Keywords
odontogenic cysts - odontogenic tumors - jaw cysts - bone cysts
Palavras-chave
cistos odontogênicos - tumores odontogênicos - cistos mandibulares - cistos ósseos
Introduction
The orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst (OOC) is an unusual developmental cyst which was previously diagnosed as odontogenic keratocyst (OKC).[1] Previously, many studies discussed the clinicopathological differences between OKC and OOC.[1]
[2] Numerous series of OOCs have been reported with characteristic clinical, histopathological and biological features differ substantially from those of odontogenic keratocysts, as well as demonstrating a better prognosis and lower recurrence rates.[3] Some studies reported that OKC is a neoplasm, which is preferably called keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KCOT).[4] According to the World Health Organization classification of head and neck tumors, OOC is not a part of KCOT and should be considered as a distinct entity.[1] Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst is a less aggressive intraosseous cyst identified by an orthokeratinized epithelium.[3] It has been suggested that KCOT may arise from the dental lamina, but OOC may arise from the oral epithelium under the influence of the dental papilla or only the oral epithelium.[4]
Orthokeratinized odontogenic cysts mainly occur in males during the third and fourth decades of life.[5] They are located predominantly in the posterior part of the mandible, in the molar and ramus area.[1] Clinically, they can grow and cause cortical expansion, swelling, and pain, although most of them can be detected incidentally through radiographic check-up.[2] Radiographically, OOCs may present mostly as a unilocular radiolucency; however, the large cysts might be multilocular.[5]
Histopathologically, the OKC has a prominent granular layer below the keratinized layer. Although the lining epithelium of OOC is generally uniform and thin, it has quite thick orthokeratinized surface layers, resembling an onion skin.[1] The palisaded basal cell layer and hyperchromatic nuclei, which are predominately seen in OKC, are absent in OOC.[3] The standard treatment for OOCs is enucleation and curettage. Recurrence of OOCs is rare, differently from the high recurrence rate of KCOTs.[5] Here, we present the clinical, radiographical, and microscopic findings of a rare OOC which was found in the anterior part of the maxilla.
Case Report
A 50-year-old male patient visited the department of oral surgery of the Semnan dental school with a chief complaint of swelling in the anterior part of his face. The patient did not notice it until 2 months prior to the visit. Intraorally, there was a diffuse swelling in the palatal cortex. The patient did not have any systemic disease and looked well and healthy. On panoramic radiography, there was a well-defined unilocular radiolucency on right side of the maxilla, measuring ∼ 3 × 1.5 × 2.4 cm. Palatal cortical expansion and thinning of buccal and lingual cortexes were seen. There was no evidence of root resorption however loss of lamina dura and periodontal ligament (PDL) widening of incisors was obvious. ([Fig. 1]) After obtaining informed consent, an incisional biopsy was done, and the histopathological examination revealed a pathologic cyst that was lined by a thick orthokeratinized epithelium. The wall of the cyst was fibrocolagenized, with a mild lymphocyte infiltration. ([Fig. 2 A], [B]) Considering the histopathological features, OOC was diagnosed.
Fig. 1 A well-defined unilocular radiolucency in the right side of the maxilla.
Fig. 2 (A) A pathologic cyst which was lined by a thick orthokeratinized epithelium. The wall of the cyst was fibrocolagenized with a mild lymphocyte infiltration. (H&E ×100), (B) The closer histopathological aspect (H&E ×400)
Discussion
Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst is an uncommon developmental odontogenic cyst which had been previously diagnosed as OKC.[1] The occurrence of the OOCs is predominant in young adults and show over a 2:1 male-to-female ratio. The lesion occurs more frequently in the mandible than in the maxilla (3:1 ratio), with a tendency to involve the posterior areas of the jaws.[2] The most common sites were in the mandibular molar and ramus region.[2] MacDonald et al. (2010), in a systematic review which aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic features as well as the frequency of OOC, reported that males are more frequently affected than females, as confirmed by our case.[6]
Clinically, the OOC exists as a single cyst, shows a predilection for males, and is most often found from the 2nd to the 5th decades of life.[6] The case presently discussed was that of a 50-year-old man, confirming this trend. Moreover, MacDonald et al. detailed that in females, the majority of the occurrences are found in the second decade of life.[6] The manifestation of these lesions in the second decade of women's lives might be related to hormonal elements because this is the decade when menarche usually takes place.[4]
[Table 1] shows all cases of OOC reported in the literature. ([Table 1])
Table 1
Orthokeratinized odontogenic cysts reported in the English literature
|
Author/Year
|
MacDonald(2010)[10]
|
Dong(2009)[2]
|
MacDonald(2010)[7]
|
Gonzalez Galvan(2013)[5]
|
|
Number of cases
|
192
|
61
|
ING
|
3
|
Gender
|
Male:Female
|
127:65
|
ING
|
2:3
|
2:3
|
|
Mean age
|
34:89
|
ING
|
34:20
|
33:6
|
Location
|
Maxilla:Mandible
|
43:104
|
6:55
|
2:4
|
0:3
|
Pain
|
yes:no
|
26:82
|
13:48
|
2:3
|
1:2
|
Incidental finding
|
yes:no
|
39:43
|
ING
|
0:5
|
1:2
|
Shape
|
Unilocular:Multilocular
|
119:9
|
47:7
|
3:2
|
2:1
|
Root resorption
|
yes:no
|
0:5
|
ING
|
0:5
|
0:3
|
Tooth displacement
|
yes:no
|
4:3
|
ING
|
4:1
|
1:2
|
Swelling
|
yes:no
|
37:53
|
46:61
|
ING
|
2:1
|
|
Mean size
|
ING
|
4:8
|
ING
|
ING
|
Unerupted tooth
|
yes:no
|
50:22
|
27
|
3:2
|
2:1
|
Recurrence
|
yes:no
|
7:158
|
0:42
|
ING
|
ING
|
Abbreviation: ING, Information not given.
The OOC affects the mandible twice more often than the maxilla, with a predilection for the most posterior region,[7] but the present case occurred in the anterior part of the maxilla; therefore, it is remarkable enough to be reported. Dong et al. reported the occurrence rate of OOC in the anterior maxilla ˂ 5%.[2]
Radiographically, OOC usually appears as a well-defined solitary unilocular or multilocular radiolucent lesion.[1]
[3]
[5] Approximately 50% of OCCs are associated with an unerupted tooth.[1] It appears most commonly as a dentigerous cyst in the posterior part of the mandible. Unicystic ameloblastoma and KCOT are the lesions that must be considered as differential diagnoses.[8] Other authors considered malignant tumors and periapical cysts as differential diagnoses.[7]
[8]
[9]
[10] This means that all periapical radiolucencies must be evaluated histopathologically.[10] The OOC shows little clinical aggressiveness. A few studies stated that OOCs showed more aggressive signs, such as paresthesia.[1] Differentiation between KCOT and OOC is essential, with respect to their treatment modalities and due to the high recurrence rate and aggressiveness of KCOT.[8] Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst is characterized by an orthokeratinized epithelium with a thickness of 4 to 8 cell layers, with prominent granulosum and low cuboidal basal cells, histologically; as we saw in the case presently discussed.[7] Orthokeratinized odontogenic cysts can present as periapical radiolucency; however, it has a different prognosis from conventional inflammatory periapical diseases, such as inflammatory cysts, granulomas, and abscesses.[9] Hence, evaluation of the keratin is mandatory to confirm the diagnosis and estimate patients' prognoses precisely.[9]
Conclusion
The OOC displays characteristic clinical and histopathological features that vary significantly from KCOT, with a lower recurrence rate and better prognosis. It is important to notice that other radiolucent lesions of the jaws must be considered in the differential diagnosis, such as dentigerous cyst, ameloblastoma, and KCOT.