Am J Perinatol 2021; 38(S 02): A1-A14
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735776
MFM and Obstetrics

Neonatal Outcomes in Late Preterm Infants of Diabetic Mothers Exposed to Antenatal Steroids: A Cohort Study

Jean W. Thermolice
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Women's and Children's Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia
,
Lillian Singer
2   School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
,
Michael J. Sheridan
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Women's and Children's Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia
› Author Affiliations
 
 

    Objective: To assess whether exposure to antenatal steroids (ANS) was associated with net neonatal benefits in late preterm infants born to mothers with pre-gestational diabetes mellitus on antidiabetic medications.

    Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women with pre-existing diabetes mellitus and nonanomalous singleton gestation who delivered between 340/7 and 366/7 weeks at Inova Fairfax Women's and Children's Hospital between 2012–2020. Maternal characteristics and neonatal outcomes were determined from electronic health records. The co-primary dichotomous dependent variables were newborn oxygen support use (other than blow-by) and neonatal hypoglycemia requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. The primary independent variable was ANS exposure in the late preterm period from at least 12 hours to 7 days prior to delivery. Correlational analysis was used to identify independent predictors statistically significantly associated with the co-primary outcomes. Categorical techniques were used to identify statistically significant differences between neonate groups for potential confounders requiring adjustment with multivariate analyses. Logistic regression was used to determine the independent variables that best predicted the co-primary outcomes. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were conducted using SAS v9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

    Results: 99 mother-infant dyads met inclusion criteria. Of those, 39 were exposed to ANS and 60 were not. Infants exposed to ANS were more likely (48.1% versus 28.9%) to develop neonatal hypoglycemia requiring NICU admission (OR=2.29, 95% CI {0.99 to 5.28}, p = 0.053). Although marginally statistically significant, the number needed to harm (NNH) was 5. However, power was low, and we would have required a minimum sample size of 83 per arm to detect a significant difference of 19.2% at 80% power. The NNH of ANS on hypoglycemia was not offset by a favorable number needed to treat (NNT) of ANS to reduce oxygen support use. In fact, 43.6% of exposed infants required oxygen support use, while only 30% of the unexposed group required oxygen use (p = 0.17). Power for this association also was low and would have required a minimum sample of 183 per arm to detect a significant difference of 13.6% at 80% power. Other univariate associations with hypoglycemia were found (see [Table 1]). A logistic regression was performed, but an appropriate model could not be fitted.

    Conclusion: Although limited by a small sample size, our findings suggest that any potential benefit of ANS in late preterm infants of diabetic mothers should be weighed against a likely higher risk of neonatal hypoglycemia requiring NICU admission.

    Zoom Image
    Fig. 1 Gestational age at delivery
    Table 1

    Predictors of neonatal hypoglycemia in univariate analysis

    Variables

    Neonatal hypoglycemia

    p-Value

    OR (95% CI)

    Yes N = 54 (%)

    No N = 45 (%)

    Neonatal

    Antenatal Steroids

    0.053

    2.29 (0.99–5.28)

    Yes

    26(48.1)

    13(28.9)

    No

    28(51.9)

    32(71.1)

    Respiratory support

    <0.0001

    13.8 (4.33–44.1)

    Yes

    31(57.4)

    4(8.9)

    No

    23(42.6)

    41(91.1)

    NICU admission

    0.0001

    262.4 (15.1–4563)

    Yes

    54(100)

    13(28.9)

    No

    0(0)

    32(71.1)

    Length of NICU stay (days)

    13.6 {10.3, 16.8}

    3.56 {1.43, 5.68}

    <0.0001

    *

    Feeding difficulties

    0.002

    7.43 (2.54–21.7)

    Yes

    26(48.1)

    5(11.1)

    No

    28(51.9)

    40(88.9)

    Jaundice requiring phototherapy

    0.0009

    4.60 (1.87–11.3)

    Yes

    44(81.5)

    22(48.9)

    No

    10(18.5)

    23(51.1)

    Transient tachypnea of newborn

    0.002

    6.52 (2.04–20.9)

    Yes

    21(38.9)

    4(8.9)

    No

    33(61.1)

    41(91.1)

    Respiratory distress

    0.0004

    *

    Yes

    18(33.3)

    2(4.4)

    No

    36(66.7)

    43(95.6)

    Gestational age at delivery (weeks)

    0.002

    *

    34 weeks

    12(22.2)

    3(6.7)

    35 weeks

    20(37.0)

    8(17.8)

    36 weeks

    22(40.8)

    34(75.5)

    ANS exposure prior to delivery (hours)

    28.6 {18.1, 39.0}

    15.9 {5.95, 25.8}

    0.04

    *

    Maternal

    Intrapartum glycemia (binary)

    0.002

    0.28 (0.10–0.79)

     ≤126 mg/dL

    32(62.7)

    36(85.7)

     >126mg/dL

    19(37.3)

    6(14.3)

    Intra-partum glycemia (interval)

    125.7 {112.0, 139.4}

    102.8 {94.7, 110.9}

    0.05

    *

    Hemoglobin A1C in 2nd or 3rd trimester(binary)

    0.02

    0.33 (0.13–0.86)

     <7

    24(50.0)

    27(75.0)

     ≥7

    24(50.0)

    9(25.0)

    Hemoglobin A1C in 2nd or 3rd trimester (interval)

    7.01 {6.68, 7.35}

    6.32 {6.02, 6.61}

    0.003

    *


    #

    No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).

    Publication History

    Article published online:
    17 September 2021

    © 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

    Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
    333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

     
    Zoom Image
    Fig. 1 Gestational age at delivery