orthosensor.com/surgeons/verasense/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Giesinger JM, Hamilton DF, Jost B, Behrend H, Giesinger K. WOMAC, EQ-5D and knee society score thresholds for treatment success after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (12) 2154-2158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Song SJ, Kang SG, Park CH, Bae DK. Comparison of clinical results and risk of patellar injury between attune and PFC sigma knee systems. Knee Surg Relat Res 2018; 30 (04) 334-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Meneghini RM, Ziemba-Davis MM, Lovro LR, Ireland PH, Damer BM. Can intraoperative sensors determine the “target” ligament balance? Early outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (10) 2181-2187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dion CB, Howard JL, Lanting BA, McAuley JP. Does recession of the posterior cruciate ligament influence outcome in total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (10) 2383-2387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Song SJ, Park CH, Bae DK. What to know for selecting cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 2019; 11 (02) 142-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Foge DA, Baldini TH, Hellwinkel JE, Hogan CA, Dayton MR. The role of complete posterior cruciate ligament release in flexion gap balancing for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (7S): S361-S365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Yamakado K, Worland RL, Jessup DE, Diaz-Borjon E, Pinilla R. Tight posterior cruciate ligament in posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a cause of posteromedial subluxation of the femur. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (05) 570-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Watanabe T, Muneta T, Sekiya I, Banks SA. Intraoperative joint gaps and mediolateral balance affect postoperative knee kinematics in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2015; 22 (06) 527-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pinskerova V, Johal P, Nakagawa S. et al. Does the femur roll-back with flexion?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (06) 925-931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Tang H, Chen H, Yang D, Jiang Y, Zhang C, Zhou Y. Distinctions of introarticular force distribution between genesis-II posterior stabilized and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: an intraoperative comparative study of 45 patients. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2017; 42: 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Shimizu N, Tomita T, Yamazaki T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. The effect of weight-bearing condition on kinematics of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (07) 1031-1037
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 van Duren BH, Pandit H, Beard DJ. et al. How effective are added constraints in improving TKR kinematics?. J Biomech 2007; 40 (Suppl. 01) S31-S37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Morooka T, Okuno M, Seino D. et al. Intraoperative kinematic analysis of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty with asymmetric helical post-cam design. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019; 29 (03) 675-681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wada K, Mikami H, Hamada D, Yamazaki T, Tomita T, Sairyo K. Can intraoperative kinematic analysis predict postoperative kinematics following total knee arthroplasty? A preliminary. J Med Invest 2017; 65 (1.2): 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar