J Am Acad Audiol 2020; 31(10): C1-C2
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726576
JAAA CEU Program

JAAA CEU Program

 

    The questions below refer to Wu et al, “Comparison of In-Situ and Retrospective Self-Reports on Assessing Hearing Aid Outcomes,” pages 746–762.

    Learner Outcomes

    Readers of this article should be able to:

    • Explain what in-situ self-reports are, how they could be implemented, and their pros and cons

    • Describe why in-situ self-reports are worth considering in audiology research


    #

    CEU Questions

    1. Which one is not a disadvantage of retrospective self-reports (e.g., traditional paper-and-pencil questionnaires)?

      • Recall bias

      • Poor contextual resolution

      • Difficult to administer

    2. In-situ self-reports differ from retrospective self-reports in that:

      • In-situ self-reports must be implemented using smartphones.

      • In-situ self-reports ask respondents to report their experiences during or shortly after the experiences.

      • In-situ self-reports ask respondents to report their experiences in a well-controlled laboratory.

    3. Which one is incorrect:

      • Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a method used to collect in-situ self-reports.

      • EMA is only available in pencil-and-paper form.

      • EMA asks respondents to repeatedly report their experiences in their natural environments.

    4. According to the Accessibility Model, respondents use what type of memory to answer in-situ self-reports?

      • Episodic memory

      • Semantic memory

      • Working memory

    5. According to the Accessibility Model:

      • In-situ self-reports reflect what respondents actually experience, while retrospective self-reports reflect what respondents believe or remember.

      • Retrospective self-reports reflect what respondents actually experience, while in-situ self-reports reflect what respondents believe or remember.

      • Both in-situ and retrospective self-reports reflect what respondents actually experience.

    6. According to the literature review by the authors, which hearing aid feature has a larger impact on hearing aid outcome?

      • High channel number

      • Expansion

      • Feedback suppression

    7. Which of the following is not an outcome domain assessed by the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP)?

      • Hearing aid use

      • Quality of life

      • Hearing aid satisfaction

    8. Order effects may cause new hearing aid users to:

      • Have no hearing aid preference.

      • Prefer the device they wore first.

      • Prefer the device most recently worn.

    9. Which is least likely to be the reason why EMA is more sensitive than retrospective self-reports?

      • Data could be aggregated across multiple EMA surveys to reduce random variation.

      • Experiences tied to specific listening situations could be more accurately recalled in EMA surveys.

      • Technology such as smartphones can be used to administer EMA.

    10. Limitations of EMA include:

      • Low respondent burden.

      • Sensitivity depends on the number of surveys that participants complete.

      • Ease of data analysis.


    #
    #

    No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).

    Publication History

    Article published online:
    20 April 2021

    © 2021. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

    Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
    333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA