Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728345
Understanding of Instructions in Pupils after Cochlear Implantation
Success in school depends on language comprehension. Based on our evaluation in comprehension of instructions in simultaneously cochlear implanted schoolchildren, we compared these with the results on understanding instructions of pupils, listening bimodal or provided sequentially bilateral within one year or later than twelve month with cochlear implants (CI). This might be important for counselling and therapy.
Results of 220 children in the subtest Comprehension of Instructions from the Marburger Sprachverständnistest für Kinder was evaluated retrospectively. Age at test of these children is 59 to 91 months and the range of hearing experience calculated from the first cochlear implantation is 13 to 80 months.
The results in percentile ranking compared to normal hearing same aged pupils are presented for simultaneously bilateral implanted children (group 2; n = 98) compared to children sequentially bilateral provided within one year (group 3; n = 60), sequentially bilateral cochlear implanted later than 12 months (group 4; n = 24) and group 1 (n = 38) bimodal provided.
Compared to group 2, a significantly lower understanding can only be seen in group 3. Age at test is significantly higher for the children in group 4 compared to group 2, while it is comparable for the other groups. Compared to group 2, group 1 is the only one with significantly lower hearing experience.
In our evaluation simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation leads to better comprehension of instructions than sequential implantation within one year. We do not know if the higher test age of group 4 leads to the comparably good results in instruction comprehension. In the case of early listening with hearing aids, a later bimodal supply may also lead to a comparably good understanding of instructions.
Poster-PDF A-1340.pdf
#
Conflict of interest
Der Erstautor gibt keinen Interessenskonflikt an.
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
13 May 2021
© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany