Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736191
How to Report: Ankle MRI
Abstract
Reporting ankle magnetic resonance imaging involves the assessment of multiple joints, tendons, and ligaments in several planes and numerous sequences. This article describes an approach using four anatomical categories (subcutaneous fat, bones and joints, tendons, and ligaments) to simplify and improve reporting efficiency. The main pathologies are covered, emphasizing the specific features to comment on, as well as suggesting terminology and phrases to use when reporting.
#
This article introduces magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reporting of the ankle for trainee radiologists and those not experienced with reporting of the main features used to describe ankle MRI. We emphasize the specific features on which to comment on, along with examples of terminology to use. Reporting of ankle MRI is not confined to the ankle joint. The radiologist should also note the included hindfoot and midfoot structures (joints, tendons, and ligaments). To simplify analysis and reporting, the ankle region can be divided into four basic anatomical areas. This also helps readers navigate a lengthy report.
Report Structure (Based on Anatomical Areas)
-
∘ Subcutaneous fat
-
∘ Bones and joints
-
∘ Tendons
-
∘ Ligaments
#
Pathologies Considered
-
∘ Ankle joint cartilage pathology
-
∘ Hindfoot-midfoot arthropathy
-
∘ Ankle tenosynovitis/tendinopathy
-
∘ Achilles tendinosis
-
∘ Plantar fasciitis
-
∘ Ankle ligament injury
#
Subcutaneous Fat
The strength of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in fluid detection is most useful in demonstrating edema in the soft tissues and bone. This sentinel sign helps identify areas of pathology. Hence it is often helpful to initially inspect the fluid-sensitive sequence images to indicate the likely site of pathology. In cases of infection (cellulitis/panniculitis), intravenous contrast may help assess more fully the degree of inflammation and delineate collections, although these features can usually be assessed quite adequately on noncontrasted images.
Sample Terminology
-
▪ “There is severe patchy subcutaneous edema and possible subcutaneous hemorrhage around the ankle, extending to the dorsum of the foot and the distal part of the leg. This may be due to trauma or abnormal mechanics. Dependent edema or venous congestion, or an infective etiology, is less likely in this clinical context.”
#
Pitfalls
-
Incomplete suppression of fat signal on fat-suppressed sequences.
-
Skin artifacts.
#
#
Bones and Joints
Cartilage evaluation with MRI is one of the major strengths of this modality, unmatched by other forms of imaging.[1] [2] Advances in MRI allow detailed evaluation of the relatively thin layer of cartilage on both sides of the ankle joint.[3] To optimize cartilage depiction, parameter requisites for cartilage and subchondral bone assessment should be met, such as sub-millimeter spatial resolution and using sequences with high contrast resolution for cartilage lesions[4] ([Fig. 1]). The radiologist also needs to be familiar with the MRI appearances of hyaline cartilage compared to fibrocartilage as well as the different types of talar dome osteochondral lesions ([Fig. 2]). These osteochondral lesions occur more commonly on the medio-central rather than the latero-central aspect of the talar dome. The MRI report should describe the size (area) and depth of cartilage defect as well as associated subchondral bone changes ([Fig. 1]).
These are other features to consider reporting:
-
Cartilage signal change (loss of zonal gradation of hyaline cartilage, with areas of increased or decreased signal intensity)
-
Cartilage surface irregularity (superficial fibrillation versus deep fissuring)
-
Tidemark junction (osteochondral) separation or delamination ([Fig. 1])
-
Focal cartilage defect versus generalized cartilage thinning (generalized cartilage thinning being a feature of osteoarthritis or a systemic arthropathy) ([Fig. 3])
-
Cartilage fracture or reparative cartilage hypertrophy ([Fig. 1])
-
Subchondral bone plate collapse ([Fig. 1])
-
Subchondral marrow edema or cysts ([Fig. 1])
-
Stability of chondral with or without osseous component of osteochondral injury ([Fig. 1])
-
Chondral with or without osteochondral intra-articular body ([Fig. 4])
Aside from cartilage pathology, these are other lesions to consider:
-
Blood clots in the joint/hemarthrosis
-
Tarsal coalition
-
Pes planus and associated abnormalities[5]
Bone injury is common around the ankle. Most commonly, bone injury is manifest as bone marrow edema with or without a discrete fracture line. These fractures may be radiographically occult ([Figs. 5] and [6]). Distinction between a traumatic fracture, stress fracture, insufficiency fracture, and pathologic fracture is made on clinical and imaging grounds.
Features to be reported include the intensity and location of bone marrow edema, the presence of a discrete fracture, and the pertinent features of this fracture. These features relevant to any fracture should be considered and/or reported:
-
Location
-
Alignment
-
Completeness
-
Displacement
-
Angulation or rotation
-
Comminution
-
Extension to cortex, physis, or joint and associated widening of physis or joint
-
Likely fracture type (traumatic, stress, insufficiency, pathologic)
-
Chronicity and healing
Sample Terminology
-
▪ “There is a small ankle joint effusion with a mild degree of synovitis.”
-
▪ “There is a medium-size (5 mm wide × 10 mm long) osteochondral lesion on the medio-central aspect of the talar dome. There is mild flattening of the subchondral bone plate due to subchondral bone plate collapse. Mild osteochondral separation is present. No chondral fracture. There is moderate subchondral cyst formation and marrow edema.”
-
▪ “There are small effusions with a mild degree of synovitis, involving the posterior and anterior subtalar joints, talonavicular joint, and calcaneocuboid joint. These changes may be related to abnormal mechanics or trauma.”
-
▪ “There is bony ankylosis between the talus and calcaneus across the anterior subtalar joint, indicative of osseous tarsal coalition.”
#
Pitfalls
-
Os trigonum and accessory navicular bone can be mistaken for a fracture or an intra-articular body.
-
Inability to recognize bone tissue (osseous body, fracture fragment, or accessory ossicle), particularly on T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR images. In some cases, radiographs are more sensitive in this regard.
-
Low-resolution images failing to clearly show cartilage pathology.
#
#
Tendons
Similar to the wrist, many tendons traverse the ankle joint. All of these tendons possess a tendon sheath, except for the Achilles tendon, which has a paratenon. Similar to tendons elsewhere, four main types of tendon pathology should be sought and, if present, reported. The four types of tendon pathology are the presence of tendinosis, tendon tear, peritendinitis, and tenosynovitis (or paratenonitis) ([Fig. 7]).[6]
The Achilles tendon is the largest tendon in the body and is formed from tendinous contributions of the gastrocnemius and soleus tendons. The soleal and gastrocnemius components run parallel in the proximal part of the Achilles tendon, though rotate in the middle and distal part of the tendon as they pass to their insertion at the posterior margin of the calcaneum. The medial gastrocnemius fascicles are the deepest and insert more proximally into the middle calcaneal facet, whereas the lateral gastrocnemius and soleal components insert more distally into the inferior calcaneal facet. The superior calcaneal facet has no tendinous insertion with the retrocalcaneal bursa located between the facet and the Achilles tendon.
Achilles tendinopathy (tendinosis)[7] [8] near the calcaneal insertion (“insertional tendinosis”) tends to occur in older patients or those with a sedentary lifestyle ([Fig. 8]), whereas tendinopathy in the proximal to midportion of the tendon (20–60 mm proximal to insertion, which is considered a watershed hypovascular zone) ([Fig. 9]), tends to occur in younger patients and athletes (especially runners). The typical MRI features of tendinosis are an increase in tendon caliber, with loss of the normal anterior concavity, on axial images and increased tendon signal intensity on T1-weighted and T2-weighted fat-suppressed images ([Figs. 8] and [9]).
Distal Achilles tendinopathy may be associated with Haglund's syndrome which comprises, in addition to clinical symptoms ([Fig. 10]),[6] the following characteristics:
-
Haglund's deformity: hypertrophic bony protuberance at posterosuperior corner of calcaneum
-
Achilles insertional tendinosis
-
Retrocalcaneal or supracalcaneal bursitis
Achilles tendon tears usually occur in the proximal to midportions of the tendon. Describe, whenever possible, the degree of background tendinosis, whether a tear is a partial tear, complete tear (rupture), or longitudinal splitting. The location of the tear, the size of the gap between the torn tendon ends, and for partial tears, the proportion of torn tendon fibers (perhaps as a percentage of the total tendon caliber) should also be described ([Fig. 8]). In some cases, a delamination pattern tear may be seen, where the tear is staggered along different depths (layers) of the tendon. In other cases, an avulsion fracture of the calcaneal insertion of the Achilles tendon may occur. All of this information is useful for treatment planning.
The remainder of the tendons around the ankle, particularly those passing behind the medial and lateral malleoli, have their own interesting features that may help the understanding of their pathology and enrich the radiology report. The posterior tibialis tendon, as the main tendinous support for the medial longitudinal arch,[9] [10] is prone to tendinosis ([Fig. 11]), especially in patients with a tendency toward pes planus. The other two main supports for the medial longitudinal arch are the spring ligament and the plantar aponeurosis. Tears of the posterior tibialis tendon include (1) longitudinal splitting (most common) ([Fig. 11]), (2) tendon attenuation (partial transverse tearing, uncommon), and (3) complete (transverse) tear (uncommon) ([Fig. 12]). Tibialis posterior tendinosis and longitudinal split tears typically occur in the relatively hypovascular zone, behind and just below the medial malleolus (i.e., the retro- and inframalleolar regions) ([Fig. 11]). Complete tears usually occur at the insertion with retraction of the completely torn tendon proximally ([Fig. 12]).
Posterior tibialis tendinosis and pes planus are often associated with an accessory navicular bone and/or cornuate (elongated) configuration of the medial pole of the navicular bone.
There are three types of accessory navicular bone.[11] Type I is a small accessory bone (os naviculare) embedded in the distal posterior tibialis Tendon. Type III is when the os naviculare is fused to the navicular tuberosity, giving rise to a cornuate-type navicular bone configuration. Both Types I and III accessory navicular bone are not directly symptomatic.
Type II comprises a large (=5 mm long) accessory navicular bone connected to the navicular tuberosity by a thin synchondrosis. The posterior tibialis tendon inserts, for the most part, into the accessory navicular bone ([Fig. 13]). Type II accessory navicular bone may become symptomatic as medial foot pain, especially in young athletes, and known as “painful accessory navicular syndrome.” This can be associated with bone marrow edema, pseudoarthrosis of the synchondrosis, overlying soft tissue edema, and tendinosis, tears, or tenosynovitis of the distal posterior tibialis tendon. Bone marrow edema may be confined to the immediate area around the synchondrosis, extend to the navicular tuberosity, or extend to the body of the navicular bone.[11] Bone marrow edema severity surrounding the synchondrosis does not seem to correlate with medial midfoot pain severity, although there is a positive correlation between adjacent soft tissue edema and pain severity. That said, bone marrow oedema severity does not seem to correlate with medial midfoot pain severity though, there is a positive correlation between surrounding soft tissue oedema and pain severity.[11]
The flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon is considered the Achilles tendon of the foot. Dancers, especially ballerinas, stress the FHL in pointe work with entrapment between the talus and calcaneus. The FHL may develop tenosynovitis (including stenosing tenosynovitis), tendinosis, or tears. That said, tendon sheath fluid is common in the medial ankle tendons in normal subjects.
The peroneal tendons[12] [13] [14] [15] also show the full spectrum of tendon pathology: tendinosis, tendon tears, tenosynovitis, and peritendinitis ([Fig. 14]). Longitudinal splitting of the peroneus brevis tendon most commonly occurs behind and below the lateral malleolus ([Fig. 14]). It is the most common ankle tendon to tear, often following an inversion injury, most likely due to the peroneus brevis tendon being compressed between the lateral malleolus and the peroneus longus tendon. Part of the split peroneus brevis tendon may sublux medially ([Fig. 14]). Not so commonly, the peroneal retinaculum may tear with anterolateral subluxation of one or both peroneal tendons.
Sample Terminology
-
▪ “There is a complete tear of the Achilles tendon, 30 mm proximal to the calcaneal insertion. There is retraction of the torn ends of the fibers, resulting in a gap of 25 mm, which is filled by a mixture of blood and fluid. More proximally, there is patchy edema around the myotendinous junction of the soleus muscle indicative of an associated muscle strain.”
-
▪ “There is stepwise laminar tearing of different layers of the Achilles tendon indicative of a delamination tear. This tearing spans from 30 mm to 85 mm proximal to the calcaneal insertion.”
#
Pitfalls
-
Magic angle artifact masquerading as tendon pathology.
-
Accessory tendon masquerading as tendon tear[16] [17] [18] ([Fig. 15]).
-
Pseudotear mid- to distal Achilles tendon (due to rotation of soleal, medial, and lateral gastrocnemius components) ([Fig. 16]).
-
Physiologic tendon sheath effusions (FHL more than posterior tibialis and flexor digitorum longus more than peroneal tendons) masquerading as tenosynovitis. The presence of tenosynovial thickening or proliferation can help distinguish between a physiologic tendon sheath effusion and tenosynovitis ([Figs. 11] and [12]).
#
#
Ligaments
The ligaments around the ankle joint can be grouped by location into the lateral, syndesmotic, and medial groups.[19]
Lateral Ligament Injury
The lateral group of ankle ligaments[20] [21] consists of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL), and the posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL). It is the most commonly injured group among the three ankle ligament groups. The main mechanism of injury is an inversion force. The ATFL is the weakest, most prone to injury, and usually the first ligament to tear, followed by the CFL and then the PTFL. The ATFL is a capsular ligament extending almost horizontally from the fibular tip to the talar neck. As this area is highly vascularized, diffuse hemorrhage or hematoma adjacent to an acute ATFL tear is quite common ([Fig. 17]). The CFL is extracapsular, extending almost vertically from the fibular tip, deep to the peroneal tendons, to the trochlear eminence on the lateral aspect of the calcaneal body. The PTFL extends intra-articularly almost horizontally from the lateral malleolar fossa to the posterior part of the talar bone, the lateral talar process, or the os trigonum, if present.
Isolated tears of the ATFL are common. Tears of the CFL nearly always occur in conjunction with ATFL tears. Tears of the PTFL only occur in conjunction with ATFL and CFL tears.
Like all ligament injuries, ankle ligament tears can be categorized into three types:
-
Sprain (ligament edema without visible discontinuity).
-
Tear (partial or complete ligament discontinuity).
-
Healing (ligament thickening with reparative fibrosis) ([Fig. 18]). Alternatively, the torn ligament may not heal and undergo complete attrition with no ligament being visible ([Fig. 19]) or there may be a variable degree of ligament attenuation present.
Tearing of the ATFL and CFL may result in ankle joint instability. Aside from ligamentous changes, adjacent bony changes may also be visible, such as avulsed bony fragment(s), tug lesion, or dystrophic ossification ([Fig. 20]). Ankle capsular injury may lead to periarticular ganglion formation.
#
Syndesmotic Ligament Injury
The syndesmotic group[22] consists of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, transverse tibiofibular ligament, and interosseous membrane. Injury to the syndesmotic ligaments is also known as a “high ankle sprain” and is a severe form of ankle injury. The anterior portion of this group is more susceptible to tear than the posterior portion. The main mechanism of injury is external rotation of the dorsiflexed ankle and, as such, syndesmotic ligament injury may be associated with fractures of the medial malleolus and deltoid ligament tear. Most syndesmotic injuries comprise partial or complete tears of the AITFL and are not associated with syndesmotic diastasis ([Fig. 20]). Important features to report are the presence and type of ligament injury and the presence or absence of syndesmotic diastasis.
#
Medial Ligament Injury
The medial group consists of the superficial and deep components of the deltoid ligament.[23] The deep component is intra-articular, crosses one joint, and consists of a slightly more superficial anterior tibiotalar ligament and a slightly deeper, larger posterior tibiotalar ligament. The superficial component is extra-articular, crosses two joints, and comprises the tibiocalcaneal, tibionavicular component, and tibiospring components.
Injury occurs with excessive abduction, supination, external rotation, and eversion. Isolated deltoid ligament injury is uncommon. Usually, both the deep and superficial components are torn in conjunction with lateral collateral ligament or syndesmotic tears or malleolar fractures. Therefore, the presence, location, and degree of tear, as well as the presence of associated injuries, should be reported.
#
Sample Terminology
-
▪ “There is a complete tear of the anterior talofibular ligament and the adjacent anterolateral aspect of the ankle joint capsule. There is an associated medium-size subcutaneous hematoma overlying the torn ligament.”
-
▪ “There is moderate diffuse edema of the deep and superficial components of the deltoid ligament, indicative of a sprain. No discrete tear evident. Overall ligament continuity is maintained.”
-
▪ “There is a medium-size (4 mm × 5 mm) corticated bony fragment at the anteroinferior margin of the lateral malleolus. This bone fragment is attached to the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), indicative of a previous ATFL avulsion injury. There is marrow edema in this bony fragment and the anteroinferior margin of the lateral malleolus, suggesting continual abnormal mechanics.”
#
Pitfalls
-
Magic angle artifact.
-
Partial volume artifact.
Both of these artifacts can be overcome by reviewing the two-dimensional fluid-sensitive images acquired in the standard three orthogonal planes or by acquiring a three-dimensional (3D) imaging data set (e.g., 3D proton-density data set).
-
Bony avulsion in conjunction with ligament tears.
#
#
#
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
-
References
- 1 Schmid MR, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J, Vienne P, Zanetti M. Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 2003; 32 (05) 259-265
- 2 Forney M, Subhas N, Donley B, Winalski CS. MR imaging of the articular cartilage of the knee and ankle. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2011; 19 (02) 379-405
- 3 Barr C, Bauer JS, Malfair D. et al. MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens. Eur Radiol 2007; 17 (06) 1518-1528
- 4 Griffith JF, Lau DT, Yeung DK, Wong MW. High-resolution MR imaging of talar osteochondral lesions with new classification. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41 (04) 387-399
- 5 Sanghvi D. MRI of lateral hindfoot impingement. Diagn Interv Radiol 2021; 27 (03) 432-439
- 6 Palmer W, Bancroft L, Bonar F. et al. Glossary of terms for musculoskeletal radiology. Skeletal Radiol 2020; 49 (Suppl. 01) 1-33
- 7 Haims AH, Schweitzer ME, Patel RS, Hecht P, Wapner KL. MR imaging of the Achilles tendon: overlap of findings in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Skeletal Radiol 2000; 29 (11) 640-645
- 8 Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the Achilles tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175 (03) 613-625
- 9 Khoury NJ, el-Khoury GY, Saltzman CL, Brandser EA. MR imaging of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167 (03) 675-682
- 10 Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the posterior tibialis tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175 (03) 627-635
- 11 Kamel SI, Belair JA, Hegazi TM. et al. Painful type II os naviculare: introduction of a standardized, reproducible classification system. Skeletal Radiol 2020; 49 (12) 1977-1985
- 12 Wang XT, Rosenberg ZS, Mechlin MB, Schweitzer ME. Normal variants and diseases of the peroneal tendons and superior peroneal retinaculum: MR imaging features. Radiographics 2005; 25 (03) 587-602
- 13 Lee SJ, Jacobson JA, Kim SM. et al. Ultrasound and MRI of the peroneal tendons and associated pathology. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42 (09) 1191-1200
- 14 Schubert R. MRI of peroneal tendinopathies resulting from trauma or overuse. Br J Radiol 2013; 86 (1021): 20110750
- 15 Kijowski R, De Smet A, Mukharjee R. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with peroneal tendinopathy and peroneal tenosynovitis. Skeletal Radiol 2007; 36 (02) 105-114
- 16 Saupe N, Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CW, Vienne P, Seifert B, Zanetti M. Anatomic variants associated with peroneal tendon disorders: MR imaging findings in volunteers with asymptomatic ankles. Radiology 2007; 242 (02) 509-517
- 17 Cheung YY, Rosenberg ZS, Ramsinghani R, Beltran J, Jahss MH. Peroneus quartus muscle: MR imaging features. Radiology 1997; 202 (03) 745-750
- 18 Cheung Y, Rosenberg ZS. MR imaging of the accessory muscles around the ankle. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001; 9 (03) 465-473 , x
- 19 Lee SH, Jacobson J, Trudell D, Resnick D. Ligaments of the ankle: normal anatomy with MR arthrography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22 (05) 807-813
- 20 Erickson SJ, Smith JW, Ruiz ME. et al. MR imaging of the lateral collateral ligament of the ankle. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156 (01) 131-136
- 21 Kreitner KF, Ferber A, Grebe P, Runkel M, Berger S, Thelen M. Injuries of the lateral collateral ligaments of the ankle: assessment with MR imaging. Eur Radiol 1999; 9 (03) 519-524
- 22 Brown KW, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Nothnagel H. MRI findings associated with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (01) 131-136
- 23 Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CWA, Vienne P, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Medial collateral ligament complex of the ankle: MR appearance in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology 2007; 242 (03) 817-824
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
03 December 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Schmid MR, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J, Vienne P, Zanetti M. Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 2003; 32 (05) 259-265
- 2 Forney M, Subhas N, Donley B, Winalski CS. MR imaging of the articular cartilage of the knee and ankle. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2011; 19 (02) 379-405
- 3 Barr C, Bauer JS, Malfair D. et al. MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens. Eur Radiol 2007; 17 (06) 1518-1528
- 4 Griffith JF, Lau DT, Yeung DK, Wong MW. High-resolution MR imaging of talar osteochondral lesions with new classification. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41 (04) 387-399
- 5 Sanghvi D. MRI of lateral hindfoot impingement. Diagn Interv Radiol 2021; 27 (03) 432-439
- 6 Palmer W, Bancroft L, Bonar F. et al. Glossary of terms for musculoskeletal radiology. Skeletal Radiol 2020; 49 (Suppl. 01) 1-33
- 7 Haims AH, Schweitzer ME, Patel RS, Hecht P, Wapner KL. MR imaging of the Achilles tendon: overlap of findings in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Skeletal Radiol 2000; 29 (11) 640-645
- 8 Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the Achilles tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175 (03) 613-625
- 9 Khoury NJ, el-Khoury GY, Saltzman CL, Brandser EA. MR imaging of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167 (03) 675-682
- 10 Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the posterior tibialis tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175 (03) 627-635
- 11 Kamel SI, Belair JA, Hegazi TM. et al. Painful type II os naviculare: introduction of a standardized, reproducible classification system. Skeletal Radiol 2020; 49 (12) 1977-1985
- 12 Wang XT, Rosenberg ZS, Mechlin MB, Schweitzer ME. Normal variants and diseases of the peroneal tendons and superior peroneal retinaculum: MR imaging features. Radiographics 2005; 25 (03) 587-602
- 13 Lee SJ, Jacobson JA, Kim SM. et al. Ultrasound and MRI of the peroneal tendons and associated pathology. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42 (09) 1191-1200
- 14 Schubert R. MRI of peroneal tendinopathies resulting from trauma or overuse. Br J Radiol 2013; 86 (1021): 20110750
- 15 Kijowski R, De Smet A, Mukharjee R. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with peroneal tendinopathy and peroneal tenosynovitis. Skeletal Radiol 2007; 36 (02) 105-114
- 16 Saupe N, Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CW, Vienne P, Seifert B, Zanetti M. Anatomic variants associated with peroneal tendon disorders: MR imaging findings in volunteers with asymptomatic ankles. Radiology 2007; 242 (02) 509-517
- 17 Cheung YY, Rosenberg ZS, Ramsinghani R, Beltran J, Jahss MH. Peroneus quartus muscle: MR imaging features. Radiology 1997; 202 (03) 745-750
- 18 Cheung Y, Rosenberg ZS. MR imaging of the accessory muscles around the ankle. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001; 9 (03) 465-473 , x
- 19 Lee SH, Jacobson J, Trudell D, Resnick D. Ligaments of the ankle: normal anatomy with MR arthrography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22 (05) 807-813
- 20 Erickson SJ, Smith JW, Ruiz ME. et al. MR imaging of the lateral collateral ligament of the ankle. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156 (01) 131-136
- 21 Kreitner KF, Ferber A, Grebe P, Runkel M, Berger S, Thelen M. Injuries of the lateral collateral ligaments of the ankle: assessment with MR imaging. Eur Radiol 1999; 9 (03) 519-524
- 22 Brown KW, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Nothnagel H. MRI findings associated with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (01) 131-136
- 23 Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CWA, Vienne P, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Medial collateral ligament complex of the ankle: MR appearance in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology 2007; 242 (03) 817-824