RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725628
10-Year Outcomes following Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients with Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Objectives: Severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) (ejection fraction <35%) has been associated with increased perioperative risk following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Off-pump CABG (OPCAB) has shown to be beneficial in other high-risk patient cohorts. However, long-term outcomes in patients with severe LVD following OPCAB still remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the early- and long-term outcomes of OPCAB and conventional CABG (ONCAB) in patients with severe LVD.
Methods: Retrospective single-center analysis including a total of 1,161 consecutive patients with severe LVD who underwent isolated CABG between 2002 and 2014. Among them, 442 underwent OPCAB and 719 underwent ONCAB. Primary outcomes were 30-day and long-term all-cause mortality.
Result: Patients' basal characteristics were similar in both groups. Incomplete revascularization rates were higher in the OPCAB group (21.7 vs. 35.2%; p < 0.01). Lower 30-day mortality was observed in OPCAB patients (7.1 vs. 4.3%; p = 0.05). Early complications were comparable in both groups. Mortality estimates were comparable for both OPCAB and ONCAB at 5 years (31 vs. 36%) and 10 years (54 vs. 57%), respectively (p = 0.13). COPD (OR: 1.52; p < 0.01) and incomplete revascularization (OR: 1.46; p <0.01) were identified as predictors of early mortality. Furthermore, COPD (HR: 1.40; p = 0.04), peripheral artery disease (HR: 1.24; p = 0.03), and diabetes mellitus (HR: 1.26; p = 0.01) were identified as predictors of long-term mortality.
Conclusion: OPCAB is safe and efficacious in patients with severe LVD. Short-term results after OPCAB show a trend toward lower mortality. Long-term mortality rates are similar among OPCAB and ONCAB patients. Survival benefits of complete revascularization are more evident among OPCAB patients.
Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
19. Februar 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany