Keywords
stent - pancreatic cancer - jaundice - endoscope
Endoscopic biliary stenting is one of the most commonly used palliative procedure
in patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction. The palliative
stenting is usually performed either for cholangitis or before palliative chemotherapy
or for symptomatic relief of pruritus. Biliary stenting can be performed with either
plastic or metallic stents. Although metallic stenting is costlier than plastic stents,
duration of hospitalization and need for repeated procedures due to stent blockage
is less with metallic stents compared with plastic stent making it a cost-effective
option even in countries with low endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)–related
costs.[1]
[2]
[3] However, plastic stent still remains one of the most commonly used modalities for
palliative biliary drainage in patients due to cost constrains in developing countries
like India. In recent years, various plastic stent designs have been built to decrease
the chances of stent blockage and increase the stent patency. One of the most extensively
explored options is to increase the diameter of the plastic stent. Despite initial
enthusiasm of increasing stent diameter to reduce the risk of stent blockage, recent
studies have shown no additional advantage for stents of more than 10F in reducing
the risk of plastic stent blockage.[4]
[5]
[6] Similarly, newer stent designs like distal windsock design, a winged stent without
central lumen or specialized coating, have been also built but without consistent
results showing benefit in increasing stent patency rates.[7] Recently, a double-layer stent design has been developed which has shown better
stent patency rates compared with conventional plastic stents.[8]
[9] In that stent, the inner layer is made up of fluorine coating, which has a water-repellant
property, to minimize the bile adhesion and the outer rigid material provides stiffness
necessary to guide smooth insertion.[10] Similar to plastic stents, designs of metallic stents have also evolved in recent
years to increase its patency and reduce the risk of migration. Initially, uncovered
metallic self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) were used in patients with unresectable
malignant distal biliary obstruction; however, covered SEMS has shown to have a better
stent patency compared with uncovered SEMS without much increase in the complications
rate.[11]One of the major limitations associated with covered SEMS is the risk of migration
and shortening after deployment. Recently, laser-cut covered SEMS are considered to
have better deployment property, without shortening of the stent.[12]
[13] However, there is no head-to-head trial of braided versus laser-cut SEMS in terms
of efficacy, risk of blockage, or risk of migration.
In this news and views, we are discussing two articles on the newer stent designs
for biliary drainage in patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction.
First study has explored a newly designed 12F plastic stent and compared it with historic
controls who had had 10F plastic stents or SEMS insertion for biliary obstruction
and the second study has explored the efficacy and safety of new laser-cut fully covered
SEMS. Although neither of the studies are large multicentric randomized trials, they
throw some light on future stent development for biliary drainage in patients with
unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction.
Deprez et al conducted a single-center prospective study in Belgium between March
2015 and June 2017 on the efficacy and safety profile of the newly designed 12F plastic
stent (PBD-Y0011) in patients with histologically proven unresectable distal malignant
biliary obstruction.[14] This novel stent has three layers, a proximal X-ray mark, three flaps at each end,
and protective sleeves to keep the proximal and distal flaps straight. Inner layer
of stent is coated with fluorine, metal coil constitutes the intermediate layer, and
outer layer is made of a special resin. Deprez and colleagues have also described
the method of stent insertion using push-and-pull endoscope movements and up-down
movement of the outer control knob rather than using elevator. Stent length varied
between 5, 7, and 9 cm and endoscopist decided stent length based on the length of
stricture. All ERCP procedures were done using therapeutic duodenoscope with 4.2 mm
working channel (TJF-Q180V; Olympus Europe, Berchem, Belgium). Recurrent biliary obstruction
(RBO) was defined in the presence of stent dysfunction (with or without cholangitis)
or symptomatic migration. Stent dysfunction was defined as dilated bile duct with
biliary pain, presence of cholestasis (greater than twofold normal values), or jaundice
(total bilirubin > 3 mg/dL) with or without fever at least 48 hour after the procedure.
In presence of stent dysfunction, the authors have also evaluated site, cause, and
severity of stent occlusion by detailed examination the removed stent. After that,
stent patency was checked using water irrigation test using three water pressures
(110, 350, and 550 mmH2O) for 3-minute durations and then the stent was scored as “open,” “partially occluded,”
or “completely occluded” for each water pressure. Moreover, all retrieved stents were
dissected at 1 cm cross-section and visually evaluated to identify the location and
degree of occlusion. Nonsignificant occlusion was defined as an unimpeded view through
>50% of the lumen through all stent segments. Significant or complete occlusions were
recorded when ≥50% or all, respectively, of the lumen was seen to be obstructed in
at least one segment. These prospectively enrolled patients undergoing 12F plastic
stent placement were compared with historic controls who underwent 10F plastic stenting,
fully covered self-expandable metallic stenting (FCSEMS), or uncovered metallic stenting
(UCSEMS) for unresectable distal bile duct malignancy. The patients were randomly
selected by frequency matching for age, sex, metastatic disease, and etiology of obstruction.
In this study, the authors have included a total of 72 patients; 24 patients underwent
12F plastic stent placement prospectively and they were compared with historic cohort
of patients who underwent 10F plastic stenting or FCSEMS or UCSEMS (16 patients in
each group). Median age, gender distribution, etiology of distal bile duct obstruction,
pre-ERCP bilirubin levels, and bile duct diameter and stricture length were comparable
between groups. Around 70% of patients had carcinoma of pancreas, 75% patients had
metastatic disease, and the median length of bile duct stricture was 20 mm. The technical
success rate was 100% in all the four groups. Median stent patency duration was 106,
51, 154, and 136 days in 12F plastic stent, 10F plastic stent, FCSEMS, and UCSEMS
groups, respectively. The 10F plastic stent had significantly lower stent patency
rate compared with FCSEMS or UCSEMS (p < 0.01); however, the differences were not statistically significant between other
groups. Over a median follow-up of 127 days (32–356 days), RBO rate for the 12F plastic
stent was significantly lower compared with the 10F plastic stent (50% vs. 81.3%;
p = 0.046) and it was comparable with the FCSEMS (43.8%; p = 0.436) or UCSEMS (68.8%; p = 0.234). None of the patients in the 12F group had RBO due to stent migration while
4 patients in the 10F group and 1 patient in the FCSEMS group had RBO due to stent
migration. Eleven 12F plastic stents were examined after removal for suspected stent
dysfunction; however, only 4 patients had occlusion in the irrigation test while 7
stents had only partial clogging on visual inspection. The cause of cholestasis in
those 7 patients was not evaluated in detail in this study. A 30-day mortality was
noted in 3 patients in the 12F group, 1 patient in the 10F group, and none in the
SEMS group. Although the difference was not statistically significant, the authors
have not explored the cause of higher 30-day mortality in the 12F group which requires
careful evaluation in future studies. Post ERCP adverse event rates were also comparable
between all groups. The authors concluded that this newly designed 12F plastic stent
looks promising in patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction
with similar stent patency and rates of RBO as FC/UC-SEMS.
Marui and colleagues, in a retrospective, observational, single-center study, explored
a newer laser-cut FCSEMS (LC-CSEMS) for unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction.[15] The new LC-CSEMS (X-Suit NIR covered biliary metal stent; Olympus Medical Systems,
Tokyo, Japan) is 10 mm in diameter and 8 or 10 cm in length.[15,]
[16] The stent has unique zigzag design composed of thick and thin struts made of nitinol.
Thick struts maintain the stent form and provide a good radial force, and contribute
to maintaining both SEMS position and the bile duct lumen. In contrast, the thin struts
can be deformed in each mesh unit along the bile duct to ensure conformability of
the stent, which enables the SEMS to fit into various bile ducts. Also, the stent
has flared ends to prevent migration, larger radiopaque markers to increase the visibility
on fluoroscopy, and a simple delivery system for easy stent placement. RBO was defined
as a composite end point of either stent occlusion or symptomatic migration. In this
study, all the stents were deployed through the papilla in duodenum. A total of 76
patients underwent LC-CSEMS placement during the study period for unresectable malignant
distal biliary obstruction and 24 patients were excluded from the analysis due to
various causes with 52 patients being finally included in the study. Majority of the
included patients had carcinoma pancreas and had undergone prior endoscopic drainage
with either nasobiliary tube or plastic stents. Seventy-five percent patients had
placement of 8-cm LC-CSEMS and 75% of patients had undergone palliative chemotherapy
or chemoradiotherapy after stent placement. Technical success was achieved in all
patients and authors have not described any incidence of technical failure or maldeployment
during the initial stent placement. Over a median follow-up of 159 days (83–248 days),
8 patients had RBO, with stent occlusion in 6 patients and distal stent migration
in 2 patients. The stent was occluded due to sludge in 2 patients and with food impaction,
tumor overgrowth, mucosal hyperplasia, or poor expansion in one patient each. The
median time to RBO with LC-CSEMS was 445 days. Although the authors did not encounter
any serious adverse events due to SEMS, 5 (10%) patients had mild pancreatitis, 4
(8%) patients had asymptomatic migration, 3 (6%) patients had nonocclusive cholangitis,
and 2 (4%) patients had cholecystitis. Stent removal was attempted in 10 patients
due to RBO (n = 3), pancreatitis (n = 1), nonocclusive cholangitis (n = 2), asymptomatic migration (n = 2), and abdominal pain (n = 1) after a median time of 89 days (1–252 days) of placement. Stent removal was
possible in 9 patients with either snare or rat tooth forceps. In one patient, stent
removal was not possible due to breakage of stent while attempted removal which was
successfully rescued with an additional LC-CSEMS inside the initial stent. Overall,
the authors have noted encouraging results of this new LC-CSEMS for unresectable malignant
distal biliary obstruction in terms of stent patency and reintervention including
stent removal. However, further prospective studies comparing effects with standard
braided CSEMS are required to compare clinical efficacy and RBO before its routine
clinical use.
Commentary
Palliative drainage of the obstructed biliary system is required in many patients
of unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction like carcinoma head of pancreas,
distal cholangiocarcinoma, or ampullary carcinoma. With advancement in palliative
chemoradiotherapy, life expectancy has increased even in patients with unresectable
malignant distal biliary obstruction which requires stent with higher stent patency
and lower risk of recurrent stent occlusion. Initially plastic stents were used for
biliary drainage in such patients; however, they are associated with recurrent biliary
obstruction and repeated ERCP sessions with prolonged hospitalization which increases
morbidity and total cost of the treatment. With the advances in the treatment protocol,
initially uncovered and now covered metallic SEMS are the preferred option for biliary
drainage in such patients.[11] However, plastic stents are still widely used in countries with limited resources
like India. We need better plastic stent designs, which is associated with stent patency
time better than conventional plastic stents and equal to SEMS. Recently, Matsubara
et al conducted a single-center retrospective study on use of 10F double-layer plastic
stent for preoperative drainage in patients with resectable malignant distal biliary
obstruction. In their study also, the new double-layer plastic stent had higher stent
patency rate compared with 7F or 8.5F conventional plastic stents.[9] These studies show that changing stent design and diameter might give the answer
for optimal plastic stent placement in patients with distal biliary obstruction. Similar
to plastic stents, the risk of acute cholecystitis and migration is the major shortcoming
in current FCSEMS designs. As braided SEMS are associated with the risk of shortening,
endoscopists usually prefer long size of SEMS which is associated with increased risk
of cystic duct blockage.[16] With LC-CSEMS, the risk of stent shortening is lower and endoscopist can choose
a smaller size of SEMS according the stricture length. Moreover, such LC-CSEMS can
be very useful in hilar stricture which requires precise deployment. However, in a
recent study by Marui et al, the authors have not used small-sized SEMS and they have
not explored their benefits in hilar strictures, which require further exploration.[15] In this study, all except one LC-CSEMS were removed with snare or rat tooth forceps
which points their potential use even in patients with benign biliary strictures.
To conclude, armamentarium of ERCP stents in patients with unresectable malignant
distal biliary obstruction is increasing with newer stent designs in both plastic
and metallic stents. With these designs, we hope to have more cost-effective options
of stents for patients in near future. Development of newer stents is an evolving
field with a variety of designs and stent materials like stents with antimigratory
properties, antireflux stents, drug-eluting stents, radioactive stents, and bioabsorbable
stents being developed in search of an ideal stent. An ideal stent would be a customized
functional stent designed to cater to the disease as well as the anatomic characteristics
of a particular patient. The era of personalized medicine is here!
